Re: Feature proposal: Extended Life Cycle Support

On 07/07/2009 06:39 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 16:24 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: If you take into account that the proposal concerns security fixes only, then every update has to be labeled a security update (and preferably have some kind of CVE/bug# attached??). We woul

Re: fedora EPEL packages.

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 02:15:54 -0300, Itamar wrote: > > > since now the people is able to build EPEL packages, > > "since now"? The people have been able to build EPEL packages for > a much longer time. The only thing that's new is that koji+b

Re: fedora EPEL packages.

On 07/09/2009 01:02 PM, yersinia wrote: > If someone want mantain an package for EPEL but the maintainer for > FEDORA don't, it is possible for someone else to do ? Yes. Refer to the EPEL FAQ. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@red

Re: an update to automake-1.11?

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote: > On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 01:17 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > On 07/06/2009 08:09 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote: > > > On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 16:36 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > >> On 07/06/2009 03:57 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote: > > >>> On 7/6

Re: an update to automake-1.11?

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:47 AM, yersinia wrote: > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote: > >> On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 01:17 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> > On 07/06/2009 08:09 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote: >> > > On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 16:36 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> > >> On 0

Re: noarch subpackages

On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. wrote: > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 07:59:43 -0600, Jr. wrote: > > > >> What is the effect on non-Fedora and older distributions (pre F10) if I > >> mark a subpackage (such as documentation) with BuildArch: noarch? > > > > Yo

Re: an update to automake-1.11?

Take 5, take note of Spot's msg. Regards, Frank -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

hall monitor / moderation policies (was: Re: an update to automake-1.11?)

On Thu July 9 2009, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > Perhaps I wasn't clear in my last post. You two need to take this > offlist, or simply let this thread stop by agreeing to disagree. This is > the last friendly warning I'm giving before triggering the "hall > monitor"/"moderation" policies. Is the

Re: readline update?

On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 01:14 +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 12:27 +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > > devtodo-0.1.20-3.fc12 > > I maintain this package in Fedora. Just wrote the author asking for a > clarification on licensing. FYI, I got this reply: Forwarded Mes

Hi help required for setting up a debug setup

Hi, Setup build environment as you said earlier, Thanks for help I did followed all you said. * yum install fedora-rpmdevtools -y yum install rpmdevtools rpmdev-setuptree * I install the srpm as below *rpm -i /home/harsha/Download/wpa_supplicant-0.6.4-2.fc10.src.rpm * every time i will create t

Re: an update to automake-1.11?

Hi. On Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:04:31 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > Perhaps I wasn't clear in my last post. You two need to take this > offlist, or simply let this thread stop by agreeing to disagree. This > is the last friendly warning I'm giving before triggering the "hall > monitor"/"moderati

bodhi error

bodhi -C igraph-0.5.2-1.fc9 dist-f9-updates-candidate qct-1.7-3.fc9dist-f9-updates-candidate python-igraph-0.5.1-3.fc9dist-f9-updates-candidate libotf-0.9.8-1.fc9 dist-f9-updates-candidate igraph-0.5.2-1.fc10

Announcement: Weekly meeting for power management related things each Thursday 15:00 UTC (17:00 CET, 9:00 EST) on #fedora-meeting

Hi everyone. I just wanted to let everyone know that at FUDCon 2009 in Berlin we decided to make the whole power management effort a lot more transparent and do it the "proper" Open Source way. To do that we'll now be holding weekly meetings on the #fedora-meeting channel each Thursday at 15

Re: an update to automake-1.11?

On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: Hi. On Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:04:31 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: Perhaps I wasn't clear in my last post. You two need to take this offlist, or simply let this thread stop by agreeing to disagree. This is the last friendly warning I'm giving before

Re: noarch subpackages

yersinia wrote: > No, it is not right for me. But it's just how things work. We conditionalize such things based on the Fedora (and possibly RHEL if the specfile supports RHEL or EPEL too) version. Our specfiles do not support any other distribution (by design). Kevin Kofler -- fedor

Re: noarch subpackages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 yersinia wrote: > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. > wrote: > >> Michael Schwendt wrote: >> > On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 07:59:43 -0600, Jr. wrote: >> > >> >> What is the effect on non-Fedora and older distributions (pre F10) if I >> >>

