On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> USB is an irritating protocol that requires USB controllers to remain
> active whenever a device is attached, even if that device is doing
> nothing.
Is this somewhat addressed in the USB3 specs?
--
Gianluca Sforna
http://morefedora.blog
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Michal Nowak wrote:
> Just noticed Canonical is pushing GRUB 2 as default in
> Ubuntu 9.10 [1]. There are some hints on testing [2] and
> from what I can see there are 40 bugs opened against
> GRUB 2 in launchpad [3] v. zero in our Bugzilla.
>
> Was wondering what'
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Warren Togami wrote:
setarch i386 chroot /path/to/i586root
Do this and yum will behave properly.
Ok, that should improve things if I want to do a series of installs.
Thanks!
It's still extra typing though. Also, any ideas on having the x86_64
kernel auto-updated (while
Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira wrote:
> In portuguese we don't have acent in the c
But other languages do have ć, so it's only logical that accent+c produces
it.
Use [RAlt]+[,] and [c] to get ç.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.
2009/6/10 King InuYasha :
> I would like to see GRUB Legacy replaced in Fedora 12 with GRUB 2,
> especially with a couple odd systems here that don't seem to like GRUB
> Legacy all that much
Actually the reverse is true, in that you will find that GRUB 2 will
support fewer machines than GRUB
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name):
> dinotrace
Does bodhi send you an email for each comment on
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ ?
The broken dependency being fixed.
Chitlesh
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedo
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le lundi 08 juin 2009 à 20:13 +0200, Florian Festi a écrit :
This approach has several shortcomings (forgetting the technical
details). It requires a lot of data be shipped with each package.
I think you misunderstood me. I'd want the definition for %font of %
icon-dir
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 23:11:33 +0200, SmootherFrOgZ wrote:
> >> list
> I assume that no one have any mono packages to rebuilt.
> then if so, i gonna request a push above packages.
Are F-11 and devel in sync? It seems you have not built any of these
changes for devel (.fc12).
--
fedora-devel-list
When trying to do a yum upgrade from 10 updates-testing to 11
updates-testing, I get the following:
This is due to F11 updates-testing 'vte' package including a newer
version of libvte, but the previous version was not retained. Could
someone push a rebuild of gnome-terminal, gnome-desktop-sh
> When trying to do a yum upgrade from 10 updates-testing to 11
> updates-testing, I get the following:
>
> This is due to F11 updates-testing 'vte' package including a newer version
> of libvte, but the previous version was not retained. Could someone push a
> rebuild of gnome-terminal, gnome-des
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 23:11:33 +0200, SmootherFrOgZ wrote:
>
>> >> list
>
>> I assume that no one have any mono packages to rebuilt.
>> then if so, i gonna request a push above packages.
>
> Are F-11 and devel in sync? It seems you have not b
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 14:58 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
# for /usr/share/gnome/autostart
Requires: gnome-session
Great! This adds
gnome-session: 1.8 MB
control-center: 7.1 MB
GConf2: 5,5 MB
gnome-keyring: 2,3 MB
gnome-vfs2: 3.1 MB
You added at
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:20:42 +0300 (EEST), Pekka wrote:
> When trying to do a yum upgrade from 10 updates-testing to 11
> updates-testing, I get the following:
>
> This is due to F11 updates-testing 'vte' package including a newer
> version of libvte, but the previous version was not retained.
Le Mer 10 juin 2009 10:59, Florian Festi a écrit :
>
> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>> 1. something auto-triggered transparently (didn't we learn anything
>> from
>> existing package triggers?).
>
> I think you make the wrong comparison here (although I admit that the
> matching names make it tempting
Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira wrote:
Hello Guys!
We have a problem with the keyboard Us Internacional.
I'm using Fedora 11 in pt_BR
Looking the file /lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/us-acentos.map.gz, I found
this:
compose '\'' 'C' to 'Ç'
compose '\'' 'c' to 'ç'
This is correct, but, when I press
a brother have reported a problem in sound since F10
and he moved to F11 and he still have the problem
lspci | grep Audio gives
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) HD Audio
Controller (rev 03)
(for more diagnostics see English output in
http://www.linuxac.org/forum/linuxac6
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mer 10 juin 2009 10:59, Florian Festi a écrit :
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
1. something auto-triggered transparently (didn't we learn anything
from
existing package triggers?).
