On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 13:21 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
What is the policy regarding deletion of individual entries in the
middle of %changelog?
A developer added a %changelog entry to each of my cloud daemons'
packages, on the main fedora-cvs devel branch of each.
Then, a day or so
On 27/08/09 16:08, Peter Jones wrote:
On 08/27/2009 06:02 AM, Howard Wilkinson wrote:
I have had to patch the code for cpqarrayd to get it working under
Fedora 11. It was failing with a stack smashing exception. I have fixed
this by replacing stack structures with dynamic allocation. Where
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 22:54, Matthew
Woehlkemw_tr...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote:
Hi, something that bothers me a bit... More and more system restart
requests with each update (even if one doesn't use the package at the time).
This is a real shame. One of the
On Thursday 27 August 2009 18:34:38 Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:14:43 -0400, Ben wrote:
[KDE X session file]
So your issue is that kdebase-workspace puts it there, but it's
not complete, so it shouldn't?
Well, in case installing ktorrent shall drag in the packages
for
On Thursday 27 August 2009 19:54:19 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
25.08.2009 02:07, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
A quick way to actually check for such dependencies is to switch to
another desktop environment, say Xfce, remove all the KDE packages and
install one
On Thursday 27 August 2009 18:45:44 Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 17:35 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
PolicyKit-KDE is now integral part of kdebase-workspace, it is a KDE
4.3 feature, we should disable it for now (untill we have new ported
version).
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 23:06 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Maybe we just need an en_INTL locale which defaults to US English
translations, but ISO standards everywhere else (ISO -mm-dd dates, ISO
A4 paper, metric units etc.)? (Currency would be a problem though, default
to €? $? The generic
Hi all,
Currently, Fedora package management is one of the most annoying part of
Fedora experience for new desktop users (at least for those without
fast, always available internet connection). For such users, Fedora
package management Just Doesn't Work! I've almost never been able to
Matthias Clasen wrote:
I have been able to port some 10-12 PolicyKit users from 0.9 to 0.90 in
a matter of a few days. The KDE sig should really be able to get this
port done. We really don't want to ship multiple authorization
databases, that way lies confusion and madness.
The PolicyKitOne
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote:
Hi all,
Currently, Fedora package management is one of the most annoying part of
Fedora experience for new desktop users (at least for those without fast,
always available internet connection). For such users, Fedora package
management Just
On 08/28/2009 01:27 PM, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote:
Hi all,
Currently, Fedora package management is one of the most annoying part
of Fedora experience for new desktop users (at least for those without
fast, always available internet connection). For such users, Fedora
package management Just
Oh, and speaking of anaconda, IMHO it should support DSL configuration
when using asknetwork. DSL is popular these days.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Aioanei Rares wrote:
Thanks anyway,
Hedayat
Since it's idea time, I think it would be good for the user that uses yum to
see in a listing (like yum search $whatever) to see the status of the
package, like installed, not installed, virtual package et al.
'yum list
On 08/28/2009 12:27 PM, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote:
Now, some ideas:
3. AFAIK, currently yum's primary database file contains information
about packages, and all of the files in directories such as /usr/bin
and /usr/lib, so that it can resolve package and file level
dependencies. Isn't it
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Florian Festi wrote:
When we think of a Fedora that has grown another order of magnitude (may be
2015) it will become hard to argue against a more centralized solution. Right
now we are not at the point where the pain of the local repo db does out
weight the complexity
There was a thread more than a month ago about kdeinit4 failing to start
before one did as root a 'prelink -f /usr/bin/kdeinit4'. Well the
problem is still here. Anyone knows anything?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On 08/28/2009 02:47 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
no - I think it'll be hard to argue why we need 20K pkgs in a single
repository. Or hell, why we need 20K pkgs AT ALL.
Dream on!
ls -1 /mnt/archive/fedora/development/x86_64/os/Packages/ | wc
18382 18382 708766
Not yet counting
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Florian Festi wrote:
May be we as upstream devs of the tool chain should just limit the number of
packages and packaged files by decree ;)=
this works for me.
When should we meet to decide how next to rule the world?
muahahahahahahaha
-sv
--
fedora-devel-list
Hello,
at certain periods of time, it was recommended to use #!/usr/bin/env .
Some people consider it ugly. (The humble opinion of the author of
this mail is the same.)
Currently there is popular mood to remove /usr/bin/env python, see
On Friday 28 August 2009 15:36:19 Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 06:47 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
I have been able to port some 10-12 PolicyKit users from 0.9 to 0.90 in
a matter of a few days. The KDE sig should really be able to get this
port done.
