On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 11:22:02AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:06:25 +0200
> Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It's just something to think about whether this is wanted at all -
> > with the current Fedora release cycles it doesn't hurt to add a new
> > arch to de
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:06:25 +0200
Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's just something to think about whether this is wanted at all -
> with the current Fedora release cycles it doesn't hurt to add a new
> arch to devel only. But if koji is used for RHEL or other longer-cycle
> products not
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 10:54:53AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:49:13 +0200
> Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > OK, we got that far, but how will you support a new arch in the tree?
>
> Usually we rebuild the package to pick up the arch.
Which is something one ca
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:49:13 +0200
Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, we got that far, but how will you support a new arch in the tree?
Usually we rebuild the package to pick up the arch. In the secondary
arch world it might not be a bad thing to have them start at devel and
do all the w
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 10:39:08AM -0400, Mike Bonnet wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 15:00 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 07:51:00AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > Once upon a time Monday 06 August 2007, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:18:36 +0200
> > >
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 15:00 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 07:51:00AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > Once upon a time Monday 06 August 2007, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:18:36 +0200
> > >
> > > Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Typo?
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 07:51:00AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Once upon a time Monday 06 August 2007, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:18:36 +0200
> >
> > Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Typo?
> >
> > Not exactly. Expression mismatch. The tag was /applied/ on the dev
Once upon a time Monday 06 August 2007, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:18:36 +0200
>
> Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Typo?
>
> Not exactly. Expression mismatch. The tag was /applied/ on the devel/
> branch, so when cvs is asked for that tag, it tries to pull it from
> de
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 08:37:45AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:35:33 +0200
> Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > CVS tag you asked for lives
> > ^
> > > > Typo?
> > >
> > > Not exactly. Expression mismatch. The tag was /applied
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:35:33 +0200
Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > CVS tag you asked for lives
> ^
> > > Typo?
> >
> > Not exactly. Expression mismatch. The tag was /applied/ on the
> > devel/ branch, so when cvs is asked for that tag, it tries to pull
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 08:25:20AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:18:36 +0200
> Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You previously tagged this source as 1.9.3-34 when on the devel/
> > branch, presumably before the branching happened for F-7. Since the
> > CVS tag yo
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:18:36 +0200
Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Typo?
Not exactly. Expression mismatch. The tag was /applied/ on the devel/
branch, so when cvs is asked for that tag, it tries to pull it from
devel/ and bad things happen.
> > in devel, koji gets a little confused when
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 08:06:20AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 08:03:29 -0400
> Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This task is the one you're probably concerned with:
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=89866&name=srpm.log
> >
> > I'm not entire
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 08:03:29 -0400
Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This task is the one you're probably concerned with:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=89866&name=srpm.log
>
> I'm not entirely certain how that produced a .fc8 srpm at the end of
> it, looking into it.
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:08:15 +0200
Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250819#c1
>
> mediawiki resists my attempts to build it in various ways. The current
> one is that building (or trying to build) under F7 automatically
> elevates the pac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250819#c1
mediawiki resists my attempts to build it in various ways. The current
one is that building (or trying to build) under F7 automatically
elevates the package to mediawiki-1.9.3-34.fc8, e.g. an F8
package. What is wrong?
--
Axel.Thimm a
16 matches
Mail list logo
