On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
>
>
> It's not really that offensive (sexist, racist, homophobic etc...), it's
> not installed by default so it won't hurt our image. Anyone offended
> should go complain to upstream, Fedora maintainers have no time to waste
> on such petty is
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 06.09.2009, 11:11 -0400 schrieb Dr. Diesel:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 11:04 AM, John Reiser
> > wrote:
> > On 09/06/2009 07:52 AM, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
> >
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 11:04 AM, John Reiser wrote:
> On 09/06/2009 07:52 AM, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
>
>> Using smolt to generate and link to a HW-spec-summery would also be a
>> nice and relevant option.
>>
>
> Think hard about the implications for [non-]privacy, legal complications,
> etc.
>
>
T
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Rajkarn Singh wrote:
> Hi,
> I am working on the development of a general Desktop Client for Bugzilla.
> Currently it can access Red Hat Bugzilla database, however in future I'd be
> working to make it work for other Bugzillas. I have posted a blog having
> somewh
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> On Monday 17 August 2009 21:09:05 Dr. Diesel wrote:
> > This happened a little while ago:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498131
> >
> > Seems to be happening again (tried 3x, same r
This happened a little while ago:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498131
Seems to be happening again (tried 3x, same result) on a different website
and most likely something different but could someone please confirm before
I BZ this?
Please save your work and visit (tech website):
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 29.07.09 06:48, Jeff Garzik (jgar...@pobox.com) wrote:
>
> >
> > Karel Zak wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:07:32PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 28.07.09 15:48, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 12:42 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > > Removing PA is far too often jumped on as the 'obvious' fix for
> > > resolving any kind of audio problem whatsoever. Even if it had nothing
> > > to do with PA in the first pla
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 29 July 2009 at 15:24, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Wed, 29.07.09 06:48, Jeff Garzik (jgar...@pobox.com) wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Karel Zak wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:07
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> > This reminds me your note:
> >
> >
> >
> https://tango.0pointer.de/pipermail/pulseaudio-discuss/2009-July/004519.htm
> >l
> >
> > PA does not make use of hardware mixing. And I don't plan to change
> > that. It's obsolete technolo
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Brian Pepple wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 00:22 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> > On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 23:58:52 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote
> > > I wanted to draw your attention to a feature I've proposed for Fedora
> > > 12, mysteriously called Extended Life Cy
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> > - yum
>
> as I said I demand for a list even if it's with false positives
>
Demand, again, has he learned anything? This is ridiculous, somebody ban
this guy.
--
projecthuh.com
All of my bits are free, are yours? Fedoraproject.org
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) <
boche...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > it's the job for those who care to check this list and take their own
> > subset from it according to their own definition.
>
> Couldn't it be the job of those who care to maintain this list in the
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 4:50 AM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3d) <
frankl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
>
>> in case you have accepted to put such packages in the repo
>>
>> please maintain a wiki page listing all of them so that we can add
>> exclude for all of them in
>> fedora .repo fil
14 matches
Mail list logo
