> My Rawhide system has qdox version 1.9.2-1.fc12, installed on 19 August,
> and this is the latest version in koji, and so must have been the
> version in Rawhide at the time. The current version in Rawhide is
> 1.6.1-7.2.fc12, which was build in Koji on 28 July, but the file date in
> the Rawhide
On 09/18/2009 02:17 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Given that we are feature frozen, is it wise to bump mono like this at
> this stage in the development cycle?
No. We should be doing this work in the dist-f13 target, especially
given the complexity and pain of doing a proper bootstrap and rebuild.
~
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/18/2009 06:22 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, J. Randall Owens wrote:
>
>> On 09/18/2009 05:25 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
>>> If you do not care about IPv6, feel free to stop reading now.
>>>
>>> I would like to remove the dhcpv6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, J. Randall Owens wrote:
On 09/18/2009 05:25 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
If you do not care about IPv6, feel free to stop reading now.
I would like to remove the dhcpv6 package from Fedora as the current dhcp
package is now provi
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 16:17 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> o We also did a quick pass through the F12Blocker list to make sure
> there were no bugs that should also be on F12Beta.
Well, in fact we promoted two bugs to f12beta.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Ta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/18/2009 05:25 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
> If you do not care about IPv6, feel free to stop reading now.
>
> I would like to remove the dhcpv6 package from Fedora as the current dhcp
> package is now providing DHCPv6 protocol support for both the
I wrote:
> (The foundry which makes the Droid fonts sells a "Pro" version with higher
> glyph coverage, which we obviously cannot ship for both licensing and
> royalty reasons.)
That actually seems not to be true, I checked their site and they say the
Pro version only has more "typographical feat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If you do not care about IPv6, feel free to stop reading now.
I would like to remove the dhcpv6 package from Fedora as the current dhcp
package is now providing DHCPv6 protocol support for both the client, server,
and relay. ISC has finally surpasse
David Malcolm wrote:
> kde4-doxygen.sh
> /usr/bin/kde4-doxygen.sh from kdelibs-devel
> /usr/bin/kde4-doxygen.sh from kdelibs
This one was the same file accidentally shipped in both subpackages. Fixed
in 4.3.1-4.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redha
Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2009-09-18/fedora-bugzappers.2009-09-18-15.03.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2009-09-18/fedora-bugzappers.2009-09-18-15.03.txt
Log:
ht
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 23:38 +0100, Quentin Armitage wrote:
> My Rawhide system has rhpl version 0.221-1.i586 installed. The current
> version in Rawhide is 0.220-2.i686, and so it appears that the version
> number in Rawhide is behind that in F11.
Looks like a change was committed to the F-11 bra
My Rawhide system has rhpl version 0.221-1.i586 installed. The current
version in Rawhide is 0.220-2.i686, and so it appears that the version
number in Rawhide is behind that in F11.
Is there further an issue here, and also with some other packages, where
the Fedora version is not included in the
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 23:03 +0100, Quentin Armitage wrote:
> My Rawhide system has qdox version 1.9.2-1.fc12, installed on 19 August,
> and this is the latest version in koji, and so must have been the
> version in Rawhide at the time. The current version in Rawhide is
> 1.6.1-7.2.fc12, which was b
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 22:49 +0100, Quentin Armitage wrote:
> My Rawhide installation has pango version 1.25.5-1.fc12, installed on 25
> August. The latest version in Rawhide is now 1.25.4-2.1.fc12, built on
> 10 September.
>
> It seems as though the version number has gone backwards, and so yum
>
My Rawhide system has qdox version 1.9.2-1.fc12, installed on 19 August,
and this is the latest version in koji, and so must have been the
version in Rawhide at the time. The current version in Rawhide is
1.6.1-7.2.fc12, which was build in Koji on 28 July, but the file date in
the Rawhide download
My Rawhide installation has pango version 1.25.5-1.fc12, installed on 25
August. The latest version in Rawhide is now 1.25.4-2.1.fc12, built on
10 September.
It seems as though the version number has gone backwards, and so yum
does not upgrade (?downgrade) to the latest version.
--
fedora-deve
Sorry it's a bit, late, but it took a while to process all the results!
