Re: bodhi abuse?

2008-08-30 Thread Michael Schwendt
A copy of my private answer to a flood of four (!) replies I've received after the original post: [...] David, first of all, there's a question mark in the subject line. In other words, I *ask* whether this is intended usage of bodhi, because I have doubts that it is. Secondly, in my opinion,

Re: bodhi abuse?

2008-08-30 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Saturday 30 August 2008 06:15:05 am Michael Schwendt wrote: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phpMyAdmin-2.11.9-1.fc8 [and several other updates] +1 dcottle - 2008-08-30 08:09:35 +1 acottle - 2008-08-30 08:11:54 +1 auscity - 2008-08-30 08:21:14

Re: bodhi abuse?

2008-08-30 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
Yes, I have seen many of these on my and other updates. It's quite annoying to me that someone would try to do that. I mean, if you really want an update and you've tested it, contact the maintainer and make a request. But creating fake accounts just to bump karma is only going to force people

One person - several FAS accounts? (was: bodhi abuse?)

2008-08-30 Thread Axel Thimm
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 05:01:24PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: Secondly, in my opinion, it is not okay that one person opens multiple Fedora accounts. [...] In case there are no rules yet, it's about time to create some. I agree with Michael about 10^10%. FAS accounts should be only one