Re: review request - rasmol, Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool

2009-11-28 Thread Carl Byington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 koji scratch build now works. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol-2.7.5-5.fc12.src.rpm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

Re: license issue - combining gplv2 and lgpl sources in a single rpm

2009-11-28 Thread Carl Byington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 15:25 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: If some of the source files use a less restrictive licensing scheme, such as the LGPL, Fedora's current licensing guidelines want you to specifiy that with and AND in the License tag.

license issue - combining gplv2 and lgpl sources in a single rpm

2009-11-27 Thread Carl Byington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am packaging rasmol. The rasmol source has a dual GPLv2/RASMOL license, so for Fedora we can consider that it is licensed gplv2. There are some libraries that are included that are licensed lgpl. Clearly, the finished rasmol binary is gplv2 since

Re: review request - rasmol, Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool

2009-11-25 Thread Carl Byington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 the short version is that at a minimum you should stick an icon with the same name as the binary, extension / file format .png, in /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps . That did not work for me, but if I put the converted .png icon in

Re: review request - rasmol, Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool

2009-11-25 Thread Carl Byington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 12:17 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: That's the 'old' system and really shouldn't be used. What you probably missed is the bit I missed from my original email - when using the new system you need to add these snippets:

review request - rasmol, Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool

2009-11-24 Thread Carl Byington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have built a spec file for rasmol 2.7.5 http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol.spec based on an earlier one from Mandrake. It now builds and seems to run on Fedora 12. This spec file clearly needs some changes: 1) There were some menu icon references

.spec file help - need buildrequires to depend on fedora version

2009-06-21 Thread Carl Byington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 My libpst package BuildRequires boost-devel, which works on older systems (centos4 thru fedora 10), but for fedora 11 and devel, it needs BuildRequires boost-python-devel. What is the preferred .spec code to achieve that? -BEGIN PGP