[fcrepo-dev] time change for weekly committers call

2013-05-30 Thread Edwin Shin
On yesterday's standup, we discussed swapping the times for our thursday standup and committers call. Previously, the committers call was at 10:30am Eastern, followed by standup at 11:00am. That timing has proved a bit challenging since we typically end up cutting short general discussions so i

[fcrepo-dev] no committers call today

2013-04-25 Thread Edwin Shin
Since most of the committers are traveling in Boston-area today, no call today. Sorry for the late notice. -- Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance moni

Re: [fcrepo-dev] fcrepo build error repo.aduna-software.org

2013-04-18 Thread Edwin Shin
I can't seem to find any information about the Aduna repo--i.e. is it gone forever or if this was just an oversight by the domain owners. I'll bring it up on the committers call today. On Apr 18, 2013, at 5:57 PM, jan schnasse wrote: > Hi all, > > fcrepo and mulgara, both define dependencies

Re: [fcrepo-dev] Error in Fedora 3.6 Documentation?

2013-03-08 Thread Edwin Shin
Thanks Don. Fixed in the 3.6 docs (https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/FEDORA36/REST+API#RESTAPI-getDatastreamHistory) There was a point in development where it was /versions but we ultimately settled on /history and the docs must not have followed, viz. https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/FCREPO

[fcrepo-dev] Proposal for change to committers call

2013-03-07 Thread Edwin Shin
Hi all, I meant to send this out last week, but I forgot, mea culpa. On our last call, we discussed some changes to the committers call: i) re-focus the call to include Fedora Futures committers and FF general discussion ii) use Google Hangouts rather than FreeConferenceCallHD, which has been th

Re: [fcrepo-dev] Difference between get and objects API

2013-02-07 Thread Edwin Shin
Pierre-Yves, My memory of 3.2.1 is a bit fuzzy. Are you saying that the /get// request in 3.2.1 *does* return the Content-Length header but doesn't in 3.6.2? All of "Lite" APIs (i.e. the /get/ requests) were deprecated as of Fedora 3.4 in favor of the REST API: https://wiki.duraspace.o

Re: [fcrepo-dev] Ingest performances

2012-11-08 Thread Edwin Shin
Jesper, I'd say fork master and submit a pull request. By the way, there's a committers call today (Thursday) from 9-9:30am Eastern (UTC-5) if you want to jump in. I think the agenda is mostly around the upcoming release of 3.6.2, but I'd welcome having either (or both) of you and Nicolas join

Re: [fcrepo-dev] [fcrepo-codewatch] [fcrepo/fcrepo] ba9678: FCREPO-1161: Fix for SimpleDateFormat allocation i...

2012-11-01 Thread Edwin Shin
On Oct 26, 2012, at 11:04 PM, GitHub wrote: > > - I think i also fixed a bug in the test were XSD dates were used by tests > for parsing > Dates, but since these use as the year 1 BCE and joda time uses -0001 > i had to change these. > Please check that i did it correctly > Frank,

Re: [fcrepo-dev] Ingesting atom 1.1

2012-10-16 Thread Edwin Shin
hmm, don't have the code before me, but I think you might be right (that you need the atom xml). If memory serves, the REST API code just pre-fabricates a foxml document for an ingest request when a foxml document isn't provided, but doesn't do the same for the other formats (atom, mets). seems

Re: [fcrepo-dev] Issue on upgrading to fedora 3.6.1

2012-09-14 Thread Edwin Shin
; > I've just opened that issue and you can follow it: > > https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/FCREPO-1153 > > - --- > A. Soroka > Software & Systems Engineering :: Online Library Environment > the University of Virginia Library > > On Sep 13, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Ed

Re: [fcrepo-dev] Issue on upgrading to fedora 3.6.1

2012-09-13 Thread Edwin Shin
Harry, I think the issue you reported is, at base, the same that Nilani just reported about Fedora using akubra even though the legacy store was selected. -Eddie On Sep 11, 2012, at 1:04 AM, Harry Sidhunata wrote: > Hi All, > > I hope that someone can help to solve this migration issue. > I

