upstream as necessary).
--- David A. Wheeler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
macros.
That may have changed now. I haven't checked it in a while.
- --
David Cantrell dcantr...@redhat.com
Red Hat / Honolulu, HI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAktGHxAACgkQ5hsjjIy1VkkA8ACeIRILiiyrMYGvRIf/HW4/C1Rh
wK8AoLRRd0JWEftiXv7Vqpop0LLG1eXg
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 03:17:45PM +, Zing wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 07:58:11 +0100, David Tardon wrote:
gconftool-2 -s -t string /apps/metacity/general/focus_new_windows
strict
thanks for that...
To be useful - when that's set, new windows never take focus away from
and the upcoming pvs-sbcl will be.
Alexander Kahl:
Are you (or is anyone else here) interested in founding a Common Lisp SIG?
I'm interested.
--- David A. Wheeler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
gconftool-2 -s -t string /apps/metacity/general/focus_new_windows strict
To be useful - when that's set, new windows never take focus away from
a window that looks like a terminal window. (This is assuming the above
opens a new window. If it changes an existing window, then
On 12/22/2009 09:15 AM, Ryan Rix wrote:
On Mon 21 December 2009 10:46:51 am Rex Dieter wrote:
I'd feel a bit uncomfortable without at least some
testing and positive feedback.
Once people try testing Rex's updated package, please provide feedback
at Rex's link about it, eg what's working,
On 12/17/2009 08:38 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 16:30 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
too. My own preference would be a more discriminating dialog
that offers three possibilities: 'do nothing', 'bounce the
service/application' and 'reboot'.
Yup, +1
Bounce the application
for authenticated writing. If you wish to play around with
the repos, you can access it via:
git://publictest5.fedoraproject.org/git/pkgs/package eg if you wished
to clone the kernel, you'd type:
git clone git://publictest5.fedoraproject.org/git/pkgs/kernel
Give it a spin, see what you think.
--
David
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 19:39 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 12:38:11PM -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com
wrote:
Jef, I'll help with istanbul. If anyone else out there is considering
doing so, please
more sense.
Thanks,
David
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 09:53 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
I'm looking into the build failures Matt identified. With my shiny
new Rawhide VM, I'm seeing this output on a local build of a package
with no python sources:
[ ... successful build messages ...]
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile
filesystems, maybe it will be a Nautilus-only feature. I don't know yet,
leaning towards the latter right now, but I guess we'll find out.
Thanks,
David
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
. Do you know who
it was?
I don't see why FESCo should be involved and I have no idea who made
this decision. I would have preferred the change to be announced and
documented in detail regardless of that. I assume David Zeuthen? (CC'ed)
Jeez, Rahul. This has nothing to do with polkit per se
lead us to a simple btrfsctl command for setting
that field instead. I agree that his solution's what we'd like.
OK, sounds good to me. I'm subscribed to the btrfs-list so I guess I'll
just sit around and wait for Josef's patch to show up.
Thanks,
David
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 11/18/2009 06:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
Many packagers don't know that maintaining a proper spec %changelog for
relevant spec file changes and %release
Author: hvad
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Curses-UI/F-12
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22982/F-12
Modified Files:
import.log
Log Message:
Index: import.log
===
RCS file:
I have a bigger problem with this, I use fedora boxes to talk to older
devices (solaris 2.6 and M88KV4 unix machines) that can never be
upgraded to newer X clients. Since the fedora ( or any xorg) servers are
talking to classic X11 clients dropping support for core fonts is a
huge issue.
The
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 11:45 -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
I need to rebuild alienarena for all targets due to a security issue, so
I decided to update to 7.32, but unfortunately, the 7.32 build segfaults
immediately on Fedora 12 (x86_64), and gdb isn't much help (gdb output
is at the
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 15:47 +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote:
David why you are so upset? No need to get nasty. I simply posted a
message about my problems installing F12. I did not Hijack any thread
(see the subject name). I thought this was a public forum. I sent this
to the whole mailing
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 08:29 +0800, Steven James Drinnan wrote:
In-reply-to: 1257111085.2314.154.ca...@adam.local.net
References: adf480660910311031h5889985by4fb8d4ac7f342...@mail.gmail.com
1257111085.2314.154.ca...@adam.local.net
Steven, please could you explain the relationship
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 22:25 -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
On 09-10-28 18:24:49, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 06:17:31PM -0400, Tony Nelson wrote:
Sorry to bug developers, but I didn't get any bites from PPC
users on fedora-list.
Does Fedora PPC work or install on oldworld PCI
On 10/20/2009 08:48 PM, Milos Jakubicek wrote:
http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/need-rebuild.html
hmmn, glglobe is mine, wonder what went wrong.
It seems that the build logs are no longer available ?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1504772
eg for: x86_64 (red)
On 10/21/2009 07:47 AM, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
Hi.
