On 7/11/2009 11:53 PM, Eric Springer wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 12:35 PM, David wrote:
>> I am serious here. Really. The names are...?
>
> It's besides the point, but there are quite a few games (World of
> Warcraft, Half-life 2 etc.) that run perfectly under wine. I do think
> Kevin does ne
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 12:35 PM, David wrote:
>
> I am serious here. Really. The names are...?
It's besides the point, but there are quite a few games (World of
Warcraft, Half-life 2 etc.) that run perfectly under wine. I do think
Kevin does need to act a little more maturely though (especially n
On 2009-07-08 01:26:28 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
> Hi, we're following the policy for nonresponsive package maintainers
> again for bug 484855. There hasn't been any update on this breakage in
> the last 3 weeks.
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
> https:/
On 7/11/2009 9:35 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 11, 2009, at 17:03, David wrote:
>
>> On 7/11/2009 6:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> Frank Murphy wrote:
Doesn't seem to work for wine :)
>>>
>>> That's because WINE is only 32-bit, because most Winblow$ executables
>>> are.
>>>
>>>
On Jul 11, 2009, at 17:03, David wrote:
On 7/11/2009 6:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Frank Murphy wrote:
Doesn't seem to work for wine :)
That's because WINE is only 32-bit, because most Winblow$
executables are.
Kevin Kofler
"Winblow$"?
You really should learn some control he
On 7/11/2009 9:27 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 21:17:56 -0400,
> David wrote:
>> On 7/11/2009 8:27 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 20:03:51 -0400,
>>> David wrote:
The 'real guys'. The developers, code writers, people-in-the-know, show
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 21:17:56 -0400,
David wrote:
> On 7/11/2009 8:27 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 20:03:51 -0400,
> > David wrote:
> >> The 'real guys'. The developers, code writers, people-in-the-know, show
> >> respect where respect is warranted.
> >
> > I'm s
On 7/11/2009 8:27 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 20:03:51 -0400,
> David wrote:
>> The 'real guys'. The developers, code writers, people-in-the-know, show
>> respect where respect is warranted.
>
> I'm sure Al Capone got a lot of respect in his day as well.
;-)
I think
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 20:03:51 -0400,
David wrote:
>
> The 'real guys'. The developers, code writers, people-in-the-know, show
> respect where respect is warranted.
I'm sure Al Capone got a lot of respect in his day as well.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
ht
On 7/11/2009 6:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Frank Murphy wrote:
>> Doesn't seem to work for wine :)
>
> That's because WINE is only 32-bit, because most Winblow$ executables are.
>
> Kevin Kofler
"Winblow$"?
You really should learn some control here.
The 'real guys'. The developers, c
Am Montag, den 06.07.2009, 19:03 +0200 schrieb Christoph Höger:
> Hi,
>
> since I sync my mail with the experimental gnome ui of offlineimap, I
> encounter a small problem:
> How do I tell cron to only invoke the job when I am logged in under
> gnome only?
How about http://www.gnomefiles.org/app
Hi,
is the default attribute definition
%defattr(-,root,root)
the same as
%defattr(-,root,root,-)?
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-li
Frank Murphy wrote:
> Doesn't seem to work for wine :)
That's because WINE is only 32-bit, because most Winblow$ executables are.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> Probably and afaik the original author also planned to do so. Unluckily the
> code that handled the bugzilla tickets is afaik not publicly available,
> therefore this needs to be rewritten.
What language is it written in? Should be easy to impl
On Jul 11, 2009, at 1:50 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/11/2009 10:01 PM, BJ Dierkes wrote:
No kidding. I've submitted two patches... one just removing the dep,
and two adding a subpackage as an alternative route. Hopefully this
will help move it along.
Axel Thimm has only been sporadica
On 07/11/2009 10:01 PM, BJ Dierkes wrote:
> No kidding. I've submitted two patches... one just removing the dep,
> and two adding a subpackage as an alternative route. Hopefully this
> will help move it along.
Axel Thimm has only been sporadically active for a long time now. There
are a number
On Jul 9, 2009, at 9:45 AM, devzero2000 wrote:
2 - not checked if this problem is actual or not: prelink erases
file-based
capabilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456105
Which remains 'NEW' a year after it was opened. It was recently
reconfirmed by Tomas Mraz in F11.
> [benefit of prelink:]
> - almost all relocations a program has to perform are avoided. These
> can be very expensive when many dependencies and/or large symbol
> tables are involved. The latter is somewhat mitigated by the new
> symbol table hashing we implemented some time back but still
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 6:49 PM, drago01 wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>> On 11/07/09 10:41, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The x86_64 repo contains some multilib packages. If you don't specify
>>> the wanted architecture when installing, yum might install both 32-
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 11/07/09 10:41, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
>
>>
>> The x86_64 repo contains some multilib packages. If you don't specify
>> the wanted architecture when installing, yum might install both 32- and
>> 64-bit versions if available. Try adding the .x
On Sat July 11 2009, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
> Thanks for nice work. I too mailed other some time back .. but did not
> recieved any mail back. May you share the program ;)
I'll share the program once I setup some repo for it, which will probably
happen the next time I spend a reasonable amount of
On Jul 11, 2009, at 9:04 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/11/2009 03:32 AM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244275
Wow. A simple spec file change and a rebuild has been waiting for 2
years now?
No kidding. I've submitted two patches... one just remo
On Sat July 11 2009, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> I wonder, can FEver become part of the Fedora infrastructure, so it's
> not quite so bus-sensitive?