Re: [fcrepo-dev] FEDORA3.6 LOW-LEVEL STORAGE

2012-09-13 Thread Edwin Shin
On a brand new install, with legacy-fs selected, it seems enough to delete $FEDORA_HOME/server/config/spring/akubra-llstore.xml before the first start of Fedora On Sep 13, 2012, at 9:08 AM, Edwin Shin wrote: > I just tested this locally to confirm (selecting legacy-fs in the instal

Re: [fcrepo-dev] FEDORA3.6 LOW-LEVEL STORAGE

2012-09-13 Thread Edwin Shin
I just tested this locally to confirm (selecting legacy-fs in the installer). Initial run shows the following in the log: INFO 2012-09-13 09:02:38.354 [main] (Server) loading spring beans from /foo/bar/fedora/server/config/spring/akubra-llstore.xml INFO 2012-09-13 09:02:38.542 [main] (Server)

Re: [fcrepo-dev] cargo-izing fedora

2012-09-04 Thread Edwin Shin
), you just need to drop in the fedora-batch-core jar and you're done--no editing of web.xml necessary. Reminds me that it would be nice to push Fedora along to require Servlet 3.0 container support, but that's a whole 'mother discussion. On Sep 3, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Edwin Shin w

Re: [fcrepo-dev] cargo-izing fedora

2012-09-02 Thread Edwin Shin
would minimize the Maven >> complexity. The first option is clearly better, but it would require some >> serious work. >> >> --- >> A, Soroka >> Online Library Environment >> the University of Virginia Library >> >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 1

[fcrepo-dev] cargo-izing fedora

2012-08-31 Thread Edwin Shin
This may be mostly directed at Adam, but just in case anyone else has any experience or ideas on the matter: I took another look at https://github.com/mediashelf/fedora-client/tree/test-with-Cargo (which still won't run correctly for me anyway), which uses Cargo to start up an instance of Fedo

[fcrepo-dev] 3.6.1 testing

2012-08-28 Thread Edwin Shin
Assuming Bamboo will sort itself out once it can find the trippi-1.5.8, we can start testing and docs for 3.6.1. I don't think anyone's created a Test Plan for 3.6.1. We can discuss that on Thursday or on list if people want. I'm fine w/ just keeping the assignments from the 3.6 Test Plan. I di

Re: [fcrepo-dev] fcrepo-1023

2012-08-28 Thread Edwin Shin
jamin Armintor > wrote: >> A janky version of that (maybe just the last?), because I had done the >> tag manually. I think it's worth running with the tools from the >> get-go. >> >> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Edwin Shin wrote: >>> ok, I'

Re: [fcrepo-dev] fcrepo-1023

2012-08-28 Thread Edwin Shin
in Armintor wrote: > Not sure- I didn't do anything with the build tasks but run them. > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Edwin Shin wrote: >> I'm not exactly sure what's happened, but trippi-mptstore and trippi-mulgara >> have blown up tremendously with 1.5.7 &

Re: [fcrepo-dev] fcrepo-1058

2012-08-28 Thread Edwin Shin
freeze. We are going to have to push another release of Trippi, however, since something went awry with the 1.5.7 jars. On Aug 28, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Edwin Shin wrote: > It's more that this issue provided an excuse to revisit DOReaderCache, rather > than any actual issue in your

Re: [fcrepo-dev] fcrepo-1023

2012-08-28 Thread Edwin Shin
licit some key signing, since I have no > idea what's become of the keys I created (2? 3?) years ago for the > project. > > - Ben > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Edwin Shin wrote: >> ok, i've requested access for you (see >> https://issues.sonatype.org

Re: [fcrepo-dev] fcrepo-1058

2012-08-28 Thread Edwin Shin
*frank asseg* > softwareentwicklung > feichtmayrstr. 37 > 76646 bruchsal > tel.: ++49-7251-322-6073 > fax.: ++49-7251-322-6078 > mail: frank.as...@congrace.de > web: http://www.congrace.de/ > > Edwin Shin wrote: > Looking at this again over my morning coffee, I thi

Re: [fcrepo-dev] fcrepo-1058

2012-08-27 Thread Edwin Shin
d and now integrated in Guava. LRU caches are pretty well-tread territory and I'd rather not re-invent the wheel, other than as an instructional exercise. On Aug 28, 2012, at 1:42 AM, Edwin Shin wrote: > Not sure if Chris is back from holiday. > > i did a really cursory review--

