Hi all,
With the recent discussion about removing sendmail from the base
install, has anyone taken a look at DMA? It appears to be designed with
exactly the same purpose in mind -- removing the dependency on a
desktop-oriented install on sendmail or postfix, while still allowing
cron et. al. to f
On 08/30/09 04:44, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
The NSLU2 is cramped and very slow, and is near end-of-life.
Look into the SheevaPlug ($100; 4X as fast, 16X the RAM of NSLU2)
http://www.globalscaletechnologies.com/c-2-globalscale-technologies-products.aspx
or the TS-109 Pro II htt
I'm wondering if anyone tried to run Fedora on a small home NAS,
in the class of NSLU2 or Synology 108j. I'm hacking on software
that permits easy management of storage clouds and I'm thinking
about creating a testbed populated with something cheap ($100 or so).
Various embedded derivatives of L
Dear All:
I'm wondering if anyone tried to run Fedora on a small home NAS,
in the class of NSLU2 or Synology 108j. I'm hacking on software
that permits easy management of storage clouds and I'm thinking
about creating a testbed populated with something cheap ($100 or so).
Please let me know if you
On 08/29/2009 08:51 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
Yes I know I should had done my research before buying, but wasn't sure
was gonna get it when I was at the store. Anyway, got this printer,
plugged it in, was detected but said no drivers for it. Any plans on
it, or way I can submit info from the CD
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Yes I know I should had done my research before buying, but wasn't sure
> was gonna get it when I was at the store. Anyway, got this printer,
> plugged it in, was detected but said no drivers for it. Any plans on
> it, or way I can submit in
Yes I know I should had done my research before buying, but wasn't sure
was gonna get it when I was at the store. Anyway, got this printer,
plugged it in, was detected but said no drivers for it. Any plans on
it, or way I can submit info from the CD to get them in?
Thanks,
Mike Chambers
--
fe
> "AT" == Axel Thimm writes:
AT> I don't think apt traces whether a packages was a pulled in manually
AT> or automatically, does it?
yum does keep track of many things in the yumdb and I think the "reason"
key is supposed to track this, but for me it seems reason is always
"user". I think t
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 07:21:30AM +0800, Ray Chen wrote:
> 在 2009-08-29六的 17:32 +0300，Muayyad AlSadi写道：
> > warning: leaves in package-cleanup or remove-with-leaves could be your
> > preferred application because it's a leaf [ie. no installed package
> > depends on it, eg. pidgin or uget]
> > Yum
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Anyway, this all seems to be a somewhat moot discussion, trying to nail
> us down on a 'promise to keep the old stuff around', when there already
> is a patch that can solve the whole dilemma.
Looks like this is actually moot. I checked for how much of KDE really uses
Pol
On Saturday 29 August 2009, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> warning: leaves in package-cleanup or remove-with-leaves could be your
> preferred application because it's a leaf [ie. no installed package
> depends on it, eg. pidgin or uget]
FWIW, there's also a show-leaves plugin which just lists installed p
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
El Sat, 29-08-2009 a las 10:25 -0400, Luke Faraone escribió:
Well, the USB format idea was left unimplemented as we (I) couldn't
get it working, but we should probably take a look at makebootfat to
achieve the same goals.
Or just use parted instead of fdisk to wipe th
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Also, the bootloader Gujin contains a stripped-down driver for ext4 so
might be interesting for a fast-booting USB setup:
http://gujin.sourceforge.net/
FWIW, Syslinux 4.00-preX supports ext4.
-hpa
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat
在 2009-08-29六的 17:32 +0300，Muayyad AlSadi写道：
> warning: leaves in package-cleanup or remove-with-leaves could be your
> preferred application because it's a leaf [ie. no installed package
> depends on it, eg. pidgin or uget]
The output of package-cleanup --leaves or remove-with-leaves doesn't
incl
Package texlive-dvips is obsoleted by texlive, trying to install
texlive-2009-0.3.20090827.fc11.i586 instead
This is obviously wrong obsolete, as dvips is actually provided by
texlive-dvips, but for some reason unless I tell yum to specifically
install the noarch package (by running yum install
te
El Sat, 29-08-2009 a las 10:25 -0400, Luke Faraone escribió:
>
> Well, the USB format idea was left unimplemented as we (I) couldn't
> get it working, but we should probably take a look at makebootfat to
> achieve the same goals.
Or just use parted instead of fdisk to wipe the MBR and create it
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 14:25:53 +0100,
Caolán McNamara wrote:
>
> Yeah, there's plenty of -MM-DD using locales listed in glibc, e.g.
