in case you have accepted to put such packages in the repo
please maintain a wiki page listing all of them so that we can add
exclude for all of them in
fedora .repo files
sorry, but our users trust us [in ojuba.org spin] to provide packages
that respect our family values and moralities
--
On Thu May 28 2009, Jon Stanley wrote:
Well, I have nothing on the agenda for tomorrow's meeting at this
point. Thus, the entire meeting taking place at 17:00UTC in
#fedora-meeting will be an open floor, unless someone comes up with
something to discuss between now and then :).
There is a
comps group or force some %group in spec files or modify pkgdb to have
tags or any thing, I just need to know all such packages them
regarding the output of yum search, yes I expected that from the post
of Mathieu Bridon (bochecha), and I was shocked it was there!!
anyway, I really need a list
The problem with a comps group is that it will lead to having a group
in graphical installers
although in ojuba we use ourown comps files, but this is a catastrophe
because they are merged!
I guess there is an option for hidden groups
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Mathieu Bridon
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:05:01AM +0300, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
in case you have accepted to put such packages in the repo
please maintain a wiki page listing all of them so that we can add
exclude for all of them in
fedora .repo files
sorry, but our users trust us [in ojuba.org spin] to
IMHO it is not Fedora's job to define family values moralities. Such
morals/values will vary all around the world
I don't want fedora to define such things, we have our own values predefined.
it should not make my job finding suck packages difficult
we have more than 10,000 packages in the
On 05/29/2009 03:00 PM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
IMHO it is not Fedora's job to define family values moralities. Such
morals/values will vary all around the world
I don't want fedora to define such things, we have our own values predefined.
it should not make my job finding suck packages
Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
in case you have accepted to put such packages in the repo
please maintain a wiki page listing all of them so that we can add
exclude for all of them in
fedora .repo files
sorry, but our users trust us [in ojuba.org spin] to provide packages
that respect our family values
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 4:50 AM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3d)
frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
in case you have accepted to put such packages in the repo
please maintain a wiki page listing all of them so that we can add
exclude for all of them in
fedora .repo files
sorry,
On Viernes 29 Mayo 2009 11:38:21 Rahul Sundaram escribió:
On 05/29/2009 03:00 PM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
IMHO it is not Fedora's job to define family values moralities. Such
morals/values will vary all around the world
I don't want fedora to define such things, we have our own values
2009/5/29 Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com:
http://images.howtoforge.com/images/the_perfect_desktop_linux_mint_7_gloria/15.jpg
I saw this and thought that it would also be a nice idea to have in
fedora, like a welcome screen Wellcome to Fedora or something
similar...
What are your
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:30:45PM +0300, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
IMHO it is not Fedora's job to define family values moralities. Such
morals/values will vary all around the world
I don't want fedora to define such things, we have our own values predefined.
it should not make my job finding
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 02:23:23PM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:33 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
There is a proposed Feature that connot be completed because kernel module
packages are prohibited in Fedora:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/VirtualBox
Maybe the
On 05/29/2009 02:07 PM, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
There is no video, only a few harmless static drawings in PNG format.
from : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gnaughty
Gnaughty is an utility to automatically download adult sex content,
i.e.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Jussi Lehtola
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:33 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
There is a proposed Feature that connot be completed because kernel module
packages are prohibited in Fedora:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Chitlesh GOORAH
chitlesh.goo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Kushal Das wrote:
Yes that is true , but it does not provide any support to view that
content, we have many other packages in Fedora which allows to
download content and they
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Nicu Buculei nicu_fed...@nicubunu.ro wrote:
Movies in proprietary formats can be downloaded also with Firefox,
Transmission, wget, etc.
From the description of gnaughty I understand it can also download images,
which are in free formats, so the content is in
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Kushal Das wrote:
As you said, no opensource simulator, but we have opensource viewer :)
Fedora doesn't ship a video viewer which supports proprietary formats
out of the box.
For me this package goes to rpmfusion.
Chitlesh
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Kushal Das wrote:
Yes that is true , but it does not provide any support to view that
content, we have many other packages in Fedora which allows to
download content and they download whatever format the site is
providing, how the
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 01:40:36PM +0200, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Nicu Buculei nicu_fed...@nicubunu.ro wrote:
Movies in proprietary formats can be downloaded also with Firefox,
Transmission, wget, etc.
