Re: Visiting webpage causes ~hard lock - round 2!

2009-08-18 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/18/2009 06:39 AM, Dr. Diesel wrote: This happened a little while ago: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498131 Seems to be happening again (tried 3x, same result) on a different website and most likely something different but could someone please confirm before I BZ this?

Re: source file audit - 2009-08-10

2009-08-18 Thread Christoph Wickert
Am Montag, den 10.08.2009, 10:15 -0600 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: cwickert:BADURL:glista-0.4.tar.gz:glista works with spectool cwickert:BADURL:gwget-1.0.1.tar.bz2:gwget 404, new version, fixed. cwickert:BADURL:lxde-settings-daemon-0.4.tar.bz2:lxde-settings-daemon 301, due to sf changes I guess.

Re: Visiting webpage causes ~hard lock - round 2!

2009-08-18 Thread Dr. Diesel
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Garry T. Williams gtwilli...@gmail.comwrote: On Monday 17 August 2009 21:09:05 Dr. Diesel wrote: This happened a little while ago: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498131 Seems to be happening again (tried 3x, same result) on a different

Kernel 2.6.29 for F10

2009-08-18 Thread Reindl Harald
Hi Is there a reason that since longer time 2.6.29-Kernels for Fedora 10 landing in Updates-testing followed with 2.6.27-Builds in the meantime? On machines with kmods this is a real problem because yum detetects the kmod for 2.6.27-Build and wants to install the 2.6.27 kernel which conflicts

rawhide report: 20090818 changes

2009-08-18 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Tue Aug 18 06:15:04 UTC 2009 Summary: Added Packages: 0 Removed Packages: 0 Modified Packages: 0 Broken deps for i386 -- 389-ds-1.1.3-4.fc12.noarch requires 389-ds-admin R-RScaLAPACK-0.5.1-19.fc11.i586

Re: Kernel 2.6.29 for F10

2009-08-18 Thread Roberto Ragusa
Reindl Harald wrote: Hi Is there a reason that since longer time 2.6.29-Kernels for Fedora 10 landing in Updates-testing followed with 2.6.27-Builds in the meantime? On machines with kmods this is a real problem because yum detetects the kmod for 2.6.27-Build and wants to install the

Re: Kernel 2.6.29 for F10

2009-08-18 Thread Joe Nall
On Aug 18, 2009, at 5:16 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Hi Is there a reason that since longer time 2.6.29-Kernels for Fedora 10 landing in Updates-testing followed with 2.6.27-Builds in the meantime? On machines with kmods this is a real problem because yum detetects the kmod for

Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread Mel Chua
If you've got a moment for some last-minute help... We (Marketing) will be freezing the F12 talking points list today, and are still somewhat light in the what makes Fedora awesome for admins and developers? categories. Right now we have libguestfs and kvm improvements for admins and maybe

Re: Kernel 2.6.29 for F10

2009-08-18 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:13:10AM -0500, Joe Nall wrote: On Aug 18, 2009, at 5:16 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Hi Is there a reason that since longer time 2.6.29-Kernels for Fedora 10 landing in Updates-testing followed with 2.6.27-Builds in the meantime? On machines

Re: Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/18/2009 09:00 PM, Mel Chua wrote: PS: I know this is last-minute notice - sorry about that. We're still learning how to do things on a schedule, and next time around we'll put the call out here much earlier. Is there a particular reason today is the last day instead of some date

Re: Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread Mel Chua
PS: I know this is last-minute notice - sorry about that. We're still learning how to do things on a schedule, and next time around we'll put the call out here much earlier. Is there a particular reason today is the last day instead of some date closer to the release? We need to brief

Re: Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/18/2009 10:15 PM, Mel Chua wrote: PS: I know this is last-minute notice - sorry about that. We're still learning how to do things on a schedule, and next time around we'll put the call out here much earlier. Is there a particular reason today is the last day instead of some date closer

Re: Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread John Poelstra
Peter Robinson said the following on 08/18/2009 09:42 AM Pacific Time: On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Mel Chuam...@redhat.com wrote: If you've got a moment for some last-minute help... We (Marketing) will be freezing the F12 talking points list today, and are still somewhat light in the what

Re: Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/18/2009 10:12 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Mel Chuam...@redhat.com wrote: If you've got a moment for some last-minute help... We (Marketing) will be freezing the F12 talking points list today, and are still somewhat light in the what makes Fedora awesome