Re: [fcrepo-dev] fcrepo-1023

2012-08-27 Thread Edwin Shin
1:41 PM, frank wrote: >> Ben, can you do this? it's 20.00h here and i'd like to call it a night >> too.. ;) >> >> On 08/27/2012 07:39 PM, Edwin Shin wrote: >>> I'm turning in for the night (it's 1:30am), so I'm not going to be able to &g

Re: [fcrepo-dev] fcrepo-1058

2012-08-27 Thread Edwin Shin
Not sure if Chris is back from holiday. i did a really cursory review--sorry, I'm about to crash for the night. Looks generally ok to me, but I didn't thoroughly review the expiry of cache items, so someone with fresher eyes might want to have a look. On Aug 27, 2012, at 2:33 PM, "Asseg, Fran

Re: [fcrepo-dev] fcrepo-1023

2012-08-27 Thread Edwin Shin
's tests and the version bump get into master > (if Frank can't) if you can cut a Trippi release. > > - Ben > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Edwin Shin wrote: >> Frank, >> >> So, if I understand correctly, in order to close FCREPO-1023, >> 1)

Re: [fcrepo-dev] fcrepo-1023

2012-08-27 Thread Edwin Shin
Frank, So, if I understand correctly, in order to close FCREPO-1023, 1) trippi/fcrepo-1023 needs to be applied to trippi/master, 2) a new release of Trippi needs to cut (including publishing to Maven central) 3) fcrepo/fcrepo-1023 needs to be applied fcrepo/master (including updating pom to ref

[fcrepo-dev] reminder: 3.6.1 code freeze 27 August

2012-08-24 Thread Edwin Shin
Just a reminder that code freeze for 3.6.1 is Monday =) -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. D

Re: [fcrepo-dev] problems uploading to duraspace nexus repo

2012-08-23 Thread Edwin Shin
t für Informationsinfrastruktur > Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1 > 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen > > http://www.fiz-karlsruhe.de/ > > > From: Edwin Shin [ed...@fedora-commons.org] > Sent: 23 August 2012 08:10 > To: fedora

[fcrepo-dev] problems uploading to duraspace nexus repo

2012-08-22 Thread Edwin Shin
I can't seem to get the latest Tomcat 6.x onto our Maven repo. I've tried both mvn deploy and using the Nexus web ui. The Nexus UI is just displaying an endless progress bar. Using the following mvn deploy command: mvn deploy:deploy-file -Durl=https://m2.duraspace.org/content/repositories/thir

[fcrepo-dev] fcrepo-client-webadmin-3.6.swf

2012-08-16 Thread Edwin Shin
Does this file actually need have to have the version string in the filename? Would be one less thing to filter at release time if we could just keep it named something like fcrepo-client-webadmin.swf -- Live Security Vi

Re: [fcrepo-dev] FCREPO-1107 feedback request

2012-08-15 Thread Edwin Shin
nm my datatypes question :P I blame it on responding to emails before my morning coffee On Aug 16, 2012, at 8:27 AM, Edwin Shin wrote: > I think the partial fix is still valuable. > > Incidentally, does the same issue apply for datatypes, then? > > -Eddie > > On Aug

Re: [fcrepo-dev] FCREPO-1107 feedback request

2012-08-15 Thread Edwin Shin
I think the partial fix is still valuable. Incidentally, does the same issue apply for datatypes, then? -Eddie On Aug 13, 2012, at 10:57 PM, Benjamin Armintor wrote: > I'm going to look at a few of the the bugfixes slated for 3.6.1 this > week, starting with FCREPO-1107 > (https://jira.duraspa

[fcrepo-dev] fcrepo branch cleanup

2012-08-15 Thread Edwin Shin
We have a ton of fcrepo branches, most of which I'm reasonably certain can be pruned. Aside from master, the list comprises (I've put names against branches per JIRA assignee). Branches with stars are ones I that I'm reasonably certain should be deleted. Can you please review your branches and

[fcrepo-dev] 3.6 documentation checklist

2012-07-12 Thread Edwin Shin
fyi, doc checklist is here: https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/FCREPO-1115 Please add subtasks as you see fit and don't be shy about assigning tickets to yourself ;-) -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive l

