On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 21:29:24 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> You should always adjust any build process which wants to use custom
> compiler flags to use the standard Fedora flags. Well-written build
> systems allow you to set compiler flags trivially with a parameter or
> environment var
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 23:07 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I am working on packaging pagedgeometry and I noticed that when building
> on gcc it passes -msse which I am guessing says to use sse instructions.
> I think that even in F12 we can't assume these instructions are available.
> The package
I am working on packaging pagedgeometry and I noticed that when building
on gcc it passes -msse which I am guessing says to use sse instructions.
I think that even in F12 we can't assume these instructions are available.
The package may gain a lot of benefit from using those instructions.
(I haven'
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:44:51 +0100, Christoph Frieben
wrote:
> I had already pointed out that this issue also affects the current
> default system font. Let's see what other people out there think about
> this issue. It's not like you are the supreme judge in this matter,
> and it's also not the
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 18:03 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 15:48 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 18:34 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 17:31 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > > > It seems, whether you use the bottom panel, or chan
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 15:48 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 18:34 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 17:31 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > > It seems, whether you use the bottom panel, or change the top panel to
> > > be the bottom (speaking after an initi
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 18:34 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 17:31 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > It seems, whether you use the bottom panel, or change the top panel to
> > be the bottom (speaking after an initial rawhide install), and go to
> > properties and change the color
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Mike McLean wrote:
After updating Firefox it gave me the "You should update Adobe Flash
Player right now." page. However, I already have the latest version
(10.0.32.18). I don't see anything newer. Am I missing something, or
is Firefox just getting it wrong?
I had time, an
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 17:31 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> It seems, whether you use the bottom panel, or change the top panel to
> be the bottom (speaking after an initial rawhide install), and go to
> properties and change the color of it, it crashes. It logs you out of
> gnome and into gdm, then
(Scene: Curtain raises. A haggard figure stumbles in from stage left,
blinking at the lights.)
AdamW: Where am I? What year is this? WHO'S THE PRESIDENT?!
FIN
Yes, today's epic F12 blocker bug review meeting has finally ended. Some
statistics:
We reviewed 43 bugs in total. The meeting took 406
It seems, whether you use the bottom panel, or change the top panel to
be the bottom (speaking after an initial rawhide install), and go to
properties and change the color of it, it crashes. It logs you out of
gnome and into gdm, then fails to load and won't allow you to log in to
gnome again.
An
On 10/30/2009 11:34 AM, Mike McLean wrote:
After updating Firefox it gave me the "You should update Adobe Flash
Player right now." page. However, I already have the latest version
(10.0.32.18). I don't see anything newer. Am I missing something, or
is Firefox just getting it wrong?
https://bug
Le Ven 30 octobre 2009 13:59, Benny Amorsen a écrit :
> It would be nice if fonts like Inconsolata somehow set a flag that they
> require hinting. This would prevent the side effects on old fonts.
This could technically be done in fontconfig IIRC but it would require a lot
of unglamorous manual
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 10/30/2009 12:03 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>> On 10/30/2009 11:00 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>
1:nant-0.85-30.fc12.i686 requires mono(NDoc.Core) = 0:1.3.3498.0
>>>
>>> This one still needs attention from a Mo
Epiphany switched to webkit by default since 2.27 series, for Fedora, it
will be for F-12.
Cheers,
H.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Friday 30 October 2009 09:01:39 am Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
> 2009/7/14 Conrad Meyer :
> > I intend to orphan the JRuby package and some of the dependencies I don't
> > believe anything else uses. It's a piece of software upstream really
> > doesn't intend to be packaged, and bumping to new vers
2009/10/30 Felix Miata:
> 2.24?
> 2.25?
> 2.26?
> 2.27? (my guess)
> 2.28?
>
> And, when did the switch from Gecko happen? F10? F11? F12?
