Quoting Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 22:09 -0400, MáirÃn Duffy wrote:
> > Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 18:22 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> > >> Bill Nottingham a écrit :
> > >>> Looking at the desktop now (beta), I see:
> > >>>
> > >>> -
David Nielsen wrote:
Well as it seems we have two potential violations something much have
gone wrong, I suggested in another thread that we might supplement the
policy with examples of things to avoid. I suspect short of requiring a
full audit trail for all submissions with ample documentati
Quoting Máirín Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is it realistic to expect this to happen?
>
Anything that thought to be unrealistic can happen. =)
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fedora Project contributor
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
Matthias Clasen wrote:
I'm the last desktop team member on fedora-art-list, but I'm not a
representative, and I have no way to reconcile the wildly varying
opinions inside the desktop team when it comes to style and quality of
the default icon theme.
But I promise you, we don't bite... I invi
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 17:53 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> When we approved Echo as the default icon theme for F10, I was under the
> assumption that this was already more or less known as a feature to the
> Desktop group, and they were OK with the coverage provided and the
> experience given. Is
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Michael Beckwith wrote:
Solar
InvinXble
Gears
Neon
They are all beautifully done pieces of artwork, and I really hope that
everyone in the Art Team is proud of what the group has collectively
achieved. I say "congrats" to everyone on the Art Team.
--Max
_
On an operating system, far far away,, we were deep. We were busy
slaving away in front of our lovely Fedora 9-run computer, hacking away
at graphics for our theme proposals. Three rounds in, and we were down
to four options. When it came down to it, we decided that we were no
longer content wi
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 22:09 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 18:22 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> >> Bill Nottingham a écrit :
> >>> Looking at the desktop now (beta), I see:
> >>>
> >>> - at least three different icon perspectives in the stock menus
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 18:22 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Bill Nottingham a écrit :
Looking at the desktop now (beta), I see:
- at least three different icon perspectives in the stock menus
(echo, 'stock', bluecurve)
I think Bluecurve mix are desktop bug. Current
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 18:22 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Bill Nottingham a écrit :
> > Looking at the desktop now (beta), I see:
> >
> > - at least three different icon perspectives in the stock menus
> > (echo, 'stock', bluecurve)
> >
> I think Bluecurve mix are desktop bug. Current Fedo
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 07:28:06PM -0400, William Jon McCann wrote:
> Is there a reason why Mike Langlie's Spectrum wallpaper is no longer
> being considered for Fedora 10?
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/F10Themes/spectrum
>
I was gonna complete this for Mike but I unfortunately ran out of
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
For the former, it can be possible as long more people participate. For
the latter, upstream gnome can be "echofied" following the guideline[3].
Is it realistic to expect this to happen?
~m
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
F
Bill Nottingham a écrit :
> Looking at the desktop now (beta), I see:
>
> - at least three different icon perspectives in the stock menus
> (echo, 'stock', bluecurve)
>
I think Bluecurve mix are desktop bug. Current Fedora default theme used
Bluecurve from some applications, same issue occurs
William Jon McCann a écrit :
> Hi Bill,
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Bill Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> When we approved Echo as the default icon theme for F10, I was under the
>> assumption that this was already more or less known as a feature to the
>> Desktop group, and t
William Jon McCann wrote:
Hi,
Is there a reason why Mike Langlie's Spectrum wallpaper is no longer
being considered for Fedora 10?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/F10Themes/spectrum
I've looked at the wiki and I'm still not sure exactly how this
selection process works.
It was not com
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 18:47 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
I had thought Matthias volunteered to serve as the Desktop team
representative. He had outlined a plan here which is what the Echo folks
have been following:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/2008-S
Hi,
Is there a reason why Mike Langlie's Spectrum wallpaper is no longer
being considered for Fedora 10?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/F10Themes/spectrum
I've looked at the wiki and I'm still not sure exactly how this
selection process works.
Thanks,
Jon
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 18:47 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> I had thought Matthias volunteered to serve as the Desktop team
> representative. He had outlined a plan here which is what the Echo folks
> have been following:
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/2008-September/msg00044.
William Jon McCann wrote:
Hi Bill,
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Bill Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When we approved Echo as the default icon theme for F10, I was under the
assumption that this was already more or less known as a feature to the
Desktop group, and they were OK with th
Hi Bill,
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Bill Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When we approved Echo as the default icon theme for F10, I was under the
> assumption that this was already more or less known as a feature to the
> Desktop group, and they were OK with the coverage provided and
When we approved Echo as the default icon theme for F10, I was under the
assumption that this was already more or less known as a feature to the
Desktop group, and they were OK with the coverage provided and the
experience given. Is that the case?
