On Wednesday 09 December 2009 19:38:55 Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> For F13 you probably want to push latest versions of the both scipy
> and matplotlib together. So if you take scipy* sign up for matplotlib*
> as well.
Not only those but also:
python-basemap -- Plots data on map projections (with conti
On Wednesday 09 December 2009 12:47:44 Neal Becker wrote:
> I just got a crash in kde plasma. Traceback is not useful, because of
> missing debug pacakges.
Downgrading hal and hal-libs fixes the crash. I noticed the other thread where
this bug is reported. I was seeing both
https://bugzilla.red
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 08:54:38 Jindrich Novy wrote:
> Do you see anything broken on non-x86_64 arches? I checked the F12 repo and
> everything looks sane to me.
You are right, it was a problem on my side.
> Jindrich
--
José Abílio
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redh
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 02:27:08 Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> Latest F11 texlive-2009 update complains about dependencies of the new
> packages (which have .fc12 version suffixes!) on
> libpoppler.so.5()(64bit).
The same complain happens on F12 (on a x86_64 no less). :-)
--
José Abílio
--
fedo
On Friday 13 November 2009 00:38:21 Neal Becker wrote:
> Was working, but after today's update:
> pdflatex pll_freq_ramp.tex
> This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (Web2C 2009)
>
> kpathsea: Running mktexfmt pdflatex.fmt
> I can't find the format file `pdflatex.fmt'!
I have been testing thi
On Thursday 29 October 2009 17:26:25 Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> IMO I think we'd be better off adopting the texlive versions of the
> packages, rather than doing a half-and-half job on this by packaging
> individual upstreams. The reason being that Fedora then benefits from
> the integration and t
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 16:58:43 Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I'd like to call attention to this bug:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526833
>
> Apparently, prelinking octave on F-12 causes it to segfault on startup.
> Can anyone else reproduce this?
I am sorry for not reporting
On Thursday 22 October 2009 19:46:29 Jiri Cerny wrote:
> Hi Jindrich,
>
> (sorry for not replaying to the original message, I was reading the
> list through archives)
>
> I was using TeXLive 2009 repository before, without any problem. After
> seeing your message,
> I followed the instruction
>
After the update of texlive-2009 packages on rawhide latex has ceased to work:
$ pdflatex mnc_modulo_2-mod-graph
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (Web2C 2009)
restricted \write18 enabled.
kpathsea: Running mktexfmt pdflatex.fmt
I can't find the format file `pdflatex.fmt'!
The suspect
Hi,
I have updated my laptop to rawhide using preupgrade. It worked without
any
major hitch, my only problem after update was with texlive (I changed the repo
to the rawhide version). I had installed the F11 version.
# yum update
Loaded plugins: dellsysidplugin2, presto, refresh-package
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> texconfig from TeXLive 2009 in F11 hangs when I attempt to set the dvips
> default paper type. The hang occurs when I run texconfig as a user and
> texconfig or texconfig-sys as root.
It works for me on either scenario (F11/texlive-2009/i58
On Tuesday 08 September 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
> The main "texlive" package now contains a dependency to
> texlive-latexrecommended so all the LaTeX recomended stuff should be
> pulled in automatically when just installing "texlive".
Thank you. :-)
It is nice to see texlive-2009 shaping so wel
On Friday 04 September 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
> It should be fixed now altogether with new packages in the repository.
>
> Jindrich
One (really) minor hiccup, when installing all the doc files with
yum install texlive-*-doc
I get a missing dependency
texlive-wadalab-doc is needed by package
On Friday 04 September 2009 Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
> Perhaps it is luck, but I'm happy about that fact that not all contributors
> with an open review request begging on devel list for a reviewer. If
> anybody will do it, the devel list will explode with review beggars.
>
> It's strange to se
On Friday 04 September 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
> It should be fixed now altogether with new packages in the repository.
