On 09/06/2009 05:42 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
nodata wrote:
I'd suggest hiding all of the Component, Version, Severity, Hardware, OS
information.
That makes no sense whatsoever, this information is required by the
developers for actually fixing the bug!
In my understanding, the purpose of
On 09/06/2009 09:30 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
You might want to look at
https://fedorahosted.org/boog/
We need to avoid duplication of work. Kushal Das hasn't started working
on the GUI since we are waiting on the design team to provide mockups
but he has a command line client that does
Steve Grubb píše v Pá 04. 09. 2009 v 14:41 -0400:
On Friday 04 September 2009 02:17:10 pm Dan Horák wrote:
I am building kernels for some ARM based devices that use Fedora/ARM as
user-land.
Glad to see someone else looking at the ARM kernel.
These devices are usually very limited in
Le Lun 7 septembre 2009 09:22, Nicu Buculei a écrit :
While there is probably a lot of room for collaboration, those tools
looks like having different targets, not replacements for each other:
one is a general bugzilla client aiming to be able to work with as many
ticketing systems as
Mike McGrath píše v Pá 04. 09. 2009 v 15:55 -0500:
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Dan Horák wrote:
Hi all,
I am building kernels for some ARM based devices that use Fedora/ARM as
user-land. These devices are usually very limited in the size of kernel
that can be stored in their flash memories
2009/9/6 Björn Persson bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se:
Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
You can always revoke a pub uuid in the future. Perhaps a message
about that will encourage people to be more forthcoming with Smolt
profiles within such a tool. Obviously, including a smolt profile just
automates certain
On 09/07/2009 01:36 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Lun 7 septembre 2009 09:22, Nicu Buculei a écrit :
While there is probably a lot of room for collaboration, those tools
looks like having different targets, not replacements for each other:
one is a general bugzilla client aiming to be
2009/9/7 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 09/07/2009 01:36 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
[..]
And many Fedora devs will ask to report the bug upstream instead, so a
tool that only works with bugzilla.redhat.com is pretty useless
[..]
If you want, check the number of bugs reported against RH bugzilla
On 09/07/2009 02:32 PM, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
btw .. python-bugzilla does work with upstream bugzilla nicely, and it
is of course not meant for other ticketing systems.
The problem is that deployments of bugzilla (GNOME, KDE etc) tend to be
customized and if we want to support them, we need to
On 09/07/2009 02:36 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 09/07/2009 02:32 PM, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
btw .. python-bugzilla does work with upstream bugzilla nicely, and it
is of course not meant for other ticketing systems.
The problem is that deployments of bugzilla (GNOME, KDE etc) tend to be
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Rakesh Panditrakesh.pan...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, that is going to be a bottleneck. But that has to be fixed while
working.
Customization also has levels. If they are customizing with customizing
interfaces already provided by bugzilla, then it wouldn't be a
On 09/05/2009 12:17 PM, nodata wrote:
I remember ages and ages ago when selinux first came to Fedora that lots
of apps (Java, flash, Mozilla/Firefox) didn't work because the apps did
dodgy things with memory.
I was wondering if these dodgy things still existed, and if they did,
what effort
Start Date: 2009-05-01 00:00:00
End Date: 2009-08-31 00:00:00
Parag AN(पराग) - 160
Jason Tibbitts - 63
Jussi Lehtola - 62
Mamoru Tasaka - 42
Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil - 25
Jochen Schmitt - 22
Andrew Overholt - 20
Christoph Wickert - 18
David Nalley - 16
Alexander Kurtakov - 15
Peter Lemenkov - 15
Jan
On Sat, 2009-09-05 at 08:02 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
Latest release in rawhide for evo is evolution-2.27.91-1.fc12.x86_64.
The latest built in koji is evolution-2.27.5-3.1.fc12.
Hi,
thank you for noticing. I just built a 2.27.92, which had been released
today, thus we are back on the
Hello All!
I just wondering why hermes_dld.ko hermes.ko were disabled in 2.6.30.
Did they obsoleted by orinoco*.ko ?
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
I went over to https://translate.fedoraproject.org/ earlier with the
idea of adding my project. Firstly, there's no hint of how to do this
from the front page. After some Leisure Suit Larry style clicking on
stuff at random until something favourable happens, I found a link
carefully hidden at
Matthew Booth wrote:
I went over to https://translate.fedoraproject.org/ earlier with the
idea of adding my project.
The translations are now hosted at http://transifex.net/ (the main Transifex
instance).
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Matthew Booth wrote:
I went over to https://translate.fedoraproject.org/ earlier with the idea of
adding my project. Firstly, there's no hint of how to do this from the front
page. After some Leisure Suit Larry style clicking on stuff at random until
something
On 07/09/09 21:56, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Despite that, I'd still like to add my project to Transifex! Can anybody
point me to the process?
Thanks,
Matt
Go to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N
-- Frequently Asked Questions
-- 1.3.8 How do I add a module to Transifex? (#add-transifex)
On 07/09/09 21:55, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Matthew Booth wrote:
I went over to https://translate.fedoraproject.org/ earlier with the
idea of adding my project.
The translations are now hosted at http://transifex.net/ (the main Transifex
instance).
Was there an official announcement about that?
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 23:17, Matthew Boothmbo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/09/09 21:55, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Matthew Booth wrote:
I went over to https://translate.fedoraproject.org/ earlier with the
idea of adding my project.
The translations are now hosted at http://transifex.net/ (the main
Hi,
The package wine-fonts is not mentioned, why? It contains
/usr/share/wine/fonts/symbol.ttf26040
/usr/share/wine/fonts/tahoma.ttf89124
/usr/share/wine/fonts/tahomabd.ttf 80408
/usr/share/wine/fonts/vgas1255.fon 6480
BTW is the name tahoma a trademark?
--
bbbush
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 20:10 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
On Sat, 2009-09-05 at 08:02 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
Latest release in rawhide for evo is evolution-2.27.91-1.fc12.x86_64.
The latest built in koji is evolution-2.27.5-3.1.fc12.
Hi,
thank you for noticing. I just built a
Hello Linus,
since when we culled OSS support in Fedora's kernel, sidplay
could not delight our ears with the three celestial, synth
voices of the SID.
If you like this patch, I'll go on and commit myself using my
überpackager superpowers. I'm also planning to submit the
autoconf changes
Le mardi 08 septembre 2009 à 09:11 +0800, Yuan Yijun a écrit :
Hi,
The package wine-fonts is not mentioned, why?
Excellent question, it certainly should have been, and I have no idea
why. Maybe it was not present in the source repo I used¹ when the test
was run ? Otherwise repoquery may have
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520505
--- Comment #11 from Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi 2009-09-07 16:13:55
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
is this all
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520505
--- Comment #12 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-09-07 16:47:41
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
(In reply to
27 matches
Mail list logo
