2008/3/13 Michael Beckwith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Valent Turkovic wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Máirín Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
> Valent Turkovic wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Nicu Buculei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> Valent Turkovic wrote:
> >
Máirín Duffy wrote:
Mike McGrath wrote:
The Infrastructure team is looking to move to mediawiki and would like to
work with your team to figure out how best to do that. We have over
4,000
attachments that we have no idea what to do with right now. What
would be
optimum for your team? Would
Valent Turkovic wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Máirín Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Valent Turkovic wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Nicu Buculei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Valent Turkovic wrote:
>> > http://www.uploadgeek.com/uploads456/0/old_icons.png
>> >
>>
Andreas Nilsson wrote:
Valent Turkovic wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Máirín Duffy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Valent Turkovic wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Nicu Buculei
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Valent Turkovic wrote:
>> > http://www.uploadgeek.com/uploads456/0/
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Nicu Buculei wrote:
Can't we use for such grouping something like categories in Wikimedia
Commons? Something like http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/GNOME - i
believe you include the right category markup in the page and it is
dynamically included in the category gallery.
Ian Weller wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Nicu Buculei wrote:
I think such category pages may solve the problem without the need fir
integration with an external gallery (integration made with an "alpha"
plug-in).
Galleries can be done within pages with the tag, as seen at
[1]. It looks like ca