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:40:46 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
In most cases, you can get that information from the original RPM
compared to the system... if you have the RPM :).
rpm -Vppackage_file_goes_here
Which is pretty much what I
for that question
and answer that might solve a problem. And once indexing is done the
first time it is not a 'machine stopper' to use it enabled.
However you don't need it if you only want to count the emails and never
search them. ;-)
--
David
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 10/19/2009 3:05 PM, mcloaked wrote:
David dgboles at gmail.com writes:
I presume that it will go out with GLODA and smart folders turned OFF?
GLODA - Global Search and Indexer - is defaulted disabled from
Mozilla. I am forever seeing users talking about having 'emails going
back
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 22:09 +0200, yersinia wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 7:15 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com
wrote:
[snip]
$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/python2.*/site-packages/* | grep -v is not
owned |
SIA, this is off of topic , i am sure. BUT, it is very strange that
could
On 10/03/2009 07:12 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
Do we have wmii (a window manager, http://wmii.suckless.org) packaged
for Fedora?
Not that I can see for f11 or rawhide.
Would you like to begin packaging it ?
DaveT.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 13:15 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
[snip]
(replying to self, with some archive links)
An earlier proposal about python 3 in Fedora is here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-May/msg02417.html
...which was the Let's make a plan for python3.0 in Fedora
Group: Development/Languages
Provides: python-abi = %{pybasever}
@@ -538,6 +538,9 @@ rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_libdir}/python%{pybasever}/lib-dynload/_testcapimodule.so
%changelog
+* Fri Oct 2 2009 David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com - 2.6.3-1
+- Update to 2.6.3
+
* Fri Aug 21 2009 Tomas Mraz tm
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 17:17 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
Python 2.6.3 was just released [1]. I think we'll want this in F13
(seems far too late to me for F12).
I tried rebuilding our devel branch with the 2.6.3 tarball, and it
built with no changes to the existing patches. I haven't gone
Proposal: Python 3 in Fedora 13
Evolutionary, not revolutionary: build a python 3 stack
parallel-installable with the python 2 stack.
= High-level summary =
- Python 3.0 was released almost 10 months ago, on 2008-12-03, and the
latest release of the 3.* branch is 3.1.1, released on 2009-08-17.
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 13:07 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com said:
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 01:15:09PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
Scoping:
- this work would target Fedora 13. I'd avoid pushing it into F12
until it's proven safe to do so
I'm
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 11:23 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 10/01/2009 11:11 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Oct 1, 2009, at 10:59, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 01:15:09PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
Scoping:
- this work would target Fedora 13. I'd
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 12:17 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 10/01/2009 10:15 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
Proposal: Python 3 in Fedora 13
Evolutionary, not revolutionary: build a python 3 stack
parallel-installable with the python 2 stack.
First: Overall +1.
Note: liberally snipped
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 19:12 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David Malcolm wrote:
Naming convention proposal:
How does this sound:
- an rpm with a python- prefix means a python 2 rpm, of
the
default python 2 minor version (for Fedora
On 9/25/2009 1:00 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 12:43 -0400, David Boles wrote:
'lurker mode off'
Comment from a 'lurker'
You developers and all do a fine job with this.
*But* you all seem to have the same wrong idea about *most* regular
Linux users. At least the ones
-type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
%check
make test
%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc Changes CREDITS README INSTALL
%{perl_vendorlib}/*
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
* Sun Aug 09 2009 David Hannequin david.hanneq...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, J. Randall Owens wrote:
On 09/18/2009 05:25 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
If you do not care about IPv6, feel free to stop reading now.
I would like to remove the dhcpv6 package from Fedora as the current dhcp
package is now
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 09:57 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, David Malcolm wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 18:45 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
Which makes me wonder, how could this conflict have been avoided? Is there
a tool that would check any new package to see if any object
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 18:45 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
Which makes me wonder, how could this conflict have been avoided? Is there
a tool that would check any new package to see if any object* in it would
conflict with any existing package? If not, sounds like a good thing to
have.
*
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 20:08 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
Why not report all conflicts, instead of only those on your PATH?
This is acting at the level of individual filenames (dropping the
directory component from the path), and doesn't have any knowledge about
a file beyond its full installation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Dennis J. wrote:
On 08/27/2009 07:49 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote:
Hi, something that bothers me a bit... More and more system
, there has been a lot of confusion. I've witnessed that
myself. We just don't want that to happen in a released OS.
David
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
scripts do the trick (after checking that the service is actually running)?
Ssh used to do that since, well, as far as I remember.
Yes, please. Though maybe with prompting; we shouldn't go restarting
possibly-critical services without good warning.
As David said, for dhcpd, 'service restart dhcpd
the correct services restarted.
