Re: Firefox addon for Fedora-pkgdb search

2009-08-29 Thread Adam Miller
If you had read what I wrote originally, I said I wrote this for me and simply released it in the hopes that others could benefit as well. So in my case I was/am the user and it does exactly what I want of it. -Adam (From Android) On Aug 28, 2009 6:04 PM, Milos Jakubicek xja...@fi.muni.cz wrote:

Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages

2009-08-29 Thread Stefan Grosse
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:16:33 +0200 Stefan Grosse singularit...@gmx.net wrote: SG dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 von installed hat SG Abhängigkeitsauflöse-Probleme -- Fehlende Abhängigkeit: SG libkpathsea.so.4 wird benötigt von Paket SG dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 (installed) Fehler: Fehlende SG

Re: how to determain those no longer required packages

2009-08-29 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Ray Chenchenrano2...@163.com wrote:        If the package has been installed automatically as a dependency        of another package, and if no packages depend on it anymore, the        package is no longer required. Do YUM codes have the same function as

Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages

2009-08-29 Thread José Matos
On Saturday 29 August 2009 Stefan Grosse wrote: Just for the record: This was caused by LyX being (still) dependent on dvipdfm. Deleting LyX made an installation possible. This is one of those cases where rpm Suggests would be appropriate (when/if implemented). LyX does not depend in any way

Re: pkgs in rawhide which are obsoleted by something in rawhide

2009-08-29 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:30:21 -0400 (EDT), Seth wrote: Working on something else I stumbled across this: http://fpaste.org/jDwM/ that's a list of pkgs in rawhide which are obsoleted by something else in rawhide. seems a bit dodgy to me. Yeah, often packagers don't request Fedora

Re: cpqarrayd for fedora 11 and 12

2009-08-29 Thread Steven Moix
Hi, On 08/28/2009 09:13 AM, Howard Wilkinson wrote: Is it really true that nobody else uses cpqarrayd? If so what do people use to monitor the HP/Compaq hardware in the Proliant range of servers? I'm using http://sourceforge.net/projects/cciss/files/cciss_vol_status/ for that purpose, with

Re: ABRT for f12 status

2009-08-29 Thread Kushal Das
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 3:57 AM, drago01drag...@gmail.com wrote: But do we even want to drop kerneloops from the distro? People may want to do random stuffs which will cause crashes in kernel and may be they want to use kerneloops directly to report them. Kushal -- http://fedoraproject.org

Re: Some ideas/questions about yum

2009-08-29 Thread Hedayat Vatnakhah
/*Muayyad AlSadi als...@gmail.com*/ wrote on ‫شنبه ۲۹ اوت ۰۹، ۰۳:۰۴:۳۷‬: 1. Since Fedora 4, Fedora doesn't support installing software from DVD out of the box. Fedora 8 is an exception here. Currently, it seems that the work is almost done (99% completed as in [1]), and fixing the remaining

Re: Some ideas/questions about yum

2009-08-29 Thread Hedayat Vatankhah
/*Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org*/ wrote on ‫جمعه ۲۸ اوت ۰۹، ۲۲:۰۳:۱۰‬: On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote: You don't need to know about all existing repositories, since you can still resolve file level dependencies. In such cases you'll be forced to download the other

Re: how to determain those no longer required packages

2009-08-29 Thread Ray Chen
Thanks, package-cleanup is what I want:) -Ray 在 2009-08-29六的 03:29 -0400,Michel Alexandre Salim写道: On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Ray Chenchenrano2...@163.com wrote: If the package has been installed automatically as a dependency of another package, and if no packages

Re: how to determain those no longer required packages

2009-08-29 Thread Milos Jakubicek
rpmreaper may be handy for that too... Regards, Milos Dne 29.8.2009 19:07, Ray Chen napsal(a): Thanks, package-cleanup is what I want:) -Ray 在 2009-08-29六的 03:29 -0400,Michel Alexandre Salim写道: On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Ray Chenchenrano2...@163.com wrote: If the package

Re: how to determain those no longer required packages

2009-08-29 Thread Ray Chen
rpmreaper is NOT installed by default, I want use yum API in scripts to remove unnecessary packages. The key is that how to determine the unnecessary packages. so that I can remove safely to save disk. Would you like show me more details?? What packages are unnecessary packages? Thanks, Ray 在

Re: Page size pain / localisation / possible F13 feature

2009-08-29 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 14:00 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: I'd guess Japan would too, that's the standard date format there IIRC. LANG=ja_JP.utf8 date +%x 2009年08月29日 Yeah, there's plenty of -MM-DD using locales listed in glibc, e.g. csb_PL de_AT de_BE de_LU en_DK fr_CA hu_HU se_NO si_LK

Re: how to determain those no longer required packages

2009-08-29 Thread Milos Jakubicek
Dne 29.8.2009 22:46, Ray Chen napsal(a): rpmreaper is NOT installed by default, I want use yum API in scripts to remove unnecessary packages. Rpmreaper doesn't use yum API, it's pure rpm-based. For usage refer to the relevant manpage (man rpmreaper), you might be especially insterested in

Re: how to determain those no longer required packages

2009-08-29 Thread Seth Vidal
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009, Ray Chen wrote: Thanks, package-cleanup is what I want:) -Ray install the plugin: remove-with-leaves then you can enable it when you want to remove a package and have yum remove anything that the pkg depends on that nothing else depends on. -sv --

