I'd support some explicit clarification via the documentation at least.
If there is an intent that DC is metadata about Fedora objects, for
repository managers, rather than descriptive metadata about the content for
consumers of objects, then this should be clear; and there should be a
recommendat
Hi, Deborah, Ben --
If part of the solution to clearing up this problem of possible and
recommended uses of the DC datastream and oai_dc metadata is improving
the documentation, can you pinpoint pages in the Fedora documentation
wiki that should be expanded? There's been some talk recently of
Deborah-
> (b) sharing a meaningless internal identifier via OAI PMH as dc:identifier is
> bad practice, and should never be a fallback default.
You make a good point: The pid satisfies the requirements for a unique
identifier as per OAI-PMH section 2.4, but it doesn't hold up to the
use of the
> Fedora's "internal"
> datastream is not called oai_dc; it's called "DC", and uses an element
> with the namespace prefix "oai_dc" as a container.
Fair enough; I was sloppy with my terminology and I shouldn't have been.
That meeting said, it's clear that this is a blocker for any number of peop
Dear Fedora Developers,
As a member of the Fedora developers community, you are engaged in front line
work that will contribute to the OR11 conference goals and conference themes.
We encourage you to make a submission to the conference! This year the
conference will also feature a new pres
Hi Laura
Take a look in the
$FEDORA_HOME/client/demo/foxml/local-server-demos/image-collection-demo
folder for some example objects. You can ingest content model objects in
exactly the same way as data objects. The main distinction is a RELS-EXT
relationship identifying them as content model obj
Steve Bayliss writes:
> Hi Laura
>
> > Thank you Greg!
> > I'm very new to Fedora so I'll try to be more concrete!
> > * Question number 1:
> > I added two objects to Fedora Repository: "base:001" and "base:002"
> > both containing a datastream ONTOLOGY with the same .rdfs schema
> > (I have
Hi Laura
> Thank you Greg!
> I'm very new to Fedora so I'll try to be more concrete!
> * Question number 1:
> I added two objects to Fedora Repository: "base:001" and "base:002"
> both containing a datastream ONTOLOGY with the same .rdfs schema
> (I have the service "Enhanced Content Models" dep