Looking at the desktop now (beta), I see:
- at le
Nicu Buculei escribió:
Gian Paolo Mureddu wrote:
I have done a translation of the banner to Spanish, following your
banners as template. However, I don't seem to have the fonts you guys
used to create the banner (on F9)... At any rate, I have used URW
Gothic L in substitution, this is work in
Ok, ok, I am sorry, you proved me partly wrong, my bad. I still feel
awkward about the whole discussion, but Mo is right there (I am sorry
for my accusations). I looked into the sources and while the blade has
been changed I believe it is directly based on Samuele's own photo, the
tilt is from same
Martin Sourada wrote:
Hi,
I haven't read the whole discussion yet, but I feel greatly disappointed
with what I read so far. First, I have an impression that Mo and Nicu
are somehow biased against Samuele's work. First, some weeks ago, Mo
kept asking Samuele about Moon brushes in the Solar theme,
Hi,
Martin Sourada wrote:
I haven't read the whole discussion yet, but I feel greatly disappointed
with what I read so far. First, I have an impression that Mo and Nicu
are somehow biased against Samuele's work. First, some weeks ago, Mo
kept asking Samuele about Moon brushes in the Solar theme,
Hi,
I haven't read the whole discussion yet, but I feel greatly disappointed
with what I read so far. First, I have an impression that Mo and Nicu
are somehow biased against Samuele's work. First, some weeks ago, Mo
kept asking Samuele about Moon brushes in the Solar theme, when the
Moons were alr
2008/9/23 Máirín Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> David Nielsen wrote:
>
>>
>> I would favor option 2 with the understanding that a proper policy be
>> written and must be agreed upon when submitting artwork for Fedora in the
>> future.
>>
>
> I don't understand. This is the case today. We've had a cle
2008/9/23 Máirín Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi folks,
>
> Did any of you joining the art team have doubts/questions/confusion over
> copyright law and licensing as it pertains to the usage of
> externally-sourced images used in artwork? Were you unsure of what
> licenses were acceptable to use in
David Nielsen wrote:
I would favor option 2 with the understanding that a proper policy be
written and must be agreed upon when submitting artwork for Fedora in
the future.
I don't understand. This is the case today. We've had a clearly written
policy on our wiki page for at least a year no
2008/9/23 Máirín Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi folks,
>
> Since it is now clear we have some licensing issues with at least one of
> the candidates for the theme, I would like to hear your thoughts on what we
> should do. Since the vote is in art team members' hands I think it's our
> call to dec
Yes... maybe you are right. But I think that anyway theme could have
some mods also after vote. But it's true that, for example with
Invixible theme, if you decide to change the katana, maybe the result
couldn't be beautiful like current version.
Marco
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 11:06 -0700, Klaatu w
Klaatu a écrit :
> The rules and licensing issues were clear to me when I joined a few
> months ago.
>
> I think a quick reference guide on what is ok to use and what is not
> ok to use might be a good idea, though, just because i think everyone
> must get a little confused from time to time about
I was frankly confused on what I was voting on, which is why I asked for
clarification on this in the first place. I did not want to vote on
InvinXible as it was only to have a different sword in the final product. I
didn't mean to wait til the last minute, I jsut didn't understand why in the
las
The rules and licensing issues were clear to me when I joined a few months
ago.
I think a quick reference guide on what is ok to use and what is not ok to
use might be a good idea, though, just because i think everyone must get a
little confused from time to time about what combination of magic le
Hi folks,
Did any of you joining the art team have doubts/questions/confusion over
copyright law and licensing as it pertains to the usage of
externally-sourced images used in artwork? Were you unsure of what
licenses were acceptable to use in Fedora artwork?
What kinds of questions / uncertai
Hi folks,
Since it is now clear we have some licensing issues with at least one of
the candidates for the theme, I would like to hear your thoughts on what
we should do. Since the vote is in art team members' hands I think it's
our call to decide what to do next.
Here are the options as I se
On 2008-09-23 10:31:36 PM, Andy Fitzsimon wrote:
> wait, those links are in regards to signed packages. not fedora account
> membership
You should be able to just request a password reset at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/resetpass.
Thanks,
Ricky
pgpZYTlZnIalS.pgp
Description:
wait, those links are in regards to signed packages. not fedora account
membership
(man im a top poster... sorry :-/ )
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork#Final_Steps is the correct link/.
/me wipes mud off face
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Andy Fitzsimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
Thanks Nicu
Here are the links for anyone else having to do the reactivation:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-September/msg9.html
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/New_signing_key
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Enabling_new_signing_key
Andy
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 9:4
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 09:33 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> Samuele Storari wrote:
> > U can exclaim exactly what do u want.
> >
> > "Part of my idea come from part of that image. YES"
> > U use the round 1 image.
