Re: openssh-blacklist - careless waste of space.

On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 05:30:27PM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote: > openssh-blacklist-0.7-1.fc11.src.rpm - size 1072930614 > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1372950 > openssh-blacklist-0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm - size 1072930519 > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1372948 > ope

Re: orphaning nopaste // ruby help wanted for broken package

On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:17:32 +0200 Simon Wesp wrote: > nopaste is back... > http://agriffis.n01se.net/nopaste/nopaste-2.1 > you should include this instead of pearl-App-Nopaste.. the big benefit would be that the package would be alive in epel 4 and 5 again.. sounds good to me. perl-App-Nopaste is

Re: Updated Fedora 12 Schedule (take 2)

On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 20:59 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > Mark McLoughlin said the following on 07/24/2009 05:55 AM Pacific Time: > > On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 21:09 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > > > >> http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-releng-tasks.html > >> http://poelstra.fedorap

Re: orphaning nopaste // ruby help wanted for broken package

On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:17:32 +0200 Simon Wesp wrote: > nopaste is back... > http://agriffis.n01se.net/nopaste/nopaste-2.1 > you should include this instead of pearl-App-Nopaste.. - Zitierten Text ausblenden - the big benefit would be that the package would be alive in epel 4 and 5 again.. sounds g

Re: Firewall rules using SELinux context (Was Re: RFE: FireKit)

On 25/07/09 07:14, Simo Sorce wrote: What's the value of labeling packets based on source/destination ports ? Doesn't seem to add any new information. Indeed. Security marking can add an additional IP header, so that a multilevel operating system on one machine can pass those multiple levels

Lack of perl(Glib::MakeHelper) module?

Now it is time to rebuild the packages for Fedora 12. I try to rebuild my maintained package. When I rebuild my perl-Gnome2-Wnck and perl-Goo-Canvas, it fails and shows that it needs Glib::MakeHelper but it can not find. But in the past when I submitted and build these two package, it is OK. I do

Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 07/26/2009 09:28 PM, Björn Persson wrote: >> >> Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>> >>> On 07/26/2009 02:37 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Alan Cox wrote: > > "all of my system has a wrong openssl version" > > a

Re: Lower Process Capabilities

On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Steve Grubb wrote: > The basic idea goes something like this: We would like to do something to > prevent priv escalation for processes running as root. For this example, lets > take cupsd to be a good case in point. If the attacker can find a vuln with > cupsd, then they ca

Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 07/27/2009 07:33 AM, David Cantrell wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Björn Persson wrote: Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 07/26/2009 02:37 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: On

Re: orphaning nopaste // ruby help wanted for broken package

2009/7/26 Simon Wesp > nopaste is back... > http://agriffis.n01se.net/nopaste/nopaste-2.1 > you should include this instead of pearl-App-Nopaste.. the big benefit would be that the package would be alive in epel 4 and 5 again.. sounds good to me. perl-App-Nopaste isn't a good replacement for no

Re: orphaning nopaste // ruby help wanted for broken package

2009/7/26 Simon Wesp > nopaste is back... > http://agriffis.n01se.net/nopaste/nopaste-2.1 > you should include this instead of pearl-App-Nopaste.. the big benefit would be that the package would be alive in epel 4 and 5 again.. sounds good to me. perl-App-Nopaste isn't a good replacement for no

Re: Lack of perl(Glib::MakeHelper) module?

2009/7/27 梁穗隆 : > Now it is time to rebuild the packages for Fedora 12. I try to rebuild my > maintained package. > > When I rebuild my perl-Gnome2-Wnck and perl-Goo-Canvas, it fails and shows > that it needs Glib::MakeHelper but it can not find. But in the past when I > submitted and build these t

Testing libsatsolver on Fedora

Hi folks, I'm the author of the "libsatsolver" library, a library solves package dependencies with a SAT algorithm. This library is currently used in SUSE by YaST/zypp. I'm currently trying to make it less SUSE specific like adding support for package coloring and different repo handling, but I'm

Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release

On 07/27/2009 11:26 AM, David Cantrell wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 07/27/2009 07:33 AM, David Cantrell wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Björn Persson wrote: Ralf Corsepius wrote:

