Hi,
I would agree with the statement preferring not to have gray inactive window
borders; my personal preference is something utilizing bg[NORMAL] -- I think
that's also what the current Clearlooks metacity does. With the gtk engine, I
think I'll try to remove glazestyles -- Nodoka doesn't
Hi,
I released new version of the Nodoka gtk {engine;theme}[1]. I made a new
function for setting gradient and the old forwarded through this one
with parameters that use murrine engine. Nodoka styling uses different
parameters... So I updated most of the widgets to the new styling. They
should
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 15:17 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
Hi,
I released new version of the Nodoka gtk {engine;theme}[1]. I made a new
function for setting gradient and the old forwarded through this one
with parameters that use murrine engine. Nodoka styling uses different
parameters... So
Martin Sourada wrote:
Hi,
I released new version of the Nodoka gtk {engine;theme}[1]. I made a new
function for setting gradient and the old forwarded through this one
with parameters that use murrine engine. Nodoka styling uses different
parameters... So I updated most of the widgets to the
Hi,
I've been following the list for a while now (write the FWN report for
it) and just wanted to drop a quick message and say I think you're all
doing great work :D
I've also installed and been using Nodoka for a while now and really
like it. I have one request/suggestion, though I'm not sure
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 07:25 +0200, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I have used your Nodoka rpms for a day now, and have to say that the
theme looks pretty reasonable and is nice to use. Of course, there
are some smaller and bigger nits to pick, otherwise I wouldn't write
this mail...
- I strongly
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 09:42 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
- Even though using a dedicated theme engine may give you the
most freedom to tweak things, but I'd consider carefully if
you really want to maintain a forked codebase long-term, if
it is just for recolorable scrollbars and
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 15:46 +0200, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Sure, if you are willing to maintain it long-term, that is fine.
In that case, we should also get it into rawhide soon, so that we don't
have to push it through package review at the last minute after deciding
on the artwork.
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 17:38 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
I've submitted a package review for the gtk-nodoka-engine package
(includes the engine, the gtk theme, the metacity theme and the
metatheme [/usr/share/themes/Nodoka/index.theme]). CC-ing maintainers
list.
Gah, I should have mentioned
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 17:34 +0200, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Gah, I should have mentioned before; here is the usual split for
packaging themes:
- engine goes in a separate package, together with the default theme
for that engine
- the metacity and metatheme go in another package, I don't
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 05:11 +0200, Daniel Geiger wrote:
Hi,
I have posted the initial release of the Nodoka theme engine to the
Nodoka wiki page, plus the gtkrc using it. Currently the main shifts
I have made from the Murrine theme engine are making the scrollbar
utilize bg[PRELIGHT
Hi,
I've done some hacking on the Nodoka engine. I worked on the gradients
and completely (but it can be still optionally turned on) removed the
glassy effect. For now it's all I am able to do - everything more would
need further studying of how it works. So the tab effect on menu is
still
Hi,
I have posted the initial release of the Nodoka theme engine to the Nodoka wiki
page, plus the gtkrc using it. Currently the main shifts I have made from the
Murrine theme engine are making the scrollbar utilize bg[PRELIGHT] in the
absence of scrollbar_color property in engine
13 matches
Mail list logo
