> Rawhide Report writes:
[...]
There appear to be a boatload of broken deps for packages based on
clutter (presumably because of API bump from 0.9 to 1.0) that have
been listed here for over a week and no movement to fix most of them.
Have the other apps been ported to the new API so they
> "PR" == Peter Robinson writes:
>> There appear to be a boatload of broken deps for packages based on
>> clutter (presumably because of API bump from 0.9 to 1.0) that have
>> been listed here for over a week and no movement to fix most of them.
PR> It was actually broken on the move from 0.
>>>>> "BO" == Bryan O'Sullivan writes:
BO> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Alex Lancaster > wrote:
>> Similarly with ghc based packages, there appears to be no movement to
>> fix these broken deps:
BO> We were told there would be a massrebu
>> 2009/8/5 Alex Lancaster :
>> There was a mass rebuild, but unfortunately they failed because of
>> some (presumably) transient problem with the build system, because the
>> rebuild now.
>>
>> However once the deps failed there should have been regular na
I'm the maintainer of octave-forge and, I've been beating my head
against the wall trying to build octave-forge against the new octave
3.2.2 in rawhide. It successfully completes the %build section, but
at fails (different times) during the %install with errors like this:
+ make install TMPDIR=/v
>>>>> "QA" == Quentin Armitage writes:
QA> On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 17:35 -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote:
>> I'm the maintainer of octave-forge and, I've been beating my head
>> against the wall trying to build octave-forge against the new octave
>
> Rawhide Report writes:
[...]
A whole slew of broken deps caused by a new maven2 have been sitting
in rawhide for about the last week with no attempted rebuilds to fix
it. Anybody know what's going on?
> Broken deps for i386
> --
[
> Rawhide Report writes:
[...]
A NetworkManger update has caused a number of new broken deps. Simple
rebuilds for some of these NetworkManager-based apps are failing:
> Broken deps for i386
> --
> NetworkManager-openconnect-0.7.
> "AK" == Alexander Kurtakov writes:
>> > Rawhide Report writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> A whole slew of broken deps caused by a new maven2 have been sitting
>> in rawhide for about the last week with no attempted rebuilds to fix
>> it. Anybody know what's going on?
AK> We are working on u
>>>>> "CM" == Caolán McNamara writes:
CM> On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 01:53 -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote:
>> >>>>> Rawhide Report writes:
>> Has something changed in the API/ABI?
CM> The name of the .pc file itself, i.e. libnm-glib.pc -> li
Hi there,
Unfortunately the new HAL on F-12 removed the handling for ACLs
(apparently this is now done by udev >= 145), but this now has the
side-effect of removing the fdi files that were being used for Palm
devices, resulting in breaking of all Palm functionality in Fedora, as
detailed here:
ht
> Thomas Janssen writes:
> 2009/11/15 Braden McDaniel :
>> I did:
>>
>> $ make tag
>>
>>
>> and got:
>>
>> cvs tag -c openvrml-0_18_3-11_fc13 cvs tag:
>> openvrml.spec is locally modified cvs [tag aborted]: correct
>> the above errors first!
>>
>> Whoops. An
Graeme Gillies, after consulting with the current elisa maintainer,
Matthias Saou, has volunteered to step-up and maintain the Moovida media
center package (which will replace elisa).
Unfortunately as a new packager, he needs a sponsor. Anybody willing to
sponsor him? Package review request is
> "-" == Rick L Vinyard, writes:
-> Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:53:16 -0700, Jr. wrote:
>
>> Tom \"spot\" Callaway wrote:
>> > On 11/18/2009 10:29 AM, Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. wrote:
>> >> Shouldn't I be getting f13 tags with "make tag"?
>>> >
>>> > If you run: cvs update -d
> "NB" == Neal Becker writes:
NB> Wouldn't it be a good idea to disallow a push to updates that has
NB> broken deps?
It's a good idea, but as Josh Boyer says, it's quite tricky to actually
implement. And there are so many other issues/fires to put out with
getting each Fedora release, that
> "NB" == Neal Becker writes:
NB> Something seems strange here with libotf. I want to push 0.9.9-3
NB> for F12. I went into my F-12 subdir and did the usual make tag
NB> build
NB> ERROR: Tag libotf-0_9_9-3_fc12 has been already created.
NB> OK, I bumped the tag.
NB> cvs tag -c libotf-0_9
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 04:48 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
[...]
>> A lot of questions seem to be getting this answer but how close are
>> we to AutoQA doing all this? Are we going to start running it and
>> reporting bugs in Rawhide soon?
> "AW" == Adam Williamson writes:
AW> There's a week
> Rawhide Report writes:
So these huge slew of broken deps (seems like more than 10 packages) for
ghc have been in the rawhide reports for over a week now, is anybody
actively maintaining and/or planning to fix these packages? If not,
please let us know so a provenpackager can fix these, the
>>>>> Alex Lancaster writes:
>>>>> Rawhide Report writes:
> So these huge slew of broken deps (seems like more than 10 packages)
> for ghc have been in the rawhide reports for over a week now, is
> anybody actively maintaining and/or planning to fix these
19 matches
Mail list logo