[fcrepo-dev] swing client problems in master

2012-07-03 Thread Edwin Shin
Dan reported issues with the Swing client which look like regressions from the Axis-to-CXF migration. He's documenting some of the specifics in a Jira ticket right now. Some of the basic stuff works fine: - login, search, ingest by single file, ingest by directory, purge object However, ingesti

Re: [fcrepo-dev] fcrepo-1102 fixed; testing can resume

2012-06-26 Thread Edwin Shin
fyi: I continued to get test failures running mvn install on the ec2 instance I was using. I've repeated this on two different ec2 (small) 64-bit instances running Ubuntu 12.04, as noted in FCREPO-1104: https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/fcrepo-1104 However, changing the instance type t

[fcrepo-dev] FCREPO-1097 (rebuilder NPE) status

2012-06-16 Thread Edwin Shin
I spent some time looking into this, not much luck determining the cause on HEAD, so I started traversing previous commits trying to determine when this crept in. I can reproduce the NPE as far back as 95cec2340fd7c026d95016eb3b24987de63ef803 (24 April) The rebuilder works as of fe760b0e8204bf

Re: [fcrepo-dev] fcrepo-954

2012-06-14 Thread Edwin Shin
AGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > +1 to #2. > > - --- > A. Soroka > Software & Systems Engineering :: Online Library Environment > the University of Virginia Library > > On Jun 14, 2012, at 3:58 AM, Edwin Shin wrote: > >> ok, fcrepo-954 is merged. >> &

Re: [fcrepo-dev] fcrepo-954

2012-06-14 Thread Edwin Shin
ok, fcrepo-954 is merged. I cheated and also created and closed a new ticket: fcrepo-1095, to update libraries. In particular, I realized that we were not using the latest releases of trippi and mptstore, but then I got the bug and did a decent sweep of dependencies, notable exception being Spr

[fcrepo-dev] fcrepo-954

2012-06-12 Thread Edwin Shin
It's a day after code-freeze, but I finally have fcrepo-954 merged locally and passing all tests. There were actually some bugs in the fcrepo-954 branch which took me awhile to run down--I ended up cherry-picking each individual commit to narrow the problem space. Do we want to make an exceptio

Re: [fcrepo-dev] Report for the 31 may 2012 committer call

2012-05-31 Thread Edwin Shin
*applause* I'm putting together the 3.6 test plan at this very moment. Today, we'll cover i) what if anything stands in the way of code freeze, ii) zip through open issues that are currently pegged against 3.6 iii) testing assignments On 31 May 2012, at 5:12 PM, Benjam

Re: [fcrepo-dev] mptstore mavenization

2012-02-16 Thread Edwin Shin
in the pom instead of CONTRIBUTORS.txt for this and trippi. Thanks for > getting these converted. > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Edwin Shin wrote: > Since I was on such a roll with trippi, I mavenized mptstore as well. This > one was a bit more straightforward. > > Same

[fcrepo-dev] mptstore mavenization

2012-02-13 Thread Edwin Shin
Since I was on such a roll with trippi, I mavenized mptstore as well. This one was a bit more straightforward. Same as before--I'll merge to master soon-ish if I no one raises any issues regarding the maven branch. -- Ke

Re: [fcrepo-dev] mavenized trippi

2012-02-13 Thread Edwin Shin
aven2 and maven3. > > So if we want to support both major versions of maven, it seems like it > really does need to go in both places. > > Ahh, maven. > > - Chris > > On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Edwin Shin wrote: > I can't duplicate the error. I did the same

Re: [fcrepo-dev] mavenized trippi

2012-02-12 Thread Edwin Shin
I see is that in the trippi pom, the DuraSpace thirdparty > maven repo is listed *both* as a plugin repository and a regular repository. > In the fedora-client pom, it's listed as a plugin repository only. So I > suspect that's the problem, but I can't verify it t

Re: [fcrepo-dev] mavenized trippi

2012-02-12 Thread Edwin Shin
I'll back them out since that was working better for me. On 12 Feb 2012, at 10:52 PM, Chris Wilper wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Edwin Shin wrote: > Maybe I'll just stick a release of 0.4-SNAPSHOT on the DuraSpace m2 repo for > now. I still can't get wag

Re: [fcrepo-dev] mavenized trippi

2012-02-12 Thread Edwin Shin
few testing issues...both in the master branch and the > maven branch. Have you been able to successfully run the existing tests yet? > There seems to at least be some log configuration classpath wonkiness going > on, but I haven't looked deeply at it. > > - Chris > >