From the description of gnaughty I understand it can also
On Viernes 29 Mayo 2009 13:40:36 Chitlesh GOORAH escribió:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Nicu Buculei nicu_fed...@nicubunu.ro
wrote:
Movies in proprietary formats can be downloaded also with Firefox,
Transmission, wget, etc.
From the description of gnaughty I understand it can also
On 05/29/2009 05:21 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
!
One interesting thing - does it download free content? Are there some porn
sites under CC licence? Free culture, by community for community...
There is and no, I am not linking to them, here.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Chitlesh GOORAH
chitlesh.goo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Internet is for porn...
Sorry I don't know this software but as someone already pointed - it's
opensource, it can be used to download other content. It's
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Rahul Sundaram
sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
My packaging survey turned up a interesting suggestion
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-May/msg01809.html
We don't currently have any guidelines covering this but considering the
Debian action
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:11 PM, sankarshan wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Rahul Sundaram
sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
My packaging survey turned up a interesting suggestion
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-May/msg01809.html
We don't currently have any
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
IMHO it is not Fedora's job to define family values moralities.
Such morals/values will vary all around the world, such that no
single list Fedora makes would be satisfactory. If a derived spin
wants to define a set of morals values then the burden should be
on
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Florian Festi ffe...@redhat.com wrote:
Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
Following your logic, OVM should enter fedora collection as well. !!
It really doesn't matter how often you repeat a wrong sentence.
There are different rules that do apply to code and content in
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:20 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:05:01AM +0300, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
in case you have accepted to put such packages in the repo
please maintain a wiki page listing all of them so that we can add
exclude for all of them in
fedora
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:16 PM, inode0 ino...@gmail.com wrote:
True. Someone should ask the question: does it make sense to have
different rules if they prevent the inclusion of useful content and
allow the inclusion of useless code?
Which is useless to me can be very useful to someone else.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:20 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:05:01AM +0300, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
in case you have accepted to put such packages in the repo
please maintain a wiki page listing
Dennis J., Thu, 28 May 2009 21:02:05 +0200:
Murder is a crime, pornography isn't
There are many states (including many states of USA) where it is.
Matěj
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Kushal Das kushal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:16 PM, inode0 ino...@gmail.com wrote:
True. Someone should ask the question: does it make sense to have
different rules if they prevent the inclusion of useful content and
allow the inclusion of
Till Maas, Fri, 29 May 2009 15:01:29 +0200:
It seems more to me, that the Feature owner does not care, because the
package is very incomplete and I got no response from my comment in
December 2008 that Virtualbox won't make it into Fedora. Btw. how does
the Feature owner delete the page? It
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 03:08:21PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
The problem, how do we determine what is offensive to any particular
group? Some people consider 3D shooter games offensive. This is slippery
slope. Unless there is a legal issue, I believe Fedora is going to end
up with that
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 01:24:14PM +0200, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
No, it doesn't (not till it is approved) not depend on the user's
choice. My package OVM was blocked by FESCo because there was no
opensource simulator. So if the downloaded videos aren't under an
opensource compatible format,
On Fri May 29 2009, Matej Cepl wrote:
Till Maas, Fri, 29 May 2009 15:01:29 +0200:
It seems more to me, that the Feature owner does not care, because the
package is very incomplete and I got no response from my comment in
December 2008 that Virtualbox won't make it into Fedora. Btw. how does
Matej Cepl wrote:
Moreover, it has been included in The Repository Which Shall Not Be Named.
You mean we should not name RPM Fusion? Or link to http://rpmfusion.org/ ?
Well, maybe I'll make an effort not to name RPM Fusion. But then again, I
think I actually won't make an effort not to name RPM
Compose started at Fri May 29 06:15:04 UTC 2009
Updated Packages:
anaconda-11.5.0.57-1.fc11
-
* Thu May 28 2009 Chris Lumens clum...@redhat.com - 11.5.0.57-1
- Create and use unique ids for Device instances. (#500808) (dlehman)
- Adjust remaining PartitionDevices' names
Josh Boyer wrote:
Or perhaps a future FESCo will revist kmods.
FWIW, I'd certainly vote for a proposal to allow kmods if I get into FESCo
and may even bring such a proposal in front of the new FESCo (though IMHO
it should not be the old regime with explicit FESCo approval for each, that
didn't
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Josh Boyer wrote:
Or perhaps a future FESCo will revist kmods.