>
> Jindrich
Thank you. Now I have installed on rawhide and it works (TM). :-)
--
José Abílio
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.red
On Thursday 27 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 03:02:18PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix
> > proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set
> > in the testing repository:
> >
> > r
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix
> proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set
> in the testing repository:
OK, I have finally installed texlive on F11. With this update all worked (with
th
On Monday 31 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
> This should be fixed with the new packages in the repository now.
>
> The new packages obsolete the ancient tetex stuff:
> tetex-tex4ht
> tetex-IEEEtran
> tetex-bytefield
> tetex-elvevier
> tetex-perltex
> tetex-prosper
>
> and these utilities:
> dvip
On Saturday 29 August 2009 Stefan Grosse wrote:
> Just for the record: This was caused by LyX being (still) dependent on
> dvipdfm. Deleting LyX made an installation possible.
This is one of those cases where rpm Suggests would be appropriate (when/if
implemented). LyX does not depend in any way
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 Jindrich Novy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> first off, thanks many people who sent me RFE and bugfix
> proposals. I've tried to fix most of them in the current package set
> in the testing repository:
>
> rpm -i
> http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/texlive-release-2009-0.1.fc11.no
On Friday 07 August 2009 14:05:25 Thomas Janssen wrote:
> > And back to the topic, afaik the KDE 4.3 packages have indeed been
> > tested (via kde-redhat/testing etc) before being thrown on the f10 &
> > f11 users.
>
> Indeed. Even the RCs up to 4.2.98 have been tested via the kde-redhat
> repo, bu
On Friday 07 August 2009 09:56:03 Pierre-Yves wrote:
> It remembers me a website made by Remi[1] which list for all the package
> available, for all the branch what version are in the repo.
> It also provides comparison between upstream and repo for some packages
> such as the PECL, PEAR and R pack
On Sunday 28 June 2009 00:13:10 Jindrich Novy wrote:
> Currently texlive correctly obsoletes all the old tetex* stuff. I
> thought it is a good idea to not to provide the old tetex bits any more
> because we have virtual provides for them like tex(latex) or tex(dvips) for
> a long time. So it is be
On Saturday 27 June 2009 13:41:42 Jindrich Novy wrote:
> Good news everyone!
>
> I've invented a device that installs TeX Live 2008 on your Fedora!
>
>
> TeX Live 2008 is now packaged and available for testing. It is not in
> Fedora yet because it requires reviews of couple of packages. But you
>
On Wednesday 01 July 2009 18:22:52 Adam Jackson wrote:
> He can't, KDE doesn't support that yet.
>
> - ajax
Neither does gnome apparently: :-)
$ yum search sense-of-humor
Loaded plugins: dellsysidplugin2, presto, refresh-packagekit
Warning: No matches found for: sense-of-humor
No Matches found
On Saturday 27 June 2009 13:41:42 Jindrich Novy wrote:
> Good news everyone!
>
> I've invented a device that installs TeX Live 2008 on your Fedora!
>
>
> TeX Live 2008 is now packaged and available for testing. It is not in
> Fedora yet because it requires reviews of couple of packages. But you
>
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 17:23:33 Adam Williamson wrote:
> Well, yeah, I actually noted in my email that MDV's tool does exactly
> that (well, it doesn't show them as separate sets, it shows them in one
> long list with "(suggests)" to note the suggested ones. But doing it in
> sets would, I imagin
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 12:31:56 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> I did a quick survey from Fedora on what software Fedora users are using
> that is not available in the repo. Here are the results. If you find
> anything interesting, feel free to pick it up.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packag
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 07:00:07 Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> Note that that would be horrible behaviour for also keeping a minimal
> packageset.
It would be easy to add configuration options with the default being on. For
keeping a minimum package set this configuration could be turned off.
I do
Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:
> Actually, there are two:
> - package-cleanup that I mentioned
> - yum-plugin-remove-with-leaves that Seth mentioned which is even easier
But both are completely broken by design because they don't understand the
difference between something being dragged in as a
30 matches
Mail list logo