Graphics Test Week was a great success, with many people turning out to
all three events, many bugs filed, and many issues fixed already. Here's
a (long!) summary of all bugs filed in each event, and their current
statuses:
R
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 14:45 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> If you have a machine with an Intel graphics chip, I need your help.
> I'm trying to make LVDS connection detection actually reliable, and I
> think I have a solution that involves parsing BIOS data tables. But I
> need more testcases to rai
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Will Woods wrote:
- "Seth Vidal" wrote:
I wrote something similar:
http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/potential_conflict.py
which is what I believe autoqa is starting from for their file
conflict checker.
Indeed; see the version we're using in autoqa here:
htt
- "Seth Vidal" wrote:
> I wrote something similar:
>
> http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/potential_conflict.py
>
> which is what I believe autoqa is starting from for their file
> conflict checker.
Indeed; see the version we're using in autoqa here:
http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=au
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:02:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> you didn't explain what connectors the card *actually* has (what
> connectors xrandr *thinks* it has is different).
It has 15" LCD builtin to laptop (LVDS) and VGA port, no TV out.
--
pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 19:48 +, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> if you need some extra info just tell me.
you didn't explain what connectors the card *actually* has (what
connectors xrandr *thinks* it has is different).
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwil
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> If you have a machine with an Intel graphics chip, I need your help.
> I'm trying to make LVDS connection detection actually reliable, and I
> think I have a solution that involves parsing BIOS data tables. But I
> need more testcases to rai
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:45:10 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> % sudo dd if=/dev/mem of=/tmp/rom bs=64k skip=12 count=1
Here you go:
http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/184632/rom-nx7300
This is HP Compaq nx7300 laptop with Intel 945GM video chip.
Full smolt profile:
http://www.smolts.org/client/show/pub_dee
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 14:45 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> If you have a machine with an Intel graphics chip, I need your help.
> I'm trying to make LVDS connection detection actually reliable, and I
> think I have a solution that involves parsing BIOS data tables. But I
> need more testcases to rai
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 21:37 +0200, heph wrote:
> Hey,
>
> got a G45 here and it has VGA, DVI and HDMI. The monitor's attached to
> the DVI port.
>
> Output follows:
>
> [h...@dhara ~]$ sudo dd if=/dev/mem of=/tmp/rom bs=64k skip=12 count=1
> [sudo] password for heph:
> 1+0 records in
> 1+0 reco
Hey,
got a G45 here and it has VGA, DVI and HDMI. The monitor's attached to
the DVI port.
Output follows:
[h...@dhara ~]$ sudo dd if=/dev/mem of=/tmp/rom bs=64k skip=12 count=1
[sudo] password for heph:
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
65536 bytes (66 kB) copied, 0.00024473 s, 268 MB/s
Thanks fo
Fedora 12 Snapshot 3 is now available for testing. These snapshots
consist of live images only. These were composed yesterday, and made
available today.
Available at http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/:
Fedora 12 Live Snapshot 3, for i686 and x86_64
Fedora 12 Live KDE Snapshot 3, fo
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 14:45 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> and email me that rom file, along with a brief description of the
> machine, and in particular what graphics outputs (DVI, VGA, LVDS...) are
> _actually_ present on the machine.
For anyone not aware: LVDS is the internal display panel on a
If you have a machine with an Intel graphics chip, I need your help.
I'm trying to make LVDS connection detection actually reliable, and I
think I have a solution that involves parsing BIOS data tables. But I
need more testcases to raise my confidence that it's actually a reliable
method.
So, do
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:01:25AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 15:11 +1000, Rodd Clarkson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 21:15 +1000, Rodd Clarkson wrote:
> > > I'm pretty sure that this problem only occurs before I've cycled through
> > > a suspend-resume.
> > >
> >
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 12:03 -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> > Neither am I. Yet I do all I can to stay reachable.
>
> Right, but even still, I don't really think that "you're not online
> for a week, you're gone!" is the right approach. Ther
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 11:10 +0100, Paul wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Just spotted on the mono forums that mono-2.6 is being branched on
> Monday which means that it (should) be in the Rawhide repos Tuesday.