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 12:45 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I'd be willing to maintain PolicyKit 0.9 packages (as compatibility
packages
(though renaming should not be needed as they already have distinct names),
to be used by KDE) for F12. It is my understanding that those will not
On Friday 28 August 2009 16:23:07 David Zeuthen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 12:45 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I'd be willing to maintain PolicyKit 0.9 packages (as compatibility
packages (though renaming should not be needed as they already have
distinct names), to be used by KDE) for
On 08/28/2009 09:09 AM, Rawhide Report wrote:
Broken deps for i386
--
paraview-3.6.1-4.fc12.i686 requires libssl.so.8
paraview-mpi-3.6.1-4.fc12.i686 requires libssl.so.8
3.6.1-5 is building now which should fix this.
--
On Friday 28 August 2009 16:14:51 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
On Friday 28 August 2009 15:36:19 Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 06:47 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
I have been able to port some 10-12 PolicyKit users from 0.9 to 0.90
in a matter of a few
2009/8/27 Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com
2009/8/27 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:44:13 +0200,
Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm trying to respin the f11.x86_64 install dvd in order to put the
new grub and anaconda packages, so that I can have
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 15:29:50 +0300,
Aioanei Rares scha...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, and speaking of anaconda, IMHO it should support DSL configuration
when using asknetwork. DSL is popular these days.
If you actually file an RFE bug about this you'll need to be more specific.
There is
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 14:57:44 +0430,
Hedayat Vatnakhah heda...@grad.com wrote:
Now, some ideas:
3. AFAIK, currently yum's primary database file contains information
about packages, and all of the files in directories such as /usr/bin and
/usr/lib, so that it can resolve package and
Hi again,
On ۰۹/۰۸/۲۸ 04:50, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote:
Hi all,
Currently, Fedora package management is one of the most annoying part
of Fedora experience for new desktop users (at least for those
without fast, always available internet connection). For
Hi again!
/*Florian Festi ffe...@redhat.com*/ wrote on جمعه ۲۸ اوت ۰۹، ۱۷:۱۳:۱۰:
On 08/28/2009 12:27 PM, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote:
Now, some ideas:
3. AFAIK, currently yum's primary database file contains information
about packages, and all of the files in directories such as /usr/bin
and
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote:
You don't need to know about all existing repositories, since you can still
resolve file level dependencies. In such
cases you'll be forced to download the other file I mentioned
(primary_file_deps.db).
I don't see why you'll need to recreate
.2009-08-28-17.01.log.html
---
17:01:14 jds2001 #startmeeting FESCo meeting 20090828
17:01:14 zodbot Meeting started Fri Aug 28 17:01:14 2009 UTC. The
chair is jds2001. Information about MeetBot at
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:01:14 zodbot Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea
Hi.
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:43:00 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote
You might be referring to PPP which some (IMO only crappy ISPs do
this for DSL) DSL providers require you to use.
PPP is pretty much standard for broadband access because it allows
for some very useful tricks.
Please note that I
For those of you that wish to separate Fedora 12 stabalization work from
future development, we are now ready to process branch requests for
F-12.
If you branch your package early, builds from your new F-12 branch will
continue to go to the Fedora 12 targets. dist-f12 for now, and
eventually
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 22:45 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
Caolán McNamara wrote:
Well, FWIW there is the (rather weird) en_DK locale, which has
-MM-YY dates (I think its the only locale where this is the default)
Assuming you meant -MM-DD, sv_SE has that:
I'd guess Japan would too,
Working on something else I stumbled across this:
http://fpaste.org/jDwM/
that's a list of pkgs in rawhide which are obsoleted by something else in
rawhide.
seems a bit dodgy to me.
-sv
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Hi internets,
I was looking at the current state of ABRT (I tested on F11). The
core capturing seems to work well. In brief, I propose to apply the
(attached) patch to comps-f12.xml.in.
For upgrades, we'll need to add a Conflicts: bug-buddy, correct?
ABRT is a big step forward from bug-buddy
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Milos Jakubicekxja...@fi.muni.cz wrote:
snip
I'm very very sorry for this as I'm sure that I've partially invalidated
my/your/both work, which is just bad:(
Could you try to merge my and your work somehow? I'd be glad if you would do
this and keep an eye of
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote:
Hi internets,
I was looking at the current state of ABRT (I tested on F11). The
core capturing seems to work well. In brief, I propose to apply the
(attached) patch to comps-f12.xml.in.
For upgrades, we'll need to
David Zeuthen wrote:
We announced that this would happen long ago. And, FWIW, it was approved
long ago by FESCO too.
