On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:02:38 +0200, Daniel Drake wrote:
> We do have a F11 box
[...]
> I then tried to create a F9 chroot using mock, with the intention of
> running revisor or pungi inside. This doesn't work, because mock
> creates a v9 berkeley DB inside the chroot, but the libraries/apps
> insid
2009/9/15 Jerry Vonau :
> Are you just adding rpms to the install media? Or are you trying
> something more difficult? I have a process in mind if you're just adding
> rpms to the mix...
Just adding RPMs would be enough, but also we're customizing the
kickstart file a little.
> However, I see tha
2009/9/15 Martin Langhoff :
> I keep my build machine of F9 due to similar issues I saw building F7
> from F9 -- however, ISTR there's been some discussion of this
> recently. Hmmm, a bit of googling leads to a nice thread
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-buildsys-l...@redhat.com/msg02210.ht
On 09/15/2009 01:10 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
>> This would be great if maintainers were willing to fix issues after the
>> fact. Look at rsync -- there's no incentive to fix the library issue at
>> this point because rsync is already in the distribution. We need to fix
>>
On 09/15/2009 01:29 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 12:34 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> This would be great if maintainers were willing to fix issues after
>> the
>> fact. Look at rsync -- there's no incentive to fix the library issue
>> at
>> this point because rsync is already i
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 15:10 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Not good at this point in the release cycle, but... an option is to
> block it
> from rawhide, until fixed/resolved. That'll light a fire to make
> things
> happen surely.
Please go ahead, and find another maintainer while you are there.
S
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 12:34 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> This would be great if maintainers were willing to fix issues after
> the
> fact. Look at rsync -- there's no incentive to fix the library issue
> at
> this point because rsync is already in the distribution. We need to
> fix
> this lack
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> This would be great if maintainers were willing to fix issues after the
> fact. Look at rsync -- there's no incentive to fix the library issue at
> this point because rsync is already in the distribution. We need to fix
> this lack of incentive for other reasons -- but w
On 09/15/2009 12:14 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 11:27 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> On 09/15/2009 06:55 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 13:44 +0200, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
Hey,
I googled for it and found Karims blogpost and Simon aka kass
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 11:27 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On 09/15/2009 06:55 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 13:44 +0200, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
> >> Hey,
> >>
> >> I googled for it and found Karims blogpost and Simon aka kassamedias
> >> answer (comment 3)
> >>
> >> http:
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 11:13 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> > We get FF [fixed format] displays pretty much right,
>
> What is holding up https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493441
Primarily that it's rage128 hardware, which no one likes working on.
> where a 1024x768 LCD panel is recognize
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 10:48 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I know that, in the dinosaur days of CRT, I could 'see' flicker (and get
> flicker-generated headaches) at anything under 80Hz, and I know there
> are even more sensitive people than that. So 72Hz may be a bit of a low
> 'safe refresh rat
On 09-09-15 12:06:54, Adam Jackson wrote:
...
> def mode_dpi_cmp(x, y):
> return cmp(abs(x.dpi - 96), abs(y.dpi - 96))
...
The names x and y suggest coordinates to me. I'd have read the code
right the first time if the names had been a and b.
> def best_mode(modes, dpi_known = True):
>
On 09/15/2009 06:55 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 13:44 +0200, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> I googled for it and found Karims blogpost and Simon aka kassamedias
>> answer (comment 3)
>>
>> http://kparal.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/zsync-transfer-large-files-efficiently/
On 09/15/2009 02:01 PM, John Reiser wrote:
> On 09/15/2009 10:29 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
>> I'm using the latest F11 version of squashfs-tools on a fully updated
>> x86_64 F11 box. Just discovered that it works on
>> Fedora-11-i686-Live.iso, but fails with F10-i686-Live.iso. So the new
>> quest
Josh Boyer (jwbo...@gmail.com) said:
> >I'm not sure how 'simple' that is in the koji configuration.
>
> It will have to be done anyway, yes?