This was epiphany-2.27.2-1.fc12:
* Mon Jun 01 2009 Matthias Clasen - 2.27.2-1
- Update to 2.27.2
- Build against webkit instead of gecko
--
fedora-devel-lis
I wrote:
> Rawhide Report wrote:
>> gnome-applet-timer-2.1.2-4.fc12.i686 requires gnome-audio
>
> That dependency was added to fix a missing file, but the problem is that
> that package got retired in F12. See:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531877#c4
> for details and a suggested
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 13:16:03 -0400,
Tom spot Callaway wrote:
>
> In case I get eaten by raptors (or someone else has to do this task in
> the future), here's the gory details:
I don't think I need to know the gory details of you being eaten by raptors.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
f
2.24?
2.25?
2.26?
2.27? (my guess)
2.28?
And, when did the switch from Gecko happen? F10? F11? F12?
--
" A patriot without religion . . . is as great a
paradox, as an honest man without the fear of God. . . .
2nd U.S. President, John Adams
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Mike McLean wrote:
> After updating Firefox it gave me the "You should update Adobe Flash
> Player right now." page. However, I already have the latest version
> (10.0.32.18). I don't see anything newer. Am I missing something, or
> is Firefox just getting it wron
After updating Firefox it gave me the "You should update Adobe Flash
Player right now." page. However, I already have the latest version
(10.0.32.18). I don't see anything newer. Am I missing something, or
is Firefox just getting it wrong?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redha
On 10/30/2009 12:03 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 10/30/2009 11:00 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
>>> 1:nant-0.85-30.fc12.i686 requires mono(NDoc.Core) = 0:1.3.3498.0
>>
>> This one still needs attention from a Mono person to fix the rebuild. (A
>> rebuild would be all that's needed, but the pro
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 05:26:25PM +, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> 2009/10/29 Jindrich Novy :
> > Currently I'm trying to not to replace any package that has a separate
> > upstream and is already packaged separatelly in Fedora.
> >
>
> IMO I think we'd be better off adopting the texlive versio
On 10/30/2009 11:00 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> 1:nant-0.85-30.fc12.i686 requires mono(NDoc.Core) = 0:1.3.3498.0
>
> This one still needs attention from a Mono person to fix the rebuild. (A
> rebuild would be all that's needed, but the problem is that it's failing to
> build.
> http://koji.fedo
2009/7/14 Conrad Meyer :
> I intend to orphan the JRuby package and some of the dependencies I don't
> believe anything else uses. It's a piece of software upstream really doesn't
> intend to be packaged, and bumping to new versions is a constant struggle.
> Furthermore, I don't have anymore use fo
Rawhide Report wrote:
> gnome-applet-timer-2.1.2-4.fc12.i686 requires gnome-audio
That dependency was added to fix a missing file, but the problem is that
that package got retired in F12. See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531877#c4
for details and a suggested fix.
> 1:nant-0.85-30
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 01:17:09PM -0400, Martin Dubuc wrote:
> How is it possible to figure out what driver is associated with which
> interface. We used to have some of this information available in
> /sys/config/hwconf. I am especially interested to know details of Wi-Fi
> interfaces (for instan
Matěj Cepl writes:
> I don't think we should back progress in order to be friendly to buggy
> closed Microsoft fonts. I know they are quite common outside of the
> Linux world, but I think
>
> a) our free fonts are now so good, that we could limit ourselves to
> this FSF-nirvana ghetto, it doesn'
Dne 29.10.2009 15:34, Nicolas Mailhot napsal(a):
It is well known that some old fonts like Microsoft core fonts have bad/buggy
hinting (MS hides the problem by adding font-specific workarounds in its text
stack). They should certainly never be used to evaluate if a general default
is good or not.
Compose started at Fri Oct 30 06:15:14 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
--
gnome-applet-timer-2.1.2-4.fc12.i686 requires gnome-audio
1:nant-0.85-30.fc12.i686 requires mono(NDoc.Core) = 0:1.3.3498.0
Broken deps for x86_64
-
31 matches
Mail list logo