>
> As it stands, 2.6 is a world of difference to 2.4.2.3 in terms of speed
> and reliability.
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:23:13 -0400, Jon wrote:
> > Monitoring
> > how many bug reports go unanswered by maintainers for example.
>
> That would be a good start. One could produce a report (sounds like
> I'm volunteering, but I have no time this weekend because of my
> brother's wedding) for somet
Brown, Rodrick wrote:
> Dave so essentially @@GLIBC_2.2.5 is the symbol version set this release
> is based on? Not necessarily having anything to do with the underlying RPM
> package version? This is what I'm getting from your explanation.
Those symbols have not changed since version 2.2.5, so t
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) said:
>> google-droid-sans-fonts
>> google-droid-sans-mono-fonts
>> google-droid-serif-fonts
>
> Is there a reason we make these the default instead of the more-or-less
> current default of dejavu?
Good question, especially considering
Hi, is jgranado reading this list or anyone know where he is?
We're having a problem with the way he's setup his FAS account and
bugzilla account. If he can get in touch with me I can straighten
everything out. If not, we'll eventually need to orphan his packages to
stop the errors we're current
On Friday 18 September 2009 12:39:57 pm Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:03:05PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 September 2009 05:29:02 pm Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > If selinux is not disabled and it does not become permissive or
> > > enforcing, it has to get logged an
Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) said:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >
> > As far as I can tell, gnome-desktop doesn't include explicit (default or
> > otherwise) fonts either.
>
> I haven't dug through the dependency graph yet, but looking at
> fedora-livecd-desktop.k
Heads up, I'm working on a GM-1.3.7 update to F-11 which includes an ABI
break. I'll be taking care of building/fixing dependent packages
(including dvdauthor, koffice).
-- Rex
___
Fedora-devel-announce mailing list
fedora-devel-annou...@redhat.com
Jan Zeleny (jzel...@redhat.com) said:
> I'm current maintainer of xinetd in Fedora. Lately I've been inspecting some
> major patches and I was informed that upstream is pretty much dead. I think
> this project is interesting and it's worth to try to resurrect it.
>
> My plan is to start project
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:03:05PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Thursday 17 September 2009 05:29:02 pm Steve Grubb wrote:
> > If selinux is not disabled and it does not become permissive or enforcing,
> > it has to get logged and optionally shutdown the system.
> >
> > Aside from no logging, a
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:03:59PM -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> > Neither am I. Yet I do all I can to stay reachable.
>
> Right, but even still, I don't really think that "you're not online
> for a week, you're gone!" is the right approach
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
>
> Whether droid is installed/used by default is another issue entirely.
Is there a feature page for this by the way? (I didn't see one in a
quick search).
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.c
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Mamoru Tasaka
wrote:
>
> Well, just FYI there is a complaint that currently google-droid-XXX-fonts
> breaks
> Japanese default desktop font. It is rather annoying problem for CJK
> users what the "default" font is.
>
>
> By the way I have never tried to install goo
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Rahul Sundaram
wrote:
> Monitoring
> how many bug reports go unanswered by maintainers for example.
That would be a good start. One could produce a report (sounds like
I'm volunteering, but I have no time this weekend because of my
brother's wedding) for somethi
Colin Walters wrote, at 09/19/2009 12:55 AM +9:00:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
As far as I can tell, gnome-desktop doesn't include explicit (default or
otherwise) fonts either.
I haven't dug through the dependency g
Once upon a time, Jon Stanley said:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Neither am I. Yet I do all I can to stay reachable.
>
> Right, but even still, I don't really think that "you're not online
> for a week, you're gone!" is the right approach. There are probably a
> g
On 09/18/2009 09:33 PM, Jon Stanley wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
>> Neither am I. Yet I do all I can to stay reachable.
>
> Right, but even still, I don't really think that "you're not online
> for a week, you're gone!" is the right approach. There are probab
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Neither am I. Yet I do all I can to stay reachable.
Right, but even still, I don't really think that "you're not online
for a week, you're gone!" is the right approach. There are probably a
good many packagers that don't check in once a we
On Thursday 17 September 2009 05:29:02 pm Steve Grubb wrote:
> If selinux is not disabled and it does not become permissive or enforcing,
> it has to get logged and optionally shutdown the system.