Well, that would involve disabling all ppc builders for a release entirely,
which is much simpler. But this isn't the right list anyway.
Bill
--
fedora
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 01:56:55PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>Josh Boyer (jwbo...@gmail.com) said:
>> Simple solution: Don't build the noarch RPMs on ppc.
>> Why?: Because F12 is the last release that will have ppc be a primary arch
>> and it is fairly arguable that you want to optimize for t
> We get FF [fixed format] displays pretty much right,
What is holding up https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493441
where a 1024x768 LCD panel is recognized only as 800x600, and with
no option to choose 1024x768, except via explicit /etc/X11/xorg.conf ?
That box does not have EDID, but
On 09/15/2009 10:29 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
I'm using the latest F11 version of squashfs-tools on a fully updated
x86_64 F11 box. Just discovered that it works on
Fedora-11-i686-Live.iso, but fails with F10-i686-Live.iso. So the new
question is, why doesn't it work with the F10 image?
That'
Josh Boyer (jwbo...@gmail.com) said:
> Simple solution: Don't build the noarch RPMs on ppc.
> Why?: Because F12 is the last release that will have ppc be a primary arch
> and it is fairly arguable that you want to optimize for the future case going
> forward anyway.
I'm not sure how 'simple' tha
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:38:32AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 01:27 -0400, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Seth Vidal
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Boy, I'm so glad we decided to jump onto the xz ship.
>> >
>> I take it it's too late to back out a
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 12:06 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> In attempting to document how displays are expected to work in F12 [1],
> I realized we still don't have a decent heuristic for some cases.
>
> Broadly, displays are either fixed-format or variable-format. FF means
> you have some set numbe
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 01:27 -0400, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
> >
> > Boy, I'm so glad we decided to jump onto the xz ship.
> >
> I take it it's too late to back out and stick to bzip2 until the
> situation stabilizes? I take it whatever solu
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 08:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 08:55 -0600, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> > Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > > At present we are
> > > still in the contradictory and unsatisfactory position of
> > shipping rsync
> > > with an internal forked zlib b
In attempting to document how displays are expected to work in F12 [1],
I realized we still don't have a decent heuristic for some cases.
Broadly, displays are either fixed-format or variable-format. FF means
you have some set number of pixels, like an LCD. VF means you don't,
like a CRT. (Proj
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 13:44 +0200, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I googled for it and found Karims blogpost and Simon aka kassamedias
> answer (comment 3)
>
> http://kparal.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/zsync-transfer-large-files-efficiently/
If we _really_ cared about doing this OAOO, we co
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 19:29 +1000, Rodd Clarkson wrote:
> I've had a problem with X in f12 or some time that sees the mouse
> pointer freezing. I'm now having the same issue in f11.
>
> I'm happy to file a bug in bugzilla, but I'm hoping someone mught be
> able to point me in the right direction.
On 09/15/2009 01:15 PM, John Reiser wrote:
>> I tried doing this with the Live CDs for F10 and F11:
>
>> Parallel unsquashfs: Using 1 processor
>> FATAL ERROR aborting: failed to read fragment table
>
>> What am I doing wrong? (I'm using the i686 live CDs.
>
> What versions are involved? [uns
I tried doing this with the Live CDs for F10 and F11:
Parallel unsquashfs: Using 1 processor
FATAL ERROR aborting: failed to read fragment table
What am I doing wrong? (I'm using the i686 live CDs.
What versions are involved? [unsquashfs -v -ll foo.img]
unsquashfs version 4.0 works for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> At present we are
>> still in the contradictory and unsatisfactory position of
> shipping rsync
>> with an internal forked zlib but refusing to accept zsync
> as a package
>> because it does
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> What do you mean when you say it "will only clutter the space"?
