er you.
I wish you all Merry Christmas and New Year 2010 ;)
Kind regards,
Chitlesh Goorah
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Eric Christensen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> When trying to install astronomy-bookmarks I get the error that
> "astronomy-bookmarks conflicts with fedora-bookmarks" in PackageKit. I
> looked at the source (an HTML file) but I can'
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:12 AM, Conrad Meyer wrote:
>
> I'd like to take sdcc.
Can you also package http://eclipse-sdcc.sourceforge.net/ please ?
Chitlesh
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Debayan Banerjee wrote:
> Well one does need an editor for development. Assuming vim and emacs
> have roughly equal user bases, chosing emacs over vim for the
> distribution shows Fedora packagers' personal preference too. I guess
> both vim and emacs should be ava
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> I am starting the AWOL procedure [1] for Claudio Tomasoni, because he
> didn't respond to a bug I opened 5 months ago [2]. Chitlesh even tried
> to contact him for more than 7 months [3]. We should prepare for taking
> over Claudio's packag
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Alexander Kurtakov
wrote:
>> On rawhide with yum install eclipse*, it seems that upon launch,
>> eclipse is not loading any eclipse plugin. Maybe because eclipse 3.5,
>> should we rebuild all the plugins ?
>>
>> Or is it a known issue ?
> There was such issue whic
Hello there,
On rawhide with yum install eclipse*, it seems that upon launch,
eclipse is not loading any eclipse plugin. Maybe because eclipse 3.5,
should we rebuild all the plugins ?
Or is it a known issue ?
Regards,
Chitlesh
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
http
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Bart Vanbrabant wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm claiming ownership over avrdude. There is a new upstream release
> and I'm in progress of packaging software that depends on avrdude.
>
> Any objections?
No objection, please do.
Chitlesh
PS: Avrdude is included in the FEL live
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Chitlesh
GOORAH wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Jon Masterswrote:
>> Can you reproduce if for example running
>>
>> "pasuspender totem " ?
>>
>> Jon.
>
>
> I try with your above command and encountere
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Jon Masterswrote:
> Can you reproduce if for example running
>
> "pasuspender totem " ?
>
> Jon.
I try with your above command and encountered the same popcorn sound
without any output on the console, except a dialog box from totem
stating:
An error occured :
Di
Hello there,
I am experiencing some random popcorn sound while playing mp3 and
while assisting flash based webinars with the kernel-2.6.29.6.
However I am not experiencing this with kernel-2.6.29.5. By random I
mean, I don't get this popcorn sound everytime I play the same mp3 and
at the same tim
Hello there,
This email is meant as a feedback of what is going about FEL and two
companies who want to collaborate with us on the gcc compiler, eclipse
and debugging level.
This is very encouraging (from FEL's point of view) to have these 2 companies :
* GreenSoCs
* XMOS Semiconductor
(who are c
> Ingvar Hagelund wrote:
>> If anyone are interested in the packages, they are available from
>> http://ingvar.blog.linpro.no/2009/06/11/amarok-14-for-fedora-11/
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Greg Trounsonwrote:
> Thank you Ingvar. After using Amarok 2 for a couple of months I'm convinced
> i
Hello there,
We have some doubt about the Requires: of a default localization.
For example, eclipse-texlipse needs aspell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506431
By default I chose aspell-en,
# For Spell-Check (choosing default : English)
Requires: aspell-en
Is there any macro
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> Would anyone be interested in creating/joining a LaTeX SIG?
I can be an on-off contributor to this Latex SIG as I am preparing
some latex packages for electronic papers.
Chitlesh
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.c
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name):
> dinotrace
Does bodhi send you an email for each comment on
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ ?
The broken dependency being fixed.
Chitlesh
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedo
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Florian Festi wrote:
> It really doesn't matter how often you repeat a wrong sentence.
>
> There are different rules that do apply to code and content in Fedora and
> OVM got categorized as content and refused by the rules for content. We are
> talking about a progr
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:11 PM, sankarshan <> wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Rahul Sundaram
> wrote:
>
>> My packaging survey turned up a interesting suggestion
>>
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-May/msg01809.html
>>
>> We don't currently have any guidelines coverin
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> Internet is for porn...
>
> Sorry I don't know this software but as someone already pointed - it's
> opensource, it can be used to download other content. It's same like Adobe
> banned rtmpdump as it can be used to download restricted conten
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> If the tool were directly containing support for decoding
> such prorietry formats that would be a different matter, because the
> codecs would not pass the legal rules.
OVM doesn't directly include any fedora forbidden items as well. I
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Kushal Das wrote:
> As you said, no opensource simulator, but we have opensource viewer :)
Fedora doesn't ship a video viewer which supports proprietary formats
out of the box.
For me this package goes to rpmfusion.
Chitlesh
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fe
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> Movies in proprietary formats can be downloaded also with Firefox,
> Transmission, wget, etc.
> From the description of gnaughty I understand it can also download images,
> which are in free formats, so the content is in both free and propriet
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Kushal Das wrote:
> Yes that is true , but it does not provide any support to view that
> content, we have many other packages in Fedora which allows to
> download content and they download whatever format the site is
> providing, how the users watch it, it depends
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> There is no video, only a few harmless static drawings in PNG format.
>
from : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gnaughty
"""Gnaughty is an utility to automatically download adult sex content,
i.e. porn movies and pictures,"""
It seems mov
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> My packaging survey turned up a interesting suggestion
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-May/msg01809.html
>
> We don't currently have any guidelines covering this but considering the
> Debian action to hot babe
>
Happy Birthday, Jesse
Chitlesh
--
http://clunixchit.blogspot.com
26 matches
Mail list logo
