On Friday 08 January 2010 15:51:28 Alain Portal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just took ownership of kbackup as it was orphan.
> As there is a long time that I didn´t contribute to the Fedora Project, can
> somebody tell me how to update the package and ask for F-10 and F-11
> branches?
F-10 branch is EOL
On Wednesday 09 December 2009 14:23:47 Neal Becker wrote:
> Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> > On 12/09/2009 02:05 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> >> Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> >>> On 12/09/2009 01:47 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> I just got a crash in kde plasma. Traceback is not useful, because of
> missing d
On Thursday 26 November 2009 23:14:09 Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 07:23 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 20:16 +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> > > On 11/26/2009 07:46 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 17:09:14 +,
> > > >
> > > >Terry
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE Summary
On Friday 20 November 2009 13:11:49 Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 11/20/2009 01:08 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> > Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> >> On 11/20/2009 12:54 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> >>> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> >>>> On Friday 20 November 2009 12:29:34 N
On Friday 20 November 2009 12:29:34 Neal Becker wrote:
> I can't seem to get abrt to work at all. I suspect it's stuck on trying to
> get bz username password. I suspect it doesn't work correctly with kde.
>
>From what I know it works correctly in KDE, even we have several KDE related
bugrepor
On Thursday 19 November 2009 14:05:01 Richard Hughes wrote:
> 2009/11/19 Jeff Garzik :
> > 1) We should recognize this new policy departs from decades of Unix and
> > Linux sysadmin experience.
>
> Sure, it's different. It doesn't make it wrong.
>
> > 2) F12 policy should be reverted to F11, ASAP
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE Summary
On Monday 19 October 2009 08:47:38 Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> 2009/10/19 Miroslav Suchý
>
> > May be good idea for Fedora as well...
> > Mirek
> >
> >
> > Původní zpráva
> > Předmět: [opensuse-packaging] Junior Jobs
> > Datum: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:46:58 +0200
> > Od: Michal Hrusecky
>
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE Summary
Hi Ray,
I have to disagree. And why? Becuase of my experience. Few days ago one
colleague came to my cubicle and asked me - KDE wants something and I don't
know what they want. So I took a look and saw Plymouth with something that
looks like password dialog. He was really surprised that it's ask
On Thursday 01 October 2009 20:38:30 Sebastian Vahl wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 30 September 2009 schrieb Jaroslav Reznik:
> > o future of Phonon
> > * Upstream (sandsmark) recommends building/packaging phonon from qt, and
> > building/packaging backends separately.
> &
On Thursday 01 October 2009 03:02:04 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > That's not about "standardize on GTK+"
>
> That was just an example of how "one size fits it all" doesn't always work
> when it comes to libraries, there will alw
On Wednesday 30 September 2009 19:32:02 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > An abstraction layer's main purpose it to abstract differences of what
> > is below, and as hence usually is a least common denominator of what is
> > below, but certainly nothing that adds features. PA OTOH
On Wednesday 30 September 2009 19:11:36 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > So I think it would make a lot of sense to switch to make our distro
> > Gst-only asap. Eventually this move will have to happen anyway.
>
> Uh, I have to disagree there. It is not our job as distribution p
On Wednesday 30 September 2009 15:33:43 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > Another interesting thing is PA & Phonon integration work by Colin
> > Guthrie (see the link in my first message). Phonon just as wrapper/thin
> > client for PA with nicer Qt l
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE Summary
On Wednesday 30 September 2009 00:11:21 Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 29.09.09 22:46, Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) wrote:
> > Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > Uh. Nokia stands pretty firmly behind gst. As do most embedded folks.
> >
> > Behind GStreamer, sure. Behind Phonon (and thus
Hi!
We, KDE SIG, are considering which backend should be default for Phonon in
Fedora. Seems like it's not easy to agree on final decision @ KDE SIG meetings,
we'd like to summarize what's the problem, some backends facts (please correct
me, comment, add, etc.) and we'd like to hear comments fro
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE Summary
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE Summary
On Saturday 29 August 2009 22:43:46 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > Anyway, this all seems to be a somewhat moot discussion, trying to nail
> > us down on a 'promise to keep the old stuff around', when there already
> > is a patch that can solve the whole dilemma.
