List fedora-art-list@redhat.com
Sent: Thursday, 23 October, 2008 11:12:49 AM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin /
Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna
Subject: Solar derived artwork under GPLv2+
Would it be possible for the copyright holders of the solar artwork to
permit two derived images to be licensed
Samuele Storari wrote:
For me there's no problem to license the image in GPLv2+.
But I think that right now Fedora is the holder of the artwork.
You will be *always* the copyright holder for your work. By signing the
CLA you allow Fedora to use your work under a certain license, but your
So the final license will be CC-BY-SA and/or GPLv2+?
Currently I'm preparing package for Solar KDE
Themes (rhbz#467943) and it's now CC-BY-SA.
R.
---
Jaroslav Reznik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Software Engineer - Base OS Core Services Brno
Red Hat, Inc.
+420 532 294 275
- Nicu Buculei [EMAIL
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
So the final license will be CC-BY-SA and/or GPLv2+?
Currently I'm preparing package for Solar KDE
Themes (rhbz#467943) and it's now CC-BY-SA.
From my understanding, it's both.
It was originally released as CC-BY-SA and the author just allowed also
GPLv2+
--
nicu ::
Charlie Brej wrote:
Nicu Buculei wrote:
From my understanding, it's both.
It was originally released as CC-BY-SA and the author just allowed
also GPLv2+
I just wanted the two images dual licensed under GPLv2. The rest can
stay as CC-BY-SA which (AFAIK) is a better licence for artwork.
- Nicu Buculei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charlie Brej wrote:
Nicu Buculei wrote:
From my understanding, it's both.
It was originally released as CC-BY-SA and the author just allowed
also GPLv2+
I just wanted the two images dual licensed under GPLv2. The rest can
stay as
