Adam Sobotka wrote:
Andreas>yup, I meant Mist, or any mist successor :)
Well, Echo is *not* Mist's successor, it is supposed to be Bluecurve's
successor.
Mist was selected as the default at a moment when Bluecurve was old and
hard to maintain/develop and Echo not ready yet.
PS: please do no
Andreas>yup, I meant Mist, or any mist successor :)
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 07:31 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> Echo's battery and ups icons are not clear enough. The battery level (at
> least at full) is hard to distinguish at small sizes. I've attached
> examples of both so you can see.
>
> Personally I think that the color in the battery
Echo's battery and ups icons are not clear enough. The battery level (at
least at full) is hard to distinguish at small sizes. I've attached
examples of both so you can see.
Personally I think that the color in the battery needs to be brighter,
the shading on the battery itself needs to be reduced
Adam Sobotka wrote:
1] Most standard. That's a hard to say..what I meant is that standard
icon set should be near tango, at least with isometry. I remember how
confusing was my experiments with ubuntu, until I applied tango icon
scheme which is similar on all distros. That doesn't mean that I d
1] Most standard. That's a hard to say..what I meant is that standard icon
set should be near tango, at least with isometry. I remember how confusing
was my experiments with ubuntu, until I applied tango icon scheme which is
similar on all distros. That doesn't mean that I don't like echo or human
