Doug,
For the time being, your best bet would be to peruse the source of the
installer classes (the fedora.utilities.install package).
At the very least, there's the web.xml and fedora.fcfg that get tweaked
by the installer, which none of the ant targets will do for you.
It might be easier to
Hello all,
I'm working on building a debian package for fedora commons, and I was
wondering if there's an alternative way to install it (i.e. not using the java
installer)? Or at the very least, are the steps that the java installer takes
documented anywhere? Can I peak at the source code somew
Tune in for live webcasts from OR09 featuring Sandy Payette, Michele
Kimpton, Bradley McLean, and Chris Wilper who will discuss new
directions for DuraSpace, DSpace and Fedora Commons on May 20 and 21
from 8:30-11:30 ET:
May 20th -- http://presentations.dlpe.gatech.edu/stream/support/or09
could you got a bit more into detail?
- did you install and configure gsearch according to the docs?
- does indexing work basically? ie, changes your index and/or do you see
output in $FEDORA_HOME/server/logs/fedoragsearch.log?
- what does "data not as you expected"? what did you see and what di
Thank you Nishen. I will try this and see if I can use it in my code...
Thanks again!
Pierre-Yves
Nishen Naidoo a écrit :
Hi Pierre-Yves,
I haven't used this in a bit, but I think it works... Attached is a
data utility class I have been using. The 'fedoraXMLHashFormat' method
formats a docume
thank you for the information. I will probably wait for the version that
fixe the bug... or adopt a published standard.
Pierre-Yves
PS: or will I test the Nishen's solution...
PS2: sorry Aaron for the personal reply!
Aaron Birkland a écrit :
There is a bug report..
https://fedora-commons.org/
Hi Pierre-Yves,
I haven't used this in a bit, but I think it works... Attached is a data
utility class I have been using. The 'fedoraXMLHashFormat' method
formats a document the same way that Fedora does when computing a
hash... so if you format the doc, and compute the hash on it, it should
Hi all,
I'm looking for a search service for custom meta-data. I have found
gsearch of course and I think that it is the service I need. But I have
some problems to understand how to configure it and how to use it.
I have files that I want to add to fedora objects. Those files are XML
files a
There is a bug report..
https://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-190
Currently, Fedora transforms the XML into a non-standard canonical form
before calculating the checksum. If you wanted to verify the checksum today,
you would have to use the same non-standard transformation rules on the X
That was what I thought... well, something like that. But is there a
method to verify the checksum when you add an "X" datastream? Maybe a
java librairy?... I have looked for it, but I didn't found it.
Pierre-Yves
Aaron Birkland a écrit :
Hi, Pierre-Yves
When you create an "M" datastream, F
Hi, Pierre-Yves
When you create an "M" datastream, Fedora stores the content in a separate
location with byte-for-byte accuracy. It stores exactly what you send
without modification. With inline XML (and FOXML in general), the whitespace
(indenting, spaces between attribute values, etc) may be m
Hi all,
I have a problem of checksum for datastreams. If I add a datastream with
a Content Model wich is equal to "M", the checksum I had calculate and
the one fedora-commons calculates are the same. But if I add the same
datastream with a Content Model wich is equal to "X", fedora-commons
fin
12 matches
Mail list logo