Re: noarch subpackages

Kevin Kofler wrote: > Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. wrote: > >> Michael Schwendt wrote: >>> On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 07:59:43 -0600, Jr. wrote: >>> What is the effect on non-Fedora and older distributions (pre F10) if I mark a subpackage (such as documentation) with BuildArch: noarch? >>> >>> You c

Re: multi-distro specs (was noarch subpackages)

Ben Boeckel wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > yersinia wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. >> wrote: >> >>> Michael Schwendt wrote: >>> > On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 07:59:43 -0600, Jr. wrote: >>> > >>> >> What is the effect on non-Fedora and older dis

Re: noarch subpackages

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > yersinia wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. > > wrote: > > > >> Michael Schwendt wrote: > >> > On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 07:59:43 -0600, Jr. wrote: > >> > > >> >> What

Re: multi-distro specs (was noarch subpackages)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. wrote: > Ben Boeckel wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> yersinia wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. >>> wrote: >>> Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jul 200

prelink: is it worth it?

Apparently there was some fun with prelink breaking everything in rawhide recently: . I didn't notice, because like Pete Zaitcev says in the comments, removing prelink is one of the first things I do. I see it as adding unnecessary complexity and

Re: noarch subpackages

Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. wrote: > Does this cover CentOS as well? Yes. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

I am curious as to this answer as well because prelink has been something that actually hurt my netbook in performance so I nuked it. -Adam -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com - () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asci

Fwd: Hi help required for setting up a debug setup

-- Forwarded message -- From: Rahul Sundaram Date: Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:11 PM Subject: Re: Hi help required for setting up a debug setup To: Harsha gowda On 07/09/2009 06:37 PM, Harsha gowda wrote: > > > Hi, > Setup build environment as you said earlier, > Thanks for help > > I

Re: noarch subpackages

yersinia wrote: > No everyone agreed with this or would the spec/rpm version frammentation > go forever. > > http://www.mail-archive.com/rpm-ma...@lists.rpm.org/msg00885.html > > http://www.mail-archive.com/rpm-ma...@lists.rpm.org/msg00939.html People are suggesting unified macros and guidelines

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > I am curious as to this answer as well because prelink has been > something that actually hurt my netbook in performance so I nuked it. > There are also other two big problem, imho, now, with prelink support: 1 - it render impossibile to do

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

Adam Miller wrote: > I am curious as to this answer as well because prelink has been > something that actually hurt my netbook in performance so I nuked it. Performance only ever can be hurt because prelink runs periodically to prelink newly installed code or re-randomize to increase security. pr

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:32:01 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > Apparently there was some fun with prelink breaking everything in rawhide > recently: . I didn't > notice, because like Pete Zaitcev says in the comments, removing prelink is > one of th

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 08:58:08AM -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > Apparently there was some fun with prelink breaking everything in rawhide > > recently: . I didn't > > notice, because like Pete Zaitcev says in the comments, removing prelink is >

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 10:32:01AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > Apparently there was some fun with prelink breaking everything in rawhide > recently: . I didn't > notice, because like Pete Zaitcev says in the comments, removing prelink is > one

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > Adam Miller wrote: > > I am curious as to this answer as well because prelink has been > > something that actually hurt my netbook in performance so I nuked it. > > Performance only ever can be hurt because prelink runs periodically to > pre

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 07:55:38AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > hot disk cache to be fair). The number of cycles for total startup is > representative of the win. I'm not sure that's the case. If I can get a 50% speed up to a program's startup times, that sounds great, but if I then leave that

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Matthew Miller wrote: On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 07:55:38AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote: hot disk cache to be fair). The number of cycles for total startup is representative of the win. I'm not sure that's the case. If I can get a 50% speed up to a program's startup times,

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 05:07:05PM +0200, yersinia wrote: > But something one have to pay a security prize on not disabling it : it > render impossible to have a > centralizzated security integrity management (e.g. rfc.sf.net for example) > or one have to skip from check the prelink binary. Very b

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 10:32:01AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > Apparently there was some fun with prelink breaking everything in rawhide > > recently: . I didn't > > notice, because lik

