Re: [fcrepo-dev] Release schedule for FCREPO-774 bugfix?

2010-12-20 Thread Ben Ranker
Quoth Chris Wilper on Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 04:26:58PM -0500: > Yes, Asger has fixed this in master as well as the maintenance-3.4 branch. > We're actually planning on an official 3.4.2 bugfix release that will > include this and other fixes shortly after the new year, but if you'd like > to try it

[fcrepo-dev] Invitation to a Special Topics Meeting - Fedora Security Information Resource Documentation

2010-12-20 Thread Daniel Davis
The Fedora Repository Committer's would like to invite you to a special topics tele-meeting. There are a number of concerns that have been voiced about using Fedora security and its current documentation. You are invited to a special topics meeting to discuss this and to form a working group

Re: [fcrepo-dev] Release schedule for FCREPO-774 bugfix?

2010-12-20 Thread Chris Wilper
Hi Ben, Yes, Asger has fixed this in master as well as the maintenance-3.4 branch. We're actually planning on an official 3.4.2 bugfix release that will include this and other fixes shortly after the new year, but if you'd like to try it out before then, you can download the latest 3.4.2 snapshot

[fcrepo-dev] Release schedule for FCREPO-774 bugfix?

2010-12-20 Thread Ben Ranker
I'm currently experiencing an error consistent with FCREPO-774[1]. I'm trying to weigh the relative merits of avoiding this bug by writing my software to call API-A-LITE getDatastreamDissemination() (which appears to be unaffected) or instead waiting for an official release that fixes this bug. Th

[fcrepo-dev] Line endings in in master & maintenance-3.4

2010-12-20 Thread Aaron Birkland
Hi all, Chris and I just merged the fcrepo-837 branch to master. This change, which was also applied to the maintenance-3.4 branch, standardizes on Unix-style (LF) line endings for all text in the repository. Formerly, there was a mix of DOS-style (CRLF) and Unix-style line endings, and the move

Re: [fcrepo-dev] [fcrepo-user] Max number of datastreams of a object

2010-12-20 Thread ajs6f
I am wondering a little about the data model in play here. I may have missed an earlier part of this conversation, but I wonder if you could describe your domain problem a little, M. Jallud? Perhaps we can find a more efficient and idiomatic way to use Fedora's CMA than is now obvious to you...

Re: [fcrepo-dev] Max number of datastreams of a object

2010-12-20 Thread Asger Askov Blekinge
Sounds about right, but this is not a hard limit. As you know, Fedora stores the datastreams in one big xml file. What is the maximum size of xml files? How many elements can there be in an xml list? How long do you want to wait for fedora to parse this object? Those are the relevant questions, a

[fcrepo-dev] Max number of datastreams of a object

2010-12-20 Thread Pierre-Yves JALLUD
Hi everyone, I'm using 3.2.1 version of FedoraCommons. I wonder what is the maximum number of datastreams that we can add in a single object. My experiments seem to demonstrate that this number is around 32000 (32768?...). Is that true? Is that always true in the last versions? Thanks for you