Updated Packages:
GFS-kernel-2.6.15.1-5.FC5.15
cman-kernel-2.6.15.1-0.FC5.13
-
dlm-kernel-2.6.15.1-0.FC5.11
Broken deps for ia64
--
rgman
Hi,
I just put my hands an a shiny Acer Travelmate 8202WLMi laptop so I
decided to give a try to FC5. The installation wen fine, but upon
first reboot I an stuck at:
Starting udev:_
Admittedly, I did _not_ expected FC to work fine on that, having a
bunch of fancy new hardware in there ( Centrino
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 09:13 +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> Hi,
> I just put my hands an a shiny Acer Travelmate 8202WLMi laptop so I
> decided to give a try to FC5. The installation wen fine, but upon
> first reboot I an stuck at:
>
> Starting udev:_
I would try an install from rawhide and see i
Sure you can. For 5 years, this has been the only workaround on my PR440FX
based SMP box to keep the RTC in sync - with enabled SMP of course! See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55223
>
> Interrupt handling. I think you can not disable them on SMP machines
> (and retain S
On 3/9/06, Tarjei Knapstad wrote:
> > With the pkg-config bug though I'd say the package is slightly broken
> > as you can't use autotools to detect the library (well, I guess you
> > can, but pkg-config is much the preferred solution). No suggestions
> > for a fix?
> >
>
> I'm currently adding so
Hi,
I've noticed a problem in rawhide just doing yum update regarding e2fsprogs on
x86_64. The update fails like this:
>Running Transaction Test
>Finished Transaction Test
>
>Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/man/man8/blkid.8.gz from install of
>e2fsprogs-1.38-12 conflicts with file from
I'm glad to know this... but I am really worried about
performance in this case, there is a lot of traffic
between the web server (Apache/PHP) and the database
server (Oracle 9.2.0.7) so "noapic" wouldn't be a
viable workaround if it degrades performance. Any
advice about this?
Thanks for your co
On 3/13/06, Steve G wrote:
> Well, I guess it is needed...is the repo broken ? Its been like this for a
> week
> or so.
the 32bit tree has e2fsprogs-libs-1.38-12 currently.
and the 32bit version is in the rawhide tree... so I don't understand
your problem...unless your yum is hitting a stale m
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 05:33 -0800, Steve G wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed a problem in rawhide just doing yum update regarding e2fsprogs on
> x86_64. The update fails like this:
>
> >Running Transaction Test
> >Finished Transaction Test
> >
> >Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/man/man8/bl
Hi all,
My broken things:
* From panel, web is not opening. I copy command to command line:
$htmlview %u
Error: No running window found
* Thunderbird is lost icon, what can see, when you are switching with
alt-tab, or when it is full screen in workspace windows...
* My compiled mplayer anym
>> Well, I guess it is needed...is the repo broken ? Its been like this for a
>>week or so.
>
>the 32bit tree has e2fsprogs-libs-1.38-12 currently.
Its the main package...not the libs.
[r...@dhcp83-35 ~]# rpm -e e2fsprogs-1.38-1.i386
error: Failed dependencies:
locate + rpm -qf does show that
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 08:50 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On 3/13/06, Steve G wrote:
> > Well, I guess it is needed...is the repo broken ? Its been like this for a
> > week
> > or so.
>
> the 32bit tree has e2fsprogs-libs-1.38-12 currently.
>
> and the 32bit version is in the rawhide tree... so
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 06:16 -0800, Steve G wrote:
> >> Well, I guess it is needed...is the repo broken ? Its been like this for a
> >>week or so.
> >
> >the 32bit tree has e2fsprogs-libs-1.38-12 currently.
>
> Its the main package...not the libs.
Maybe the manpage was moved from the main package
On 3/13/06, Steve G wrote:
> locate + rpm -qf does show that /lib/libcom_err.so.2 is owned by
> e2fsprogs-1.38-1.i386.
then thats the problem... the most recent packages
/lib/libcom_err.so.2 is owned by the -libs.
So the problem you are seeing is the result of shifts inside the
development tree.
Philippe Rigault wrote:
> > Due to circumstances outside of our control, we're going to be unable to
> > keep to the scheduled date of March 15th for the release of FC5 and
> > instead are going to have to make the release date Monday, March 20th.
> > While unfortunate in some ways, this gives us
Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> Every one in a while the problem of repository scoring comes up (maybe
> under a different name, but I chose this one): The wish of users to
> give different RPM repositories different "rights" with respect to the
> packages that can be installed from the various sources, m
Horst von Brand writes:
> Philippe Rigault wrote:
>
> > > Due to circumstances outside of our control, we're going to be
> > > unable to keep to the scheduled date of March 15th for the
> > > release of FC5 and instead are going to have to make the
> > > release date Monday, March 20th. Wh
Hi.
Horst von Brand wrote:
> > * I do not know if such a change can be made while retaining backwards
> > compatibility to older RPM versions (if this is desired, that is)
>
> You are proposing a scheme that doesn't touch the RPM format itself, so
> I don't see how this would enter here.
