On 01/06/2010 06:50 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 01:27:07PM -0500, Fulko Hew wrote:
I'd say... only take focus if its a child/creation of the window currently
in focus.
You don't want ssh passphrase windows to take focus?
Hell, no! :-)
Andrew.
--
I have installed emacs-23.1-10.fc12.src.rpm
Then, when I run
$ rpmbuild -ba emacs.spec
I get
...
+ /usr/bin/make bootstrap
(cd src; /usr/bin/make bootstrap-clean)
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/aph/rpmbuild/BUILD/emacs-23.1/src'
Makefile:103: *** commands commence before first
On 12/23/2009 12:21 AM, Karel Klic wrote:
Andrew, this problem is already fixed in the latest version; please see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540921
OK, ta.
Andrew.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Mike A. Harris wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
King InuYasha wrote:
Except, that could be false advertising. In most cases, where CPU
computation is not used heavily, 64-bit is actually SLOWER than the
32-bit counterpart. Optimizations are narrowing the gap, but it
Kevin Kofler wrote:
The absence of a GUI policy editor combined with lack of documentation for
the config files makes bad defaults a big issue.
This is a key issue. Do I take it that I have to edit the XML files
directly to require authentication for package installs?
So far I have:
$
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, nodata wrote:
-sv
I do if it's in the default DVD install, or was pulled in in an
upgrade. I've never intentionally installed it, and yes I do. Never
imagined it would be a problem. I'll remove it.
Maybe you and I have a different concept of
Ewan Mac Mahon wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 02:06:45PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
On 10/26/2009 01:34 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com writes:
On 10/26/2009 12:06 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Unfortunately, this sounds like only. Is it out of the question to
Steve Dickson wrote:
On 09/29/2009 10:10 PM, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com wrote:
My main concern is with installer, installing from NFS shares from older
servers, say RHEL5. How will anaconda handle mounting? Will there be
odd errors
Steve Dickson wrote:
On 09/30/2009 04:53 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
Steve Dickson wrote:
On 09/29/2009 10:10 PM, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com wrote:
My main concern is with installer, installing from NFS shares from older
servers, say
Steve Dickson wrote:
On 09/30/2009 06:18 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
Steve Dickson wrote:
On 09/30/2009 04:53 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
Steve Dickson wrote:
On 09/29/2009 10:10 PM, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com wrote:
My main concern
Deji Akingunola wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Joachimjoachim.frie...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I think there's a valid case for making an exception to this: when a
package is an accelerated version of a particular library. That is,
when the basic functionality of a library is
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Joachim wrote:
I do not understand then, that there exist i686 packages which have
higher requirements.
Those packages need to be fixed.
I know there are some audio production packages which are building with SSE
enabled (and required, those packages don't do runtime
Joachim wrote:
Quoting Bill Nottingham:
Given the loud feedback, I've updated the proposal at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F12X86Support
The revised proposal:
- Build all packages for i686 (this requires cmov)
- Optimize for Atom
I do not understand then, that there
Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:45:19AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
In Ubuntu there's a Help button on the top menu bar that leads to a
nice help application, yelp. We have that app too, but it doesn't
seem to have the same contents, which are:
New to Ubuntu?
Adding
Matthias Clasen wrote:
we'd like to announce the 'Fit and Finish' initiative for Fedora,
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fit_and_Finish
with the goal to improve the user experience of the Fedora desktop. We
want to identify the small (and sometimes large) roadblocks that make
everyday
Tom Lane wrote:
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes:
drago01 (drag...@gmail.com) said:
Moving to i686 is fine, non i686 chips are mostly dead (but the
perfomance gain from moving to i686 from i586 is questionable at
best).
... how so? It's consistently 1-2% in reasonable benchmarks
Dimi Paun writes:
This package is giving me grief as well:
[r...@dimi ~]# rpm -e java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-1.4.2.0-40jpp_31rh.FC4.1.i386
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.84077: line 8: /usr/bin/rebuild-security-providers: No such
file or directory
error:
Dimi Paun writes:
From: Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com
[r...@dimi ~]# rpm -q jpackage-utils
jpackage-utils-1.6.6-1jpp
You have a bad version of jpackage-utils; remove it and get one from
`yum install'. You need version 1jpp_2rh.
Heh, 1jpp_2rh 1jpp, yum should update
Dimi Paun writes:
From: Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com
Heh, 1jpp_2rh 1jpp, yum should update it, no?
No.
Why? Something is broken: my system got into this state
without me doing anything wrong.
Yes. Remove it with `rpm -e'. Install it with `yum install'.
Still
Dimi Paun writes:
From: Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com
I think you've got yum pointing at jpackage.org, not fedora.
Yes.
Get rid of whatever yum config you have pointing at jpackage.org, and
you'll see this:
Do we really need this sort of incompatibilities
Dimi Paun writes:
From: Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com
My guess is your yum is pointed at FC4.
Sorry I didn't mention it, it is indeed. It's just
broken for FC4 :) People still use it, no?
Well, this is fedora-devel-list.
OK, so you've got a configuration problem, with a bleeding-edge
21 matches
Mail list logo