Re: how to determain those no longer required packages

2009-08-29 Thread Muayyad AlSadi
warning: leaves in package-cleanup or remove-with-leaves could be your preferred application because it's a leaf [ie. no installed package depends on it, eg. pidgin or uget] there is a flag in conf of remove-with-leaves to exclude non-library binary packages from being removed Yum does not trace

Re: [Sugar-devel] Unbootable machine

2009-08-29 Thread Bernie Innocenti
El Sat, 29-08-2009 a las 10:25 -0400, Luke Faraone escribió: Well, the USB format idea was left unimplemented as we (I) couldn't get it working, but we should probably take a look at makebootfat to achieve the same goals. Or just use parted instead of fdisk to wipe the MBR and create it

Re: how to determain those no longer required packages

2009-08-29 Thread Ray Chen
在 2009-08-29六的 17:32 +0300,Muayyad AlSadi写道: warning: leaves in package-cleanup or remove-with-leaves could be your preferred application because it's a leaf [ie. no installed package depends on it, eg. pidgin or uget] The output of package-cleanup --leaves or remove-with-leaves doesn't

Re: [Sugar-devel] Unbootable machine

2009-08-29 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Also, the bootloader Gujin contains a stripped-down driver for ext4 so might be interesting for a fast-booting USB setup: http://gujin.sourceforge.net/ FWIW, Syslinux 4.00-preX supports ext4. -hpa -- fedora-devel-list mailing list

Re: [Sugar-devel] Unbootable machine

2009-08-29 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Bernie Innocenti wrote: El Sat, 29-08-2009 a las 10:25 -0400, Luke Faraone escribió: Well, the USB format idea was left unimplemented as we (I) couldn't get it working, but we should probably take a look at makebootfat to achieve the same goals. Or just use parted instead of fdisk to wipe

Re: how to determain those no longer required packages

2009-08-29 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Saturday 29 August 2009, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: warning: leaves in package-cleanup or remove-with-leaves could be your preferred application because it's a leaf [ie. no installed package depends on it, eg. pidgin or uget] FWIW, there's also a show-leaves plugin which just lists installed

Re: PolicyKit 0.9 is going away

2009-08-29 Thread Kevin Kofler
Matthias Clasen wrote: Anyway, this all seems to be a somewhat moot discussion, trying to nail us down on a 'promise to keep the old stuff around', when there already is a patch that can solve the whole dilemma. Looks like this is actually moot. I checked for how much of KDE really uses

Re: how to determain those no longer required packages

2009-08-29 Thread Axel Thimm
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 07:21:30AM +0800, Ray Chen wrote: 在 2009-08-29六的 17:32 +0300,Muayyad AlSadi写道: warning: leaves in package-cleanup or remove-with-leaves could be your preferred application because it's a leaf [ie. no installed package depends on it, eg. pidgin or uget] Yum does

Re: how to determain those no longer required packages

2009-08-29 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
AT == Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net writes: AT I don't think apt traces whether a packages was a pulled in manually AT or automatically, does it? yum does keep track of many things in the yumdb and I think the reason key is supposed to track this, but for me it seems reason is always user.

Canon PIXMA MP190 drivers

2009-08-29 Thread Mike Chambers
Yes I know I should had done my research before buying, but wasn't sure was gonna get it when I was at the store. Anyway, got this printer, plugged it in, was detected but said no drivers for it. Any plans on it, or way I can submit info from the CD to get them in? Thanks, Mike Chambers --

Re: Canon PIXMA MP190 drivers

2009-08-29 Thread Jerry James
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Mike Chambersm...@miketc.net wrote: Yes I know I should had done my research before buying, but wasn't sure was gonna get it when I was at the store.  Anyway, got this printer, plugged it in, was detected but said no drivers for it.  Any plans on it, or way I

Fedora on NSLU2/Synology/etc.

2009-08-29 Thread Pete Zaitcev
Dear All: I'm wondering if anyone tried to run Fedora on a small home NAS, in the class of NSLU2 or Synology 108j. I'm hacking on software that permits easy management of storage clouds and I'm thinking about creating a testbed populated with something cheap ($100 or so). Please let me know if

Re: Fedora on NSLU2/Synology/etc.

2009-08-29 Thread John Reiser
I'm wondering if anyone tried to run Fedora on a small home NAS, in the class of NSLU2 or Synology 108j. I'm hacking on software that permits easy management of storage clouds and I'm thinking about creating a testbed populated with something cheap ($100 or so). Various embedded derivatives of

rpms/perl-GStreamer/devel .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 perl-GStreamer.spec, 1.10, 1.11

2009-08-29 Thread Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-GStreamer/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2454 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-GStreamer.spec Log Message: * Sat Aug 29 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu - 0.15-4 - Filter errant private provides Index:

rpms/perl-HTML-Defang/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 perl-HTML-Defang.spec, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.2, 1.3

2009-08-29 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-HTML-Defang/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24311 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-HTML-Defang.spec sources Log Message: * Sat Aug 29 2009 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 1.02-1 - update to latest upstream version

rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-Natural/devel .cvsignore, 1.6, 1.7 perl-DateTime-Format-Natural.spec, 1.7, 1.8 sources, 1.6, 1.7

2009-08-29 Thread Iain Arnell
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-Natural/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22496 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-DateTime-Format-Natural.spec sources Log Message: * Sat Aug 29 2009 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.78-1 - update to