On 10/07/2009 07:25 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> There was at least one noarch package in today's Rawhide updates, and I
> didn't see the usual "md5 mismatch" error when rebuilding the RPMs.
> Does this mean that they are now being built on a little endian arch
> (probably Intel), and if so, will th
i like vim , I'll take it.
2009/10/7 Orion Poplawski
> On 10/06/2009 03:41 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
>
>> Matej Cepl, Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:26:09 +:
>>
>>> However, for personal reasons I
>>> need to decrease my personal involvment in non-work related Fedora work.
>>>
>>
>> I have still on my list
There was at least one noarch package in today's Rawhide updates, and I
didn't see the usual "md5 mismatch" error when rebuilding the RPMs.
Does this mean that they are now being built on a little endian arch
(probably Intel), and if so, will this be done consistently from now on?
(At least until
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> which is that we should avoid making permanent optimizations, and
> instead try to do runtime tests wherever possible. This is because
> P2V, V2V and virtual machine migration makes it more likely that
> CPU features such as SSE* can cha
I don't know if this thread reached a conclusion, but I'd like to add
point #6 from here:
http://rwmj.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/what-things-make-p2vv2v-conversion-hard/
which is that we should avoid making permanent optimizations, and
instead try to do runtime tests wherever possible. This is bec
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 17:00 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
that feature has been in since the first update of yum released for
f11.
so it's been in use for at least 6 months, now.
I stand corrected. I could have sworn we had a discussion about a late
lan
Hi everybody,
I've started packaging TypePad Motion [1] and thrown it into a repo at
my FedoraPeople space [2] in case some of you wanted to give it a try.
It's pretty easy, just install the RPMs from above and run:
django-admin typepadproject mymotion --settings=motion.settings
Executing
On 10/06/2009 03:41 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
Matej Cepl, Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:26:09 +:
However, for personal reasons I
need to decrease my personal involvment in non-work related Fedora work.
I have still on my list:
* ldapvi -- An interactive LDAP client (the best tool for managing LDAP
s
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 17:00 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
> that feature has been in since the first update of yum released for
> f11.
>
> so it's been in use for at least 6 months, now.
I stand corrected. I could have sworn we had a discussion about a late
landing change for the history db.
--
Je
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 14:07 -0400, James Antill wrote:
Yum already keeps track of that:
"already" as in a brand new feature not seen outside of rawhide IIRC.
And that's great for packages installed via yum via repos, which leaves
the other junk to w
Le mardi 06 octobre 2009 20:15:40, Jesse Keating a écrit :
> On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 14:07 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> > Yum already keeps track of that:
>
> "already" as in a brand new feature not seen outside of rawhide IIRC.
> And that's great for packages installed via yum via repos, which lea
Greetings folks,
This week features another test day focused on the installer. The topic
is all things RAID. The anaconda-devel team has asked for help testing
software RAID, BIOS RAID and hardware RAID. While this is specific to
installation, I certainly welcome testing using mdadm tools on al
2009/10/6 Joshua C. :
> 2009/10/6 Matej Cepl :
>> Joshua C., Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:05:54 +0200:
>>
>> Do we have a bug for this? If not, please do file one and include all
>> those information you collected for this thread together with /var/log/
>> Xorg.0.log (if possible after the problem happened
Le Mar 6 octobre 2009 17:03, Tom \"spot\" Callaway a écrit :
>
> On 10/06/2009 10:37 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> It is out of scope for this discussion though, the question here is
>> about the default value Fedora packages should have. The BUGURL tag
>> contents is just a plain old string whic
Compose started at Tue Oct 6 06:15:15 UTC 2009
Broken deps for ppc64
--
python-mwlib-0.11.2-3.20090522hg2956.fc12.ppc64 requires LabPlot
New package pure
A term-rewriting functional programming language
Removed pa
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 14:07 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> Yum already keeps track of that:
"already" as in a brand new feature not seen outside of rawhide IIRC.
And that's great for packages installed via yum via repos, which leaves
the other junk to worry about.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freed
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 10:43 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 19:59 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > Well in that case rpm is the wrong place entirely, and ditto for respins
> > controlling their own bug report URLs. For these you'd want the bug
> > reporting URL in repodata in
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 10:43 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> So I guess the real question is do we want our packages built in koji to
> assume a bug URL of fedora, even when used in downstream projects?
I think that's a giant assumption - if the maintainer didn't put that
URL in the package themselv
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 19:59 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Well in that case rpm is the wrong place entirely, and ditto for respins
> controlling their own bug report URLs. For these you'd want the bug
> reporting URL in repodata instead: spins are creating their own
> repositories so they can
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 09:32:08AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 01:49:49PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >Oracle released a new DB 4.8.24 recently and it is now ready to hit
> >rawhide. Before that happens I want to let you test your package(s)
>
> You mean devel/d
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 17:37 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Something like that is quite easily doable by adding a RPMTAG_BUGURL tag
extension which grabs its value from macro configuration if set, otherwise
use the contents from the package.
It is out of
On 10/06/2009 11:41 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
Matej Cepl, Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:26:09 +:
However, for personal reasons I
need to decrease my personal involvment in non-work related Fedora work.
I have still on my list:
* vim-vimoutliner -- Script for building an outline editor on top of Vim
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE Summary
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 17:37 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Something like that is quite easily doable by adding a RPMTAG_BUGURL tag
> extension which grabs its value from macro configuration if set, otherwise
> use the contents from the package.