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 05:07:05PM +0200, yersinia wrote: > > But something one have to pay a security prize on not disabling it : it > > render impossible to have a > > centralizzated security integrity management (e.g. rfc.sf.net for > exa

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 11:08:20AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 07:55:38AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > > hot disk cache to be fair). The number of cycles for total startup is > > representative of the win. > > I'm not sure that's the case. If I can get a 50% speed up

Re: Hi help required for setting up a debug setup

On Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:33:10 +0200, Harsha gowda wrote: > use any kind of debug build where i can debug line by line... If you want to debug wpa_supplicant installed in the system: $ gdb -q wpa_supplicant Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install wpa_supplicant-0.6.8-4.fc11.x86_64 (gdb

Font-Size Problem with liberation-fonts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, currently I am working on a website which should be displayed correctly on Linux and Windows using the "Arial"-Font. I've learned that liberation-fonts are the way to go (because they are metric compatible), and discovered a problem with a font-s

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

On Thu July 9 2009, yersinia wrote: > But something one have to pay a security prize on not disabling it : it > render impossible to have a > centralizzated security integrity management (e.g. rfc.sf.net for example) > or one have to skip from check the prelink binary. Very bad i think. You pay

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Till Maas wrote: > On Thu July 9 2009, yersinia wrote: > > > But something one have to pay a security prize on not disabling it : it > > render impossible to have a > > centralizzated security integrity management (e.g. rfc.sf.net for > example) > > or one have to

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Till Maas wrote: > On Thu July 9 2009, yersinia wrote: >> >> > But something one have to pay a security prize on not disabling it : it >> > render impossible to have a >> > centralizzated security integrity management (e.g. rfc.sf.net for >> example) >> > or one h

Re: bodhi error

On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 07:37:28AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > bodhi -C > igraph-0.5.2-1.fc9 dist-f9-updates-candidate > qct-1.7-3.fc9dist-f9-updates-candidate > python-igraph-0.5.1-3.fc9dist-f9-updates-candidate > libotf-0.9.8-1.fc

Re: Font-Size Problem with liberation-fonts

On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 17:55 +0200, Christian Nolte wrote: > Hi, > > currently I am working on a website which should be displayed correctly > on Linux and Windows using the "Arial"-Font. I've learned that > liberation-fonts are the way to go (because they are metric compatible), > and discovered

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 17:59 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Thu July 9 2009, yersinia wrote: > > > But something one have to pay a security prize on not disabling it : it > > render impossible to have a > > centralizzated security integrity management (e.g. rfc.sf.net for example) > > or one have to

Re: Hi help required for setting up a debug setup

On Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:03:43 +0200, Harsha gowda wrote: > I tried compiling with -O0 ggdb3 > > and installed the rpms & still get symbol not found, > > *[r...@localhost i386]#* gdb -q wpa_supplicant > (no debugging symbols found) I wanted to write it short but it was not clear I see. So just on

Re: Keyboard US Internacional

Em 08-07-2009 01:36, Ding Yi Chen escreveu: - "Rodrigo Padula de Oliveira" wrote: Hello guys. How can we add gtk2-immodules and gtk2-immodule-xim by default in a PT_BR Fedora installation ? We need to correct this problem ASAP for Fedora 10 ,11 and rawhide We are receiving a lot of clai

Re: noarch subpackages

Kevin Kofler wrote: > Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. wrote: > >> Michael Schwendt wrote: >>> On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 07:59:43 -0600, Jr. wrote: >>> What is the effect on non-Fedora and older distributions (pre F10) if I mark a subpackage (such as documentation) with BuildArch: noarch? >>> You can evalu

rawhide report: 20090709 changes

Compose started at Thu Jul 9 06:15:04 UTC 2009 New package daemonize Run a command as a Unix daemon New package ewl Enlightenment Widget Library New package gir-repository Introspection for GNOME libraries New package hunspell-am Amharic hunspell dictionaries New p

Re: noarch subpackages

On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 18:28 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote: > > Except it should be: > > %if 0%{?fedora} > 9 || 0%{?rhel} > 5 > > it'd be nice if _all_ packages which have noarch subpackage use this > since most fedora packager reply to my such patches that they don't care > about rhel/centos:-( Thi

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 04:45:55PM +0200, devzero2000 wrote: > 2 - not checked if this problem is actual or not: prelink erases file-based > capabilities And not just that - it nukes other stuff too. Old-style OCaml bytecode programs[1] and there was some MinGW binary problem too, can't find the

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

On Thu July 9 2009, Tomas Mraz wrote: > On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 17:59 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > On Thu July 9 2009, yersinia wrote: > > > But something one have to pay a security prize on not disabling it : > > > it render impossible to have a > > > centralizzated security integrity management (e.