The
hello,
as one of the core features of fc5 will be final gnome 2.14, I tried
to match up what described at gnome.org "A look at Gnome 2.14" (see
http://www.gnome.org/%7Edavyd/gnome-2-14/), that seems to me a sort of
manifesto of the new functionalities a user will find in upcoming
gnome 2.14, with
The grub documentation includes provides kernel failover provisions, but
these don't appear to work.
http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/Making-your-system-robust.html#Making-your-system-robust
Should I expect this to work? Is there some other mechanism to boot a
different kernel ju
The grub documentation includes provides kernel failover provisions, but
these don't appear to work.
http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/Making-your-system-robust.html#Making-your-system-robust
Should I expect this to work? Is there some other mechanism to boot a
different kernel ju
Right,
the main implication of running in "noapic" mode is a performance hit, as
interrupts are not handled as efficiently. For systems that are heavily
interrupt driven (includes those that have a lot of network traffic such as
web servers) this might be measurable. Nonetheless, the benefits of S
This test *must* depend on your actual hardware, so the value given has to
be taken with a grain of salt and is probably a lower bound. On my IBM
ThinkPad T23, the "gnome-terminal" benchmark takes more than a 1/2 a minute!
Of course, as indicated for 25x80 and fixed font.
> bench this? - gnome t
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Janina Sajka wrote:
> The grub documentation includes provides kernel failover provisions, but
> these don't appear to work.
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/Making-your-system-robust.html#Making-your-system-robust
>
> Should I expect this to work? Is ther
Janina Sajka wrote:
The grub documentation includes provides kernel failover provisions, but
these don't appear to work.
http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/Making-your-system-robust.html#Making-your-system-robust
Should I expect this to work?
...
Is there some other mechanism
Hapy Birthday To You
Hapy Birthday To You
Hapy Birthday Dear Jesse
Hapy Birthday To You
Cheers mate!;-)
--
Igor Jagec
Le lundi 13 mars 2006 à 19:37 +0100, Paul Wouters a écrit :
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Janina Sajka wrote:
>
> > The grub documentation includes provides kernel failover provisions, but
> > these don't appear to work.
> >
> > http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/Making-your-system-robust.
On dual athlon MP 2200+ (1800): 5.6 secs
On PIV 2.8GHz: 6.5
On laptop Dell C640 (PIV Mob 1.8GHz): 10.2
It is strange nevertheless to say 1 sec... a typo or an overestimating..
Happy Birthday, Jesse
Chitlesh
--
http://clunixchit.blogspot.com
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 20:00 -0700, Dax Kelson wrote:
> Just a FYI.
>
> On my FC4, LVM using, laptop I created a LV to install rawhide on. I
> tried installing a March 11th 2006 rawhide tree. But ananconda bombed
> out when I tried to do a custom layout and tried to assign "/" to the
> previously c
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 20:19 +0100, Igor Jagec wrote:
> Cheers mate!;-)
Heh! In light of the slip and all that, I needed this. Cheers!
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Janina Sajka wrote:
Should I expect this to work? Is there some other mechanism to boot a
different kernel just once--on the next boot?
http://togami.com/~warren/guides/remoteraidcrazies/
My guide here has an example of using grub's savedefault --default X
--once directives in order to specif
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 11:00 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:
> Rodd Clarkson wrote :
>
> > Would you like to explain to the masses (or maybe just me) how you got
> > SD/MMC support working in Fedora.
> >
> > I notice that 'modprobe mmc_block' now installs the modules needed, but
> > beyond this it's n
Short version
==
Nvidia Nforce4 chipset with Maxtor SATA II drives with certain firmware
revisions cause data corruption and system instability.
This was acknowledged just in the last few weeks, see:
http://maxtor.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/maxtor.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=2685
Does anyone have a simple perl or shell script that will run a set of
commands on a number of machines?
For example install a perl cpan module on 50 machines, listed in a file.
I've very much a beginner when it comes to shell scripting.
Many thanks in advance!
Mark
Maccy wrote:
Does anyone have a simple perl or shell script that will run a set of
commands on a number of machines?
Sorry, but this is pretty off topic. Please find help elsewhere. -mf
--
Michael Favia michael.fa...@insitesinc.com
Insites Incorporated http://michael.insitesinc.com
I there some docs (FAQ/ReleaseNotes?) that describe how to make changes
to policy in FC5?
On Sat, 2006-03-11 at 04:41 -0500, Build System wrote:
>
> Updated Packages:
So uh... yeah. This seems to have gotten stuck in a mail queue
somewhere. Don't panic (:
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Warren Togami writes:
> Janina Sajka wrote:
> >
> >Should I expect this to work? Is there some other mechanism to boot a
> >different kernel just once--on the next boot?
>
> http://togami.com/~warren/guides/remoteraidcrazies/
> My guide here has an example of using grub's savedefault --default X
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 18:56 +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> - You've Got The Whole World In Your Hand
> deskbar-applet is at the moment in extras. Ok on x86; it doesn't work
> for me on x86_64 (I'm going to open bugzilla point): the icon stays
> grey and I'm not able to wwrite in it...
Is this wit
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 18:36 -0500, Janina Sajka wrote:
> Warren Togami writes:
> > Janina Sajka wrote:
> > >
> > >Should I expect this to work? Is there some other mechanism to boot a
> > >different kernel just once--on the next boot?
> >
> > http://togami.com/~warren/guides/remoteraidcrazies/
> >
41 matches
Mail list logo
