On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> Now that .1 is out, is there anything in particular stopping F-11 from
> having this kernel?
Worth mentioning— .30 makes a non-backwards-compatible BTRFS format change.
So if you go .30 on a BTRFS system you can't go back.
(though, I suppose
Jeroen van Meeuwen, Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:30:46 +0200:
> On Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:13:14 +0200, Julian Aloofi
>> To be honest, I think environments that work like that won't use Fedora
>> anyway if it wasn't supported for at least three, let's say two and a
>> half, years.
>
> Having to agree with you
Toshio Kuratomi writes:
On 07/04/2009 03:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 12:40:44PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
No, not if they bundle the generated auto* files with their tarballs, as
they are supposed to do.
They're not "supposed to do" that. Don't make stuff up
On 07/04/2009 03:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 12:40:44PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> No, not if they bundle the generated auto* files with their tarballs, as
>> they are supposed to do.
>
> They're not "supposed to do" that. Don't make stuff up.
>
It's true t
On Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:13:14 +0200, Julian Aloofi
wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Extended_Life_Cycle reads:
>> Say a desktop environment runs Fedora 9 today, then within a month
>> after Fedora 11 is released, the user can choose to either upgrade to
>> Fedora 10 (N+1), or Fedor
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Extended_Life_Cycle reads:
> Say a desktop environment runs Fedora 9 today, then within a month
> after Fedora 11 is released, the user can choose to either upgrade to
> Fedora 10 (N+1), or Fedora 11 (N+2). This is not considered a suitable
> amount of time f
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 00:22:41 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 23:58:52 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote
>> I wanted to draw your attention to a feature I've proposed for Fedora
>> 12, mysteriously called Extended Life Cycle.
>
> Is it that time of the year again?
BINGO
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Brian Pepple wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 00:22 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> > On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 23:58:52 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote
> > > I wanted to draw your attention to a feature I've proposed for Fedora
> > > 12, mysteriously called Extended Life Cy
On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 00:22 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 23:58:52 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote
> > I wanted to draw your attention to a feature I've proposed for Fedora
> > 12, mysteriously called Extended Life Cycle.
>
> Is it that time of the year again?
Geez, I was go
Hi.
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 23:58:52 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote
> I wanted to draw your attention to a feature I've proposed for Fedora
> 12, mysteriously called Extended Life Cycle.
Is it that time of the year again?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 12:40:44PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> No, not if they bundle the generated auto* files with their tarballs, as
> they are supposed to do.
They're not "supposed to do" that. Don't make stuff up.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redh
I wanted to draw your attention to a feature I've proposed for Fedora
12, mysteriously called Extended Life Cycle.
You can find more details at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Extended_Life_Cycle
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-deve
Ralf Corsepius, Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:29:46 +0200:
> I thought, we banned all non-utf-8 aware packages?
And BTW zsh has been fixed not to corrupt non-ASCII filenames?
Matěj
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Ralf Corsepius, Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:29:46 +0200:
> I thought, we banned all non-utf-8 aware packages?
I agree, who needs grep after all :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194471
Matěj
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/list
>>> I don't see a package review request or any koji builds. Are you sure
>>> it's coming to Fedora?
>>
>> Solang developers need to port it to the newer version of libgda first.
>> Otherwise it would require a compat package to get into the repository.
To be precise, it is actually libgdamm. The
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 18:47:35 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > I hit this as well, rolling back to: glibc-2.10.1-2 got me running again.
>
> It is actually prelink, a fixed prelink is in package CVS, but can't be
> built because libselinux is broken.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=50
On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 12:36:25PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
> On 07/04/2009 11:16 AM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 12:04:44 +, Rawhide Report
> > wrote:
> >
> >> glibc-2.10.90-2
> >> ---
> >> * Thu Jul 02 2009 Andreas Schwab 2.10.90-2
> >> - Update from mast
On 07/04/2009 11:16 AM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 12:04:44 +, Rawhide Report
> wrote:
>
>> glibc-2.10.90-2
>> ---
>> * Thu Jul 02 2009 Andreas Schwab 2.10.90-2
>> - Update from master.
>>
>> * Fri Jun 26 2009 Andreas Schwab 2.10.90-1
>> - Update from master.
>> -
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 12:04:44 +, Rawhide Report
wrote:
> glibc-2.10.90-2
> ---
> * Thu Jul 02 2009 Andreas Schwab 2.10.90-2
> - Update from master.
>
> * Fri Jun 26 2009 Andreas Schwab 2.10.90-1
> - Update from master.