> >
> > Other?
> > U know what's the problem?
>
> Yes, I do know what the problem is:
Hi Marco,
Marco Mornati wrote:
Ok thanks for the answer Máirín... For me was so strange the decision to
have an image "not creative commons" in the final round!
I was unaware the image wasn't properly licensed as again, it had been
brought up earlier and Samuele assured us he would replace it
Hi Marco,
Marco Mornati wrote:
Yes... I'm in agreement with you Máirín... we can't have a NO.Licenses
Image inside Fedora... that it's completely free!
My question is... why now? There are user voting also Invinxible
theme... and are all lost. There were a licensing doubt over that
theme... why
Hi Samuele,
Samuele Storari wrote:
I'm little sad about our discussion.
I think everyone loud his voice more than necessary, the only problem with my
image is the hilt?
Ok, but why waitin the last day to say it?
Nicu and I brought up our concerns with the licensing of this imagery
weeks ago,
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 09:44 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > Using
> > non-free elements for examples for the first round (or two) is probably
> > even OK.
>
> I don't think it should be, absolutely not if the artwork is going to be
> uploaded to our wiki.
>
> We have alw
Paul W. Frields wrote:
Using
non-free elements for examples for the first round (or two) is probably
even OK.
I don't think it should be, absolutely not if the artwork is going to be
uploaded to our wiki.
We have always said, if you are using artwork you did not create to make
a proposal,
I'm little sad about our discussion.
I think everyone loud his voice more than necessary, the only problem with my
image is the hilt?
Ok, but why waitin the last day to say it?
I understand your position, and believe me I've got nothing with u don't take
me bad.
I worked a lot for adv agency and
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 15:38 +0200, Marco Mornati wrote:
> Yes... I'm in agreement with you Máirín... we can't have a NO.Licenses
> Image inside Fedora... that it's completely free!
>
> My question is... why now? There are user voting also Invinxible
> theme... and are all lost. There were a licens
David Nielsen wrote:
...it surprises you that an iconic image of a katana which he already
admitted to using as inspiration contains a katana of a similar design..
when katanas are pretty much the same, I mean it looks exactly like the
replica my friend has hanging on his wall as well, will you
Andy Fitzsimon wrote:
Hi guys.. I'd like to (finally) join the Fedora Art team.. -[Proper]-
I've helped out on DVD artwork stuff, contributed a few samples, built
visual remixes on your ideas and a shot a few fedora inspired photos too
. (most mentioned on this list or peer to peer with othe
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 09:35 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> Marco Mornati wrote:
> > In this moment there is again the same question about Katana in the
> > photo... I think you if you are not sure (also with all "probations"
> > about katana) you have to STOP the vote over that theme.
>
> If inv
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 09:33 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>
> I worked on gears. I decided to stop working on it because I liked Solar
> and wanted it to win.
Me too... I can't vote but I'm happy to read this! :)
Marco
--
Dott. Ing. Mornati Marco
Byte-Code s.r.l
via Antonio Cechov, 1
San Giulian
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 12:04 +0200, Luca Foppiano wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 11:50 +0200, Samuele Storari wrote:
> > sstorari *claimed* that he had remade the photo cos he had remade the
> > photo. If u take a look in the source before write something u can see
> > that the problem was solved
Marco Mornati wrote:
In this moment there is again the same question about Katana in the
photo... I think you if you are not sure (also with all "probations"
about katana) you have to STOP the vote over that theme.
If invixble wins, and there is still a question over the licensing of
the k
Yes... I'm in agreement with you Máirín... we can't have a NO.Licenses
Image inside Fedora... that it's completely free!
My question is... why now? There are user voting also Invinxible
theme... and are all lost. There were a licensing doubt over that
theme... why it's in the final round?
Anyway.
Samuele Storari wrote:
U can exclaim exactly what do u want.
"Part of my idea come from part of that image. YES"
U use the round 1 image.
Other?
U know what's the problem?
Yes, I do know what the problem is: you appear to be taking Fedora's
license policies personally.
Please don't.
Sinc
Luca Foppiano wrote:
I completely agree! Sometime I don't understand which is the real goal:
find *the best* fedora theme or do whatever to try to denigrate the
others?
We have had egregious violations of copyright and image licensing in the
past, due to a misunderstanding of licensing and cop
Honestly I can't see the problem.
In round 1, as Samuele said, there was a question about "the origin" of
katana (all "sword" look like a peace of iron with an handle) and there
was a discussion about it... Samuele posted a photo to shown the "start
point" of his image... and you (I don't know who
Samuele Storari wrote:
So just a little question: If u can't do something, it means that it can't be
done?
I find this presumption extremely offensive.