FWIW, I'd certainly vote for a proposal to allow kmods if I get into FESCo
and may even bring such a proposal in front of the new FESCo (though IMHO
it should not be the old regime with
inode0 wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Kushal Das kushal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:16 PM, inode0 ino...@gmail.com wrote:
True. Someone should ask the question: does it make sense to have
different rules if they prevent the inclusion of useful content and
allow the
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Rahul Sundaram
sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi
I did a quick survey from Fedora on what software Fedora users are using
that is not available in the repo. Here are the results. If you find
anything interesting, feel free to pick it up.
Kevin Kofler, Fri, 29 May 2009 15:30:29 +0200:
You mean we should not name RPM Fusion?
You can. I probably can as well too (I haven't checked lately), but it is
just such fun not to name it. :)
Matěj
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Patrick MONNERAT p...@datasphere.ch wrote:
Hello list,
Package WebCalendar
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231) is awaiting review for 5
month already.
I will be glad to review another package in counterpart of this one's review.
If you're going to maintain a spin for a like-minded community (like
ojuba.org is)
have you took a look to the proposal ?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/InappropriateContents
where does it mention anything about the alike-minded community of
fanatic government censorship
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 16:28 +0200, Dennis J. wrote:
On 05/29/2009 03:27 PM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
Where do you anything about family values and moralities in Fedora's
mission statement? I see statements about software being free to use,
that's why I said us [in ojuba.org] as I'm member
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:40 -0400, David Nalley wrote:
Package WebCalendar
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231) is awaiting review for
5 month already.
I'll grab it
Many thanks, David.
I do not find any pending new review request from you just now, but if
you have
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 03:33:37PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Josh Boyer wrote:
Or perhaps a future FESCo will revist kmods.
FWIW, I'd certainly vote for a proposal to allow kmods if I get into FESCo
and may even bring such a proposal in
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 05/29/2009 02:10 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
The problem with a comps group is that it will lead to having a group
in graphical installers
although in ojuba we use ourown comps files, but this is a catastrophe
because they are merged!
I guess
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:02:23AM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 05/29/2009 02:10 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
The problem with a comps group is that it will lead to having a group
in graphical installers
although in ojuba we use ourown comps
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
it's the job for those who care to check this list and take their own
subset from it according to their own definition.
Couldn't it be the job of those who care to maintain this list in the
first
We had a really long debate about this package in #fedora-devel
yesterday and it basically boils down to
1) Need fedora-legal to check the legality of the app not verifying
user's age and legality of the URL of the site being in the C source.
2) If fedora-legal say it is legal, then its up to the
On 05/29/2009 04:24 AM, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Kushal Das wrote:
Yes that is true , but it does not provide any support to view that
content, we have many other packages in Fedora which allows to
download content and they download whatever format the site is
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Adam Miller wrote:
We had a really long debate about this package in #fedora-devel
yesterday and it basically boils down to
1) Need fedora-legal to check the legality of the app not verifying
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:53 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
- If a driver is headed upstream, and is needed... just add it to the kernel
package proper
Not just driver. We said that the kernel team could choose to include
any out of tree stuff they deem acceptable, but they would include it in
Hiyas,
the Security spin[0] categorizes several security related packages in
categories like Wireless or Forensics. It would be useful to have this
information also in comps, so one can easier search for e.g. Forensics
software available in Fedora.
Is it ok if I just add such groups to comps
On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:03:59 +0300
Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
as I said I don't want you to tag them I want you to limit the list
for me from more than 10,000 package which increases at arbitrary time
to tens of packages on a wiki that I can //watch// (a feature of the
wiki)
Deciding whether to
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 11:02 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
- firefox
- yum
These are a bit rediculous and you know it. Neither of these come
pre-configured to get to the content. You have to actively seek it out.
gnaughty doesn't require that, it's
inode0 wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Florian Festi ffe...@redhat.com wrote:
inode0 wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Kushal Das kushal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:16 PM, inode0 ino...@gmail.com wrote:
True. Someone should ask the question: does it make sense
- yum
as I said I demand for a list even if it's with false positives
Couldn't it be the job of those who care to maintain this list in the
first place ?
no problem, just give me a procedural way other than watching all
packages in pkgdb [so that I catch them before they are submitted to
the
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 13:51 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Sorry I don't know this software but as someone already pointed - it's
opensource, it can be used to download other content.