Re: What to do with release number on new EL-5 branch

Hi, >> > There is nothing wrong with starting at 9-5. >> >> Using the disttag can make it clearer that a package comes from epel as >> opposed to someone installing the Fedora package onto an EL-5 system and >> expecting it to work. >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag >> -Toshio

Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release

On 07/27/2009 11:25 AM, drago01 wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 07/26/2009 09:28 PM, Björn Persson wrote: Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 07/26/2009 02:37 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Alan Cox wrote: "all of my system has a wrong openssl version"

rawhide report: 20090727 changes

Compose started at Mon Jul 27 06:15:04 UTC 2009 New package audtty A ncurses based terminal client for the Audacious New package clutter-imcontext IMContext Framework Library for Clutter New package comoonics-cluster-py Comoonics cluster configuration utilities written in P

Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 07/27/2009 11:25 AM, drago01 wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Ralf Corsepius >>  wrote: >>> >>> On 07/26/2009 09:28 PM, Björn Persson wrote: Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On 07/26/2009 02:37 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:

Re: Updated Fedora 12 Schedule (take 2)

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 08:40:04 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > Constructive suggestion for the next cycle - we should go back to a > shorter gap between Feature Freeze and GA. Isn't development for the N+2 release supposed to start at the branch point and not GA of N+1? I think that is lik

Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release

On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Bill McGonigle wrote: On 07/26/2009 09:06 AM, Seth Vidal wrote: can you tell me even one such distro+release when this happened? it's never happened with any of the redhat, fedora, rhel releases. fc1->fc2 fc6->fc7 rhel4->rhel5 It's not new. Is this where we branch t

Re: Testing libsatsolver on Fedora

On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Michael Schroeder wrote: Hi folks, I'm the author of the "libsatsolver" library, a library solves package dependencies with a SAT algorithm. This library is currently used in SUSE by YaST/zypp. I'm currently trying to make it less SUSE specific like adding support for pa

Re: Lower Process Capabilities

Quoting Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com): > On Sunday 26 July 2009 08:54:26 pm Steve Grubb wrote: > > > I trust you meant to write 0555? > > > > No, I really mean 005 so that root daemons are using public permissions. > > Admins of course have DAC_OVERRIDE and can do anything. Try the script in a >

Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release

Hi. On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:38:09 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > No, some people (me included) use tmpfs for /tmp , so this would > > result into reboot, no packages found (if it did not hit a space > > problem either). > Your problem, if you are using a non-reboot persistant /tmp I'd think tha

Re: Lower Process Capabilities

On Monday 27 July 2009 09:11:33 am Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com): > > On Sunday 26 July 2009 08:54:26 pm Steve Grubb wrote: > > > > I trust you meant to write 0555? > > > > > > No, I really mean 005 so that root daemons are using public > > > permissions. Admins o

Re: Firewall rules using SELinux context (Was Re: RFE: FireKit)

On 07/24/2009 04:55 PM, Steve Grubb wrote: > I don't think I explained it well. I was thinking what if you had this rule: > > -A INPUT -Z cups_t -j ACCEPT > > and then cups was compromised and started listening on port 80. Since the > above rule has no port restrictions and cups is allowed to ac

Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > Hi. > > On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:38:09 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> > No, some people (me included) use tmpfs for /tmp , so this would >> > result into reboot, no packages found (if it did not hit a space >> > problem either). >> Your prob

Re: Clipboard manager by default in Fedora 12

On 07/26/2009 07:32 AM, Julian Aloofi wrote: > Oops, I meant Fedora 12 when I wrote this: > >> I don't think that would count as a feature, and it isn't one. It's >> basically a program every system should have (in my opinion). >> The Gnome clipboard isn't working great. I often get complaints fro

Re: Lower Process Capabilities

Quoting Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com): > On Monday 27 July 2009 09:11:33 am Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com): > > > On Sunday 26 July 2009 08:54:26 pm Steve Grubb wrote: > > > > > I trust you meant to write 0555? > > > > > > > > No, I really mean 005 so that root

Re: Clipboard manager by default in Fedora 11

On 26/07/09 05:06, Julian Aloofi wrote: I don't think that would count as a feature, and it isn't one. It's basically a program every system should have (in my opinion). The Gnome clipboard isn't working great. I often get complaints from new users I introduce to Fedora that their clipboard conte

Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release

* Ralf Corsepius [27/07/2009 13:49] : > > Your problem, if you are using a non-reboot persistant /tmp "Although data stored in /tmp may be deleted in a site-specific manner, it is recommended that files and directories located in /tmp be deleted whenever the system is booted." Filesyste

Re: Firewall rules using SELinux context (Was Re: RFE: FireKit)

On 07/27/2009 04:23 AM, Glen Turner wrote: > On 25/07/09 07:14, Simo Sorce wrote: > >> What's the value of labeling packets based on source/destination ports ? >> Doesn't seem to add any new information. > > Indeed. > > Security marking can add an additional IP header, so that a multilevel > ope

Re: Applications install should be idiot proof

On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Ben Boeckel wrote: Would these be a comps-like system? Could they replace comps with tags like -required and -recommended tag suffixes (my knowledge of the inner working of comps is limited)? Or would they be marked in pkgdb or the spec file? Links to information would be

Re: Clipboard manager by default in Fedora 12

On 27.07.2009 15:49, Casey Dahlin wrote: On 07/26/2009 07:32 AM, Julian Aloofi wrote: Oops, I meant Fedora 12 when I wrote this: I don't think that would count as a feature, and it isn't one. It's basically a program every system should have (in my opinion). The Gnome clipboard isn't working g

Re: Testing libsatsolver on Fedora

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 09:04:13AM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: > is libsatsolver supporting file deps as well? Yes, it downloads filelists.xml.gz if a file dep is not matching the standard filter regexps. Btw, there are surprisingly many of such deps in fedora, like: /lib/lsb/init-functions /us

Re: Clipboard manager by default in Fedora 12

On 07/27/2009 07:49 AM, Casey Dahlin wrote: The Firefox issue was always Firefox's fault. Its designed to keep information from leaking out of the browser. Seriously? Do you have any reference source for this information? AFAIK, the real truth is that this behaviour is a a result of how X

Re: Firewall rules using SELinux context (Was Re: RFE: FireKit)

On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > This is all fascinating conversation. But the question still arises, > why can't anyone use SECMARK/IPTABLES rules on a Targeted policy system. > My opinion is that it is still too difficult. Well, it's taken years to get all the basic technology i

Re: Lower Process Capabilities

Steve Grubb writes: > On Monday 27 July 2009 09:11:33 am Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >> Using 0005 will mean root also needs CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE to read/execute, >> which seems a bit much. Suddenly it needs extra privilege if i just want >> it to be able to execute /bin/date. That actually seems less se

Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release

On 07/27/2009 03:39 PM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: * Ralf Corsepius [27/07/2009 13:49] : Your problem, if you are using a non-reboot persistant /tmp "Although data stored in /tmp may be deleted in a site-specific manner, it is recommended that files and directories located in /tmp be deleted when

Re: Lower Process Capabilities

On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 19:25 +1000, James Morris wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Steve Grubb wrote: > > The basic idea goes something like this: We would like to do something to > > prevent priv escalation for processes running as root. For this example, > > lets > > take cupsd to be a good case in

Re: rpms/rubygem-rails/devel .cvsignore, 1.8, 1.9 import.log, 1.1, 1.2 rubygem-rails.spec, 1.13, 1.14 sources, 1.8, 1.9

Mamoru Tasaka wrote: Hello: Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote, at 07/26/2009 07:42 PM +9:00: Author: kanarip Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/rubygem-rails/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28785/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore import.log rubygem-rails.spec sources Log Message: 2

Re: Updated Fedora 12 Schedule (take 2)

On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 08:40 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > Constructive suggestion for the next cycle - we should go back to a > shorter gap between Feature Freeze and GA. With No Frozen Rawhide approved, the scheduling will look a tad bit different. Please review https://fedoraproject.org/wi

Wednesday special session FESCo meeting

I've heard back from a few of the FESCo members, and it looks like we're going to do a special session on Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting in order to knock out a few last features for Fedora 12. I just wanted to drop a note saying that it was happening, the agenda is still dynamic right n

Fedora Packaging Committee Seat Filled

Thanks to everyone who applied for this open seat. We got a lot of very qualified individuals who were interested in filling the open seat on the Fedora Packaging Committee. After much discussion and thought, I've asked Jon Ciesla to fill the open seat and he has accepted. I'm sure that we will ha

