[fcrepo-dev] unsubscribe

2012-08-28 Thread Lechich, Roy
-- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile secur

[fcrepo-dev] 3.6.1 testing

2012-08-28 Thread Edwin Shin
Assuming Bamboo will sort itself out once it can find the trippi-1.5.8, we can start testing and docs for 3.6.1. I don't think anyone's created a Test Plan for 3.6.1. We can discuss that on Thursday or on list if people want. I'm fine w/ just keeping the assignments from the 3.6 Test Plan. I di

Re: [fcrepo-dev] fcrepo-1023

2012-08-28 Thread Edwin Shin
ok, i released 1.5.8 and bumped fcrepo/pom.xml bamboo is of course failing at the moment since it can't find the new trippi artifacts yet. On Aug 28, 2012, at 10:49 PM, Benjamin Armintor wrote: > That 1.5.8 release looks promising. > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Benjamin Armintor > w

Re: [fcrepo-dev] fcrepo-1023

2012-08-28 Thread Benjamin Armintor
That 1.5.8 release looks promising. On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Benjamin Armintor wrote: > A janky version of that (maybe just the last?), because I had done the > tag manually. I think it's worth running with the tools from the > get-go. > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Edwin Shin wr

Re: [fcrepo-dev] fcrepo-1023

2012-08-28 Thread Benjamin Armintor
A janky version of that (maybe just the last?), because I had done the tag manually. I think it's worth running with the tools from the get-go. On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Edwin Shin wrote: > ok, I'm going to try and release trippi-1.5.8 and see if it goes better this > time 'round. > > Di

Re: [fcrepo-dev] fcrepo-1023

2012-08-28 Thread Edwin Shin
ok, I'm going to try and release trippi-1.5.8 and see if it goes better this time 'round. Did you use the maven release plugin to do 1.5.7? i.e. mvn release:prepare -DdryRun mvn release:clean && mvn release:prepare mvn release:perform On Aug 28, 2012, at 8:41 PM, Benjamin Armintor wrote: > N

Re: [fcrepo-dev] fcrepo-1023

2012-08-28 Thread Benjamin Armintor
Not sure- I didn't do anything with the build tasks but run them. On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Edwin Shin wrote: > I'm not exactly sure what's happened, but trippi-mptstore and trippi-mulgara > have blown up tremendously with 1.5.7 > > (10.8K and 19.6K vs 7.6M and 12.0M) > > Ok, I see, someh

Re: [fcrepo-dev] fcrepo-1058

2012-08-28 Thread Edwin Shin
I spun off a branch that uses CacheBuilder, just for kicks: https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo/blob/cachebuilder/fcrepo-server/src/main/java/org/fcrepo/server/storage/DOReaderCache.java In any case, I think fcrepo-1058 is going to have to wait for 3.6.2 unless we make an exception for post-code fr

Re: [fcrepo-dev] fcrepo-1023

2012-08-28 Thread Edwin Shin
I'm not exactly sure what's happened, but trippi-mptstore and trippi-mulgara have blown up tremendously with 1.5.7 (10.8K and 19.6K vs 7.6M and 12.0M) Ok, I see, somehow the regular jar artifacts have been replaced with the shaded jars. But not sure how that would have happened: doesn't look li

Re: [fcrepo-dev] fcrepo-1058

2012-08-28 Thread Edwin Shin
It's more that this issue provided an excuse to revisit DOReaderCache, rather than any actual issue in your refactoring. Guava's CacheBuilder looks like a promising ready-made cache, backed by a ConcurrentMap: http://code.google.com/p/guava-libraries/wiki/CachesExplained and is limited