I think you make the wrong comparison here (although I admit that the
Le Mer 10 juin 2009 13:21, Panu Matilainen a écrit :
>
> File triggers are certainly not the holy grail of packaging, they're
> only
> applicaple to a pretty limited set of situations, from the top of my
> head:
>
> 1) Caches updaters which you only want to run once per transaction:
> - ldconfig
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 19:32 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> Through F12 I'm going to be slowly enabling autosuspend on various
> pieces of USB hardware. The aim is to ensure that it's only enabled on
> hardware that supports it. This is going to be a combination of kernel
> modifications and
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 12:25 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> c) Have rpm silently add ownership of unowned directories to the package
> that creates them. This could cause weird directory conflicts when some
> other package actually owns the directory / becomes the owner, and just
> feels wro
Em 10-06-2009 07:32, Bill Crawford escreveu:
Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira wrote:
Hello Guys!
We have a problem with the keyboard Us Internacional.
I'm using Fedora 11 in pt_BR
Looking the file /lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/us-acentos.map.gz, I
found this:
compose '\'' 'C' to 'Ç'
compose '\'' 'c'
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mer 10 juin 2009 13:21, Panu Matilainen a écrit :
File triggers are certainly not the holy grail of packaging, they're
only
applicaple to a pretty limited set of situations, from the top of my
head:
1) Caches updaters which you only want to run
Hello,
I just upgrade to Fedora 11 my virtual box , but I can't build vmware-tools
does anyone succeeded ?
(x86_64 and vmware-tools sources here :
http://download3.vmware.com/software/fusion/VMware-tools-linux-116369.iso
)
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://w
Hi all,
I've been contacted with one man who is using "named" daemon in chroot
environment. In Fedora <= 10 there is script called
"bind-chroot-admin" which synchronized non-chroot and chroot
configuration files (mostly created symlinks to chroot). This script
has been removed in F11 development p
Em 10-06-2009 05:21, Kevin Kofler escreveu:
Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira wrote:
In portuguese we don't have acent in the c
But other languages do have ć, so it's only logical that accent+c produces
it.
Use [RAlt]+[,] and [c] to get ç.
Kevin Kofler
It works, but we can't change the
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:21:07AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira wrote:
> > In portuguese we don't have acent in the c
>
> But other languages do have ć, so it's only logical that accent+c produces
> it.
>
> Use [RAlt]+[,] and [c] to get ç.
>
> Kevin Kofler
He i
Le Mer 10 juin 2009 15:29, Panu Matilainen a écrit :
>
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> And this is why the actual script to do whatever magic it
> needs to do, when it needs to, would be in a distros fontconfig
> package, not rpm.
This is totally orthogonal to invoking this scrip
On 06/10/2009 10:43 AM, Christopher Brown wrote:
2009/6/10 King InuYasha:
I would like to see GRUB Legacy replaced in Fedora 12 with GRUB 2,
especially with a couple odd systems here that don't seem to like GRUB
Legacy all that much
Actually the reverse is true, in that you will find that
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> The first part of this is an upload of libfprint which enables
> autosuspend on fingerprint readers.
Fingerprint readers and other "un-unpluggable" USB laptop stuff
such as flash-readers, bluetooth adapters etc. are perfect candidates
for suspending.
Is there somewhere a
Greetings,
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 01:56:38 Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
[...snipped...]
>
> X86_64 DVD Install. I dropped the max connections and have slowly bumped
> it up from there. Its at 350 now, so I'm now getting 500K/s. Not really
> sure what was going on, when I looked at the peer/seeder
Le Mer 10 juin 2009 16:48, Glauber Costa a écrit :
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:21:07AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira wrote:
>> > In portuguese we don't have acent in the c
>>
>> But other languages do have ć, so it's only logical that accent+c
>> produces
>> it.
>>
>
Le Mer 10 juin 2009 15:28, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
> I think we want something slighly less than this; rpm should track the
> fact that a directory was created just because some files needed to be
> put there, and it should be able to clean up if the last such file is
> removed. But I should n
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 09:15:30AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 19:32 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >
> > Through F12 I'm going to be slowly enabling autosuspend on various
> > pieces of USB hardware. The aim is to ensure that it's only enabled on
> > hardware that suppo
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Christopher Brown wrote:
> 2009/6/10 King InuYasha :
>
> > I would like to see GRUB Legacy replaced in Fedora 12 with GRUB 2,
> > especially with a couple odd systems here that don't seem to like GRUB
> > Legacy all that much
>
> Actually the reverse is true, i
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Dennis J. wrote:
> On 06/10/2009 10:43 AM, Christopher Brown wrote:
>
>> 2009/6/10 King InuYasha:
>>
>> I would like to see GRUB Legacy replaced in Fedora 12 with GRUB 2,
>>> especially with a couple odd systems here that don't seem to like GRUB
>>> Legacy all th
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 05:16:41PM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > The first part of this is an upload of libfprint which enables
> > autosuspend on fingerprint readers.