>
> Aside from no logging, any ideas why selinux no longer works?
A few minutes ago, I updated to
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Colin Walters wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>>
>>> As far as I can tell, gnome-desktop doesn't include explicit (default or
>>> otherwise) fonts either.
>>
>> I haven't dug through the dependency graph yet, but
Colin Walters wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>
>> As far as I can tell, gnome-desktop doesn't include explicit (default or
>> otherwise) fonts either.
>
> I haven't dug through the dependency graph yet, but looking at
> fedora-livecd-desktop.ks:
>
> google-droid-sa
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>
>> As far as I can tell, gnome-desktop doesn't include explicit (default or
>> otherwise) fonts either.
>
> I haven't dug through the dependency graph yet, but looking at
> fedora-livecd-
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> As far as I can tell, gnome-desktop doesn't include explicit (default or
> otherwise) fonts either.
I haven't dug through the dependency graph yet, but looking at
fedora-livecd-desktop.ks:
google-droid-sans-fonts
google-droid-sans-mono-fonts
Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Daniel Mach wrote:
Which group should I install?
yum install @base-x is definitely not a good choice, it installs a lot of
packages I don't really want.
It's 107 additional packages to my current installation.
I'm just explaining the suppo
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:
>> I always thought that one reason for xinetd was the capability of running
>> network servers without actually having any network code in the server.
>
> Its network code, it just doesn't do listen/accept. :) Of course xinetd also
> takes care
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 16:51 +0200, Daniel Mach wrote:
> On 09/18/2009 04:42 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Daniel Mach wrote:
> >
> >> I've manually installed KDE desktop (yum install ..., i.e. without
> >> anaconda) and found that no fonts were installed.
> >>
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Jan Horak wrote:
> Hi,
> we would like to cooperate with Mozilla on reporting crashes into their bug
> reporting tool (http://crash-stats.mozilla.com/). To do so it is required to
> upload debug-like-info to specified location on remote server. This task
> should b
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Jan Horak wrote:
> Hi,
> we would like to cooperate with Mozilla on reporting crashes into their bug
> reporting tool (http://crash-stats.mozilla.com/). To do so it is required to
> upload debug-like-info to specified location on remote server. This task
> should b
Thanks!!
-Original Message-
From: fedora-devel-list-boun...@redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-devel-list-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Adam Jackson
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 11:08 AM
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject: Re: GNU libc confusion with symbols undefined.
O
Dave so essentially @@GLIBC_2.2.5 is the symbol version set this release is
based on? Not necessarily having anything to do with the underlying RPM package
version? This is what I'm getting from your explanation.
One question I'm still uncertain about is why do these symbols still show up as
un
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 09:21 -0500, Brown, Rodrick wrote:
> I'm trying to understand the following here
>
> I have a simple test program that calls memcpy/malloc/printf
>
> int
> main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> char * p = malloc(10);
> memcpy(p,"Hello",6);
> printf("%s\n", p);
> }
>
> When l
On 09/18/2009 10:27 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 10:15 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> On 09/18/2009 10:01 AM, Steve Grubb wrote:
>>> On Friday 18 September 2009 09:54:12 am Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> If the kernel has SELinux and it is not in permissive mode, it should
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 15:11 +1000, Rodd Clarkson wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 21:15 +1000, Rodd Clarkson wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure that this problem only occurs before I've cycled through
> > a suspend-resume.
> >
> > I suspect bluetooth issues because the bluetooth icon appears until I do
> >
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Daniel Mach wrote:
>
> Which group should I install?
> yum install @base-x is definitely not a good choice, it installs a lot of
> packages I don't really want.
> It's 107 additional packages to my current installation.
I'm just explaining the supported way to ins
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 09:21 -0500, Brown, Rodrick wrote:
> I'm trying to understand the following here
>
> I have a simple test program that calls memcpy/malloc/printf
>
> int
> main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> char * p = malloc(10);
> memcpy(p,"Hello",6);
> printf("%s\n", p);
> }
>
> When l
On 09/18/2009 10:25 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 10:16 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> On 09/18/2009 10:05 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 10:01 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Friday 18 September 2009 09:54:12 am Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>> If the ker
On 09/18/2009 04:42 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Daniel Mach wrote:
I've manually installed KDE desktop (yum install ..., i.e. without
anaconda) and found that no fonts were installed.