Actually it can't. It's hard coded to download the porn from one
specific website that acts as a porn
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 12:50 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
It is not Fedora's place to police *usage* of apps, only whether the
app
or package has a compliant license and follows the defined packaging
legal rules. If the tool were directly
Very long thread deleted.
Could we all cool it a bit and think for a bit about the following questions
1) Does this discussion need to occur right before a release where
there are bigger problems to test/find.
2) Are we discussing anything. People are stating their points of view
but its all a
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
stop censorship conspiracy theory.
I don't care what does the the law in US, UK, AU say
I care about the little daughter of some brother in this universe.
just so we're clear - you might want to be careful about the use of
the word demand. At
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Muayyad AlSadi als...@gmail.com wrote:
- yum
as I said I demand for a list even if it's with false positives
Demand, again, has he learned anything? This is ridiculous, somebody ban
this guy.
--
projecthuh.com
All of my bits are free, are yours?
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 17:29 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
Hiyas,
the Security spin[0] categorizes several security related packages in
categories like Wireless or Forensics. It would be useful to have this
information also in comps, so one can easier search for e.g. Forensics
software
* Muayyad AlSadi [29/05/2009 18:08] :
as I said I demand for a list even if it's with false positives
That's simple.
Treat all packages in the repo as having inappropriate content.
Emmanuel
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Florian Festi ffe...@redhat.com wrote:
inode0 wrote:
To lead the advancement of free and open source software and content
as a collaborative community.
That is the mission statement of what project?
The Fedora Project with is close but not exactly the same
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 12:02 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
and I think the distinction being made is that the bookmarks and menu
items are content-only, not software.
So an application that reads the included above mentioned bookmarks to
let you click to go to those sites is OK? Bookmarks alone,
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 05/29/2009 08:40 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
we're on a silly slope and putting provides tags into certain pkgs is
just plain dumb - wanna put a wiki page up - that's fine.
polluting provides tags is not a good plan.
Here's a proposal then:
Dr. Diesel wrote:
Demand, again, has he learned anything? This is ridiculous, somebody ban
this guy.
That's just the language barrier. E.g. in French, demander is more
like request than demand. English is clearly not his first language,
possibly not even his second language, I don't think he
On 05/29/2009 04:34 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Dennis J. (denni...@conversis.de) said:
I wrote a proposal
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/InappropriateContents
I don't think you can just flag Packages as inappropriate because
everyone has his own definition for that term. If
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 11:09 -0500, Dr. Diesel wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Muayyad AlSadi als...@gmail.com
wrote:
- yum
as I said I demand for a list even if it's with false
positives
Demand, again, has he learned anything? This is
or some sort of power.
hmmm, I guess it's the power of friendship :-)
seriously, I'm sorry, I did not meant it like that,
no problem, I request that whenever someone pack a package that he
does not want his 8 years old daughter to add it to the list
as I don't care for false positives like
Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
- yum
as I said I demand for a list even if it's with false positives
Couldn't it be the job of those who care to maintain this list in the
first place ?
no problem, just give me a procedural way other than watching all
packages in pkgdb [so that I catch
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 12:02 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
and I think the distinction being made is that the bookmarks and menu
items are content-only, not software.
So an application that reads the included above mentioned bookmarks to
let you click
What is the most recent Devel-Spin?
Will there be one for GA?
Frank
--
msn: frankly3d skype: frankly3d
Mailing-List Reply to: Mailing-List
Still Learning, Unicode where possible
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
don't think of that list/tags as censor ship,it's just an advice from a friend.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 05/29/2009 05:02 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 05/29/2009 02:10 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
The problem with a comps group is that it will lead to having a group
in graphical installers
although in ojuba we use ourown comps files, but this is a
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 17:40 +0300, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
no I mean inspecting a list of tens of packages would be much simpler
than inspecting all the tens of thousands of packages
You're just transferring the work. In order to *generate* the list of
tens of packages to make _your_ life
Dennis J. (denni...@conversis.de) said:
At which point, you need some sort of review board, where then every
package gets something like:
- TuxPaint is rated E for Everyone
- quake3 is rated T for violent content
- tcl is rated M for inappropriate language
I'm going to go out on a limb
On 05/29/2009 09:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:53 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
kernel-2.6.29.4-167.fc11
* Wed May 27 2009 Kyle McMartin k...@redhat.com 2.6.29.4-164
- drm-intel-disable-kms-i8xx.patch: disable KMS by default on 845, 855,
You're just transferring the work. In order to *generate* the list of
tens of packages to make _your_ life easier, someone else has to inspect
the tens of thousands of packages.
and the someone else you refer to is fedora censorship board!
no no like that,
I asked for a unified place to put
On 05/29/2009 09:27 PM, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:
By refusing kmods, we have more motivation to actually try and include
upstream what we really need to use. If we can simply install the
kmod, who cares if it's upstreamed ?