>
> Fingerprint readers and other "un-unpluggable" USB laptop stuff
> such as flash-readers, bluetoot
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 11:07 -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
> Well, the existing GRUB used in distros was declared Legacy a long
> time ago. GRUB 2 is a rewrite that is supposed to include all the
> features the various vendors have been patching into GRUB Legacy, as
> well as being able to support EF
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 11:07 -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
>
>> Well, the existing GRUB used in distros was declared Legacy a long
>> time ago. GRUB 2 is a rewrite that is supposed to include all the
>> features the various vendors have been patch
drago01 wrote:
>> I have yet to hear of a problem we're actually having that would be
>> solved with grub2.
>
> the version number ;)
>
A better argument than you'd think. The number itself is no big deal, but the
fact that upstream is a hollow void in the universe certainly troubles users
loo
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 18:41 +0200, Dennis J. wrote:
> If that's the case then it obviously makes sense to stick with grub
> "legacy" but given it's status who is going to be upstream for this? What I
> fear is a similar situation like we had with rpm where nobody really took
> ownership and ven
On 06/10/2009 06:36 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 11:07 -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
Well, the existing GRUB used in distros was declared Legacy a long
time ago. GRUB 2 is a rewrite that is supposed to include all the
features the various vendors have been patching into GRUB Lega
2009/6/10 Matthias Clasen :
> On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 18:41 +0200, Dennis J. wrote:
>
>> If that's the case then it obviously makes sense to stick with grub
>> "legacy" but given it's status who is going to be upstream for this? What I
>> fear is a similar situation like we had with rpm where nobody
During the DVD upgrade from F10 -> F11 I encountered the issue that my
yum appears broken now:
"There was a problem importing one of the Python modules
required to run yum. The error leading to this problem was:
No module named yum
Please install a package which provides this module, or
veri
On 06/10/2009 12:05 PM, King InuYasha wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Christopher Brown
> wrote:
>
>> 2009/6/10 King InuYasha :
>>
>>> I would like to see GRUB Legacy replaced in Fedora 12 with GRUB 2,
>>> especially with a couple odd systems here that don't seem to like GRUB
>>> Legacy
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:17:37 +0200 Stefan Grosse
wrote:
SG> During the DVD upgrade from F10 -> F11 I encountered the issue that
SG> my yum appears broken now:
SG>
SG>
SG> "There was a problem importing one of the Python modules
SG> required to run yum. The error leading to this problem was:
SG>
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:17:37 +0200
Stefan Grosse wrote:
> During the DVD upgrade from F10 -> F11 I encountered the issue that my
> yum appears broken now:
First: Note that this is the devel list, please post end user support
questions over on fedora-list?
Did you have 'updates-testing' enabled
Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira wrote:
> Since Fedora 1 and in all others SOs when we choose the
pt_BR language
> and the US Internacional keyboard when we press C + ' we
have = ç
>
> I will report a bug.
>
This is NOT a bug!
I have been using en_US International for many years and in
Canada, wh
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Stefan Grosse wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:17:37 +0200 Stefan Grosse
wrote:
SG> During the DVD upgrade from F10 -> F11 I encountered the issue that
SG> my yum appears broken now:
SG>
SG>
SG> "There was a problem importing one of the Python modules
SG> required to run yu
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mer 10 juin 2009 15:28, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
I think we want something slighly less than this; rpm should track the
fact that a directory was created just because some files needed to be
put there, and it should be able to clean up if the las
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:55:42 -0400 (EDT) Seth Vidal
wrote:
SV> You can try:
SV> 1. download yum 3.2.23 from F11-updates
SV> 2. install it with rpm -Uvh pkg
SV>
SV> or
SV>
SV> 1. export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages
SV> 2. yum update yum
SV>
SV> I'm curious if this second one will
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:43:34 -0600 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
KF> First: Note that this is the devel list, please post end user
KF> support questions over on fedora-list?
Sorry. Mixed that up.
KF> Did you have 'updates-testing' enabled in f10?
Yes. Probably.