Use "yum groupinstall" to add a desktop.
Which group should I i
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Daniel Mach wrote:
> I've manually installed KDE desktop (yum install ..., i.e. without
> anaconda) and found that no fonts were installed.
Use "yum groupinstall" to add a desktop.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redha
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 10:15 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 09/18/2009 10:01 AM, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Friday 18 September 2009 09:54:12 am Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> If the kernel has SELinux and it is not in permissive mode, it should
> execute load_policy
> >>
> >> Yes in permissiv
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 10:16 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 09/18/2009 10:05 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 10:01 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> >> On Friday 18 September 2009 09:54:12 am Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> > If the kernel has SELinux and it is not in permissive mode,
I'm trying to understand the following here
I have a simple test program that calls memcpy/malloc/printf
int
main(int argc, char **argv)
{
char * p = malloc(10);
memcpy(p,"Hello",6);
printf("%s\n", p);
}
When looking at the symbol list why are the following routines undefined? And
why is it
On 09/18/2009 10:05 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 10:01 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
>> On Friday 18 September 2009 09:54:12 am Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> If the kernel has SELinux and it is not in permissive mode, it should
> execute load_policy
>>>
>>> Yes in permissive mo
On 09/18/2009 10:01 AM, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Friday 18 September 2009 09:54:12 am Daniel J Walsh wrote:
If the kernel has SELinux and it is not in permissive mode, it should
execute load_policy
>>
>> Yes in permissive mode load_policy will return 2 if it can not load policy.
>> I gues
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 10:01 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Friday 18 September 2009 09:54:12 am Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> > >> If the kernel has SELinux and it is not in permissive mode, it should
> > >> execute load_policy
> >
> > Yes in permissive mode load_policy will return 2 if it can not load
I've manually installed KDE desktop (yum install ..., i.e. without
anaconda) and found that no fonts were installed.
There were just rectangles instead of letters in KDM.
I filed a bug (#523957) which led to conclusion to discuss this issue on
fedora-devel.
It looks like no common desktop pac
Aloas,
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 07:01:21PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> I want to start the non-responsive maintainer process for Krzysztof
> Kurzawski, because youtube-dl was not updated for several releases and
> there was not response to bug reports regarding this.
>
> I will use this bug to trac
On 09/18/2009 09:44 AM, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a couple clarifications for anyone implementing this.
>
> On Friday 18 September 2009 07:34:29 am Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> Bottom line is a bug in the dracut scripts. The scripts should execute
>> load_policy and if for ANY reason load_p
On Friday 18 September 2009 09:54:12 am Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> >> If the kernel has SELinux and it is not in permissive mode, it should
> >> execute load_policy
>
> Yes in permissive mode load_policy will return 2 if it can not load policy.
> I guess dracut should also look in /etc/selinux/confi
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 09:17 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 09/18/2009 08:35 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 07:34 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> >> On 09/17/2009 09:39 PM, Yuan Yijun wrote:
> >>> 2009/9/18 Steve Grubb :
> hi,
>
> What's happened in our rawhide
Hi,
Just a couple clarifications for anyone implementing this.
On Friday 18 September 2009 07:34:29 am Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> Bottom line is a bug in the dracut scripts. The scripts should execute
> load_policy and if for ANY reason load_policy fails and the machine is in
> enforcing mode the
On Friday 18 September 2009 08:34:03 am Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:24:18 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > I also think that the reason xinetd came into existence in the first
> > place has long since passed. The original intent was to save memory
> > by not having half a d
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 09:05 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/17/2009 07:04 PM, S Knox wrote:
> > Dear list,
> > Back in 2006, someone wrote the following:
> >
On 09/18/2009 08:35 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 07:34 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> On 09/17/2009 09:39 PM, Yuan Yijun wrote:
>>> 2009/9/18 Steve Grubb :
hi,
What's happened in our rawhide boot sequence that cause selinux to not be
running anymore? Selin
Hi,
we would like to cooperate with Mozilla on reporting crashes into their
bug reporting tool (http://crash-stats.mozilla.com/). To do so it is
required to upload debug-like-info to specified location on remote
server. This task should be done the same time the xulrunner, firefox or
thunderbi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2009 07:04 PM, S Knox wrote:
> Dear list,
> Back in 2006, someone wrote the following:
> -
>
> * /From/: Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
> * /To/: Development
Due to a little communications failure on my end, there may or may not
be a FESCo meeting today. If some FESCo member wants to step up and
chair it, that would be most helpful.