You (well, whoever from your team was there to talk about the feature)
promised to FESCo that PolicyKit 0.9 and 1.0 can coexist and that 0.9 can
stay around if somebody signs
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:49 PM, drago01drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote:
Hi internets,
I was looking at the current state of ABRT (I tested on F11). The
core capturing seems to work well. In brief, I propose to apply the
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:49 PM, drago01drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote:
Hi internets,
I was looking at the current state of ABRT (I tested on F11). The
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:26 AM, drago01drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:49 PM, drago01drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Colin Walterswalt...@verbum.org wrote:
Hi internets,
I
1. Since Fedora 4, Fedora doesn't support installing software from DVD out
of the box. Fedora 8 is an exception here. Currently, it seems that the work
is almost done (99% completed as in [1]), and fixing the remaining 1% doesn't
seem to need much work but unfortunately it seems that it is
Message du 27/08/09 16:38
De : Jindrich Novy
A : fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Copie à : fedora-fonts-l...@redhat.com, tcall...@redhat.com
Objet : Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 03:02:18PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi,
first off, thanks many
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote:
Hi, something that bothers me a bit... More and more system restart
requests with each update (even if one doesn't use the package at the
time).
This is a real shame. One
Dne 28.8.2009 23:33, Adam Miller napsal(a):
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Milos Jakubicekxja...@fi.muni.cz wrote:
snip
I'm very very sorry for this as I'm sure that I've partially invalidated
my/your/both work, which is just bad:(
Could you try to merge my and your work somehow? I'd be
I'm reading APT and YUM source codes recently, and met the following
question:
for class apt.package.Package, there are a function isAutoRemovable,
which means:
http://apt.alioth.debian.org/python-apt-doc/apt/package.html?highlight=isautoremovable#apt.package.Package.isAutoRemovable
Return True
This is, ah, slightly off-topic, but it seems like something others
might be interested in. :)
http://use.perl.org/articles/09/08/24/2012226.shtml
--
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496891
Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hello,
I have noticed that some of the perl module packages do pack their
tests in the %doc subdirectory.
Is that intentional?
Is it because the user might want to runthe test suite on the
installed package?
The packages I noticed were the following:
perl-Class-MOP-0.92-1.fc12.x86_64
SK == Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com writes:
SK Hello, I have noticed that some of the perl module packages do pack
SK their tests in the %doc subdirectory. Is that intentional?
One maintainer insists on doing it. I think it's pointless, but I gave
up arguing long ago.
- J
--
Fedora Extras
Hello,
at certain periods of time, it was recommended to use #!/usr/bin/env .
Some people consider it ugly. (The humble opinion of the author of
this mail is the same.)
Currently there is popular mood to remove /usr/bin/env python, see
On 08/28/2009 04:11 PM, Stepan Kasal wrote:
Hello,
at certain periods of time, it was recommended to use #!/usr/bin/env .
Some people consider it ugly. (The humble opinion of the author of
this mail is the same.)
My opinion is converse.
Actually I think _you_ (as a perl maintainer) are
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: testsuite fails because of openssl-1.0.0beta3 crash
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520153
Summary: testsuite fails because of openssl-1.0.0beta3
Author: kasal
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19846
Modified Files:
perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA.spec
Log Message:
- disable tests to work around bug #520152
Index: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA.spec
Hello all,
perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA-0.13-11.fc12 requires libcrypto.so.8, libssl.so.8
I deugged this and it seems the test suite is failing because the
etalon openssl dgst command crashes. I filed it as bug #520152.
Then I disabled the tests in the module and filed a bug 520153 as a
Author: ruben
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Nagios-Plugin/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15086/F-11
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log perl-Nagios-Plugin.spec
Log Message:
Initial import
--- NEW FILE import.log ---
Author: cweyl
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-PerlIO-gzip/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28234
Modified Files:
perl-PerlIO-gzip.spec
Log Message:
release bump
Index: perl-PerlIO-gzip.spec
===
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=156113
Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Ralf Corsepiusrc040...@freenet.de wrote:
Consider you have another perl installed in parallel the official vendor
perl and want to test a particular application suite with it.
Using env you can simply use your experimental perl.
Removing it, you will normally
Hello Chris,
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:49:30AM -0700, Chris Weyl wrote:
It's not unusual for the tests to be better than the docs...
...
Another reason is that sometimes we make changes to the tests as part
...
In any case, I've generally suspended this pending some magic to
automagically
Hello,
let me explain. I was told they are doing this env clenup
with python scripts don't you want to do it for perl as well?
My hands were quicker than my brain and I did the search.
Only when I was about to post the results, I realized that I'm
actually not convinced about the issue.
The
Author: cweyl
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Sub-Identify/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23261
Modified Files:
perl-Sub-Identify.spec
Log Message:
release bump
Index: perl-Sub-Identify.spec
Author: cweyl
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Net-CUPS/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12361
Modified Files:
perl-Net-CUPS.spec
Log Message:
release bump
Index: perl-Net-CUPS.spec
===
RCS file:
Author: cweyl
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-App-Cmd/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28040
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-App-Cmd.spec sources
Log Message:
* Sat Aug 29 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.207-1
- switch filtering to perl_default_filter
-
Author: cweyl
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-local-lib/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9686
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-local-lib.spec sources
Log Message:
* Sat Aug 29 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 1.004006-1
- auto-update to 1.004006 (by
66 matches
Mail list logo