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Till Maas wrote: > On Thu July 9 2009, yersinia wrote: > > > But something one have to pay a security prize on not disabling it : it > > render impossible to have a > > centralizzated security integrity management (e.g. rfc.sf.net for > example) > > or one have to

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

Till Maas wrote: > I fail to understand what is nonsense, since you agree that prelink > performs randomization. If the binary is not prelinked, the kernel randomizes the address spaces at runtime, which is more secure than the prelink-time randomization. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

On Thursday 09 July 2009 10:45:55 am devzero2000 wrote: > There are also other two big problem, imho, now, with prelink support: > > 1 - it render impossibile to do a centralizzated integrity checker (with as > example rfc.sf.net ): very very bad The aide program in rawhide is prelink friendly. So

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Till Maas wrote: > On Thu July 9 2009, yersinia wrote: > > > But something one have to pay a security prize on not disabling it : it > > render impossible to have a > > centralizzated security integrity management (e.g. rfc.sf.net for > example) > > or one have to

Re: noarch subpackages

Jussi Lehtola wrote: > On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 18:28 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote: >> > Except it should be: >> > %if 0%{?fedora} > 9 || 0%{?rhel} > 5 >> >> it'd be nice if _all_ packages which have noarch subpackage use this >> since most fedora packager reply to my such patches that they don't care

Re: rawhide report: 20090709 changes

Hi. On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:42:32 +, Rawhide Report wrote > glibc-2.10.90-3 > --- > * Wed Jul 08 2009 Andreas Schwab 2.10.90-3 > - Reenable setuid on pt_chown. That glibc explodes on my x64 laptop (everything segfaults), reverting to -2 fixes that. -- fedora-devel-list mailing l

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] dracut-0.3

On 07/02/2009 06:59 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote: Here it is, dracut-0.3! Featuring booting from all kind of block devices, NFS, iSCSI and NBD. Dracut is a new initramfs infrastructure. It should replace nash/mkinitrd. Dracut is a feauture for Fedora 12 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Dracut

Re: Font-Size Problem with liberation-fonts

On 09.07.2009 18:16, Yanko Kaneti wrote: On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 17:55 +0200, Christian Nolte wrote: Hi, currently I am working on a website which should be displayed correctly on Linux and Windows using the "Arial"-Font. I've learned that liberation-fonts are the way to go (because they are met

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Steve Grubb wrote: > On Thursday 09 July 2009 10:45:55 am devzero2000 wrote: > > There are also other two big problem, imho, now, with prelink support: > > > > 1 - it render impossibile to do a centralizzated integrity checker (with > as > > example rfc.sf.net ): v

Conditionally applying a patch based on a program's EVR

I want to conditionally apply a patch in a spec file based upon the version of a package. (There's an emacs package that needs a patch to work with the latest version of xemacs, but this patch shouldn't be applied for previous versions of xemacs.) I know that for checking something like Fedora vers

Re: noarch subpackages

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. wrote: > Jussi Lehtola wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 18:28 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote: > >> > Except it should be: > >> > %if 0%{?fedora} > 9 || 0%{?rhel} > 5 > >> > >> it'd be nice if _all_ packages which have noarch subpackage use this > >

Re: Conditionally applying a patch based on a program's EVR

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 09.07.2009 21:59, schrieb Alan Dunn: > I want to conditionally apply a patch in a spec file based upon the > version of a package. (There's an emacs package that needs a patch to > work with the latest version of xemacs, but this patch shouldn't be

Re: noarch subpackages

Lainaus yersinia : On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. wrote: Jussi Lehtola wrote: > This should really be a macro in rpm, as it has to be duplicated in so > many places. Say, %{_noarch_subpackage} which would expand to Yes, it really should. Otherwise, some will look like:

Re: Partitioning error during install

> But the problem I run into (no matter which I install), > is when I get to the partition section. I go to add a partition - not > as a primary (this should allow it to be an extended correct?) - and I > get an error and can't proceed any longer. > > So either anaconda is having problems wi

Re: noarch subpackages

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Jussi Lehtola < jussileht...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Lainaus yersinia : > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. >> wrote: >> >> Jussi Lehtola wrote: >>> >>> > This should really be a macro in rpm, as it has to be duplicated in so >>> > many p

Re: Possible packages...