Release Engineering meeting summary for 2009-07-27

Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-07-27/fedora-meeting.2009-07-27-18.03.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-07-27/fedora-meeting.2009-07-27-18.03.txt Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-07-27/fedora-meeting.2

Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 07/27/2009 11:26 AM, David Cantrell wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 07/27/2009 07:33 AM, David Cantrell wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNE

Updated Anaconda packages

On 07/28/2009 01:11 AM, David Cantrell wrote: > The problem here is when do you stop generating new media to fix bugs in > F-11's installer and start working on F-12? Never? A week after F-11 GA? > What determines if an installer bug gets a fix in F-11 vs. not? > > It's a gigantic waste of time

Orphaning some packages

I am orphaning this packages because i don't have time to maintain them. clutter-- Open Source software library for creating rich graphical user interfaces clutter-cairo

Re: Updated Anaconda packages

Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 07/28/2009 01:11 AM, David Cantrell wrote: The problem here is when do you stop generating new media to fix bugs in F-11's installer and start working on F-12? Never? A week after F-11 GA? What determines if an installer bug gets a fix in F-11 vs. not? It's a giganti

Re: Orphaning some packages

I have grabbed everything, please let me know if I can help with anything else. co-maintaners are always welcome. On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Allisson Azevedo wrote: > I am orphaning this packages because i don't have time to maintain them. > clutter -- Open Source software library for crea

Re: Orphaning some packages

On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 16:59 -0300, Allisson Azevedo wrote: > I am orphaning this packages because i don't have time to maintain > them. > > clutter -- Open Source software library for creating rich graphical > user interfaces > clutter-cairo -- A basic Cairo clutter widget > clutter-gst -- Clutt

Re: Orphaning some packages

On 07/28/2009 01:38 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > I have grabbed everything, please let me know if I can help with anything > else. > > co-maintaners are always welcome. That was fast. I applied to be a co-maintainer for all of them. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-lis

Re: Updated Anaconda packages

On Monday, July 27 2009, Jeff Garzik said: > Honestly, I always thought Fedora install images should be regenerated > far more frequently. > > I think back to my days as a Solaris sysadmin in the late 90's, where > ordering the latest "media kit" (CD-ROM) from Sun meant I got a fresh > instal

Re: Updated Anaconda packages

Once upon a time, Jeff Garzik said: > I think back to my days as a Solaris sysadmin in the late 90's, where > ordering the latest "media kit" (CD-ROM) from Sun meant I got a fresh > installer, fresh kernel, and all recommended patches. IIRC Sun only spun that a couple of times per year though (

Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release

On 07/26/2009 03:06 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Farkas Levente wrote: who think about that his system will not working after doing everything as it has to be. can you tell me any other distro (including windows!) where the system installer not working after upgrade? It happen

Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release

On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Farkas Levente wrote: fc1->fc2 fc6->fc7 rhel4->rhel5 It's not new. just to be correct neither fc6->fc7 nor rhel4->rhel5 break any system tools! and i don't remember to fc1->fc2. fc6->fc7 had a couple of fun metadata breaks rhel4->rhel5 upgrades are neither support

fedora mini revisted

Hi All, I'd like some thoughts, and some help so yes, I'm opening a can of worms :-) A while a go jkatz put out a call about support for netbooks, and I begun to step up and the idea behind Fedora Mini [1] was born before being sidetracked by shiny things in the corner. So I'd like to get th

Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 04:30:55PM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Farkas Levente wrote: > > >> > >>fc1->fc2 > >>fc6->fc7 > >>rhel4->rhel5 > >> > >>It's not new. > > > >just to be correct neither fc6->fc7 nor rhel4->rhel5 break any system > >tools! and i don't remember to fc

Re: Orphaning some packages

> clutter-cairo -- A basic Cairo clutter widget This one is deprecated upsteam and merged into clutter, I've already done most of the rawhide dead package stuff in bug [1] it just needs the obsoletes added to clutter. Cheers, Peter [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507389 -- fed

Re: Updated Anaconda packages

Jeremy Katz wrote: And Sun was doing those media kits roughly every six to twelve months from what I remember. And our (major) release frequency is every six months, so ... Chris Adams wrote: IIRC Sun only spun that a couple of times per year though (at most maybe once per quarter, but I don

Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release

On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 04:30:55PM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Farkas Levente wrote: fc1->fc2 fc6->fc7 rhel4->rhel5 It's not new. just to be correct neither fc6->fc7 nor rhel4->rhel5 break any system tools! and i don't r

Re: Updated Anaconda packages

Jeremy Katz wrote: Regenerating the images is expensive -- it requires effort on the part of the developers doing fixes, release engineering doing builds with the fixes, QA testing the fixes, infrastructure (mirrors) carrying a significant amount more bits[1], ... The alternative being the cu

Re: Orphaning some packages

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Owen Taylor wrote: > On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 16:59 -0300, Allisson Azevedo wrote: >> I am orphaning this packages because i don't have time to maintain >> them. >> >> clutter -- Open Source software library for creating rich graphical >> user interfaces >> clutter-cai

Re: Testing libsatsolver on Fedora

On 07/27/2009 04:31 PM, Michael Schroeder wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I'm the author of the "libsatsolver" library, a library solves > package dependencies with a SAT algorithm. > This library is currently used in SUSE by YaST/zypp. I'm currently > trying to make it less SUSE specific like adding su

Re: Updated Anaconda packages

On 07/27/2009 04:21 PM, Jeremy Katz wrote: > When our releases are at most six months apart, how much effort are we > willing to divert from the next release to make this happen? It's not > going to happen for free. The counter-balance is when each release is substantially broken, then Fedora jus

Re: Updated Anaconda packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 07/28/2009 01:11 AM, David Cantrell wrote: The problem here is when do you stop generating new media to fix bugs in F-11's installer and start working on F-12? Never? A week after F-11 GA? What deter

Re: Testing libsatsolver on Fedora

On 07/27/2009 04:45 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > What's the eventual goal? Not to speak for Michael or his ambitions, but I was curious and found this on the openSUSE site: http://en.opensuse.org/Package_Management/Sat_Solver -especially- http://en.opensuse.org/Package_Management/Sat_S

Re: Updated Anaconda packages

On 07/28/2009 03:14 AM, David Cantrell wrote: > > I've been doing that for Jeroen. He's submitting patchsets for review and > I've built at least a few anaconda updates for him. He is currently > testing > updates for F-11 and when that's ready, he'll submit the patches for review > for anacond

Re: Updated Anaconda packages

On 07/27/2009 10:21 PM, Jeremy Katz wrote: Regenerating the images is expensive -- it requires effort on the part of the developers doing fixes, release engineering doing builds with the fixes, QA testing the fixes, infrastructure (mirrors) carrying a significant amount more bits[1], ... Not qu

Re: Updated Anaconda packages

Once upon a time, Jeff Garzik said: > Chris Adams wrote: > >IIRC Sun only spun that a couple of times per year though (at most maybe > >once per quarter, but I don't remember it being that often). > > Incorrect, for our shop at least. They regenerated every month, and > were dated thusly. I sa

Re: Updated Anaconda packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 07/28/2009 03:14 AM, David Cantrell wrote: I've been doing that for Jeroen. He's submitting patchsets for review and I've built at least a few anaconda updates for him. He is currently testing updat

Re: Updated Anaconda packages

On Tuesday, July 28 2009, Ralf Corsepius said: > On 07/27/2009 10:21 PM, Jeremy Katz wrote: >> Regenerating the images is expensive -- it requires effort on the part >> of the developers doing fixes, release engineering doing builds with the >> fixes, QA testing the fixes, infrastructure (mirrors)

Re: Orphaning some packages

On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 21:41 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Owen Taylor wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 16:59 -0300, Allisson Azevedo wrote: > >> I am orphaning this packages because i don't have time to maintain > >> them. > >> > >> clutter -- Open Source software

Re: Updated Anaconda packages

On 07/28/2009 12:27 AM, Jeremy Katz wrote: On Tuesday, July 28 2009, Ralf Corsepius said: On 07/27/2009 10:21 PM, Jeremy Katz wrote: Regenerating the images is expensive -- it requires effort on the part of the developers doing fixes, release engineering doing builds with the fixes, QA testing

Re: rawhide report: 20090727 changes

Hi, > kernel-2.6.31-0.94.rc4.fc12 > --- > * Fri Jul 24 2009 Chuck Ebbert > - Enable CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT in debug kernels. (#513606) > > * Fri Jul 24 2009 Kristian Høgsberg > - Add drm-page-flip.patch to support vsynced page flipping on intel > chipsets. > - Really add

