On 08/10/2009 02:38 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> I think he means to download from the look-aside cache, not from the
> upstream location, which might not exist for snapshot packages.
>
> I believe this would be useful too.
No, actually did mean the upstream source. The look-aside cache can curren
On 08/10/2009 02:14 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Would a make target be much simpler than using spectool -g foo.spec?
> It wouldn't take much to wrap that, if it would be helpful.
No, it wouldn't be. spectool is definitely what I was looking for, thanks!
-Doug
signature.asc
Description: OpenPG
Does anyone have a Makefile target for download a SourceX file (similar to
Kevin Fenzi's recent report)? This would have the added benefit of
simplifying the update process for new versions (ex: "make source NUM=0"
instead of manually downloading the file).
-Doug
signature.asc
Description: Ope
On 07/31/2009 01:38 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Perl dep generator gone wild on this package. There is probably some
> comment in a perl file that says something like "Use the argv it" and
> the dep checker thinks it's the perl syntax for use
Yeah, I saw that. I was wondering if I should file a
Looks like this is on F10 as well [2]
-Doug
[2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1570320
On 07/31/2009 01:28 PM, Doug Warner wrote:
> I'm trying to build libconcord [1] and am seeing the following problems with
> the swig package in the buildroot on F11:
>
>
I'm trying to build libconcord [1] and am seeing the following problems with
the swig package in the buildroot on F11:
DEBUG util.py:256: swig-1.3.39-1.fc10.x86_64 from build has depsolving problems
DEBUG util.py:256:--> Missing Dependency: perl(the) is needed by package
swig-1.3.39-1.fc10.x8
On 07/27/2009 04:33 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> So what do people want out of a Fedora Mini SIG?
I recently got a Asus eee Pc 1005HA which was almost entirely supported
out-of-the-box with F11 (awesome!). I had to install via DVD-to-USB stick
since network didn't work in anaconda, but otherwise wo
On 07/16/2009 01:16 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> It is nothing to do with what is in the mock configs. the issue is that if
> you
> create a srpm on F-11 or rawhide then it uses internal hashing that is not
> understood by anything previous. F-10 uses md5 but understands the new style
> also.
On 07/16/2009 12:42 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Thursday 16 July 2009 09:51:32 am Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 16:32, Rick L. Vinyard, Jr.
> wrote:
>>> I've built the following package on Fedora 10 and 11 in mock without any
>>> problems.
>>> http://miskatonic
On 07/14/2009 12:40 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> It's that time of the release cycle again, to purge the orphans before
> we get to feature freeze. Any unblocked orphans will be purged by the
> 28th of this month. Here is a current list of unblocked orphans:
>
Thinkfinger should probably also be
10 matches
Mail list logo
