On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:10:03 +0200, Till wrote:
Good example of how poor the current process is.
I agree, but at least in 3 weeks if I do remember to write all mails or
bug comments, then FESCo will hopefully agree to allow other maintainers
to get the packages in this case. But I would
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
The non-responsive packager procedure could
have been started _several_ months earlier. Perhaps one year ago already.
There have been dead silent bugzilla tickets that ought to have raised an
alarm-bell.
Is this
Hi,
I have updated my laptop to rawhide using preupgrade. It worked without
any
major hitch, my only problem after update was with texlive (I changed the repo
to the rawhide version). I had installed the F11 version.
# yum update
Loaded plugins: dellsysidplugin2, presto,
Compose started at Sat Sep 12 06:15:05 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
--
anerley-0.0.20-3.fc12.i686 requires libmissioncontrol-client.so.0
anerley-devel-0.0.20-3.fc12.i686 requires pkgconfig(libmissioncontrol)
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:13:52AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The single month you're willing to wait is not much of a problem. There is
a more fundamental problem. The non-responsive packager procedure could
have been started _several_ months earlier. Perhaps one year ago already.
There
On 09/11/2009 04:17 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
Hmm - good idea. I'll put them up at a nightly URL to do that.
Did this go anywhere?
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/
Did this cause the nightlies to stop updating? I know they aren't very
useful right now, but I still like to see them as I add
On 09/12/2009 10:30 AM, Warren Togami wrote:
On 09/11/2009 04:17 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
Hmm - good idea. I'll put them up at a nightly URL to do that.
Did this go anywhere?
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/
Did this cause the nightlies to stop updating? I know they aren't very
useful right
You (spot) said:
undo arch-specific deps on gecko-libs and java (%%{?isa} doesn't work
like you think it works)
Unless I was told the wrong things in this thread:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-July/msg01366.html
... it *does* work like I think it works.
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 11:55:11PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
IMHO, a consecutive week or longer without being online (there are usually
ways to check your mail when on vacation, if not, see the next point) and
with no preannouncement (that's what the Vacation page in the wiki is for!)
is
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498746
--- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com 2009-09-12 03:53:02
EDT ---
That should be easy. All it would
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513580
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-09-12 13:54:25 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513580
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-09-12 13:54:54 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513580
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
13 matches
Mail list logo