On Monday 06 July 2009 10:49:31 Eric Sandeen wrote: > Nathanael Noblet wrote: > > On Jul 5, 2009, at 9:33 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: ... > > Well their python run script checks for its dependancies, and if not > > met will do a svn checkout of the right copy, however, they don't keep > > copies of

Re: Possible packages...

On 07/09/2009 02:31 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote: On Monday 06 July 2009 10:49:31 Eric Sandeen wrote: Nathanael Noblet wrote: On Jul 5, 2009, at 9:33 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: .. Well their python run script checks for its dependancies, and if not met will do a svn checkout of the right copy, however

3Dsee.net java applet crashes firefox

I get an intermittant segfault in Firefox [1] when viewing the items in the gallery over at http://3dsee.net/Gallery (once even trashing the display and locking the machine up solid). Should I report this against Firefox or Java? I have the following installed: java-1.5.0-gcj.x86_64

Re: Possible packages...

On Thursday 09 July 2009 17:02:45 Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > On 07/09/2009 02:31 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > On Monday 06 July 2009 10:49:31 Eric Sandeen wrote: > >> Nathanael Noblet wrote: > >>> On Jul 5, 2009, at 9:33 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > .. > >>> Well their python run script checks for

Re: Possible packages...

On Thursday 09 July 2009 17:15:47 Jarod Wilson wrote: > > > Stuff in Fedora, but simply not used for whatever reason: > > > -vobject (we have python-vobject) > > > -pyflakes > > > > I thought they were used if found... I'd have to look at the run file to > > see if they ignore the system versions

Re: 3Dsee.net java applet crashes firefox

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Mat Booth wrote: > I get an intermittant segfault in Firefox [1] when viewing the items > in the gallery over at http://3dsee.net/Gallery (once even trashing > the display and locking the machine up solid). > > Should I report this against Firefox or Java? > > I hav

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 17:06 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > LD_DEBUG=statistics /usr/lib64/openoffice.org3/program/swriter.bin > 11799: > 11799: runtime linker statistics: > 11799: total startup time in dynamic loader: 18632372 clock cycles > 11799: time ne

Re: 3Dsee.net java applet crashes firefox

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Mat Booth wrote: > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Mat Booth wrote: >> I get an intermittant segfault in Firefox [1] when viewing the items >> in the gallery over at http://3dsee.net/Gallery (once even trashing >> the display and locking the machine up solid). >> >

Plan for tomorrow's (20090710) FESCo meeting

Following are the topics to be discussed at tomorrow's FESCo meeting at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on freenode: 178 Application for provenpackager - whot 171 Critical Path Package Proposal 175 Exception to link against bundled copy of crypsetup in volume_key 177 Are the Adobe CMap

Man pages need love from native speakers!

Currently I maintain man-pages-es, man-pages-it, and man-pages-ko. In terms of package maintenance, they are easy and requires low maintenance effort. These packages are also good for a novice packager to get use to the rpm spec. But since I speak none of them, it is better for them to be handled

Re: Man pages need love from native speakers!

On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 11:38 +1000, Ding-Yi Chen wrote: > Currently I maintain man-pages-es, man-pages-it, and man-pages-ko. I could help with the -es manpages, as I also speak Spanish fluently. :) -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) Who am I? :: http://thecodergeek.com/about-me signature.asc Descrip

Re: Conditionally applying a patch based on a program's EVR

On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Alan Dunn wrote: I want to conditionally apply a patch in a spec file based upon the version of a package. (There's an emacs package that needs a patch to work with the latest version of xemacs, but this patch shouldn't be applied for previous versions of xemacs.) I know that