Re: Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread Mel Chua
(http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-marketing-tasks.html) (Feel free to push back if this schedule sounds unreasonable, btw; it probably could use some patches for the next cycle in terms of having more time for getting dev feedback.) The schedule itself might have been fine

Re: Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Rahul Sundaramsunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On 08/18/2009 10:12 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Mel Chuam...@redhat.com wrote: If you've got a moment for some last-minute help... We (Marketing) will be freezing the F12 talking

Re: Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 22:18 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 08/18/2009 10:15 PM, Mel Chua wrote: PS: I know this is last-minute notice - sorry about that. We're still learning how to do things on a schedule, and next time around we'll put the call out here much earlier. Is there a

Re: Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread Mike McGrath
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 22:18 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 08/18/2009 10:15 PM, Mel Chua wrote: PS: I know this is last-minute notice - sorry about that. We're still learning how to do things on a schedule, and next time around we'll put

Re: Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:15:27PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 22:18 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 08/18/2009 10:15 PM, Mel Chua wrote: PS: I know this is last-minute notice - sorry about that. We're still learning how to do things on a schedule, and next time

Re: Last call for talking points - what makes you excited about F12?

2009-08-18 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:27:53PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 22:18 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 08/18/2009 10:15 PM, Mel Chua wrote: PS: I know this is last-minute notice - sorry about that. We're still learning

Re: Trouble formatting flash disk

2009-08-18 Thread Eric Sandeen
Casimiro de Almeida Barreto wrote: Hello, I have a pendrive (flash memory) which lists in /proc/bus/usb/devices as: ... And I've tried to format it as ext2 (so I can backup my home directory). It happens that no matter what I do (and I've tried almost everything) it formats but no matter

Re: Trouble formatting flash disk

2009-08-18 Thread Casimiro de Almeida Barreto
Em 18-08-2009 15:13, Eric Sandeen escreveu: (...) Could you take this to the linux-ext4 list? It'd be the more appropriate place for the discussion. It'd be good to know the details of the errors you see, too. Thanks, -Eric Best regards, CdAB Yes, if I know where I can

Re: Trouble formatting flash disk

2009-08-18 Thread Eric Sandeen
Casimiro de Almeida Barreto wrote: Em 18-08-2009 15:13, Eric Sandeen escreveu: (...) Could you take this to the linux-ext4 list? It'd be the more appropriate place for the discussion. It'd be good to know the details of the errors you see, too. Thanks, -Eric Best regards, CdAB

KDE-SIG weekly report (34/2009)

2009-08-18 Thread Sebastian Vahl
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply to this email or add it to the related meeting page. -- = Weekly KDE

Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread Christopher Brown
2009/8/18 Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu: On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:35:37AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 07/26/2009 06:40 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi, Can we make it a default in comps for Rawhide? Rahul No answer here after weeks. After some lengthy discussion with rel-eng team

Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread drago01
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Jeff Spaletajspal...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Christopher Brownsnecklif...@gmail.com wrote: FWIW, I have also experienced zero problems with it and believe it would be better enabled by default, retaining the option to disable.

Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread Jesse Keating
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:47 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: Only potential side effect is cpu consumption that the delta unpacking process requires. User on single core systems may notice that unless presto renices itself down in priority. The hit on slow disks is pretty bad too, even non-slow

Troubleshooting pendrive ext2fs

2009-08-18 Thread Casimiro de Almeida Barreto
Hello, I've trouble creating an ext2/ext3/ext4 file system in a 64GBytes pendrive. The device appears at /proc/bus/usb/devices as: T: Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=04 Cnt=01 Dev#= 4 Spd=480 MxCh= 0 D: Ver= 2.00 Cls=00(ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1 P: Vendor=1043 ProdID=8012 Rev= 1.00

glibc error reports go to the bit bucket in koji

2009-08-18 Thread Tom Lane
I've been poking away at the mysql crashes I mentioned a few days ago, and have just realized something that explains why I've been at such a loss to interpret the failure reports from koji. It seems that what has been getting triggered is glibc's malloc-error aborts, the ones that look like ***

Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Jesse Keatingjkeat...@redhat.com wrote: The hit on slow disks is pretty bad too, even non-slow disks.  With a local mirror the time to re-make the deltas is far longer than the time to just pull down the entire packages. Time isn't the only metric...people may