[fcrepo-dev] mavenized trippi

2012-02-11 Thread Edwin Shin
I've mavenized trippi in a branch creatively named, "maven". https://github.com/fcrepo/trippi/compare/master...maven Unless anyone sees any issues, I'll merge with master in the next couple of days. -- Virtualiza

Re: [fcrepo-dev] Junit version

2011-11-15 Thread Edwin Shin
forgot to include the link: https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/FCREPO-1025 On 15 Nov 2011, at 8:55 PM, Edwin Shin wrote: > no reason other than we haven't gotten 'round to it. > > I created a ticket for this. If you want to submit a pull request on Github, > feel free =) &

Re: [fcrepo-dev] Junit version

2011-11-15 Thread Edwin Shin
no reason other than we haven't gotten 'round to it. I created a ticket for this. If you want to submit a pull request on Github, feel free =) On 15 Nov 2011, at 8:03 PM, Jesper Damkjaer wrote: > Hi. > > I have looked at some of the tests during my attempt to test > multi-threading in DefaultD

Re: [fcrepo-dev] Fedora Client Maven Bundles

2011-10-17 Thread Edwin Shin
Greg, Pardon my jet-lag, I had assumed you were talking about the fedora-client library at https://github.com/mediashelf/fedora-client On 16 Oct 2011, at 8:55 PM, Greg Pendlebury wrote: > Hello again, > > I started looking at later versions today. I've currently got v3.3, v3.3.1, > v3.4.2 and

Re: [fcrepo-dev] Fedora Client Maven Bundles

2011-10-17 Thread Edwin Shin
Greg, The Maven information you need to include in your pom is documented here: http://mediashelf.github.com/fedora-client/usage.html They are in the DuraSpace repo and at present not in Maven central because fedora-client currently has dependencies which themselves are not in Maven central.

Re: [fcrepo-dev] Uploading large media files

2011-08-29 Thread Edwin Shin
Pablo, Short answer is yes, Fedora can store and manage large files. However, there have been bugs such as https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/FCREPO-704 which caused errors for uploading larger files. Can you provide some more detail, e.g.: 1) Are you seeing the error with the SOAP or REST API,

Re: [fcrepo-dev] building fcrepo on JDK 7

2011-08-05 Thread Edwin Shin
you're rolling out jdk 7 in production? http://lucene.apache.org/solr/#28+July+2011+-+WARNING%3A+Index+corruption+and+crashes+in+Apache+Lucene+Core+%2F+Apache+Solr+with+Java+7 I would at least wait till the dust settles and a couple updates came through before considering jdk7 for production. A

Re: [fcrepo-dev] Max Permgen Size = 256m?

2011-07-27 Thread Edwin Shin
+1 for openjdk On 27 Jul 2011, at 1:37 PM, aj...@virginia.edu wrote: > OpenJDK is one with which I've had no problems running Fedora, at least on > Linux. Some of the others were mixtures of Apache Harmony with other VMs. A > few of them worked well, others... not so much. {grin} Fedora, in fac

Re: [fcrepo-dev] fedora.home vs. FEDORA_HOME

2011-07-26 Thread Edwin Shin
Just to be clear, the order of precedence for determining Constants.FEDORA_HOME is: 1) fedora.home init param via servlet.fedora.home system property People shouldn't actually set the servlet.fedora.home system property directly as org.fcrepo.server.utilities.LogSetupContextListener checks for t

Re: [fcrepo-dev] regarding FCREPO-951

2011-07-22 Thread Edwin Shin
I'm not aware of any plans that scoped FCREPO-951 as part of the GSoC work. So unless Adam/Jiri chime in otherwise, you're more than welcome to take it =) On 22 Jul 2011, at 8:54 AM, Asseg, Frank wrote: > Hola guys! > > i wanted to ask if > https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/FCREPO-951 > is in l

Re: [fcrepo-dev] spring configuration loading from outside of /WEB-INF

2011-07-20 Thread Edwin Shin
Just to summarize the background of the issue: - Prior to Fedora 3.5.0, you were able to run Fedora within Jetty 1) without defining the FEDORA_HOME environment variable 2) only using relative paths to define the fedora.home property in web.xml (https://github.com/projecthydra/hydra-jetty/blo

Re: [fcrepo-dev] REST API

2011-06-07 Thread Edwin Shin
; headers > (). > > This happened with accept headers */* and application/json. I cannot imagine > that the method does not work in some way - could you give me a hint? > > Thanks > Steffen > > > > -Original Message- > From: Edwin Shin [mailto:ed...

