2009/10/31 Bruno Wolff III :
> I am working on packaging pagedgeometry and I noticed that when building
> on gcc it passes -msse which I am guessing says to use sse instructions.
> I think that even in F12 we can't assume these instructions are available.
> The package may gain a lot of benefit fro
Compose started at Sat Oct 31 06:15:21 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
--
1:nant-0.85-30.fc12.i686 requires mono(NDoc.Core) = 0:1.3.3498.0
Broken deps for x86_64
--
1:na
As I know, the kernel is compressed with bzip2 or gzip. How about
using LZMA instead? Or is that already the case?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Ikem Krueger
wrote:
> As I know, the kernel is compressed with bzip2 or gzip. How about
> using LZMA instead? Or is that already the case?
There is such an option but it is currently disabled due to missing
support in xen.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedor
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 09:25:30 +0100,
Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> -msse is fine for x86_64 and ia64 by default (but not for non-intel arches).
> The only way to have sse enabled on ix86 is for a library to be built
> twice, the provides the sse version in %{_libdir}/sse2. The linker
> will then
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 18:08 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 18:03 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 15:48 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 18:34 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 17:31 -0500, Mike Chambers wr
On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 09:29 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> That is very useful information. It sounds like I will want to do this for
> this package, since enabling sse2 will turn on the sse instructions and sse2
> might turn out to be useful for this code as well.
>
> > Now I would really like
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 09:33:13 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 09:29 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> > That is very useful information. It sounds like I will want to do this for
> > this package, since enabling sse2 will turn on the sse instructions and sse2
> > might
>> As I know, the kernel is compressed with bzip2 or gzip. How about using LZMA
>> instead? Or is that already the case?
> There is such an option but it is currently disabled due to missing support
> in xen.
Thanks. But don't understand. What has LZMA todo with Xen?
--
fedora-devel-list maili
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Ikem Krueger
wrote:
>>> As I know, the kernel is compressed with bzip2 or gzip. How about using
>>> LZMA instead? Or is that already the case?
>
>> There is such an option but it is currently disabled due to missing support
>> in xen.
> Thanks. But don't understa
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 09:33:13AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 09:29 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> > That is very useful information. It sounds like I will want to do this for
> > this package, since enabling sse2 will turn on the sse instructions and sse2
> > might t
Hello All!
There is a package, already included in Fedora, and there is a
friendly and active upstream developer, who wants to be a
(co)maintainer of this app. (S)he doesn't maintain any packages in
Fedora currently. So the question is - is there a policy on how such
situations should be handled?
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 20:31:16 +0300,
Peter Lemenkov wrote:
>
> There is a package, already included in Fedora, and there is a
> friendly and active upstream developer, who wants to be a
> (co)maintainer of this app. (S)he doesn't maintain any packages in
> Fedora currently. So the question i
Thanks. But don't understand. What has LZMA todo with Xen?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515831
The executive summary is: Xen does not let a kernel boot itself,
because mimicking bare hardware is too tedious (and pointless.)
Instead, Xen instantiates an instance of a kernel into
This is a follow-up to my mail from October 9th [1]
As per unresponsive package maintainer policy, Claudio is now officially
considered missing in action and his packages [2] will be orphaned.
qtoctave - Frontend for Octave
1 Bug: 2 Menu entries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486753
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> I remember, that if Redhat hires someone from upstream, then no
> additional procedures with review requests and sponsorship needed (at
> least visible to others, outside Redhat) - (s)he just started to be a
> (co)maintainer.
Anyone that w
16 matches
Mail list logo
