Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] call for vote on package renaming

2009-11-20 Thread Chris Wilper
org.fcrepo +1 Reasons, by order of importance to me: A) distinctiveness (googling for fedorarepo gets you lots of redhat stuff) B) brevity C) consistency (jira tracker, development space, mailing list name, website name, etc) Although the hosting organization is now DuraSpace, I think people will

Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] call for vote on package renaming

2009-11-20 Thread Bill Branan
Hi Eddie, For all of the reasons you mentioned, I don't think any of 1-4 are the best options. I feel like fcrepo is nice for its shortness, but it seems a bit cryptic to me. This is particularly true considering that "fc" is short for fedora commons, which is the old organization name. Granted, t

[Fedora-commons-developers] call for vote on package renaming

2009-11-20 Thread Edwin Shin
Now that we've actually grabbed the fcrepo com & org domains, I think we can call for a vote. At issue is renaming the Java package name used by Fedora. Currently it's just "fedora", e.g. fedora.server.Module.java Part of mavenizing Fedora includes publishing our artifacts to Maven Cen

[Fedora-commons-developers] NEWS: DuraSpace Launches Solution Communities to Engage Decision-Makers

2009-11-20 Thread Carol Minton Morris
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE November 20, 2009 Contact: Carol Minton Morris DuraSpace, Dir. of Marketing and Communications cmmor...@duraspace.org Skype: carolmmorris 607 255-2702 twit...@duraspace http://DuraSpace.org DuraSpace Reaches Out to Decision-Makers Through Open Source Development Process w