Re: [fcrepo-dev] REST API

2011-06-02 Thread Edwin Shin
As I recall purgeDatastream used to only return a 204 status code, no payload. See https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/FCREPO-708 Returning a JSON array of dates was intentional, so I suppose I would call that a feature ;-) On 2 Jun 2011, at 8:59 AM, Stephen Bayliss wrote: > Hi Steffen > > This

Re: [fcrepo-dev] [fcrepo-codewatch] [DuraSpace Bamboo] FCRepo - Linux-Sanity build 118 has FAILED (1 tests failed). Change made by Edwin Shin

2011-03-17 Thread Edwin Shin
lled in. Not positive that this the same sort of problem that Bamboo is hitting, but I can't reproduce a test failure aside from the two methods described above. On 18 Mar 2011, at 12:00 AM, DuraSpace Bamboo wrote: > FCREPO-LINUXSAN-118 failed. > Code has been updated by Edw

Re: [fcrepo-dev] build/test errors

2011-03-11 Thread Edwin Shin
t;>> -Dfile=/path/t >>> o/file >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Chris Wilper [mailto:cwil...@duraspace.org] >>>> Sent: 09 March 2011 13:00 >>>> To: fedora-commons-developers@lists.so

Re: [fcrepo-dev] build/test errors

2011-03-09 Thread Edwin Shin
.org/maven2), > apache-incubating > (http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/), > java.net (https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/nonav/repository), > aduna (http://repo.aduna-software.org/maven2/releases/), > maven2-repository.dev.java.net (http://download.java.net/mave

[fcrepo-dev] build/test errors

2011-03-09 Thread Edwin Shin
Off a fresh clone of fcrepo, I'm getting the following running mvn verify -Dconfig=Q -Dit.test=org.fcrepo.test.api.TestAPIA Running org.fcrepo.test.api.TestAPIA Ingesting demo objects... Ingesting demo objects in FOXML format from // Could not create managed clone test objects: java.lang.Error: Un

Re: [fcrepo-dev] [Vote] Migrate to GitHub

2010-11-25 Thread Edwin Shin
+1 On 23 Nov 2010, at 9:10 PM, Chris Wilper wrote: > Hi all, > > Over the past few weeks, several of us have been looking into a > potential move of the core Fedora Repository code to GitHub. During > today's developer call, we decided the investigation had progressed > along far enough that we

[Fedora-commons-developers] getObjectProfile for inactive objects failing in trunk

2010-07-25 Thread Edwin Shin
Hoping someone else can confirm this one, and even better, run this down, since I'm not seeing anything obvious in the post 3.4RC1 commits that would suggest this behavior change. To reproduce: - change the status of an object to Inactive - attempt to fetch it, e.g., http://localhost:8080/fedor

Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] PEP Denying Access

2010-06-01 Thread Edwin Shin
Huân, When you installed fedora, did you require authentication for API-A? (you can check $FEDORA_HOME/install/install.properties for the value of apia.auth.required). If it's false, then try applying the workaround Steve suggested below. If it's true, then FCREPO-703 doesn't apply in case. T

Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] PEP Denying Access

2010-05-31 Thread Edwin Shin
Can you find an earlier reference in the logs where the request has not already been cached? Look for a debug message that includes "No item found in cache. Sending to PDP for evaluation" On 31 May 2010, at 3:48 PM, Huân Thebault wrote: > Hello > > I’ve built fedora-3.4 from trunk but I can’t

Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] Failed tests: testParseDate(org.fcrepo.server.utilities.TestDateUtility)

2010-05-25 Thread Edwin Shin
w.fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-667 > > But what var do I exactly have to change in windows ? Or is there any way to > get it to work without changing any var ? > > Regards, > > - > Huân Thebault > Centre de Calcul de l'IN2P3 > Development Team >

Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] Failed tests: testParseDate(org.fcrepo.server.utilities.TestDateUtility)

