On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 10:29 -0600, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote:
> We would like for Koji to remain compatible with the version of Yum
> that is shipped with RHEL 5.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeffrey C. Ollie
> ---
> builder/mergerepos | 11 +++
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
This makes building Koji packages directly from a Koji git repository
in Koji possible. Highly self-referential!
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey C. Ollie
---
Makefile |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 7432f31..fcd4dca 100644
--- a/Makefil
Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote:
We would like for Koji to remain compatible with the version of Yum
that is shipped with RHEL 5.
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey C. Ollie
---
builder/mergerepos | 11 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builder/mergerepos b/builder/merger
---
Makefile |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 7432f31..51196ea 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -81,6 +81,9 @@ tarball: clean
srpm: tarball
$(RPM_WITH_DIRS) $(DIST_DEFINES) -bs $(SPECFILE)
+test-srpm: tarball
+
We would like for Koji to remain compatible with the version of Yum
that is shipped with RHEL 5.
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey C. Ollie
---
builder/mergerepos | 11 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builder/mergerepos b/builder/mergerepos
index defb8c1..cfa3a8
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey C. Ollie
---
builder/mergerepos |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builder/mergerepos b/builder/mergerepos
index 4243444..defb8c1 100755
--- a/builder/mergerepos
+++ b/builder/mergerepos
@@ -95,7 +95,10 @@ class RepoMerge(object):
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> It's just that I found myself needing this just after seeing:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/97941
>
> and Seth's response:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/97950
>
> I'm just sharing what I wra
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Andreas Thienemann wrote:
>
> Is it really worth it including this in mock?
>
> I'm using the same concept here for our in-house builds. But all the logic
> is part of a shellscript which calls mock for both i386 and x86_64 and
> fills a "local" repository with the
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> With this patch, mock grows a --chainbuild option (and a Require on
> createrepo).
>
> The --chainbuild option work by creating a local yum repository in the
> resultdir path which is used during the BuildRequires installation
> step.
> The net result
With this patch, mock grows a --chainbuild option (and a Require on
createrepo).
The --chainbuild option work by creating a local yum repository in the
resultdir path which is used during the BuildRequires installation
step.
The net result is that, when building more than one srpm in the same
run,
10 matches
Mail list logo