~m
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/lis
Hi guys.. I'd like to (finally) join the Fedora Art team.. -[Proper]-
I've helped out on DVD artwork stuff, contributed a few samples, built
visual remixes on your ideas and a shot a few fedora inspired photos too .
(most mentioned on this list or peer to peer with other art team members)
I'd al
David... Yes I admit... I stoled it.
Say to your friend that now he can come to me to get back his own katana. :D
Thanks
Samuele
- Messaggio originale -
Da: "David Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A: "Discussions about the artwork included with Fedora, including icons,
themes, and wallpapers
U can exclaim exactly what do u want.
"Part of my idea come from part of that image. YES"
U use the round 1 image.
Other?
U know what's the problem?
Since the first round u try to push my works down.
InvinXble, Solar as same, everyday every single day since some months ago but I
made all u reque
2008/9/23 Nicu Buculei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Samuele Storari wrote:
>
>> Part of my idea come from part of that image. YES
>> But the desktop was created by USING free source and this is the last time
>> I will say it.
>>
>> The Hattory Hanzo katana is a katana u know a katana.
>>
>> Katana is for
Samuele Storari wrote:
Part of my idea come from part of that image. YES
But the desktop was created by USING free source and this is the last time I
will say it.
The Hattory Hanzo katana is a katana u know a katana.
Katana is for most similar:
Trying to hod myself from exclaiming "no shit?"
Part of my idea come from part of that image. YES
But the desktop was created by USING free source and this is the last time I
will say it.
The Hattory Hanzo katana is a katana u know a katana.
Katana is for most similar:
I link for u some photo so u can see what I mean:
http://www.flickr.com/
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 15:06 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> Paul W. Frields wrote:
> >
> > I tried doing this myself this morning, without any luck or success. If
> > anyone can get this banner working this morning, I'll talk to the admins
> > about putting it up tonight.
>
> I think this should do
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 11:50 +0200, Samuele Storari wrote:
> sstorari *claimed* that he had remade the photo cos he had remade the photo.
> If u take a look in the source before write something u can see that the
> problem was solved creatin' the blade from 0.
> I think it's clear this sword is tot
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 09:36 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> María Leandro wrote:
> >
> > I was reading the Artwork Design Service and some ideas came up on the
> > FedoraQA open request. I was talking a little with jlaska at the IRC
> > channel and this are two propositions. (draws).
> >
> > Hope
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 09:53 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 12:13 -0500, Michael Beckwith wrote:
>
> > >
> > I like this overall, but the text on the banner sounds like we're
> > closing shop. If we could somehow add "and many more" or something
> > similar to it, it'd be
Luca Foppiano wrote:
I completely agree! Sometime I don't understand which is the real goal:
find *the best* fedora theme or do whatever to try to denigrate the
others?
The real goal is to create a Free theme, using as much as possible Free
tools, by a team working in an open and collaborativ
- Messaggio originale -
Da: "Nicu Buculei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A: "Discussions about the artwork included with Fedora, including icons,
themes, and wallpapers."
Inviato: Martedì, 23 settembre 2008 12:42:16 GMT +01:00
Amsterdam/Berlino/Berna/Roma/Stoccolma/Vienna
Oggetto: Re: R: Re: R:
Samuele Storari wrote:
Sorry, but I'm a lil sick to try to defend my work everyday and u wait til the last day
to make a "new" question?
Well, Klaatu asked and I answered to the best of my knowledge.
I have not waited until the last day, this is something I said all
along, see [1], but didn'
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 11:50 +0200, Samuele Storari wrote:
> sstorari *claimed* that he had remade the photo cos he had remade the
> photo. If u take a look in the source before write something u can see
> that the problem was solved creatin' the blade from 0. I think it's
> clear this sword is t
sstorari *claimed* that he had remade the photo cos he had remade the photo.
If u take a look in the source before write something u can see that the
problem was solved creatin' the blade from 0.
I think it's clear this sword is totally a patchwork of various level created.
Just take a look to the
sstorari *claimed* that he had remade the photo cos he had remade the photo.
If u take a look in the source before write something u can see that the
problem was solved creatin' the blade from 0.
I think it's clear this sword is totally a patchwork of various level created.
Just take a look to the
Gian Paolo Mureddu wrote:
I have done a translation of the banner to Spanish, following your
banners as template. However, I don't seem to have the fonts you guys
used to create the banner (on F9)... At any rate, I have used URW Gothic
L in substitution, this is work in progress as I'll most li
Klaatu wrote:
I am not clear, is this to be the final katana or is it still being
swapped out with a newly photographed one? I recall there being an
issue with licensing, and thought we would be seeing a different
sword...but maybe I missed the thread in which all of this was solved.
Honestl
76 matches
Mail list logo
