On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 04:44:10PM +0100, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 14:06 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 01:42:55PM +0100, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> > > A little bit? Did you read my other mail on the subject:
> > >
> > > "That's an idea, b
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 09:33:48PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Thursday 05 November 2009, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > "KF" == Kevin Fenzi writes:
> >
> > KF> Well, the script I am running uses 'spectool -g' and indeed, it
> > KF> doesn't handle self signed certs:
> >
> > Honestly,
Dne 6.11.2009 05:49, Liang Suilong napsal(a):
> For example, system-config-selinux disappears. I can not find it in the
> retired packages list. Is it merged into another package?
yum whatprovides /usr/bin/system-config-selinux
--
http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/, Jabber: mceplceplovi.cz
GPG Finger:
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Josephine Tannhäuser
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Moblin is afaik Intel processors only. Would this work because of the
> fedora fundament on other processors like a via with 733mhz, too?
Intel's version of Moblin is optimised for Intel processors only.
Fedora's version of
On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 17:18 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
[...]
> stefansf:BADURL:sec-2.5.2.tar.gz:sec
Fixed in CVS. Thanks for letting me know.
Just an idea. Wouldn't it be useful to have such a feature in rpmlint,
too? Maybe not enabled as default but as an option.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing li
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 14:24, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> http://is.gd/4NU9N
>
> Phoronix published Fedora 12 vs. Ubuntu 9.10 Benchmarks
>
[snip]
>
> Fedora 12 performed on most test better than Ubuntu, nice work guys/
> galls :)
Well, I just did a tally of the results on the link you posted and
Ubun
Michael Schwendt píše v Pá 06. 11. 2009 v 09:49 +:
> The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
>
> ==
> The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
>
