2009/12/2 Justin M. Forbes jmfor...@linuxtx.org
The only downside to merging updates into the main repository...
I would also assume that the repo data will need to be regenerated and often
be much larger than the one that is for the updates only repository, so
there will be acost to end users
2009/11/19 Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com
So if I pick personal desktop, the change you made makes sense. If on
the other hand, I choose workstation profile, I would obviously need a
more locked down profile.
Surely if you're deploying a workstation (1000s of workstations?) you
would
Not Bill, but from my understanding, SSE2 was originally going to be
required and that question must have been presented and answered at that
point. Once the main page got updated after discussion, the original
questions that no longer apply have not been removed.
2009/8/14 Tony Nelson
That
AFAIK there should be an F11 rpm in updates-testing that will work with
Fedora 12 rpms.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
The I don't care looks like get me out of here!.
Not presenting a default choice is just bad usability. Those that know about
the different desktop environments should be offered an easy and accessible
way to get to them (I am not suggesting that the current page does that -
but presenting a
2009/6/28 Christopher Stone
I think the question you need to ask is why they must force this onto
the Fedora *community* OS when the community is clearly objecting to
it.
The *community* is not objecting to it - just parts of it. and only recently
- a year ago, the KDE desktop was ion no
2009/6/4 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
Unfortunately, as much as I'd like that to be true, at this point it's
mostly just wishful thinking. :-(
Maybe, but there are real business reasons for investigating such
alternatives.
But HTML 5 with patent-free codecs is clearly the solution we
