planning to retire pydict package

2010-01-04 Thread पराग़
Hi, Few months back I got ownership of this pydict package. Later on I come to know that Merge-review is pending for this package. I had a look at this package and found that current code is very old development. This package has not seen any upstream release since 2000-09-17. I hope there shou

Orphaning jlint

2010-01-04 Thread Jerry James
Well, actually, I plan to EOL jlint, for Rawhide only. On the other hand, if someone wants it, I will orphan it so you can pick it up. This package has had a dead upstream for several years. I only kept it around because I still found it useful. With findbugs in Fedora, I don't find it useful a

Re: Common Lisp apps in Fedora

2010-01-04 Thread Jerry James
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Alexander Kahl wrote: > Actually I've started trying to package ccl as it is (AFAIK) the only > implementation besides sbcl supporting (all at once) threads, mutexes, > semaphores and conditions, hence some projects like cl-patron do not > support any other impleme

Reminder: FUDCon Toronto Survey closes Friday night!

2010-01-04 Thread Robyn Bergeron
FUDCon Toronto (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Toronto_2009) may be over, but we still want to hear your (anonymous, of course!) thoughts on how it went.  This is your friendly reminder that the FUDCon Toronto Survey will be available though 11:59pm PST Friday, January 8, 2010 (that's 07:59 U

Re: orphaning gwibber, any takers?

2010-01-04 Thread Tom "spot" Callaway
On 01/04/2010 04:25 PM, Ian Weller wrote: > I know Gwibber is widely used by Fedora users because there are a > crapton of abrt reports for it and I just can't keep up with it. :) > > Let me know if you have a desire for maintaining Gwibber in Fedora. From > what I've heard, a release of 2.30 is o

Re: Top Crashers

2010-01-04 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 04:35:54PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 03:12:18PM +, Matthew Booth wrote: > > Now we have abrt making it easier for lazy people to submit crash > > reports, do we have enough information for a 'Top Crashers' list? It > > would be good to

Re: Looking for pointers how to set up lzma stream using xz-devel

2010-01-04 Thread John Reiser
On 01/04/2010 10:18 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 07:57:54 -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote: I've actually come across this WRT UPX as well. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501636 It seemed odd that the debian bug for this claimed that source from the SDK was need

orphaning gwibber, any takers?

2010-01-04 Thread Ian Weller
I know Gwibber is widely used by Fedora users because there are a crapton of abrt reports for it and I just can't keep up with it. :) Let me know if you have a desire for maintaining Gwibber in Fedora. From what I've heard, a release of 2.30 is on the horizon [1], and I just don't have the time to

Re: ABRT considered painful

2010-01-04 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:40:35 +0100, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > On 01/02/2010 09:32 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > >Moreover ABRT does not install the whole debuginfo package but only copies > >the > >needed specific .debug files out of it somewhere - as know the ABRT people. > > What happens if the

Reviewers needed

2010-01-04 Thread Matthias Clasen
I need some kind soul to review at-spi2-atk and pyatspi for me, both of which are part of the new at-spi2 accessibility stack. The bugs are here: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544629 http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544630 Thanks, Matthias -- fedora-devel-list mailing l

Re: Problem building on rawhide

2010-01-04 Thread Rick L. Vinyard, Jr.
Never mind. Seems to be building now. Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. wrote: > No problems building on F12, F11 and EL5. > > Here's the build log: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1901276&name=build.log > > But, the short version is that I'm getting a ton of this error on rawhide > only:

Problem building on rawhide

2010-01-04 Thread Rick L. Vinyard, Jr.
No problems building on F12, F11 and EL5. Here's the build log: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1901276&name=build.log But, the short version is that I'm getting a ton of this error on rawhide only: Cannot utime: Bad file descriptor Any suggestions? -- fedora-devel-list maili

Phase 3 of dist-git project under way

2010-01-04 Thread Jesse Keating
Over the holiday break I coded up the framework for fedpkg, the utility to replace Make within dist-git. I'm now ready to accept help with developing this tool. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Dist_Git_Project#fedpkg if you would like to help develop / test and then contact me. -- Jesse Keat

Re: Looking for pointers how to set up lzma stream using xz-devel

2010-01-04 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 07:57:54 -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote: > I've actually come across this WRT UPX as well. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501636 > > From what I can tell. . .we may be stuck unless someone wants to > write some docs. I am going to get squashfs-tools working w

Re: Common Lisp apps in Fedora

2010-01-04 Thread Alexander Kahl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm the one who actually asked for this discussion; I've also asked for CL developers/packagers at the FUDCon'09 in Berlin if anyone remembers but no luck back then. On 01/04/2010 05:29 PM, Jerry James wrote: > One of the first issues we'll have to fa

Re: Top Crashers

2010-01-04 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 03:12:18PM +, Matthew Booth wrote: > Now we have abrt making it easier for lazy people to submit crash > reports, do we have enough information for a 'Top Crashers' list? It > would be good to highlight these centrally to provide an incentive to > give them the attent

Common Lisp apps in Fedora

2010-01-04 Thread Jerry James
I was asked [1] to start a thread about the packaging of Common Lisp applications for Fedora. The person who made that request feels that the existing guidelines are lacking detail. Who else is interested in packaging such applications? We should get a group together and start hashing through th

Re: Top Crashers

2010-01-04 Thread Matthew Booth
On 04/01/10 15:43, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:12:18 +, Matthew wrote: Now we have abrt making it easier for lazy people to submit crash reports, do we have enough information for a 'Top Crashers' list? It would be good to highlight these centrally to provide an incentive

Re: BZ 523646 - F13Blocker?