>
> Looks like th
On Friday 28 August 2009 16:14:51 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Friday 28 August 2009 15:36:19 Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 06:47 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > > > I have been able to port some 10-12 PolicyKit users from 0
On Friday 28 August 2009 16:23:07 David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 12:45 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > > I'd be willing to maintain PolicyKit 0.9 packages (as compatibility
> > > packages (though renaming should not be needed as they already have
> > > distinct names), to be used by
On Friday 28 August 2009 15:36:19 Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 06:47 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > > I have been able to port some 10-12 PolicyKit users from 0.9 to 0.90 in
> > > a matter of a few days. The KDE sig should really be able to get this
> > >
On Thursday 27 August 2009 18:34:38 Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:14:43 -0400, Ben wrote:
>
> [KDE X session file]
>
> > So your issue is that kdebase-workspace puts it there, but it's
> > not complete, so it shouldn't?
>
> Well, in case installing ktorrent shall drag in the pack
On Thursday 27 August 2009 19:54:19 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
> 25.08.2009 02:07, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> A quick way to actually check for such dependencies is to switch to
> >> another desktop environment, say Xfce, remove all the KDE packages and
> >> i
On Thursday 27 August 2009 18:45:44 Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 17:35 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > > PolicyKit-KDE is now integral part of kdebase-workspace, it is a KDE
> > > 4.3 feature, we should disable it for now
On Thursday 27 August 2009 17:35:36 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > PolicyKit-KDE is now integral part of kdebase-workspace, it is a KDE 4.3
> > feature, we should disable it for now (untill we have new ported
> > version). Same problem is with PolicyKit-Qt as
Hi Matthias!
For KDE we'd like to use Gnome Authentication Agent as we don't have our own,
I've already reported it to polkit-gnome bugzilla [1].
PolicyKit-KDE is now integral part of kdebase-workspace, it is a KDE 4.3
feature, we should disable it for now (untill we have new ported version).
Sam
/2009-08-11/fedora-
meeting.2009-08-11-14.07.log.html
--
= Participants =
* Jaroslav Reznik
* Kevin Kofler
* Rex Dieter
* Sebastian Vahl
* Steven Parrish
* Lukas Tinkl
* Thomas Janssen
On Tuesday 11 August 2009 10:02:23 Steven Moix wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm facing a problem with one of my SPEC files...I'm packaging a program
> (motion, in RPM Fusion) that has a startup script. In the start()
> section of this startup script, I have added an
> "LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib64/libv4l/v4l2c
On Friday 07 August 2009 10:42:35 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 08/07/2009 01:35 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> >> The other problem is if you'd like stable updates but you prefer KDE, or
> >> vice versa =)
> >
> > Why do you expect that updating to the latest KDE
On Friday 07 August 2009 04:21:56 Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 12:30 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 12:06 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > OK, bad example, but you know what I mean.
> >
> > Yes, I do, and I think there is room for a Fedora offering that i
On Thursday 06 August 2009 01:59:02 Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 00:56 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 15:15 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> > > Hi FESCo,
> > >
> > > After requesting status updates, including direct email to the feature
> > > owners, the follo
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 12:04:21 Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:55:11PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > The KDE SIG is now working on KDE-4.3.0-related builds for Fedora 10 and
> > 11 candidate updates. As this requires some buildroot overrides, if your
> > package uses KDE librarie
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE Summary
On Wednesday 15 July 2009 02:28:07 Ben Boeckel wrote:
> John Poelstra wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/KDE43
>
> I updated this since both Rex is on vacation and Kevin is most
> likely as well.
Hi Ben,
don't forget to update "Updated" column on Feature List page [1]. I often
for
On Tuesday 14 July 2009 10:21:13 Daniel Mach wrote:
> I found 375 possibly wrong NVRs in rawhide.
