Re: [fcrepo-dev] [ff-tech] Storing bytes, checksums and bytestream keys in Fedora Futures

2013-03-07 Thread Chris Beer
Perhaps arbitrary checksums could be stored as implementation-specific properties, but fcrepo 4 only uses the SHA-1 in some actionable way in the core/default fixity checker/etc? Chris On 7 Mar, 2013, at 8:48 , Benjamin Armintor wrote: > This email concerns Fedora-Futures development, and no

Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] Three patch ideas for discussion..

2010-01-14 Thread Chris Beer
It's certainly a similar problem. I think the disseminator route would work, but it also seems like it is overkill to write a definition, deployment, and some intermediate wrapper to essentially pass through query string parameters. There may be some cases where a pass-through behavior isn't des

Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] Three patch ideas for discussion..

2010-01-13 Thread Chris Beer
any media players implement) or URI fragments, both of which are probably appropriate (and better semantically?) in this application. Chris On 1/13/10 4:55 PM, "Scott Prater" wrote: Chris Beer wrote: > Hi all, > > At WGBH, we're in the midst of rolling out a public d

[Fedora-commons-developers] Three patch ideas for discussion..

2010-01-13 Thread Chris Beer
Is there a philosophic problem with doing that? http://gist.github.com/276585 I might end up writing a disseminator anyway, but thought I'd offer this for discussion anyway.. Thanks, Chris Beer Web Developer WGBH Interactive ---

[Fedora-commons-developers] JMS / Relationship-level messages

2009-07-28 Thread Chris Beer
n API-based messages to be an easy addition, but it also seems like it'd really help streamline some applications, especially as more people start developing workflow processes around Fedora. Thanks, Chris Beer Web D