2010-01-04 Thread Ralf Ertzinger
Hi. On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:03:59 +, Adam Williamson wrote > Are you sure this is the case? There are a wide variety of intel > graphics chipsets and not all behave the same. If they were all > broken - especially in F12 - I would have expected to hear a much > larger stink by now. It defini

Re: Top Crashers

2010-01-04 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:12:18 +, Matthew wrote: > Now we have abrt making it easier for lazy people to submit crash > reports, do we have enough information for a 'Top Crashers' list? It > would be good to highlight these centrally to provide an incentive to > give them the attention they de

Re: ABRT considered painful

2010-01-04 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 01/02/2010 09:32 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: Moreover ABRT does not install the whole debuginfo package but only copies the needed specific .debug files out of it somewhere - as know the ABRT people. What happens if the software version N crashes, then the updates install a later version, and

Top Crashers

2010-01-04 Thread Matthew Booth
Now we have abrt making it easier for lazy people to submit crash reports, do we have enough information for a 'Top Crashers' list? It would be good to highlight these centrally to provide an incentive to give them the attention they deserve. My specific motivation for this is: https://bugzil

Re: need help in contributing to se-linux policy development

2010-01-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 13:52 +, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > 2010/1/3 sai ganesh : > > hi, > > my name is sai. i am a fedora-ambassador.i want to contribute to the > > development of se-linux policies.i am a Redhat certified se-linux policy > > administrator.i am well versed in development o

Re: BZ 523646 - F13Blocker?

2010-01-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 23:38 +, Paul wrote: > Hi, > > I originally reported this bug in September 2009 when f12 was rawhide. > It was fixed but has recently resurfaced for both F12 and rawhide users > leaving anyone with an intel chipset for video with unusable systems. Are you sure this is th

Re: Looking for pointers how to set up lzma stream using xz-devel

2010-01-04 Thread Jon Ciesla
Bruno Wolff III wrote: I am working on getting squashfs-tools 4.1 in rawhide. It has wrapper functions that are set up to use streaming compression/uncompression from the LZMA SDK 4.65 library. Currently the LZMA SDK 4.32 library is in Fedora, but is no longer supported upstream and is not compa

Re: Can some provenpackager bump openvpn in EL-5

2010-01-04 Thread Jon Ciesla
Jussi Lehtola wrote: On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 16:35 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote: Jussi Lehtola wrote: Even though any proven packager could do the change, that bug does not fall in the items listed in the proven packager policy [1]. You haven't listed any problems with the current pac

rawhide report: 20100104 changes

2010-01-04 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Mon Jan 4 08:15:14 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- anjal-0.1.0-1.fc13.i686 requires libevolution-mail-shared.so.0 anjal-0.1.0-1.fc13.i686 requires libefilterbar.so.0 cduce-0.5.3-3.fc13.i686 require

Re: ABRT considered painful

2010-01-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2010-01-01 at 16:45 +0100, drago01 wrote: > Also some duplicate detection wouldn't hurt ... (I get new bug reports > everyday just to notice that almost all of them are duplicates). abrt already does duplicate detection, but it's hardly a straightforward thing to do. Jiri and the rest of

Re: ABRT considered painful

2010-01-04 Thread Mat Booth
2010/1/4 Jiri Moskovcak : > On 01/04/2010 07:41 AM, James Antill wrote: >> >> On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 13:37 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: >>> >>> On 01/02/2010 03:32 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: Moreover ABRT does not install the whole debuginfo package but only copies the needed spec

Oracle DB 4.8.26 update in rawhide

2010-01-04 Thread Jindrich Novy
Hi, Oracle released a new BDB-4.8.26 which is a bugfix release. No soname bump or similar changes. This email is a heads-up that I'm going to update to this version in a week or so. List of bugfixes since 4.8.24 can be found here: http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/berkeley-db/db/prog

Re: How did I end up as the package owner for emacs?

2010-01-04 Thread Till Maas
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 10:53:26PM +0100, Karel Klic wrote: > you became the owner in the pkgdb when Daniel Novotny and I agreed to > transfer the package ownership to me. We discovered that the next person > with commit access become the owner when a package is orphaned, and the > package o

Re: can't find package Tk, Fedora 12

2010-01-04 Thread Nikola Pajkovsky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 1.1.2010 08:10, Shakthi Kannan napsal(a): > Hi, > > On Fedora 12, when using: > > $ tclsh > % package require Tk > can't find package Tk > % > > Has anything been changed in Tcl package in Fedora 12 w.r.t. > finding/searching for Tk libr

Re: ABRT considered painful

2010-01-04 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
On 01/04/2010 07:41 AM, James Antill wrote: On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 13:37 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: On 01/02/2010 03:32 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: Moreover ABRT does not install the whole debuginfo package but only copies the needed specific .debug files out of it somewhere - as know the ABRT p