- --
David Cantrell dcantr...@redhat.com
Red Hat / Honolulu, HI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkqWxw0ACgkQ5hsjjIy1VknDsgCfasl1AnpQ74vKT/ZTK8l2WU6b
CUAAoMKxJloW1IEiRGIVC9lRPLUYW/+C
=Kqzr
-END PGP SIGNATURE
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 21:27 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Thursday 13 August 2009 05:53:37 pm John Poelstra wrote:
Can you update the feature page to reflect the reduced scope of the
feature and its completion percentage? All I see since FESCo met was
the change to the detailed description
?
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Mike Chambers wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 14:35 -1000, David Cantrell wrote:
What version of anaconda did you try? I just recently fixed a problem with
askmethod not doing anything. If you booted from a CD or DVD
-1.
- --
David Cantrell dcantr...@redhat.com
Red Hat / Honolulu, HI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkqCDlsACgkQ5hsjjIy1VkmMEwCdEgqLcE/0JOK+tS8OYZsQJ19f
Z+kAn1cr1NHHAyyhFb3djEb44OqQSNLI
=mh6W
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
fedora-devel-list mailing
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:30 AM, wde...@mikrotec.com wrote:
I am new to this list, and I am looking forward to hearing the discussion.
But thanks to bob and others responding to my post on fedoraforum.org
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=227101 , I think I would
like to broach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 07/27/2009 07:33 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Björn Persson wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 07/26/2009 02:37 PM, Seth Vidal wrote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 07/27/2009 11:26 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 07/27/2009 07:33 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
-BEGIN PGP
.
- --
David Cantrell dcantr...@redhat.com
Red Hat / Honolulu, HI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkptPBYACgkQ5hsjjIy1VkkFlACeNHFf5Tx8Ief3O1qjFgSrYPEm
GBkAnj4Guybso65om2SV88cQb+vU2JiC
=uTAM
-END PGP SIGNATURE---
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel
to update Fedora 12/Rawhide during the rebuild?
Or wait until the rebuild is completed?
--
David
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Hi, what would be the best location to list an issue with the meeting
minutes, where the entries overflow the width of the user's screen ?
DaveT.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 7/11/2009 8:27 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 20:03:51 -0400,
David brusefamel...@gmail.com wrote:
The 'real guys'. The developers, code writers, people-in-the-know, show
respect where respect is warranted.
I'm sure Al Capone got a lot of respect in his day as well
On 7/11/2009 9:35 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Jul 11, 2009, at 17:03, David brusefamel...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/11/2009 6:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Frank Murphy wrote:
Doesn't seem to work for wine :)
That's because WINE is only 32-bit, because most Winblow$ executables
we
shouldn't let them _try_. It doesn't hurt Fedora at all, does it?
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https
skip a release, but not always). And those are mostly
headless, remote boxes.
If you want new stuff, run Fedora and do a fairly painless update
annually. If you want old stuff, run Centos and update less frequently.
I don't see any need for a middle ground.
--
David Woodhouse
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Rahul
Sundaramsunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 07/02/2009 06:03 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Rawhide Reportrawh...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
Compose started at Thu Jul 2 06:15:05 UTC 2009
...
New package ldd-pdf
Linux Device
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Rahul
Sundaramsunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 07/02/2009 08:51 PM, David wrote:
I disagree that Fedora should be packaging books, both of these can
easily be downloaded via web.
Why package something that has no dependencies?
We package hundreds
://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1450335name=build.log
You know you can have access to a real box to test this on if you want
it, right? You don't have to do it all in koji and look at the build
logs.
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho
Re the discussion at
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-June/msg01991.html
The below suggestion tries to satisfy all parties:
- it presents a neutral default
- it presents a simple choice for newbie who doesnt know what a desktop is
- it shows the range of what is available
-
On 6/26/2009 1:04 PM, Aly Dharshi wrote:
Yeah I just caught that, and started a new one already ! Sorry about the
grief.
ASD.
On 06/26/2009 11:02 AM, David wrote:
On 6/26/2009 11:01 AM, Aly Dharshi wrote:
Hello Folks,
I fired up pidgin via the cmd line and get the following error
use the 0.x revision tags for
alpha/beta/RC releases like everyone else?
Plenty of projects fall outside that naming scheme, it's unfortunate but
that is life. Maybe upstream will consider your thoughts on the matter if
you bring them to their attention.
- David
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
2009/6/20 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Nielsen wrote:
2009/6/19 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
mono-tools-2.4.2-1.fc12
---
* Tue Jun 09 2009 Paul F. Johnson p...@all-the-
johnsons.co.uk - 2.4.2-1
.
Btrfs has been surprisingly good for me, no problems outside claiming the
partition was full when there was 25gb left (on a 120gb drive). I say bring
on this update, hilarity and dataloss, they do mix no matter what sanity
says.
