On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 12:14 -0400, Chris Wilper wrote:
> For notification of relationship-level (err.. statement-level)
> changes, currently apps can subscribe to the appropriate RELS-*
> changes, but as you point out, determining the diffs is difficult
> because you have to look at the previous r
Hi Chris,
As mentioned on irc, I think having both of these (notification for
read-oriented API calls, and relationship-level change notification)
would be good, but I want to see what other people think too. Some
thoughts:
For notification of read-oriented calls, it'd be nice to have a way to
t
Following up on Mike Park's messaging thread, I'd like to also suggest the
addition of relationship-level notifications (in addition to the API-M level
messages).
The drawback of API-M messages is capturing updates to the RELS-EXT/INT when
they are modified by modifiyDatastream rather than the