> Can you check it an fix it, please?
> I'd like to file bugs for those which won't get fixed in couple weeks.
kde-settings-4.2-10.20090430svn.fc11.src.rpm
- Pre-release build's release should start
On Monday 29 June 2009 21:27:27 Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> we'd like to announce the 'Fit and Finish' initiative for Fedora,
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fit_and_Finish
>
> with the goal to improve the user experience of the Fedora desktop. We
> want to identify the small (and somet
On Monday 29 June 2009 17:02:36 Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Dariusz J. Garbowski on 06/29/2009 09:56 AM wrote:
> > Maybe call it "Default" then?
>
> No, because that's offensive to some people apparently.
No, "default" is not offensive! "Gnome Desktop Live Edition (default)" is OK
for me...
--
On Monday 29 June 2009 17:12:42 Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 15:15 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > I'm sure that a KDE hacker with access to a supported fingerprint
> > > reader could implement the enrollment facility within an afternoon.
> >
> > There's
On Monday 29 June 2009 16:08:02 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 06/29/2009 07:20 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > The biggest issue is lack of communication from "the only right Desktop"
> > - we can't catch changes if these changes are communicated to community
> &g
On Monday 29 June 2009 06:47:32 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 06/28/2009 06:51 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> The difference between features like a desktop globe and things like
> >> NetworkManager is obvious.
> >
> > I know NM is important, and in fact that's why we have been
On Monday 29 June 2009 10:56:24 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 06/29/2009 12:54 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > The user does not care, so why present things to the user as if they
> > should?
>
> I said nothing about users. You should as a Fedora developer care about
> integration with leading edge featur
On Monday 29 June 2009 15:15:12 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > I'm sure that a KDE hacker with access to a supported fingerprint reader
> > could implement the enrollment facility within an afternoon.
>
> There's already an implementation:
> http://blog.djaara.net/wordpress/2009/
>
On Monday 29 June 2009 13:22:05 Naheem Zaffar wrote:
> The "I don't care" looks like "get me out of here!".
"I don't care" really scares me. If you don't care then system installation or
using with live CD is not a job for you!
Jaroslav
>
> Not presenting a default choice is just bad usability
On Saturday 27 June 2009 04:02:37 Adam Miller wrote:
> On 6/26/09, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> > Also, I want to pick at your use of "blindly"; who says it has to be
> > blind? Why not work to educate users about the difference? A "Take a
> > Tour" would probably be good publicity anyway. (You know,
/fedora-
meeting.2009-06-23-16.04.log.html Full log
--
= Participants =
* Jaroslav Reznik
* Kevin Kofler
* Lukas Tinkl
* Rex Dieter
* Steven Parrish
* Than Ngo
On Tuesday 09 June 2009 18:11:37 Jeremy Sanders wrote:
> Hi - Are we likely to see a qt 4.5.1 update at some point for F10? There's
> a bug fixed which makes my application very slow. Qt <4.5.1 draws long
> clipped lines extremely slowly.
Hi,
it's waiting in Bodhi...
https://admin.fedoraproject.
On Martes 09 Junio 2009 17:05:04 Kevin Kofler escribió:
> drago01 wrote:
> > Or you can simply ship provide multiple video streams and switch them
> > based on the useragent. (this is very likely to be the end result,
> > even thought it sucks).
>
> The user agent is the wrong way to check for supp
On Viernes 05 Junio 2009 10:47:06 Matej Cepl escribió:
> Christof Damian, Fri, 05 Jun 2009 09:55:08 +0200:
> > youtube is testing html5 too: http://www.youtube.com/html5
>
> Except they don't use OGG, but MPEG4, so Firefox is not able to handle it
> (midori, epiphany/WebKit are).
