Hello all,
While not strictly a -devel issue, the advise I'm seeking does raise an
interesting issue.
I've got a number of workstations running a combination of F9 and F10.
All are using LVM over software RAID5. (DM)
I've done a test upgrade on the workstation (including a partial
migration of
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 01:49:14PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 14:08 +1000, Bradley Baetz wrote:
Hi,
Running F11 (x86_64), I've noticed that not all updates have deltarpms
built for them. It looks like there is one built for the package, but
the source version is
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 08:04:21AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 01:49:14PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 14:08 +1000, Bradley Baetz wrote:
Hi,
Running F11 (x86_64), I've noticed that not all updates have deltarpms
built for them. It looks like there
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 08:04 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 01:49:14PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 14:08 +1000, Bradley Baetz wrote:
Hi,
Running F11 (x86_64), I've noticed that not all updates have deltarpms
built for them. It looks like there
I've had no further replies to:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-June/msg00036.html
So can I take it nobody minds if I add my name to the sig
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Development#Participants
and try get this going again?
Frank
--
jabber | msn | skype:
What happened to these updates?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5739
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5966
Is it a bodhi failure or a human one (both are from the same submitter)
Regards,
Christoph
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
Hi.
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:54:00 -0500, Adam Miller wrote
1) Cisco VPN
I don't use this myself but I was told it just needs these rules, so I
don't see a big issue here:
$IPT -A FORWARD -i $IF -o $INIF -p udp --dport 500 -m state --state
NEW,ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
$IPT -A FORWARD -i
Gilboa Davara wrote:
Far worse, the F9 workstations are reaching EOL, and I cannot install
F10 on them due to known anaconda issue (That was fixed during the F11
devel cycle) so in short, I'm in deep ...
Can you upgrade them by Yum? That should avoid any Anaconda bugs.
Björn Persson
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 15:10 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
What happened to these updates?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5739
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5966
Is it a bodhi failure or a human one (both are from the same submitter)
The
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 16:34 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
Gilboa Davara wrote:
Far worse, the F9 workstations are reaching EOL, and I cannot install
F10 on them due to known anaconda issue (That was fixed during the F11
devel cycle) so in short, I'm in deep ...
Can you upgrade them by
- Original Message -
From: Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca
To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 11:22 PM
Subject: Pulseaudio question...
At the risk of bringing up a touchy subject, I have a couple
On 06/19/2009 07:21 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Quote:
I will post the ks file and the image to fedora-devel list a bit
later.
To me this sounds like a promise.
If this looks like a promise, then I guess every statement of intend
looks like a promise to you. Remember, that you are talking
Compose started at Sat Jun 20 06:15:04 UTC 2009
New package hunspell-ky
Kirghiz hunspell dictionaries
New package hunspell-quh
Quechua, South Bolivia hunspell dictionaries
New package python-urllib2_kerberos
Kerberos over HTTP Negotiate/SPNEGO support for urllib2
New
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 14:50 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 11:48 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 11:55 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 00:40 +0200, Kevin Kofler
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 13:25:26 +0100,
Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
I've had no further replies to:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-June/msg00036.html
So can I take it nobody minds if I add my name to the sig
On 06/13/2009 12:43 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 23:59 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/12/2009 11:35 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Heya,
I've added a patch to bluetoothd in F-12 to support being started via
udev, on-demand. bluetoothd will now only start up when you have a
On 2009-06-20 10:55:20 AM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
While not strictly a -devel issue, the advise I'm seeking does raise an
interesting issue.
I've got a number of workstations running a combination of F9 and F10.
All are using LVM over software RAID5. (DM)
What I would do is see if the Anaconda
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 08:37:40PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
I've orphaned the fxload, unison213, unison227 packages. unison* have
reverted ownership to gemi. fxload now has no maintainer.
Unfortunately, with a young child, busy job, and the fact I switched my
PC to Ubuntu, I'm not
Christoph Wickert wrote:
What happened to these updates?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5739
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5966
Is it a bodhi failure or a human one (both are from the same
submitter)
I believe I've seen this happen when an
On 18/06/09 11:03, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
Its all a matter of how you look at it. If it turns out that a lot of
64bit hardware owners are running 32bit Fedora 11...
It would be useful if anaconda displayed a info box telling people when
they were considering installing 32b Linux on systems with
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506389
--- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-06-20 06:43:27 EDT ---
That's easy enough to check. repoquery, cvs,
21 matches
Mail list logo