- David
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list
://hal.freedesktop.org/docs/polkit/pkexec.1.html
in the docs. In the future please direct questions/concerns/etc about to
the polkit-devel mailing list, see
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/polkit-devel
before taking misinformation to non-upstream lists. Thanks.
David
--
fedora-devel-list
to depart from the model where the whole user session is a
single security context.
Hope this clarifies.
David
[1] : except of course that right now the authentication agent runs in
your user session. This means it is susceptible to the same attacks as
anything else in the session including
on context switch that wouldn't otherwise
have to be saved/restored.
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https
that I pointed to earlier, yourself. From what I
read it works. I can not really confirm that because I have not done
that. Nor will I because it is not what I want.
Similar to yumex.
--
David
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman
.
--
David
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
to
handle media insertion and removal
notice that I asked about new UI for media change
I guess it means a dialog box which says please insert the disk label
so and so
I know of *no* distribution that does this. Sorry.
--
David
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
not support media!!
this does not make sense to me
did I miss something
Second hit on the first page.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=fedora+repo+dvd
:-)
--
David
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 6/16/2009 10:16 PM, Mani A wrote:
David dgbo...@comcast.net wrote:
To have the DVD *always* as a source to check for packages is a pain in
the neck IMO.
Mandriva does that. The install DVD is a default source. *Every time*
that you try to *install*, or *update*, you have to find
this be
trolling? ;-)
BTW. Great job on Fedora 11.
--
David
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 16:56 +0100, Paul Jakma wrote:
Hi,
I run the above system, and everything works fine (except perhaps for
SELinux[1]). I have created a /etc/rpm/platform containing
'i586-redhat-linux'.
Well, everything works except for one thing: yum. Installing with
'yum install
developer through a packager as a proxy is better than
answering the same questions directly...
David
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 6:23 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I submitted ampache (http://ampache.org/) for review, but I was told that it
could not use any external software
bundled in the code. In fact, it uses getid3, a file that seems to come from
horde
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:00 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 6:23 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I submitted ampache (http://ampache.org/) for review, but I was told
enough. But just closing the bug in our bugzilla as
'upstream' is rarely acceptable for a _real_ bug, IMHO.
--
David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Patrick MONNERAT p...@datasphere.ch wrote:
Hello list,
Package WebCalendar
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231) is awaiting review for 5
month already.
I will be glad to review another package in counterpart of this one's review.
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 09:05 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 15:09 +0200, Pierre-Yves wrote:
There is an Online Docs group that has the -docs subpackage for many of
the system-config-* packages. It uses conditionals which are painful,
but would be a way for more -docs
On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 12:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi, guys. I've been working with a Bugzappers group community member,
Brennan Ashton, who has written a great tool in Python for generating a
range of graphical metrics of Bugzilla information, which would be very
useful to us. The tool
features, only fixes.
If you're using anaconda in projects, it's probably worth following what
happens in rawhide. New anaconda packages make it there all the time.
--
David Cantrell
Red Hat / Westford, MA
the contents of the CDs to the HD before hand would be
a very good idea too. But when that's not possible (due to free
space constraints), the ticks would be nice :)
A suggestion if this gets considered: dd the CD to a .iso file on disk, and
mount it loopback. That way you avoid slow CD seeks.
David
man, 20 03 2006 kl. 16:28 -0500, skrev Matthew Miller:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 09:40:10PM +0100, David Nielsen wrote:
I tend to agree, the 9 month cycle worked wonderfully, Fedora Core 5 is
by far the best release the Fedora Project has put out yet and as a
tester I enjoyed having
).
But let's get a clear roadmap down this time, what features are
essential for the next cycle?
- David
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 18:34 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Why do you need a separate header/field/whatever ?
You *already* have this field - that's the GPG signature.
Assign weights to signing keys and you're done
Not always sufficient. Most of the time I want yum to prioritise, it's
when it
and figure out if
and when we should set user_xattr.
For FC6 isn't one of the goals to get seperate partitions for /home -
then it would be a great time to add the user_xattr to that partition at
least.
- David
before the rawhide messages of the day.
- David
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 09:32 +0100, Igor Jagec wrote:
Speaking about NM, are there any plans for supporting static IP addresses?
Doesn't NM work with static IP addresses? It obeys static IP addresses
in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 for me -- it confused me by
doing so a couple of
?
David
\
org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.SystemPowerManagement.Suspend int32:0
Though it's a one-time only pain since this interface probably won't
change much until hal goes 1.0.
David
Roberto Ragusa m...@robertoragusa.it wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
And how do you define library? There's no reliable way to
distinguish them
from applications.
This is part of the problem. It would be nice to have all things which
are strictly libraries add a provides: Library
95 matches
Mail list logo