> - Enable multi-arch support on x86/x86-64.
> - Add require
Hi.
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 15:59:46 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote
> Given the fact that F11-xorg actually works on my GM45, while rawhide
> with the mentioned .30 kernel and 2.8 intel driver died various
> horrible deaths without ever producing a picture makes me question
> the general usefulness of th
On Saturday 04 July 2009 03:23:59 am Gregory Hosler wrote:
> SmootherFrOgZ wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Gregory Hosler wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >>> EPEL is now using koji to build instead of plague. please make
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Patrice Dumas wrote:
>> Certainly not. Many very useful package are not utf8 aware
>
> Those packages need to be fixed. It is not acceptable that we ship
> applications which don't work properly in our default locales. You can't
> even open your
Bojan Smojver wrote:
> Now that .1 is out, is there anything in particular stopping F-11 from
> having this kernel?
And why is F10 still stuck on 2.6.27? 2.6.29 has been in updates-testing for
ages now.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://
Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Certainly not. Many very useful package are not utf8 aware
Those packages need to be fixed. It is not acceptable that we ship
applications which don't work properly in our default locales. You can't
even open your files with those broken applications if they're in a
director
Hi.
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 14:15:49 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote
> The fact is that F11 shipped with broken Xv support for old Intel
> chips such as the i855 among other deficiencies. The problem can
> mainly be attributed to the outdated xorg-drv-x11-intel-2.7.0 that
> came with F11. A newer version (2.
Hi,
> The fact is that F11 shipped with broken Xv support for old Intel
> chips such as the i855 among other deficiencies. The problem can
> mainly be attributed to the outdated xorg-drv-x11-intel-2.7.0 that
> came with F11.
The version in F11 isn't really 2.7, its heavily patched as is the kernel
Hi,
The fact is that F11 shipped with broken Xv support for old Intel
chips such as the i855 among other deficiencies. The problem can
mainly be attributed to the outdated xorg-drv-x11-intel-2.7.0 that
came with F11. A newer version (2.8.0) for that driver exists but also
depends on an updated use
On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 11:51:15 +0100,
Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Users with Intel's integrated chips need the updated DRM in that
> kernel. I think that an update is highly recommended.
Where do you think the development of those features has been going on?
Most of that stuff went into the
Compose started at Sat Jul 4 06:15:03 UTC 2009
Updated Packages:
bluez-4.43-2.fc12
-
* Fri Jul 03 2009 Bastien Nocera 4.43-1
- Update to 4.43
* Fri Jul 03 2009 Bastien Nocera 4.43-2
- Up the required udev requires so bluetoothd gets started
on boot when an adapter is present
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Users with Intel's integrated chips need the updated DRM in that
> kernel. I think that an update is highly recommended.
>
> -Ilyes
>
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> > Now that .1 is out, is there anything in p
Hi,
Users with Intel's integrated chips need the updated DRM in that
kernel. I think that an update is highly recommended.
-Ilyes
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> Now that .1 is out, is there anything in particular stopping F-11 from
> having this kernel?
>
> --
> Bojan
>
Now that .1 is out, is there anything in particular stopping F-11 from
having this kernel?
--
Bojan
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Gregory Hosler wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> SmootherFrOgZ wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Gregory Hosler
> wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >>> EPEL is now
Hello everybody,
I was tracing a problem that was no reproducible
getting "Error activating XKB configuration"
as I'm not the only one who got this error, just google for it and see
some times is could be a result of broken language files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487583
but
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 09:29:46PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> I thought, we banned all non-utf-8 aware packages?
Certainly not. Many very useful package are not utf8 aware, at least
many that use motif or the athena widget set. And yes, there are very
useful applications in that case.
More b
Information:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Dracut
Download:
F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=112941
Rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=112940
Bugs can be filed in bugzilla now:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&compone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
SmootherFrOgZ wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Gregory Hosler wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>> EPEL is now using koji to build instead of plague. please make sure that
>>> you
>>> upd
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 23:19 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 15:00 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 10:43:34 +0100,
> > Adam Williamson wrote:
> > >
> > > but it's actually a lot less trouble to just do:
> > >
> > > "tar xf dracut-$version.tar.bz2"
> >
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> I thought, we banned all non-utf-8 aware packages?
Unfortunately, a lot of that crap went in anyway because some reviewers just
don't care. I agree with you that it's a showstopper. Applications which
don't support UTF-8 WILL NOT WORK properly in Fedora's default locales. N
39 matches
Mail list logo