Probably and afaik the original author also planned to do so. Unluckily the
code that handled the bugzilla tickets is afaik not publicly available,
ther
On 11/07/09 10:41, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
>
> The x86_64 repo contains some multilib packages. If you don't specify
> the wanted architecture when installing, yum might install both 32- and
> 64-bit versions if available. Try adding the .x86_64 arch specifier,
> e.g. instead of
> # yum install foo
Till Maas wrote:
> Aloas,
>
> some of you added your packages to:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_FEver_to_track_upstream_changes
>
> Unfortunately seems the original author of fever not to be around anymore,
> e.g. his fedorapeople account is removed/backed-up. Therefore I started to
>
On Sat July 11 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Till Maas wrote:
> > mingw32-nsis2.44 < 207b0
>
> Hmmm, the regex is somehow picking up something broken. The current version
> is actually 2.45. I should probably make it read
> http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Download instead.
In 200
Till Maas wrote:
> mingw32-nsis2.44 < 207b0
Hmmm, the regex is somehow picking up something broken. The current version
is actually 2.45. I should probably make it read
http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Download instead.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing lis
On 07/11/2009 03:32 AM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244275
Wow. A simple spec file change and a rebuild has been waiting for 2
years now?
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/
Mat Booth wrote:
> Though after a little thought, it could be the proprietary nvidia
> driver I'm using.
It most definitely is. Yet another nvidia driver bug...
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-de
Alan Dunn wrote:
> but is there an easy way to do this for a version number in say, EVR
> form? That is, something like
>
> %if %{program_version} > 1.2.3
> ...
> %endif
Just figure out the Fedora releases with that version and conditionalize
based on the Fedora release. If the required version
Doh! teach me for not watching my mail client more carefully.
original message-
From: "Frank Murphy" frankl...@gmail.com
To: fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 06:19:24 +0100
-
> On 11/07/09 05:4
On 07/11/2009 02:37 PM, Brian Pepple wrote:
I've been working on updating libchamplain to 0.3.3 in Rawhide, but
until it gets ported to the clutter-0.9 api (or we do a clutter-0.8
compat) it's a no go for now.
I've been told to expect clutter 1.0 real soon (tm) :-)
--
fedora-devel-list mailing
On 07/10/2009 09:04 PM, Jon Stanley wrote:
18:08:49 #topic Feature - extended lifecycle
(...snip...)
18:15:31 jds2001, we have majority vote to move to the Board
I'm interested to know what the follow-up on this would be; Is it added
to the board's agenda?
Also, I would appreciate if t
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 18:25 +0530, Debarshi Ray wrote:
>
> So no one is affected by this change. On the other hand, 0.2.x is old
> and 0.3.x is where the fun is. So atleast some developers would
> benefit from it and libchamplain-0.3 would also get some testing
> leading to a better 0.4.x.
Since
> I've been working on updating libchamplain to 0.3.3 in Rawhide, but
> until it gets ported to the clutter-0.9 api (or we do a clutter-0.8
> compat) it's a no go for now.
That is also what I was waiting for.
> Regarding pushing this to F11, I really
> don't think we should, since the only real c
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 08:37:49 -0400, Brian wrote:
> I've been working on updating libchamplain to 0.3.3 in Rawhide, but
> until it gets ported to the clutter-0.9 api (or we do a clutter-0.8
> compat) it's a no go for now. Regarding pushing this to F11, I really
> don't think we should, since the o
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 16:36 +0530, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> I am going to update libchamplain from 0.2.9 to 0.3.3 in Fedora 11.
> This involves a change in the soname, but since no other package
> depends on it I hope it would not be a problem. On the plus side, the
> GtkChamplainEmbed widget which wa
2009/7/11 Till Maas wrote:
> Aloas,
>
> some of you added your packages to:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_FEver_to_track_upstream_changes
>
> Unfortunately seems the original author of fever not to be around anymore,
> e.g. his fedorapeople account is removed/backed-up. Therefore I started
I am going to update libchamplain from 0.2.9 to 0.3.3 in Fedora 11.
This involves a change in the soname, but since no other package
depends on it I hope it would not be a problem. On the plus side, the
GtkChamplainEmbed widget which was earlier separately released has
been merged into the libchamp
Thank you very much for doing this.
Happy hacking,
Debarshi
--
One reason that life is complex is that it has a real part and an
imaginary part.
-- Andrew Koenig
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
2009/7/11 Jussi Lehtola :
>
> The x86_64 repo contains some multilib packages. If you don't specify
> the wanted architecture when installing, yum might install both 32- and
> 64-bit versions if available. Try adding the .x86_64 arch specifier,
> e.g. instead of
> # yum install foo
> perform
> # yu
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 08:38 +0100, Joshua C. wrote:
> 2009/7/10 Tom "spot" Callaway :
> > On 07/10/2009 05:58 PM, Joshua C. wrote:
> >> I made a custom x86_64 livecd (f11) and found that the following
> >> x86_64 packages depend on i586 and i686. Is this an error when
> >> compiling those packages
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 12:40:44PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
No, not if they bundle the generated auto* files with their tarballs, as
they are supposed to do.
They're not "supposed to do" that.
Wrong.
Don't make stuff up.
Read the manuals, then come back.
-
Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello All!
I plan to add arm-toolchain into Fedora and encountered a difficulty -
how to properly name the package? From what I found in the Internets,
the cross-toolchains *often* named with the following prefix:
For example:
i686-pc-linux-gnu-
powerpc-unknown-linu
2009/7/10 Tom "spot" Callaway :
> On 07/10/2009 05:58 PM, Joshua C. wrote:
>> I made a custom x86_64 livecd (f11) and found that the following
>> x86_64 packages depend on i586 and i686. Is this an error when
>> compiling those packages or they do need the 32 bits?
>>
>> mesa-libGL-devel.x86_64 ne
45 matches
Mail list logo