By this I mean to say that if we give 4 gb pre-installed stuff then menu and
workspace will be too cluttered. It will be hard to find
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 08:55 -0600, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > At present we are
> > still in the contradictory and unsatisfactory position of
> shipping rsync
> > with an internal forked zlib but refusing to accept zsync
> as a package
> > because it does exactly
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 15:47 +0545, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A number of difficulties/unfortunate circumstances are combining and
> causing me a headache. I'm looking for help/ideas on getting around
> these...
>
> I am trying to build a customized version of the OLPC XS school server
> for t
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE Summary
Adam Williamson wrote:
> At present we are
> still in the contradictory and unsatisfactory position of
shipping rsync
> with an internal forked zlib but refusing to accept zsync
as a package
> because it does exactly the same thing.
I hope this would not mean that rsync would be discontinued
i
On 09/15/2009 04:44 AM, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I googled for it and found Karims blogpost and Simon aka kassamedias answer
> (comment 3)
>
> http://kparal.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/zsync-transfer-large-files-efficiently/
>
>
I will note that the reply is not quite right. We can
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 02:36:57PM +0100, Matthew Booth wrote:
> I'd like to add a new package (virt-v2v) to rawhide/F-12. Nothing
> depends on it. I don't appear to be able to do this, although I can add
> it to the supposedly stable F-11. This seems like an unlikely state of
> affairs. Am I mi
I'd like to add a new package (virt-v2v) to rawhide/F-12. Nothing
depends on it. I don't appear to be able to do this, although I can add
it to the supposedly stable F-11. This seems like an unlikely state of
affairs. Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Matt
--
Matthew Booth, RHCA, RHCSS
Red Hat
On 09/14/2009 03:48 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> On 09/14/2009 12:05 PM, John Reiser wrote:
>>> Deltaisos are capable of saving roughly half the download size in
>>> going from Fedora N to Fedora (N+1), but only work for installation
>>> images, not live images. Is there any form of delta compressi
Compose started at Tue Sep 15 06:15:09 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
--
anerley-0.0.20-3.fc12.i686 requires libmissioncontrol-client.so.0
anerley-devel-0.0.20-3.fc12.i686 requires pkgconfig(libmissioncontrol)
clutter-c
On Monday, 14 September 2009 at 22:41, Aditya Patawari wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:00 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> > I think that if we're going to ship software,
> > we should also preinstall it on the live image. Otherwise users can't try
> > it
> > out right away when starting the live sy
On 15/09/09 12:50, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
I want to become a maintainer too and I want to impress with some
unofficial reviews.
Don't really know if this is socially accepted to nag in other reviews
without having an open review request
Go right ahead. A valid comment is a valid comment re
I want to become a maintainer too and I want to impress with some unofficial
reviews.
Don't really know if this is socially accepted to nag in other reviews
without having an open review request
--
Josephine "Fine" Tannhäuser
2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-
Hey,
I googled for it and found Karims blogpost and Simon aka kassamedias answer
(comment 3)
http://kparal.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/zsync-transfer-large-files-efficiently/
--
Josephine "Fine" Tannhäuser
2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> I then tried to create a F9 chroot using mock, with the intention of
> running revisor or pungi inside. This doesn't work, because mock
> creates a v9 berkeley DB inside the chroot, but the libraries/apps
> inside the chroot only support bdb
Hi,
A number of difficulties/unfortunate circumstances are combining and
causing me a headache. I'm looking for help/ideas on getting around
these...
I am trying to build a customized version of the OLPC XS school server
for the OLPC deployment here in Nepal. The latest XS release is based
on F9.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Matthew Booth wrote:
> If so, could somebody have a look at
> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1662 for me? There are
> also older outstanding hosting requests than mine on there.
>
I'll take care of your request.
> Thanks,
>
--
Xavier.t L
If so, could somebody have a look at
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1662 for me? There
are also older outstanding hosting requests than mine on there.
Thanks,
Matt
--
Matthew Booth, RHCA, RHCSS
Red Hat Engineering, Virtualisation Team
M: +44 (0)7977 267231
GPG ID:
48 matches
Mail list logo
