> 16x16 should be definitely flat, I am still considering whether 24x24 as
> well, but seeing how gnome handles that, probably not...
>
> Martin
Since 22x22 and 24x24 appears to be the main problem, perhaps using
table perspective
might do the trick.
Luya
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP dig
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 13:13 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Martin Sourada a écrit :
> > Finally I'd like to throw some fuel for discussion (mainly on the
> > art-list). We are a lot criticized for inconsistencies in the projection
> > we use in echo. Strictly speaking we are using 3 different ty
Martin Sourada a écrit :
> Finally I'd like to throw some fuel for discussion (mainly on the
> art-list). We are a lot criticized for inconsistencies in the projection
> we use in echo. Strictly speaking we are using 3 different types of
> projections and we have rules which is used where and we ar
"That also pretty much summarize our main goal, which is similar to what
tango project has, to cover various desktops with one icon set."
Well, with one style. Huge difference.
I'm still not a fan of the isometric view of the bigger icons, i think
it causes most of the noise in the icons.
Also, I
Hi,
the last week's discussion about Echo was pretty fruitful I think and
showed that the general opinion is to not include Echo in F10 as a
default icon set. I take this as an opportunity to rethink the general
goals of echo and "give some credit" to various critics.
The main reason why *I* thin