2010-05-25 Thread Edwin Shin
Huân, Could you insert a print statement at line 90 to see which date string is causing the problem? e.g.: for (String element : dates) { +System.out.println("parsing: " + element); assertEquals(EPOCH, DateUtility.parseDateAsUTC(element)); } And re-ru

Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] (no subject)

2010-05-24 Thread Edwin Shin
I did some work for a client to get Fedora running on Weblogic in December & January (post 3.3 release). If you're comfortable checking & building from trunk, I'd test to see if that works for you in WL 9.2 (I tested against WL10). If that works for you, you can see about backporting those chang

Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] maven compile fedora

2010-02-16 Thread Edwin Shin
Are you using Java 5? Until just recently in the trunk, we employed some build hackery to maintain source compatibility with Java5 and Java6. If you just did a checkout of trunk from svn, you now need to be using Java 6 to build. Eddie On 16 Feb 2010, at 7:14 PM, wei yuan wrote: > Hi, > > I s

Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] FeSL: Make XACML policies first-class Fedora digital objects (FCREPO-577)

2010-02-12 Thread Edwin Shin
ch policies are applicable--but I do believe that that describes logically different parcels of work from what's scoped by FCREPO-577. On 12 Feb 2010, at 5:54 PM, Asger Askov Blekinge wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 17:19 +0100, Edwin Shin wrote: >> I definitely support

Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] FeSL: Make XACML policies first-class Fedora digital objects (FCREPO-577)

2010-02-12 Thread Edwin Shin
I definitely support the proposal to have an object that represents the repository itself (just as I would like to see objects that represent fedora.fcfg, users, groups, etc.). Even before FeSL, we'd discussed the desirability of representing policies as Fedora objects (in contrast to the set o

Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] Moving away from Java 5

2009-12-22 Thread Edwin Shin
Must be that post-release spring-cleaning sort of feeling going round. I was just waiting to raise this very issue after everyone got back from the holidays ;) >From a development standpoint, it's a no-brainer. It would be a good idea, >however, to ping the users list and any large Fedora insta

Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] jai & java.awt.headless issues

2009-12-15 Thread Edwin Shin
; > http://n2.nabble.com/A-ImageManipulation-that-kill-my-fedora-daemon-td2826668.html > > It seems odd that getting a new XACML PDP instance would have anything > to do with awt... > > - Chris > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Edwin Shin wrote: >> background: integration tes

[Fedora-commons-developers] jai & java.awt.headless issues

2009-12-15 Thread Edwin Shin
background: integration tests that used the imagemanip service were failing with fesl (the new, experimental security layer) enabled. The odd thing was, even requests to: http://localhost:8080/imagemanip/ImageManipulation?op=resize&newWidth=50&url=http://localhost:8080/tomcat.gif would h

[Fedora-commons-developers] cleaning up nexus

2009-12-03 Thread Edwin Shin
Can we safely remove - org/fedoracommons - org/fedorarepo from both thirdparty and releases? It looks like everything has already been copied over to org/fcrepo and org/akubraproject -- Join us December 9, 2009 for the

[Fedora-commons-developers] fcrepo-580 status

2009-12-02 Thread Edwin Shin
Update for the committers: I've updated Maven repo, but I'm getting some runtime errors on test configB which look to be related to picking up the transitive dependencies when the war is being built. So I'll be holding off on committing my updates until I get back home later tonight. Eddie ---

[Fedora-commons-developers] call for vote on package renaming

2009-11-20 Thread Edwin Shin
is imminent, I'm calling for a vote between org.fedorarepo and org.fcrepo by the next committer call, Tuesday 24 November. On 20 Nov 2009, at 7:30 AM, Chris Wilper wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Edwin Shin wrote: >> I generally like the new naming, although Chris &am

Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] Proposal to rename 6 maven modules

2009-11-19 Thread Edwin Shin
I generally like the new naming, although Chris & Dan see my email off-list for a alternative prefix for the project as a whole. For the localservice renaming, another option is to use the fedora-webapp module (now fedorarepo-webapp) as a pom with child modules fedora, fop, saxon, and imagemani

Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] Alternate installation...

