s from Broadcom, and they give us a way to
decode digital video on Fedora w/o violating any codec patents, since
the decoding is done entirely in hardware (this is pretty similar to the
mpeg2 decoder on the Hauppauge WinTV PVR-350 in that respect).
Please and thank you, etc., etc.
--
Jarod Wil
On 1/6/10 1:41 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 17:32 +, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 01/06/2010 05:00 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 11:36 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>>>> I'd go with "don't let a different app stea
as "stealing" or not, then great.
I'd go with "don't let a different app steal focus". Windows for the
same currently focused app are allowed to. This works pretty well under
Mac OS X. Might depend on some of the stuff being done by the
gnome-shell folks though,
y issue. This *does*
need to be allowed. But it wouldn't be on a branch named "private-*", it
would be quite blatant and obvious in naming, such as
f12-2_6_31_x-kernel-branch or similar.
I think there was some confusion in my use of "private branch", where I
was referring to b
maintaining
both e.g. 2.6.29 and 2.6.30 trees simultaneously for F10). If you get
eaten by raptors, you can't expect another maintainer to come in after
you and have to dig around for a private branch to update a build.
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
June (rjune) 415
>
> As such, Adam Jackson, Christoph Wickert, Peter Jones, and Matthew
> Garrett are elected to FESCo for a full 2 release term.
As others have said to *me* recently for other reasons... Congrats and
condolences to the new FESCo members. ;)
--
Jarod
ust
fine, and was properly denied push on firefox.
And man, just 'git diff' performance vs. 'cvs diff' performance almost
on its own makes going forward with this change worth it, let alone all
the other reasons its so much better... :)
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
finger-taps for right-click
a form of multitouch? Or are we talking about extending that to pinch,
rotate, etc?
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
linuxwacom.
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
but there were assorted
aftermarket upgrades one could purchase. I had a Beige G3 tower running
at 533MHz with 768MB of RAM at one point in time, iirc.
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 09/29/2009 01:16 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 12:13 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Rawhide is still based on dist-f12. We have no cute name for
dist-f13.
Futurehide
Runandhide
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On 09/16/2009 08:02 AM, Pim Zandbergen wrote:
Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 07/09/2009 02:31 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
That said, I have it up and running on an F11 host at home right now,
satisfying everything else w/Fedora packages.
Yeah same here.
Did any of you create a calendarserver
e will have to be some expectation changes, but really the kind of
> people digging at raw mirror paths are going to be the kind of people
> that can adjust their expectations.
All good points... Okay, I think I've been sufficiently convinced that
dropping the bits into /pub/fedora/li
On Wednesday 22 July 2009 11:58:11 Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 10:57 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > Only thing I'm not terribly wild about is storing the pre-release tree
> > in /pub/fedora/linux/releases/#/Everything/. Its bound to cause some
> > con
/fedora/linux/releases/test/#/Everything/ instead?
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
e
supported by i686, and we've talked about adding a cmov trap-and-emu
function to keep supporting the few i686 procs w/o cmov, which really
leaves only the original Pentium series that would benefit from an
i586 secondary arch. At least, that's my vague recollection of it all
right now
but not ownership. He's more than welcome to take over
ownership too, but for the moment, I've taken ownership of the devel
branch to stave off purging, since I use ctrlproxy myself...
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
ny change to the layout of a
> kernel structure would appear to be incompatible with ksplice. Thus
> it seems highly unlikely it'll ever work in its current form for
> arbitrary kernel revisions.
Trying to ksplice from 2.6.29.4 in the installer to say 2.6.30.1 or even
to 2.6.31 does
On Thursday 09 July 2009 17:22:20 Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Thursday 09 July 2009 17:15:47 Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > > > Stuff in Fedora, but simply not used for whatever reason:
> > > > -vobject (we have python-vobject)
> > > > -pyflakes
> > >
> &
On Thursday 09 July 2009 17:15:47 Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > > Stuff in Fedora, but simply not used for whatever reason:
> > > -vobject (we have python-vobject)
> > > -pyflakes
> >
> > I thought they were used if found... I'd have to look at the ru
On Thursday 09 July 2009 17:02:45 Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 07/09/2009 02:31 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > On Monday 06 July 2009 10:49:31 Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >> Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> >>> On Jul 5, 2009, at 9:33 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > ..
> >
to nfs... though I guess there could be others but I haven't checked...
>
> Looking at http://monkey.org/~provos/libevent/ there's no mention of
> 1.5.x on the front page anyway. Where does it get it?
Fedora 11 has libevent 1.4.5. The calendarserver auto-build script
tries to
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 15:17:28 Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 15:14 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > I thought an official spin could only be a live image. i.e., once you
> > start letting the user choose packages in anaconda, it can't be an
> > official s
es X" is indeed irrelevant either way.
[1] doesn't mean a mass rebuild won't happen for RHEL6. Also doesn't
mean that it will. Hand-wavy "can't talk about unreleased products"...
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
was the case a
while back, unless the guidelines have changed while I had my head
buried in the sand.
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
ke a
go/no-go call if we're moving F12 to i686, the better... Not sure if
there is a formal feature page for this yet or not...
--
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
sb scanners that krh got when working on the
firewire stack (and I inherited when I was working on it). Of course,
last I knew, they both worked just fine using the gimp sane plugin,
so they may not be all that interesting.
(One is an Epson somethingorother, one is a Microtek, both are
reasonably n
27 matches
Mail list logo