Re: glibc error reports go to the bit bucket in koji

2009-08-18 Thread Mike Bonnet
On 08/18/2009 06:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote: I've been poking away at the mysql crashes I mentioned a few days ago, and have just realized something that explains why I've been at such a loss to interpret the failure reports from koji. It seems that what has been getting triggered is glibc's

Re: glibc error reports go to the bit bucket in koji

2009-08-18 Thread Roland McGrath
IMHO koji (and mock for that matter) ought to be running the builds inside a captive pty whose ouytput it logs anyway, even if they redirect everything. You never know what crazy nonsense some package is going to try. You can put LIBC_FATAL_STDERR_=1 in the environment to get those messages to

Re: glibc error reports go to the bit bucket in koji

2009-08-18 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 06:14:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: I've been poking away at the mysql crashes I mentioned a few days ago, and have just realized something that explains why I've been at such a loss to interpret the failure reports from koji. It seems that what has been getting

Re: glibc error reports go to the bit bucket in koji

2009-08-18 Thread Jesse Keating
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 15:36 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: IMHO koji (and mock for that matter) ought to be running the builds inside a captive pty whose ouytput it logs anyway, even if they redirect everything. You never know what crazy nonsense some package is going to try. How does one setup

Re: glibc error reports go to the bit bucket in koji

2009-08-18 Thread Roland McGrath
How does one setup one of these things? Since I assume you are implementing it in Python, you might have to ask, you know, someone who knows Python. I don't, but I have a web browser. I even have locate '*python*pty*'. So maybe: import pty (pid, fd) = pty.fork() or pty.spawn(...) --

Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 14:17 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: -jefspeaking of metered bandwidth..I need to remember to work from barnes and nobles instead of working from home this winter..so i can steal power, wireless and a nice warm firespaleta Nice warm fire? you're going to burn all the books?

Re: glibc error reports go to the bit bucket in koji

2009-08-18 Thread Tom Lane
Mike Bonnet mi...@redhat.com writes: On 08/18/2009 06:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote: **The build logs from koji do not contain this rather critical information**. I haven't dug into the glibc sources, but what it looks like on my own machine is that these reports go to /dev/tty not to stderr (and

F12 Feature Status Requested

2009-08-18 Thread John Poelstra
Greetings Feature Owners, The Alpha Release of Fedora 12 is scheduled for public availability one week from today on Tuesday, August 25, 2009. As a result of our announcements around this release many journalists and other people curious to find out what's on the way for Fedora 12 will come

Updated Fedora 12 Schedule--Final Release Date 2009-11-10

2009-08-18 Thread John Poelstra
As a follow-up to last week's announcement changing the date for the Fedora 12 Alpha release, https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-announce/2009-August/msg6.html the remaining tasks in the Fedora 12 schedule have been adjusted by one week.

Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread Steven James Drinnan
I would hold off on the default thing. I have found that it has played havoc with intel video drivers and NetworkManager. I do not know how but for me it was a pain in the neck. All I know is that after I re-installed and upgraded I have had no problems -1 to installing it by default in F12.

Re: Kernel 2.6.29 for F10

2009-08-18 Thread Rodd Clarkson
I too would like to see F10 move up to 2.6.29+ prior to end-of-life. In days of old, we were able to get rebases out pretty quickly after their upstream release. These days, we're hindered by the kernel modesetting stuff we're carrying. It's closely tied to the userspace X drivers,

Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread Chuck Anderson
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:03:44AM +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote: I would hold off on the default thing. I have found that it has played havoc with intel video drivers and NetworkManager. I do not know how but for me it was a pain in the neck. All I know is that after I re-installed

Re: yum-presto plugin by default

2009-08-18 Thread Chuck Anderson
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:36:15AM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:03:44AM +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote: I would hold off on the default thing. I have found that it has played havoc with intel video drivers and NetworkManager. I do not know how but for me it

rpms/perl-PPIx-EditorTools/devel perl-PPIx-EditorTools.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2009-08-18 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
Author: mmaslano Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-PPIx-EditorTools/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2172 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: perl-PPIx-EditorTools.spec Log Message: * Fri Aug 14 2009 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 0.07-1

Broken dependencies: perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader

2009-08-18 Thread buildsys
perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.04006-4.fc12.noarch requires perl(DBIX::Class) On x86_64: perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.04006-4.fc12.noarch requires perl(DBIX::Class) On i386:

Re: our perl-core on p5p

2009-08-18 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 08:36:11PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: SLES-11 has a big perl with a perl-base that contains the interpreter and a very small set of modules. thank you, Paul, for this. You saved my time. Debian and mandrake use these package names the same way. I peeked into a

rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-Pg/devel .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 perl-DateTime-Format-Pg.spec, 1.5, 1.6 sources, 1.3, 1.4

2009-08-18 Thread Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-Pg/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27883 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-DateTime-Format-Pg.spec sources Log Message: * Tue Aug 18 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.16004-1 - auto-update to

rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-Pg/F-11 perl-DateTime-Format-Pg.spec, 1.4, 1.5 sources, 1.3, 1.4

2009-08-18 Thread Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-Pg/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28171 Modified Files: perl-DateTime-Format-Pg.spec sources Log Message: * Tue Aug 18 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.16004-1 - auto-update to 0.16004 (by

rpms/perl-File-ChangeNotify/F-11 perl-File-ChangeNotify.spec, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.2, 1.3

2009-08-18 Thread Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-File-ChangeNotify/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21399 Modified Files: perl-File-ChangeNotify.spec sources Log Message: * Tue Aug 11 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.07-1 - auto-update to 0.07 (by

rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader/devel .cvsignore, 1.6, 1.7 perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader.spec, 1.12, 1.13 sources, 1.7, 1.8

2009-08-18 Thread Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21845 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader.spec sources Log Message: * Tue Aug 18 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.27-1 -

rpms/perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch/F-11 perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch.spec, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.2, 1.3

2009-08-18 Thread Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25777 Modified Files: perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch.spec sources Log Message: * Sat Jul 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org

rpms/perl-Git-CPAN-Patch/devel perl-Git-CPAN-Patch.spec,1.6,1.7

2009-08-18 Thread Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Git-CPAN-Patch/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30531 Modified Files: perl-Git-CPAN-Patch.spec Log Message: * Tue Aug 18 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.2.0-2 - add a BR on git, for command paths Index:

rpms/perl-Git-CPAN-Patch/F-11 perl-Git-CPAN-Patch.spec, 1.4, 1.5 sources, 1.5, 1.6

2009-08-18 Thread Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Git-CPAN-Patch/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32617 Modified Files: perl-Git-CPAN-Patch.spec sources Log Message: * Tue Aug 18 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.2.0-2 - add a BR on git, for command paths

rpms/perl-Class-MOP/devel .cvsignore, 1.34, 1.35 perl-Class-MOP.spec, 1.40, 1.41 sources, 1.32, 1.33

2009-08-18 Thread Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Class-MOP/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23019 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-Class-MOP.spec sources Log Message: * Tue Aug 18 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.92-1 - auto-update to 0.92 (by

rpms/perl-Text-SimpleTable/F-11 perl-Text-SimpleTable.spec, 1.7, 1.8 sources, 1.3, 1.4

2009-08-18 Thread Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Text-SimpleTable/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23618 Modified Files: perl-Text-SimpleTable.spec sources Log Message: * Tue Aug 11 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2.0-1 - auto-update to 2.0 (by

rpms/perl-Text-SimpleTable/devel perl-Text-SimpleTable.spec, 1.9, 1.10 simpletable.patch, 1.1, NONE

2009-08-18 Thread Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Text-SimpleTable/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24786 Modified Files: perl-Text-SimpleTable.spec Removed Files: simpletable.patch Log Message: * Tue Aug 18 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2.0-2 -

rpms/perl-Text-SimpleTable/F-11 perl-Text-SimpleTable.spec,1.8,1.9

2009-08-18 Thread Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Text-SimpleTable/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26588 Modified Files: perl-Text-SimpleTable.spec Log Message: * Tue Aug 18 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2.0-2 - drop old patch Index:

rpms/perl-Moose/devel .cvsignore, 1.32, 1.33 perl-Moose.spec, 1.44, 1.45 sources, 1.32, 1.33

2009-08-18 Thread Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Moose/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26894 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-Moose.spec sources Log Message: * Wed Aug 19 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.89-1 - auto-update to 0.89 (by cpan-spec-update 0.01)