> csb_PL de_AT de_BE de_LU en_DK fr_CA hu_HU se_NO si_LK sv_SE ug_CN. But
> en_DK is the only English language one where this is default. (I wonder
> as an a
warning: leaves in package-cleanup or remove-with-leaves could be your
preferred application because it's a leaf [ie. no installed package
depends on it, eg. pidgin or uget]
there is a flag in conf of remove-with-leaves to exclude non-library
binary packages from being removed
Yum does not trace
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009, Ray Chen wrote:
Thanks, package-cleanup is what I want:)
-Ray
install the plugin: remove-with-leaves
then you can enable it when you want to remove a package and have yum
remove anything that the pkg depends on that nothing else depends on.
-sv
--
fedora-devel-li
El Sat, 29-08-2009 a las 15:17 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard escribió:
> BTW, are all these details about USB booting being collected somewhere
> on a wiki page?
it would be great if someone could expand this paragraph:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Soas#Boot
This page is not even linked from it:
Dne 29.8.2009 22:46, Ray Chen napsal(a):
rpmreaper is NOT installed by default, I want use yum API in scripts to
remove unnecessary packages.
Rpmreaper doesn't use yum API, it's pure rpm-based. For usage refer to
the relevant manpage (man rpmreaper), you might be especially
insterested in som
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 14:00 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I'd guess Japan would too, that's the standard date format there IIRC.
LANG=ja_JP.utf8 date +%x
2009年08月29日
Yeah, there's plenty of -MM-DD using locales listed in glibc, e.g.
csb_PL de_AT de_BE de_LU en_DK fr_CA hu_HU se_NO si_LK sv_
rpmreaper is NOT installed by default, I want use yum API in scripts to
remove unnecessary packages. The key is that how to determine the
unnecessary packages. so that I can remove safely to save disk.
Would you like show me more details?? What packages are unnecessary
packages?
Thanks,
Ray
在 2
rpmreaper may be handy for that too...
Regards,
Milos
Dne 29.8.2009 19:07, Ray Chen napsal(a):
Thanks, package-cleanup is what I want:)
-Ray
在 2009-08-29六的 03:29 -0400，Michel Alexandre Salim写道：
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Ray Chen wrote:
If the package has been installed auto
Thanks, package-cleanup is what I want:)
-Ray
在 2009-08-29六的 03:29 -0400，Michel Alexandre Salim写道：
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Ray Chen wrote:
> >
> >If the package has been installed automatically as a dependency
> >of another package, and if no packages depend on it anymo
/*Seth Vidal */ wrote on جمعه ۲۸ اوت ۰۹،
۲۲:۰۳:۱۰:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote:
You don't need to know about all existing repositories, since you can
still resolve file level dependencies. In such
cases you'll be forced to download the other file I mentioned
(primary_
/*Muayyad AlSadi */ wrote on شنبه ۲۹ اوت ۰۹، ۰۳:۰۴:۳۷:
1. Since Fedora 4, Fedora doesn't support installing software from DVD "out of the
box". Fedora 8 is an exception here. Currently, it seems that the work is almost
done (99% completed as in [1]), and fixing the remaining 1% doesn't see
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 3:57 AM, drago01 wrote:
> But do we even want to drop kerneloops from the distro?
People may want to do random stuffs which will cause crashes in
kernel and may be they want to use kerneloops directly to report them.
Kushal
--
http://fedoraproject.org
http://kushaldas.in
Hi,
On 08/28/2009 09:13 AM, Howard Wilkinson wrote:
Is it really true that nobody else uses cpqarrayd? If so what do people
use to monitor the HP/Compaq hardware in the Proliant range of servers?
I'm using http://sourceforge.net/projects/cciss/files/cciss_vol_status/
for that purpose, with a
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:30:21 -0400 (EDT), Seth wrote:
> Working on something else I stumbled across this:
>
> http://fpaste.org/jDwM/
>
> that's a list of pkgs in rawhide which are obsoleted by something else in
> rawhide.
>
> seems a bit dodgy to me.
Yeah, often packagers don't request Fedor
On Saturday 29 August 2009 Stefan Grosse wrote:
> Just for the record: This was caused by LyX being (still) dependent on
> dvipdfm. Deleting LyX made an installation possible.
This is one of those cases where rpm Suggests would be appropriate (when/if
implemented). LyX does not depend in any way
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Ray Chen wrote:
>
> If the package has been installed automatically as a dependency
> of another package, and if no packages depend on it anymore, the
> package is no longer required.
>
>
> Do YUM codes have the same function as 'isAutoRemovable
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:16:33 +0200 Stefan Grosse
wrote:
SG> dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 von installed hat
SG> Abhängigkeitsauflöse-Probleme --> Fehlende Abhängigkeit:
SG> libkpathsea.so.4 wird benötigt von Paket
SG> dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 (installed) Fehler: Fehlende
SG> Abhängigkeit: libk
If you had read what I wrote originally, I said I wrote this for me and
simply released it in the hopes that others could benefit as well. So in my
case I was/am the user and it does exactly what I want of it.
-Adam
(From Android)
On Aug 28, 2009 6:04 PM, "Milos Jakubicek" wrote:
Dne 28.8.2009
34 matches
Mail list logo