The following items are on the agenda:
252 sponsor application by Till Maas
251 simplify non-responsive maintai
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 07:34 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 09/17/2009 09:39 PM, Yuan Yijun wrote:
> > 2009/9/18 Steve Grubb :
> >> hi,
> >>
> >> What's happened in our rawhide boot sequence that cause selinux to not be
> >> running anymore? Selinux is not disabled in the grub.conf kernel line an
Compose started at Fri Sep 18 06:15:05 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
--
PolicyKit-olpc-1.2-2.fc11.noarch requires /var/lib/PolicyKit-public
anerley-0.0.20-3.fc12.i686 requires libmissioncontrol-client.so.0
anerley-0.0.
Hi.
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:24:18 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> I also think that the reason xinetd came into existence in the first
> place has long since passed. The original intent was to save memory
> by not having half a dozen servers running. (Remember the early
> 1990's systems.) Today we hav
On Friday 18 September 2009 06:04:43 am Jan Safranek wrote:
> Don't forget to announce the fork on xinetd mailing list.
Its dead.
> Also, contacting orginal xinetd maintainer if he is willing to contribute,
> e.g. with xinetd.org domain :).
I am/was the co-maintainer of xinetd. I hearby relinq
On Thursday 17 September 2009 09:39:48 pm Yuan Yijun wrote:
> > What's happened in our rawhide boot sequence that cause selinux to not be
> > running anymore? Selinux is not disabled in the grub.conf kernel line and
> > sestatus shows its disabled. There is nothing in the system logs saying
> > tha
On 09/17/2009 09:39 PM, Yuan Yijun wrote:
> 2009/9/18 Steve Grubb :
>> hi,
>>
>> What's happened in our rawhide boot sequence that cause selinux to not be
>> running anymore? Selinux is not disabled in the grub.conf kernel line and
>> sestatus shows its disabled. There is nothing in the system logs
Hi Folks,
Just spotted on the mono forums that mono-2.6 is being branched on
Monday which means that it (should) be in the Rawhide repos Tuesday.
As it stands, 2.6 is a world of difference to 2.4.2.3 in terms of speed
and reliability. I've not encountered any big problems with code
compiled unde
On 09/18/2009 09:31 AM, Jan Zeleny wrote:
Hi all,
I'm current maintainer of xinetd in Fedora. Lately I've been inspecting some
major patches and I was informed that upstream is pretty much dead. I think
this project is interesting and it's worth to try to resurrect it.
My plan is to start projec
Hi,
I've made quite big changes to some Finnish spell checking, hyphenation
and grammar checking libraries for F-12. I'll talk about them here in
case there's people on the list who are interested in this stuff.
Libvoikko is the main library for Finnish spell checking, hyphenation
and grammar che
2009/9/17 Adam Williamson :
> On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 09:52 +0200, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
>
>> >> PS3MediaServer. A Java program to talk to a PS3 with DLNA. I'm
>> >> guessing this one would have problems because it requires ffmpeg or
>> >> mplayer/mencoder... Plus as a java program its probably a bit m
Heya,
The gupnp stack was upgraded to the latest version yesterday.
Both rygel and nautilus-sendto are due upstream releases to fix gupnp
0.13 support, and I'll be porting bickley to the new version as well.
If you have a package that depends on gupnp-igd, or libnice, please
rebuild it for the n
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 09:31:49AM +0200, Jan Zeleny wrote:
> > I already have one developer, who is willing to join me. I'd like to know
> > your opinion of this project. And of course if there is anybody who would
> > like to join, just let me know, I'd be happy to gather some more people
> > t
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