In Arora I can he
On Jueves 04 Junio 2009 20:23:01 Adam Williamson escribió:
> On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 17:27 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > I'll happily raise upstream bugs myself but it irks me when maintainers
> > close Fedora bugs with the UPSTREAM resolution without actually taking
> > the upstream fix and bringin
On Jueves 04 Junio 2009 23:47:21 Kevin Kofler escribió:
> Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> > the end of life for flash player (HTML5)
>
> Unfortunately, as much as I'd like that to be true, at this point it's
> mostly just wishful thinking. :-( (It's good that Dailymotion is leading
> the way there tho
On Jueves 04 Junio 2009 11:01:56 Tim Waugh escribió:
> My own opinion is that the package maintainer is responsible for
> reporting bugs upstream when they are able to reproduce them.
>
> One reason for my belief is that I've seen the situation from the other
> side: as an upstream maintainer for a
On Miércoles 03 Junio 2009 23:35:07 Adam Williamson escribió:
> On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 22:57 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > And then should the bug be closed hoping that one day you pull in a
> > > package that solves the user's problem?
> >
> > If the bug is fixed upstream,
On Miércoles 03 Junio 2009 22:27:13 Kevin Kofler escribió:
> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > Most bugs are filled by quite technically skilled users. For average
> > users it doesn't depend if it is RH bugzilla or upstream's bugzilla -
> > it's too complicated f
On Jueves 04 Junio 2009 08:59:23 Ralf Corsepius escribió:
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Steve Grubb wrote:
> >> Not if its closed. How would I be notified that the fix is in Fedora? If
> >> the bug is severe enough, shouldn't the upstream commit be applied to
> >> Fedora's package and the package pushe
On Miércoles 03 Junio 2009 11:52:37 Juha Tuomala escribió:
> On Wednesday 03 June 2009 11:47:26 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > PS: I'm not saying to not report bugs to RH bugzilla, we can help then
> > but lack of direct communication between user and developer is issue,
>
>
On Miércoles 03 Junio 2009 05:09:49 Ralf Corsepius escribió:
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Steve Grubb wrote:
> >> I don't want to start a long thread, but just to ask a couple questions
> >> for my own clarification. Does a maintainer's responsibilities end with
> >> packaging bugs? IOW, if there is a
On Miércoles 03 Junio 2009 01:34:17 Kevin Kofler escribió:
> Steve Grubb wrote:
> > I don't want to start a long thread, but just to ask a couple questions
> > for my own clarification. Does a maintainer's responsibilities end with
> > packaging bugs? IOW, if there is a problem in the package that
On Viernes 29 Mayo 2009 13:40:36 Chitlesh GOORAH escribió:
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Nicu Buculei
wrote:
> > Movies in proprietary formats can be downloaded also with Firefox,
> > Transmission, wget, etc.
> > From the description of gnaughty I understand it can also download
> > images,
On Viernes 29 Mayo 2009 11:38:21 Rahul Sundaram escribió:
> On 05/29/2009 03:00 PM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> >> IMHO it is not Fedora's job to define family values & moralities. Such
> >> morals/values will vary all around the world
> >
> > I don't want fedora to define such things, we have our own
On Martes 26 Mayo 2009 15:44:56 Matthias Clasen escribió:
> On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 15:37 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > Seems like direct DBus communication is the only way to do it from Qt/KDE
> > apps as PolKit library requires gtk_init() somewhere in code... I've
&g
On Martes 26 Mayo 2009 11:16:14 Daniel P. Berrange escribió:
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 02:22:02PM -0400, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
> > | From: Rex Dieter
> > |
> > | Seems frustrations are mounting:
> > | "On policykit and standards"
> > | http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/polkit-devel/2009-Ma
On Sunday 24 May 2009 00:33:09 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > How long old PK will be shipped in Fedora?
>
> Shipping old PolicyKit won't really help, as PackageKit etc. are all going
> to get ported to the new one. The only reasonable thing to do is to BL
On Sunday 24 May 2009 04:26:10 Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 00:33 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > > How long old PK will be shipped in Fedora?
> >
> > Shipping old PolicyKit won't really help, as PackageKit etc. are all
67 matches
Mail list logo
