Is this as it should be?
Dependencies Resolved
Package Arch Version
Repository
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 06:24:40PM -0400, Bill McGonigle
wrote:
>> On 07/22/2009 12:39 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> > I think the confusion for normal users will be minimal,
because normal users
>> > won't be looking at the
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 06:24:40PM -0400, Bill McGonigle wrote:
> On 07/22/2009 12:39 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > I think the confusion for normal users will be minimal, because normal users
> > won't be looking at the raw repos in any case.
>
> There's a class of users between active developer
On 07/22/2009 12:39 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I think the confusion for normal users will be minimal, because normal users
> won't be looking at the raw repos in any case.
There's a class of users between active developers/QA folk and people
who only use GUI package managers who are apt to go t
2009/7/22 Pasi Kärkkäinen :
> He's been trying to identify the problem with powertop, disable services
> etc, but hasn't been able to match the battery life of Windows.
> Have you guys thought about this?
Depends on the hardware. If it's friendly graphics and intel
networking, we should compare qu
As part of an upstream cleanup of the xextproto and libXext repositories,
some header files that didn't belong to the former were moved to the latter.
Along with that, some header files got renamed to match the common naming
scheme.
The rawhide packages for xorg-x11-proto-devel and libXext now ha
On Wednesday 22 July 2009 14:14:32 Jesse Keating wrote:
...
> > > Churn on the mirror configs and the repo files,
> >
> > That much sort of sucks, yeah, but meh. We change it at least once
> > anyway though, going from rawhide to release, so is one more change
> > here a huge undertaking? (I ask b
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 15:49 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I think that it will still help with large enough rpms since rsync will
> try to use parts of the files if they match names. (There options to
> try to use files with similar names, but I don't think that is very
> useful for compressed fi
On 07/23/2009 02:13 AM, Rawhide Report wrote:
> pidgin-2.6.0-0.3.20090721.fc12
> --
> * Tue Jul 21 2009 Warren Togami 2.6.0-0.1.20090721
> - 2.6.0 snapshot with voice and video support via farsight
For which protocols?
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedor
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 15:35:06 -0400,
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:55:27AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> >> You actually want overlap for a while so that when rsyncing you can use
> >> hardlinks instead of having to redownload files you already have.
> >> This is going to be
Compose started at Wed Jul 22 06:15:05 UTC 2009
New package chunkd
Data storage daemon for cloud computing
New package python-tgext-crud
Crud Controller Extension for TG2
New package zikula-module-News
Manages news articles on your Zikula site
Removed package clutter-cairo
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:14:32AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Well every change has potential to break users who have had to do some
> customization, and it hurts 3rd party repo setups. It'd be nice to
> install a repo config at Alpha and have the paths used remain useful and
> valid through t
> Releases prior to F-11 wouldn't benefit from that at all, as the RPMs
> actually change when going from updates-testing to updates due to being
> signed with different keys.
I think it still helps a lot with rsync. The old .all/* files are there to
be seen as almost the same and get rsync goodn
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:55:27AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
>> You actually want overlap for a while so that when rsyncing you can use
>> hardlinks instead of having to redownload files you already have.
>> This is going to be more relevant if koji signing happens and packages don't
>> get diff
> I am wondering if there is an known incompatibility between the
> rawhide version of boost and Fedora 11.
Builds fine for me on F11, F12 on x86_64
-benjamin
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:19:41PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> The 'Fit and Finish' test day about batteries and suspend took place
> yesterday. Thanks to everybody who came by and helped us find, fix and
> test things !
>
Hello,
A friend of mine has been having a lot of problems with his l
> You actually want overlap for a while so that when rsyncing you can use
> hardlinks instead of having to redownload files you already have.
> This is going to be more relevant if koji signing happens and packages don't
> get different signatures depending on which repo they are in.
That would be
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:21:17PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:36:38 -0400,
> Jarod Wilson wrote:
> >
> > $ cd .../pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/
> > $ mv 12 ../
>
> You actually want overlap for a while so that when rsyncing you can use
> hardlinks instead of h
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 12:36 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 July 2009 11:58:11 Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 10:57 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > > Only thing I'm not terribly wild about is storing the pre-release tree
> > > in /pub/fedora/linux/releases/#/Everything/.
Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> I assume I'm missing a dependency, but what is it?
It's trying to load the old F10 version of OpenSSL.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:36:38 -0400,
Jarod Wilson wrote:
>
> $ cd .../pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/
> $ mv 12 ../
You actually want overlap for a while so that when rsyncing you can use
hardlinks instead of having to redownload files you already have.
This is going to be more relevant if
2009/7/22 Martin Langhoff :
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
>> 2009/7/22 Matthias Clasen :
>>> Amazingly, Richard fixed quite a few of the incoming bugs already, while
>>> the test day was still ongoing, and people were able to confirm that the
>>> fixes are working. Well d
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> 2009/7/22 Matthias Clasen :
>> Amazingly, Richard fixed quite a few of the incoming bugs already, while
>> the test day was still ongoing, and people were able to confirm that the
>> fixes are working. Well done!
