[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Christian Iseli and I were discussing the possibility of automatically
> running rpmlint somehow.
Hey, thanks for posting this... I was just about to post such a message
myself :-)
I've tried to give some thought and get some feedback from the f-e-l li
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Why do we need to install the just-generated binary RPMs in the chroot?
AFAIU, rpmlint can catch more/other things when a package is installed.
So the full thing seems to be:
1 rpmlint the src.rpm
2 rpmlint the .rpm
3 install the rpm and then run rpmlint again
Since
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Installing the freshly built package is a big no.
May I ask why ?
Christian
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Getting the rpmlint output is easy enough. Doing anything more than that
> sounds like something out of the scope of mock.
Agreed.
> Ah, we're talking automated test suite here.
Yup.
> That's not mock.
Ok.
> I applaud your desire to automate this stuff, but I don't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Sounds like a good idea to me... I suggested some other things to check on
> this list a few months back.
Yes. I hope I put them all on the wiki here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/QA
Christian
--
Fedora-buildsys-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> The whole discussion is about doing something extra with mock itself, and has
> nothing to do with plague or with the actual Extras buildsys.
It was probably me who gave that impression. Sorry about that.
I would actually like the buildsys to run rpmlint on built packa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Installing the package outside of the chroot is completely senseless.
I completely agree, but I was thinking about installing the package *within*
the chroot, not on the build host's root...
Is that also a big no ?
Christian
Hi folks,
Anyone has slides he would be willing to share that describe plague and
mock ?
I'd like to give a short presentation to co-workers here...
Thanks,
Christian
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 16:56:40 -0500, Clark Williams wrote:
> Thinking about this a bit more makes me wonder if we need to be
> able to install rpm's *using* yum, since yum brings with it the ability
> to resolve dependencies.
Yes, I think we'll need yum.
> I say this because the RPM we just genera
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:49:47 -0500, Doug Chapman wrote:
> Does anybody have ideas on how we can make this more portable?
The path to libc.so.6* is in libc.so:
$ cat /usr/lib/libc.so
/* GNU ld script
Use the shared library, but some functions are only in
the static library, so try that second
On 21 Apr 2008 21:35:01 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "BN" == Bill Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> BN> So, the question would be... is this worth it? Do we want to keep
> BN> supporting this?
>
> I can't see how it's all that useful. And given that this is the kind
>
11 matches
Mail list logo