We generally do care about whether something is upstream or
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
* Wed May 27 2009 Kyle McMartin k...@redhat.com 2.6.29.4-164
- drm-intel-disable-kms-i8xx.patch: disable KMS by default on 845, 855,
and 865. It can be forced on with i915.modeset=1 boot parameter.
The last change on 167 says that KMS is disabled on these chipsets.
On 05/29/2009 07:34 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
I don't think JEP should be on that list. I've used it in few
commercial products and its a thousand dollars a pop for a source code
licence:
http://www.singularsys.com/order/
JEP in the wiki is linked to http://sourceforge.net/projects/jep/. Are
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 19:49 +0300, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
You're just transferring the work. In order to *generate* the list of
tens of packages to make _your_ life easier, someone else has to inspect
the tens of thousands of packages.
and the someone else you refer to is fedora censorship
On 05/29/2009 09:47 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
There is a solution to this particular point, which it seems many who
use kmods don't seem to know about: akmods. Install the akmod for your
kmod, and if the pre-built kmod hasn't yet been updated when a new
kernel is released, the akmod handles
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 09:00 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
Then do you find it OK to package up a bunch of packages that provide
nothing but gnome or KDE menu entries that launch porn internet sites?
I am heartily interested in your ideas and wish to read your pamphlet!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora
On 05/29/2009 06:48 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Dennis J. (denni...@conversis.de) said:
At which point, you need some sort of review board, where then every
package gets something like:
- TuxPaint is rated E for Everyone
- quake3 is rated T for violent content
- tcl is rated M for inappropriate
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 22:17 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/29/2009 09:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:53 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
kernel-2.6.29.4-167.fc11
* Wed May 27 2009 Kyle McMartin k...@redhat.com 2.6.29.4-164
-
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Rahul Sundaram
sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 05/29/2009 07:34 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
I don't think JEP should be on that list. I've used it in few
commercial products and its a thousand dollars a pop for a source code
licence:
On 05/29/2009 10:47 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
As of 2008-09-29 23:14, this project may now be found at:
http://www.singularsys.com/jep;
Wouldn't older versions still exist under the open source license? Are
they still useful?
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On 05/29/2009 10:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
* Wed May 27 2009 Kyle McMartin k...@redhat.com 2.6.29.4-164
- drm-intel-disable-kms-i8xx.patch: disable KMS by default on 845, 855,
and 865. It can be forced on with i915.modeset=1 boot parameter.
The last change on 167
Mat Booth wrote:
Yes, I think we are. At the very top of the page you link to it says:
As of 2008-09-29 23:14, this project may now be found at:
http://www.singularsys.com/jep;
So that's one of those evil packages which has switched to become non-Free.
People caring about it need to organize
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:00 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 05/29/2009 09:47 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
There is a solution to this particular point, which it seems many who
use kmods don't seem to know about: akmods. Install the akmod for your
kmod, and if the pre-built kmod hasn't yet
You're just transferring the work. In order to *generate* the list of
tens of packages to make _your_ life easier, someone else has to inspect
the tens of thousands of packages.
I forgot to mention that I'm not the only one who cares
think of OLPC having a pre-installed something similar to
Patrick MONNERAT wrote:
Hello list,
Package WebCalendar
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231) is awaiting review for 5
month already.
I will be glad to review another package in counterpart of this one's review.
Thanks in advance.
Patrick
I have a webcalendar
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 09:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 11:15 +0100, Frank Murphy (Frankly3d) wrote:
But I think morality it is delving away from fedora,
unless it is global socially objectionable,
maybe Child-Porn.
I see this is this week's merry train-wreck of
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:32:25 -0700,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
NVIDIA and ATI are the major use case for MDV (and, frankly, for RPM
Fusion), so I came around to the view that it isn't really a good idea
to have kmods or DKMS in Fedora; the major use case for them doesn't
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