2009-05-15 Thread Edwin Shin
Doug, For the time being, your best bet would be to peruse the source of the installer classes (the fedora.utilities.install package). At the very least, there's the web.xml and fedora.fcfg that get tweaked by the installer, which none of the ant targets will do for you. It might be easier to

Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] JOTM (and carol) causing issues for other webapps

2009-02-20 Thread Edwin Shin
Steve, The first reference you listed states the following: Note: In Tomcat 5.5.x, you can include all required JARs in WEB-INF/lib. With this configuration carol.properties goes in WEB-INF/classes. For an example WAR, see http://static.raibledesigns.com/downloads/dbtest.war. I took that to m

[Fedora-commons-developers] 2.2.4 license and upgrade instructions

2008-10-28 Thread Edwin Shin
...are up on the wiki - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source

Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] Problem while creating FoxML document by using fedora.utilities.FoxmlDocument class

2008-10-24 Thread Edwin Shin
On 10/24/2008 10:41 PM, yf508 is rumored to have said: > We're using Fedora 2.x/Muradora to build our digital library. I've got a > problem while using fedora.utilities.FoxmlDocument. The addDataStream, > addDataStreamVersion work correctly. However, when I tried to use > addXmlContent method, I'v

Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] Testing assignments for 2.2.4 and 3.1 releases

2008-10-23 Thread Edwin Shin
All my tests have passed (release-3.1 & release-2.2.4 on Linux + Java 5 + MySQL 5). Testing of the manual upgrade from 2.2.3 to release-2.2.4 passed as well. However, we need to note that upgraders will need to 1) update the Kowari configuration portions of fedora.fcfg w/ the new Mulgara config

Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] Testing assignments for 2.2.4 and 3.1 releases

2008-10-22 Thread Edwin Shin
On 10/22/2008 07:51 PM, Edwin Shin is rumored to have said: > On 10/22/2008 10:02 AM, Aaron Birkland is rumored to have said: > > >> 2) TestLargeDatastreams failed. Reason: URI syntax exception >> (happens with mulgara, mckoi as well) > > > >> If t

Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] Testing assignments for 2.2.4 and 3.1 releases

2008-10-22 Thread Edwin Shin
On 10/22/2008 10:02 AM, Aaron Birkland is rumored to have said: > 2) TestLargeDatastreams failed. Reason: URI syntax exception (happens > with mulgara, mckoi as well) > If this test is still valid, can someone verify this failure? I see the same error. The test is failing because it's pass

Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] Concurrency issue in DOValidatorImpl.java with patch

2008-10-21 Thread Edwin Shin
On 10/21/2008 02:13 PM, Morten Grouleff is rumored to have said: > When doing concurrent ingests we have experienced the occasional > ingest-error. Not that many on Linux systems. but quite a few on Windows > systems. We did a bit of debugging and discovered the following > temporary file naming

Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] SF.net SVN: fedora-commons:[7787] fedora/branches

2008-10-20 Thread Edwin Shin
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 1:43 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Revision: 7787 > > http://fedora-commons.svn.sourceforge.net/fedora-commons/?rev=7787&view=rev > Author: pangloss > Date: 2008-10-17 17:43:22 + (Fri, 17 Oct 2008) > > Log Message: > --- > updated Trippi to 1.4.1 (Mulga

Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] FW: Rebuilding the ResourceIndex in a 2.2.3 World

2008-10-04 Thread Edwin Shin
problems with > SourceForge mail. Not sure if you got it? Like Joe, we initially ended > up with an empty ri! > > Richard > > -Original Message- > From: Richard Green > Sent: 19 September 2008 16:53 > To: 'Edwin Shin'; fedora-commons-developers@lists.sourcef

Re: [Fedora-commons-developers] Warnings from Mulgara being logged from "risearch"

2008-09-12 Thread Edwin Shin
Morten, Thanks for the patch. Were you able to reliably reproduce the error you reported? I'd like to get a unit test to cover this, if possible. Eddie On 09/12/2008 04:46 AM, Morten Grouleff is rumored to have said: > Never got a response, but instead found a bit of time to look into it > my

[Fedora-commons-developers] bug 2031516 (ri does not delete all triples)

2008-09-01 Thread Edwin Shin
By way of summary: when purging an object from a 3.0 repository, triples that contain empty literals (i.e. "") are not deleted. For example, add an object with an empty label, delete the object, the triple for the label remains. Originally, I treated this as a problem of failing to delete triples.