>
> It is out of scope for this discussion though
On 10/06/2009 10:37 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> It is out of scope for this discussion though, the question here is
> about the default value Fedora packages should have. The BUGURL tag
> contents is just a plain old string which is expanded from %bugurl macro
> at build time and currently no furt
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Juha Tuomala wrote:
On Tuesday 06 October 2009 15:48:32 Panu Matilainen wrote:
This was added to Fedora's rpm recently, what's still missing is the
default contents of the %{bugurl} macro in redhat-rpm-config.
Opinions wanted:
a) just make it https://bugzilla.redhat.com
b)
I'm trying to build the latest Asterisk sounds package, but I'm
getting the following error:
error: Recognition of file
"/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/asterisk-sounds-core-1.4.16-1.fc13.noarch/usr/share/asterisk/sounds/fr/digits/1.g729"
failed: mode 100444 zlib: invalid stored block lengthsempty (gzip
2009/10/6 Matej Cepl :
> Joshua C., Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:05:54 +0200:
>
> Do we have a bug for this? If not, please do file one and include all
> those information you collected for this thread together with /var/log/
> Xorg.0.log (if possible after the problem happened -- on reboot put 3 to
> the e
On 10/06/2009 06:43 PM, Juha Tuomala wrote:
On Tuesday 06 October 2009 15:48:32 Panu Matilainen wrote:
This was added to Fedora's rpm recently, what's still missing is the
default contents of the %{bugurl} macro in redhat-rpm-config.
Opinions wanted:
a) just make it https://bugzilla.redhat.
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 01:49:49PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Oracle released a new DB 4.8.24 recently and it is now ready to hit
>rawhide. Before that happens I want to let you test your package(s)
You mean devel/dist-f13. Rawhide is still tracking dist-f12.
/me tries to avoid confusio
On Tuesday 06 October 2009 15:48:32 Panu Matilainen wrote:
> This was added to Fedora's rpm recently, what's still missing is the
> default contents of the %{bugurl} macro in redhat-rpm-config.
> Opinions wanted:
>
> a) just make it https://bugzilla.redhat.com
> b) use http://bugz.fedoraprojec
Le 06/10/2009 14:48, Panu Matilainen a écrit :
>
> A while ago there was a request to add a bug reporting URL to packages:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512774
>
> This was added to Fedora's rpm recently, what's still missing is the
> default contents of the %{bugurl} macro in red
A while ago there was a request to add a bug reporting URL to packages:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512774
This was added to Fedora's rpm recently, what's still missing is the
default contents of the %{bugurl} macro in redhat-rpm-config.
Opinions wanted:
a) just make it https:
Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
2009/10/6 Peter Robinson :
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
yum list all |grep olpc
dracut-modules-olpc.x86_64 0.2.1-2.fc12 rawhide
olpc-contents.x86_6
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> 2009/10/6 Peter Robinson :
>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
>>> yum list all |grep olpc
>>> dracut-modules-olpc.x86_64 0.2.1-2.fc12
>>> rawhide
>>> olpc-contents.x86_64
2009/10/6 Peter Robinson :
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
>> yum list all |grep olpc
>> dracut-modules-olpc.x86_64 0.2.1-2.fc12
>> rawhide
>> olpc-contents.x86_64 2.6-2.fc12
>> rawhide
>> olpc-library.n
Hi!
Oracle released a new DB 4.8.24 recently and it is now ready to hit
rawhide. Before that happens I want to let you test your package(s)
with this new release so that we may delay updating to the latest
version if severe problems with it are reported.
With an exception of the RPC support which
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> yum list all |grep olpc
> dracut-modules-olpc.x86_64 0.2.1-2.fc12 rawhide
> olpc-contents.x86_64 2.6-2.fc12 rawhide
> olpc-library.noarch 2.0.2-2.fc12
Hi,
I am a user of the 'usb_modeswitch'[1] tool which is also available as a Fedora
package.
Since this is a tool to be run as super-user but currently does not error out or
warn when it is not invoked by root. I thought that i'd file a bug against the
package to prompt for root password.
yum list all |grep olpc
dracut-modules-olpc.x86_64 0.2.1-2.fc12 rawhide
olpc-contents.x86_642.6-2.fc12 rawhide
olpc-library.noarch 2.0.2-2.fc12 rawhide
olpc-netutils.noarch
Matej Cepl, Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:26:09 +:
> However, for personal reasons I
> need to decrease my personal involvment in non-work related Fedora work.
I have still on my list:
* cycle -- Calendar program for women (any ladies would like to decrease
gender gap in Fedora packaging? Or would li
Hi,
the repository at http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/packages/
contains a lot of rawhide (f12) packages, so it can no longer be used
on f11, was that intentional?
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Moschny
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mai
Joshua C., Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:05:54 +0200:
Do we have a bug for this? If not, please do file one and include all
those information you collected for this thread together with /var/log/
Xorg.0.log (if possible after the problem happened -- on reboot put 3 to
the end of the kernel command line, s
- "Michal Nowak" wrote:
> But there's patch http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20901
> you might wanna test it -- looked good.
As of now it's "RESOLVED FIXED". Should be part of 2.6.32 kernel (when
is out).
Michal
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
ht
The report for 20091001 shows the following broken dependency, and it is
not listed in the report for 20091002:
perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP-0.85-3.fc11.noarch requires
perl(POE::Component::Client::Keepalive) >= 0:0.0901
However, the report for 20091002 shows no relevant package update that
coul
On 10/05/2009 09:05 PM, Joshua C. wrote:
> 2009/10/5 Adam Jackson :
>
>> On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 19:19 +0200, Joshua C. wrote:
>>
>>
>>> (gdb) bt
>>> #0 0x003cc3cd70b3 in __select_nocancel () from /lib64/libc.so.6
>>> #1 0x004e615a in WaitForSomething (
>>> pClientsReady=) a
46 matches
Mail list logo