Thanks
Stefan
--
fedora-devel-list mai
Hi all,
Assuming all goes well with an account system upgrade this week, we're
going to be updating the PackageDB to 0.4 on Monday, June 10. An outage
notification will go out later that tells the exact times. This is just
a note that anyone who has scripts hitting the package database for
infor
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 13:45 +0300, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> a brother have reported a problem in sound since F10
> and he moved to F11 and he still have the problem
> lspci | grep Audio gives
> 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) HD Audio
> Controller (rev 03)
> (for more di
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 17:04 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 09:15:30AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 19:32 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > >
> > > Through F12 I'm going to be slowly enabling autosuspend on various
> > > pieces of USB hardware. The
We've had a very productive 3 days here at the Fedora Activity Day. Our
wiki page [1] details what we came here to as well as gobby logs of our
work in progress.
Yesterday we identified a number of proposals we could make to resolve
many of the issues we've talked about, and today we created a se
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:30:37 -0400, James wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 20:22 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> > > Given you are
> > > trying to update via. yum, just enabling updates-testing should be the
> > > most fun :). Or you can always just download the above yum, and use yum
> > > shell to upda
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> The
> issue is more about letting the *bus* power down. How much we save will
> depend on the specific bus layout on a given machine, and also whether
> we can successfully autosuspend all of the drivers.
Modern machines are full of (mostly empty) buses, so there is ho
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 11:07 -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
>
> > Well, the existing GRUB used in distros was declared Legacy a long
> > time ago. GRUB 2 is a rewrite that is supposed to include all the
> > features the various vendors have been
thanks, that's useful
I'll try to make an rpm for hda-verb
and make a brother of mine test it
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 06/10/2009 03:30 PM, philippe makowski wrote:
Hello,
I just upgrade to Fedora 11 my virtual box , but I can't build vmware-tools
does anyone succeeded ?
(x86_64 and vmware-tools sources here :
http://download3.vmware.com/software/fusion/VMware-tools-linux-116369.iso
)
This is off-topic for
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 06:41:55PM +0200, Dennis J. wrote:
> [..] with fedoras "stay close to upstream" mantra.
I'm glad somebody said it.
Can someone summarise what the problems are with GRUB2?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 't
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Dennis J. wrote:
> On 06/10/2009 06:36 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 11:07 -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
>>
>> Well, the existing GRUB used in distros was declared Legacy a long
>>> time ago. GRUB 2 is a rewrite that is supposed to include all
On Wednesday, June 10 2009, Richard W.M. Jones said:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 06:41:55PM +0200, Dennis J. wrote:
> > [..] with fedoras "stay close to upstream" mantra.
>
> I'm glad somebody said it.
>
> Can someone summarise what the problems are with GRUB2?
grub2 is an entirely new codebase an
On Wednesday, June 10 2009, King InuYasha said:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 11:07 -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
> > > Well, the existing GRUB used in distros was declared Legacy a long
> > > time ago. GRUB 2 is a rewrite that is supposed to inclu
On 06/10/2009 05:17 PM, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 10 2009, King InuYasha said:
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 11:07 -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
Well, the existing GRUB used in distros was declared Legacy a long
time ago. G
>> issue is more about letting the *bus* power down. How much we save will
>> depend on the specific bus layout on a given machine, and also whether
>> we can successfully autosuspend all of the drivers.
>
> Modern machines are full of (mostly empty) buses, so there is hope the
> gain will not be i
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Assuming all goes well with an account system upgrade this week, we're
> going to be updating the PackageDB to 0.4 on Monday, June 10. An outage
> notification will go out later that tells the exact times. This is just
> a note
On 2009-06-10 10:39:00 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Assuming all goes well with an account system upgrade this week, we're
> > going to be updating the PackageDB to 0.4 on Monday, June 10. An outage
> > notification will go
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 15:13 -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
> EFI support is not the same as fake-EFI.
Your mail client has atrociously bad indentation. Fix it.
It appears from light googling that what you mean by "fake EFI" is "a
boot loader that fakes enough of EFI to be able to boot OSX on a
non
On 2009-06-10 05:51:13 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
> I think he meant the 16th. Also, there will be python-fedora and FAS
> upgrade on Thursday that includes some minor API changes (and major
> speedups, we hope).
Urgh, sorry for the noise, I meant to say Monday the _15th_.
Thanks,
Ricky
pgp5Wjxya2
On 06/10/2009 02:51 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
> On 2009-06-10 10:39:00 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Assuming all goes well with an account system upgrade this week, we're
>>> going to be updating the PackageDB to 0.4 on Monday,
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 15:13 -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
>
> > EFI support is not the same as fake-EFI.
>
> Your mail client has atrociously bad indentation. Fix it.
>
> It appears from light googling that what you mean by "fake EFI" is "a
>
Fedora Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for x86_64
using the first rawhide of the Fedora 12 development cycle, cut on 6/8/2008.
Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
2 Open Bugs which now build, and can be marked CLOSED RAWHIDE:
pan: [u'476250']
ruby-rpm: [u'465103']
To
Fedora Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for i386
using the first rawhide of the Fedora 12 development cycle, cut on 6/8/2008.
Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
2 Open Bugs which now build, and can be marked CLOSED RAWHIDE:
pan: [u'476250']
ruby-rpm: [u'465103']
Tota
Le mercredi 10 juin 2009 à 17:06 -0500, Matt Domsch a écrit :
> Fedora Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for x86_64
> using the first rawhide of the Fedora 12 development cycle, cut on 6/8/2008.
>
> Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
> Of those expected to ha
Jeremy Katz wrote:
> I need to sit down and figure out where [grub2] is in the realm of capability
> vs our grub[1] these days, but just haven't had enough round 'tuits.
Next year (2010) is the year for new harddrives with a hardware sector size
of 4096 bytes instead of 512. All boot loaders will
Christopher Brown wrote:
> Actually the reverse is true, in that you will find that GRUB 2 will
> support fewer machines than GRUB Legacy. This is why, as the ubuntu
> page quite correctly states, "upgrading a bootloader is at best
> frightening and risky".
But Fedora has been through a lot of "fr
Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Please post the bug number to this list, so that we can
> correctly refute the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505100
I just closed it as NOTABUG.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redha
Am Mittwoch, den 10.06.2009, 17:06 -0500 schrieb Matt Domsch:
> cwickert: gwget,xfce4-clipman-plugin
clipman-plugin is fixed, gwget only fixed in CVS and I'm waiting for the
buildsys to come up again.
Thanks for your report,
Christoph
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 05:03:56PM -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
>Well, not necessarily Mac OS X itself. Wouldn't the Darwin kernel require
>it anyway? I have been installing Chameleon so I could boot the regular
>Darwin kernel and userland because I was told I needed a form of EFI to
>
On 06/10/2009 03:06 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
Thanks Matt!
> python-sqlalchemy-0.5.3-1.fc12 (build/make)
> toshio,ivazquez,shahms,toshio,lmacken,fschwarz
This one looks like it's due to an sqlite upgrade. It builds fine in
F11 with sqlite-3.6.12:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?task
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 05:07:42PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> Fedora Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for i386
> using the first rawhide of the Fedora 12 development cycle, cut on 6/8/2008.
>
> Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
Sereinity noted to me privately that so
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:16:28PM +0200, Denis Leroy wrote:
> On 06/10/2009 03:30 PM, philippe makowski wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >I just upgrade to Fedora 11 my virtual box , but I can't build vmware-tools
> >does anyone succeeded ?
> >
> >(x86_64 and vmware-tools sources here :
> >http://download3.
Maybe I missed something, but it seems that some updates that have been
submitted for F-11 testing are still pending. Any ideas why that is?
--
Bojan
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Bojan Smojver rexursive.com> writes:
> Maybe I missed something, but it seems that some updates that have been
> submitted for F-11 testing are still pending. Any ideas why that is?
I meant to say, submitted over a week ago.
--
Bojan
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redha
On 06/11/2009 07:39 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> Bojan Smojver rexursive.com> writes:
>
>> Maybe I missed something, but it seems that some updates that have been
>> submitted for F-11 testing are still pending. Any ideas why that is?
>
> I meant to say, submitted over a week ago.
They are probab
Rahul Sundaram fedoraproject.org> writes:
> They are probably waiting on rel-eng to sign the packages. If you can be
> more specific, it would be easier to tell you what the status is.
viewvc-1.1.1.
Also, it would be good if various apr-util packages (from F-9 to F-11 could be
pushed to testing
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 17:17:07 -0400,
Jeremy Katz wrote:
> we've been left in a position of maintaining it and we've added some
> real features that have been needed along the way as grub 2's progress
> has been slow at best and some of the design decisions early on were a
I was watching them
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 07:44:24 +0530,
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 06/11/2009 07:39 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> > Bojan Smojver rexursive.com> writes:
> >
> >> Maybe I missed something, but it seems that some updates that have been
> >> submitted for F-11 testing are still pending. Any ideas wh
On 06/10/2009 06:10 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On 06/10/2009 03:06 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
>
> Thanks Matt!
>
>> python-sqlalchemy-0.5.3-1.fc12 (build/make)
>> toshio,ivazquez,shahms,toshio,lmacken,fschwarz
>
Diagnosed as a bug in sqlite-3.6.14. Updating to sqlite-3.6.14.2 should
fix it.
Tic
90 matches
Mail list logo