>
> Sure, and in mutual back-
2009/7/22 Matthias Clasen :
> Amazingly, Richard fixed quite a few of the incoming bugs already, while
> the test day was still ongoing, and people were able to confirm that the
> fixes are working. Well done!
Sure, and in mutual back-patting, Matthias did a great job
coordinating things. I'm sure
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:57:13 -0400,
Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 July 2009 19:04:50 Jesse Keating wrote:
> > I've done some updating to the no frozen rawhide proposal[1]. There is
> > still time to enact this for Fedora 12, which would take effect when we
> > reach Alpha freeze in a
On Wednesday 22 July 2009 11:58:11 Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 10:57 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > Only thing I'm not terribly wild about is storing the pre-release tree
> > in /pub/fedora/linux/releases/#/Everything/. Its bound to cause some
> > confusion amongst the general popu
The 'Fit and Finish' test day about batteries and suspend took place
yesterday. Thanks to everybody who came by and helped us find, fix and
test things !
If you could not make it, our test cases are still available here:
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2009-07-21_Fit_and_Finish:Batter
I've been using StumpWM ( http://www.nongnu.org/stumpwm/ ) perpetually for
awhile now, and I would like to see it as a package in Fedora. The trouble is,
its in Common Lisp (which I'm not terribly comfortable with) and I've run into
some trouble with building it (something to do with prelink I t
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 10:57 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Only thing I'm not terribly wild about is storing the pre-release tree
> in /pub/fedora/linux/releases/#/Everything/. Its bound to cause some
> confusion amongst the general population. Any reason not to keep it at
> /pub/fedora/linux/release
On Tuesday 21 July 2009 19:04:50 Jesse Keating wrote:
> I've done some updating to the no frozen rawhide proposal[1]. There is
> still time to enact this for Fedora 12, which would take effect when we
> reach Alpha freeze in a couple weeks. I'd like another round of people
> reviewing it and givi
Am Mittwoch, den 22.07.2009, 14:50 +0200 schrieb Christoph Wickert:
> ...
Sorry, this wasn't supposed to go to the list.
Christoph
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Am Dienstag, den 21.07.2009, 16:47 + schrieb Gerd Pokorra:
> Author: gerd
>
> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/parrot/F-9
Ähm, F-9 ist end of lifetime, da kannst Du keine Updates mehr machen.
Ich würde dich bitten, die Änderungen im CVS wieder auf den Stand vorher
zurückzusetzen, damit es mit dem, wa
Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
Hi.
I need a sponsor for this. An RPM has been built on several systems
(including FC8 and FC9 and Centos5) and tested on all of those.
The ticket has been languishing now unassigned for almost a year.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s
On Wednesday 22 July 2009 01:35:34 am Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> On 07/21/2009 09:00 PM, Rawhide Report wrote:
> >> > Compose started at Tue Jul 21 06:15:03 UTC 2009
> >> >
> >> > New package ghc-editline
> >> > Haskell %{pgk_name} library
> >>
> >> Obvious typo and it passed through review
>> On 07/21/2009 09:00 PM, Rawhide Report wrote:
>> > Compose started at Tue Jul 21 06:15:03 UTC 2009
>> >
>> > New package ghc-editline
>> > Haskell %{pgk_name} library
>>
>> Obvious typo and it passed through review as well.
>>
>> Rahul
>
> I noticed this, but I don't think it's a typo. I
On Wednesday 22 July 2009 01:05:23 am Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/21/2009 09:00 PM, Rawhide Report wrote:
> > Compose started at Tue Jul 21 06:15:03 UTC 2009
> >
> > New package ghc-editline
> > Haskell %{pgk_name} library
>
> Obvious typo and it passed through review as well.
>
> Rahul
Matthew Woehlke píše v Út 21. 07. 2009 v 13:27 -0500:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
> > List of deps left behind by orphan removal:
> >
> > Orphan: libatomic_ops
> > pulseaudio requires libatomic_ops-devel = 1.2-6.fc12
>
> Obviously, this is also a problem, except that again F11 has no such
> depen
On 07/21/2009 09:00 PM, Rawhide Report wrote:
> Compose started at Tue Jul 21 06:15:03 UTC 2009
>
> New package ghc-editline
> Haskell %{pgk_name} library
Obvious typo and it passed through review as well.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www
> Wow. Who knew sponsors were that hard to come by? Especially when most
> of the work is already done...
FWIW, having I the need to use this module on Fedora and RHEL I have
already included it in my RPM repository, and so I am using it in
production without a problem.
Regards
--
fedora-dev
39 matches
Mail list logo