Re: Lower Process Capabilities

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 19:25 +1000, James Morris wrote: >> On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Steve Grubb wrote: >> > The basic idea goes something like this: We would like to do something to >> > prevent priv escalation for processes running as root. For thi

Re: Updated Anaconda packages

> OK, in which package can I find your "mkimage" script. revisor ? livecd-tools ? pungi ? Just pick the one you prefer :) -- Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Updated Anaconda packages

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 06:27:00PM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Tuesday, July 28 2009, Ralf Corsepius said: > > An alternative would be, to ship a script to let people build such an > > image themselves. It would not help everybody in all situations, but it > > at least help people who have s

Re: Updated Anaconda packages

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:14:08PM -1000, David Cantrell wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > On 07/28/2009 03:14 AM, David Cantrell wrote: > > > >> > >> I've been doing that for Jeroen. He's submitting patchsets for review and > >> I've built at least a few anaconda updates

Re: Updated Anaconda packages

On 07/28/2009 12:14 AM, David Cantrell wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 07/28/2009 03:14 AM, David Cantrell wrote: I've been doing that for Jeroen. He's submitting patchsets for review and I've built at least a few anaconda u

Re: Updated Anaconda packages

On 07/27/2009 10:21 PM, Jeremy Katz wrote: Regenerating the images is expensive -- it requires effort on the part of the developers doing fixes, release engineering doing builds with the fixes, QA testing the fixes, infrastructure (mirrors) carrying a significant amount more bits[1], ... Hey,

Re: Updated Anaconda packages

On 07/28/2009 12:54 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 07/28/2009 12:27 AM, Jeremy Katz wrote: As it turns out, we ship all the tools to build the distribution the exact way we do! And as David said, he's been working with Jeroen for occasional updated anaconda packages. OK, in which package can I

Re: Updated Anaconda packages

On 07/28/2009 04:49 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > http://www.kanarip.com/anaconda/ > ...is what you want, I think. Yes but I want in the official repository as an update. Fedora 11 Anaconda has been troublesome for many people due to the storage layer rewrite. It would have been nice to avoid that

Re: Updated Anaconda packages

On 07/28/2009 01:19 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 06:27:00PM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: That means that you can take revisor, pungi or livecd-tools in your existing Fedora system None of these are what I am looking for. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel

Re: Updated Anaconda packages

On 07/28/2009 01:43 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: On 07/28/2009 12:54 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 07/28/2009 12:27 AM, Jeremy Katz wrote: As it turns out, we ship all the tools to build the distribution the exact way we do! And as David said, he's been working with Jeroen for occasional upda

Re: Updated Anaconda packages

On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 01:51 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > That means that you can take revisor, pungi or livecd-tools in your > > existing Fedora system > None of these are what I am looking for. Pungi and livecd-tools are what is used to produce the Fedora you download. It calls the anacon

Re: rpms/sylpheed/devel import.log,1.1,1.2 sylpheed.spec,1.100,1.101

On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:53:29 + (UTC), Itamar wrote: > Author: itamarjp > > Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sylpheed/devel > +%post -p /sbin/ldconfig > +%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig > > -%post devel -p /sbin/ldconfig > > +%post devel -p /sbin/ldconfig > %postun devel -p /sbin/ldconfig You don't

Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-07-28

== The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name): beagle CodeAnalyst-gui gauche-gl gauche-gt

Nightly Rawhide LiveCD script

Somebody asked for my crappy script to generate a rawhide LiveCD that can be scheduled in cron. This script sucks. Suggest improvements if you want. One big improvement that could be written is a rawhide timestamp checker, so the script would run more often in cron and detect when the rawhi

Re: Package: postgis-1.4.0rc1-2.fc12 Tag: dist-f12-rebuild Status: failed Built by: jkeating

I will take care of this. 1.4.0 also was not built -- I will contact upstream. On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 04:33 +, Koji Build System wrote: > Package: postgis-1.4.0rc1-2.fc12 > Tag: dist-f12-rebuild > Status: failed > Built by: jkeating > ID: 122120 > Started: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:25:04 UTC > Finish